imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
There are heartening signs that the recession is causing a creeping "Berlinification" of England. An article in the Business section of yesterday's Guardian said that MPs, desperate to prevent the recession turning Britain into a succession of ghost towns, have outlined a series of emergency measures which include giving thousands of grants to people who find creative uses for vacant shops -- and there are predicted to be more than 70,000 newly-chained and shuttered shops in Britain this year alone.



The article describes UK law coming halfway to meet potential squatters: "Planning rules will be relaxed to allow changes of use which go against local guidelines. For example, a disused clothes shop could become an art gallery or an empty Woolworths an NHS drop-in centre. Temporary lease agreements will enable owners who want to retain a vacant property in the long term to make it available for community or creative use."

This development shows the UK government embracing the so-called Slack Space movement described in a February article in The Guardian's art and design section. That article, though, came out and used the s-word: squat. "Artists and curators have begun colonising "slack space" freed up by the recession and are transforming vacant shops into "creative squats", galleries and studios."



The February article sees defunct branches of Woolworths and Carphone Warehouse colonised to house community cafes and performance art events. "We know recessions are awful," says a member of a group of art squatters who've taken over a parade of shops in Margate, "but they can be a good time for artists as creative ideas start appearing while otherwise redundant people are sitting at home fiddling and doing creative stuff."

Meanwhile, an article in last Sunday's Observer looked at The artists who are hot to squat. "Straitened times call for ever greater resourcefulness," wrote Hermione Hoby. "They also - luckily for artists if not the former occupants - mean more empty buildings than ever. According to England's Empty Homes Agency, 784,495 are unoccupied, and the number rises each day. Taking their cue from similar movements in Berlin and Amsterdam, artists in this country are realising that squatting provides not just freedom from paying rent but also extraordinary creative freedom. The chance to make large-scale work, to put on frequent, artist-curated exhibitions and to form collaborative relationships based on sharing a space, has made squatting more than simply a housing solution." Hermione's article covered the Da! Collective, Steal From Work, Artspace Lifespace, The Hannah Barry Gallery, and !WOWOW! collective.



Berlinification indeed; when Germany legalized squatting in the 1990s, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, a new verb -- Instandbesetzen -- entered the language; a combination of "to occupy" and "to renew". Berlin squatters became adept at adding cultural value to their squats, knowing it put them in a much stronger position. Many squats became cultural centres -- art galleries, music performance spaces, bookshops, coffee bars. Many of the places I go to regularly -- places with names like Eschloraque, Neurotitan, Zapata Coffee, Ausland -- began as squats, or still are.



Now, I'm too lazy to be a squatter myself; I don't have the energy for hacking at building infrastructure, making repairs, changing locks, let alone having confrontations with owners or police. I just want to get on with my own thing, thank you very much, and paying rent buys me time and space. But I live in a city that's been vastly improved by culturally-minded squatters, and I often think the current recession came along just in time to prevent Berlin getting too chi-chi, too bourgie-bourgie.

Since it's a global recession, I also like to think Berlin has now become a sort of template for cities all over the world. Whereas we might once have looked like a museum of crusty subcultures past their sell-by date, this city now looks like the future of Tokyo, the future of London, and the future of New York. We're your best-case scenario, guys, your optimal recessionary outcome. Everything else is dystopia, Escape-From-New-York stuff.

If the major cities of the world all become "Berlins", though, I can't guarantee I'd stay in the actual Berlin, the black flagship, the Big Squat itself. If Tokyo, for instance, got as cheap and cheerfully creative as Berlin -- if it became the kind of city you could simply occupy without having to scuttle around pointlessly making rent -- I'd be there in a flash. Secretly, what I'm doing here in Berlin is waiting for Tokyo to Berlinify.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 09:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stanleylieber.livejournal.com
let us know when the time is right!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 10:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krskrft.livejournal.com
We're your best-case scenario, guys, your optimal recessionary outcome. Everything else is dystopia, Escape-From-New-York stuff.

Not really. I think the future is in real economic utilitarianism (as opposed to the design variety) like that which exists in South Korea. The only way that a place can continue to be livable, even after the cool kids flood in and take over, is if the consumer culture is designed from the ground up to specifically target the many rather than the few. Which is to say that new apartment buildings need to target average consumers instead of millionaires and/or their trust-fund-having spawn.

I was having a conversation with two Koreans the other day about looking for a new apartment this summer, and they expressed dismay that I would be willing to pay the equivalent of $500 or $600 a month for a 3-room apartment near a subway station in a city with a population of 3 million. And these aren't recession prices, either. They're the norm. Production of apartment buildings intentionally outstrips demand so prices will remain low. And of course, the government makes sure this is the case by offering all sorts of subsidies to the corporations who build and run these complexes.

In your argument, Berlin needs a recession in order to keep it from ballooning into an NYC or Tokyo. But giving corporations the correct incentives (and hitting them with the right regulations) can create an incredibly stable living situation that doesn't require a recession in order to persist. South Korea is the prime example.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 10:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vertigoranger.livejournal.com
This is at booster shot against by bloody miserablism at least. I am loathing a return to the UK in a week from now. West Coast living agrees with me.

Berlin

Date: 2009-04-15 11:01 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I share much of this perspective but it concerns me that you would so easily dessert the 'black flagship'. Earlier you remarked that you lack the time or inclination for hacking the infrastructure and it occurs to me that perhaps this is a problem in relation to the 'creative class', specifically here in this city.

The international artists, musicians, writers et al, that choose to live here, enjoying Berlin's relatively cheap rents, liberalism and cultural diversity (and I count myself amongst this group) can easily exist in a bubble, indifferent to local concerns and politics and contributing little. Don't like the neighborhood, city, country? - Move.

There is never any need to take responsibility for the consequences of gentrification by culture - just keep one step ahead, so long as the rent is cheap. After all, the city, society, the world, exist for no other purpose than to facilitate our needs, provide a backdrop for our fabulous creativity - and isn't it great that everyone speaks English as well?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 11:29 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
What about Saigon and Ho Chi Minh City ?
From: (Anonymous)
History will look back at this period in history and say "Never was it so easy for a committed, pre-senile person to defy their social position, and to earn as much as they like, with access to education available as never before."

The exciting imbalance in earnings is proof of this mass Exodus from poverty!

Dump the didgeridoo, and get on board the Bling Bus, sister.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
what about São Paulo ? It's has the largest japanese community based outside of japan, superb health care, lovely weather , just not sure bout that hipster thing although their biennal keeps bombing every two years!
Anyone know how much the rents are down there ?
Talks abunded about getting ride of all outdoor publicity by the end of 2008.Though socially pleasing, i'm not sure it turned out the best way ....

Alex P.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kumakouji.livejournal.com
The recession is causing people to have to downsize. They can't earn the salaries hey once could, they can't afford the larger properties they once had, they can't afford to eat as much as they once did. But you don't need as much as you had, enough is as good as a feast and we have enough.

This new law is all about the shifting of priorities. Just because someone isn't earning enough profits to keep their current lifestyle afloat doesn't mean the property they once occupied should be left disused when there are people who live on less who are willing to use it for other pursuits that earn less. Maybe when people see this is possible it'll help change priorities for the better.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eptified.livejournal.com
Next year in Brooklyn.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 04:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robotdeer.livejournal.com
I was always under the impression that Amsterdam had the best squatting laws.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
I've talked to a German who said that Berlin was expensive. But, somewhere in Click Opera history this has been discussed before, I am certain of it. It is interesting though, she thought that Sweden is cheaper than Berlin while a Swede wouldn't agree. Everything is cheaper than the other except when it is expensive. Or something like that.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-15 09:09 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Krkrft,

This was a very interesting blog post on Berlin. And I was glad to see Momus stop by and add his 2 cents.

Not in Reykjavík, alas

Date: 2009-04-15 10:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kineticfactory.livejournal.com
It appears that this isn't happening in Iceland. I was in Reykjavík over this past week, and over the weekend, a group of squatters took over a disused building (just off Laugavegur, in 101) to establish a community space. They already had a "free shop", in which they would allow people to leave and take potentially useful items. By Tuesday afternoon, there were protests outside, as the police had given notice that the squatters would be evicted by force. (Under Icelandic law, squatters have no rights, and are considered to be equivalent to burglars in all aspects of the law, regardless of whether the property is occupied or not. Whether or not this has anything to do with Iceland having been a favourite project of the neoliberal/anarchocapitalist/property-first movement (http://www.grapevine.is/Features/ReadArticle/the-end-of-neo-liberal-neverland) is uncertain.) This morning, as I was leaving, I walked past and saw that the street had been taped off and there were police in riot gear near the building.


Hopefully this will change when the conservative Independence Party (which ruled Iceland since independence) is kicked out and a Social Democratic/Leftist Green coalition takes office.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-16 12:56 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Very cool, very cool!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-04-16 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gubia.livejournal.com
La Escocesa