imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
"There is no hope for liberals if they seek only to imitate conservatives, and no function either," said J.K. Galbraith, who died yesterday. You could extend that idea: there is no hope for peace if peace demonstrators, deep down, think war, death and aggression are cool.

Yesterday was a strange and interesting day. I began it by joining the March for Peace, Justice and Democracy on Broadway. The marchers carried banners saying "Fuck Bush" and chanted "1-2-3-4, We don't want your fucking war, 5-6-7-8, Fuck the cops, smash the state". I couldn't help wondering what kind of peace demonstration calls for things to be fucked and smashed, and, as a socialist who believes in the state and in civic order, I left the demo rewriting the chant in my head: how about "improve the cops, improve the state"? No? Too wishy-washy for you?



These thoughts were focused beautifully at the Whitney's Peace Tower demonstration in the evening. An event which could have been sanctimonious, worthy and boring turned out to be nothing less than explosive, full of fascinating contrasts.

The idea was to celebrate the original Peace Tower built in 1966 by Mark di Suvero as a protest against the Vietnam War. This tower has been reconstructed in the Whitney courtyard by di Suvero and Rirkrit Tiravanija. The evening began with a blonde lady singing Dylan's "Masters of War" (complete with Martin Luther King samples and Muslim calls to prayer) in a sententious "invocation" reminiscent of the very American moment when some over-wrought soul singer warbles "Amazing Grace" a capella in a baseball stadium. Call it "motivational melisma". This was followed by some of the veterans of the original peace tower in LA reminiscing about it, 60s radicals who'd been hounded by the security services for their political activities (one brandished his FBI file, full of hilarious references to "young men of unkempt appearance demonstrating against the war in art galleries").

I then sang five songs (Morality is Vanity, Beowulf, Frilly Military, I Refuse To Die and Tinnitus), executing my usual deformed twitches, Japanese girl poses and fake folk dances. There were more speeches, which I missed because I was clearing my gear out. When I got back, thrashcore band Apeshit started up. They played a set of screeching, jerky noise. I screwed in my earplugs, and noticed children in the room covering their ears in dismay. The older people, the 60s veterans, also looked pained, and many of them left. Basically all the frail people, the people who need the benign protection of other people, left the room. The strong remained.



I saw John Giorno pacing about, looking pensive, while Apeshit played. How would he follow this punky, nihilistic din? But Giorno is an old pro, a master of the crowd as well as a world-class poet and veteran Beat. He performed two long lyrics from memory, enunciating forcefully and clearly. Here's the second one, an excellent political allegory about a tree:

There Was A Bad Tree

After Giorno, a Japanese (well, the drummer is Chinese) group called New Humans set some fluorescent tubes on the floor and began slowly fading up pure feedback from their instruments. Intense, still and concentrated, they looked like Buddhist monks meditating. Rhythms began, an organic tattoo played with sticks on the back of a speaker cabinet. Then there was a "song", but strikingly original, sculptural, made of sheets of harsh concentrated noise. I thought New Humans were great, fresh and pure, proof that rock music doesn't have to be Dionysian, sharky, populist, fascist; it doesn't have to use exhausted rhetorics and hackneyed structures to whip up the crowd.



It was at this point that the evening took an extraordinary turn. DeeDee Halleck of Deep Dish TV, the radical video-makers whose excellent documentary about Iraq Shocking and Awful can be found in between the gift store and the toilets (the Whitney have taken some flak for siting it there), took the podium. She told us that she'd brought Faiza Al-Arji, an Iraqi woman whose blog A Family in Baghdad details everyday life in Iraq under the American occupation. But, close to tears, DeeDee told us that Faiza had decided not to speak, and had left. "I think it was the music that did it," she said. "I think she felt it was the kind of music that the American soldiers in Iraq listen to in their tanks."

At this, Ian Vanek of Japanther, who was setting up his drumkit for the band's performance, exploded in rage. "That's fucked," he interrupted. "What do you mean, the music they listen to in the tanks? We're trying to set up a fucking rock show here, and you tell us this is the music they listen to in tanks? That is so fucked! We support our troops in Iraq!"

Halleck left, looking bewildered. Other speakers calmed Vanek down with calls that he at least respect Halleck's right to speak, and someone tried to smooth things out with the statement that "A lot of the artists who performed tonight are motivated by deep anger at the way things are, and they need to express that anger in the music they play".

I ran over to the fraught Halleck and told her that I thought she'd made a good and important point. What does it mean to advocate peace using the textures, rhetorics and semantics of war? How can you be into peace when you're talking about fucking x and smashing y? And what does it mean that a representative -- the only representative -- of the people supposedly being helped by this evening's events, the Iraqis, sensed a deeply alienating menace and aggression in the music being played, and associated it with the spirit of the occupation?

Having shouted down a radical video-maker, Japanther took the stage, and played a populist set accompanied by two giant styrofoam puppets, grotesque Garfield-type figures decorated with fanged skull motifs and Satanism-ready, Thanatos-friendly phrases like "Moloch" and "Pack of Spades". One puppet was a lion with a knife, the other a chainsaw-wielding cat, and they proceeded to dance about in the crowd, hacking each other to bits like a gigantic Tom and Jerry. In other circumstances it might have been fun, but in the light of Vanek's disgusting dressing-down of Halleck and (by implication) her Iraqi friend, it was actually pretty obnoxious. Japanther's music showed none of the formal originality of New Humans' sheets of abstract noise; it's punked-up surf music, a lo-fi, speeded-up rehash of 90s American alternarock.

I left before the end, and met the Japanese musicians from New Humans on the street. They were also skipping Japanther's set, riding the subway home with a nice guy who turned out to be a friend of Marxy's. (Here's an mp3 compiling some of the evening's sounds. You hear the Broadway peace demonstrators, followed by Apeshit, followed by New Humans, followed by Japanther.)

Back home, I googled Japanther and found a Brooklyn girl called Laura talking on her blog about the swimming pool gig the band played last week. The conversation turned to clothes, some boutique called F21, which Laura thought sounded "like a cool code... or a fighter jet".

It's a small detail, but, like the fanged skulls on Japanther's puppets, it really brought home to me how little Americans in their 20s care for the iconography, the textures of peace. The Whitney's problem, in trying to assemble a 1960s-style program combining peace speeches and music, is that rock music today comes from a subculture that doesn't celebrate peace. It comes from a dark, nihilistic place more in love with death than life. Forty years ago that wouldn't have been the case. The rock music of 1966 would have been charged with Eros, not Thanatos.

The plant imagery of Giorno's poem, and its humane message, marked him out as someone who loves life, and his poem is about peaceful co-existence with nature. These are the values of the 1960s Peace Tower veterans, but they're also values I can see in the blogs of young Japanese -- Rinko Kawauchi's photojournal, for instance. The flower imagery Kawauchi loves so much is mirrored in the photos Faiza Al-Arji takes in her Baghdad garden and shows in Pictures in Baghdad, her photoblog. Unfortunately, on last night's evidence, America's rocking and awful subculture seems more in love with power than flowers. It really does sound more like a man stuck under a tank hatch or glassed into a jet cockpit than a woman watering her garden.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-30 06:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kubia.livejournal.com
Au Contraire, dear Momus. Israel is very much a victim and to my eyes the idea of it being an "adjunct" to the US imagines the relationship between the two more stable than it actually is. The Bush administration has continually declared their support for a Palestinian state and we should not forget the constant threats from both suicide bombers and other Arabic states (e.g. Iran). Whereas the latter might be exaggerated and hopefully will turn out as mere hyperbole, the former is real as last week's events prove. And it is precisely the fantasy of Israel being the smaller sibling to the US that fuels such events. This does not excuse the exaggerated brutality of some of the Israeli military reactions, but it clearly demonstrates that anti-semitism, while being a "mere" violation of etiquette in the West, poses a real threat for the Israeli people.
I'm also left a bit flabbergasted by the binarism you put on display: either victim OR junior partner of the oppressor. Why not both?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-30 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think Iranians wouldn't like being called Arabs.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-30 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
david lammy would make a fucking terrible leader of the labour party (even though he is black?)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 10:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kubia.livejournal.com
True, I should have phrased it as "arab states" and "non-arab states with a strong muslim influence." I don't perceive of the current wave of anti-semitism as particularly arab, rather as influenced by demagogues making use of muslim rhetoric.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 02:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bricology.livejournal.com
"Israel is very much a victim..."

Ah, the good old victim card. I wonder how many more decades that will keep diverting attention from Israel's own oppressions? It's certainly convenient that most people outside of the Middle East have no idea about the details of foundation of the State of Israel (back-room deals between the British and the US, huge waves of Jewish immigrants flooding Palestine long before WWII, systematic assassinations of hundreds of Arab civilians, British and Swedish diplomats, etc.)

Quoth Wikipedia: "Large numbers of the Arab population were driven out of the newly-created Jewish State. (Estimates of the final refugee count range from 600,000 to 900,000 with the official United Nations count at 711,000. The continuing conflict between Israel and the Arab world resulted in a lasting displacement that persists to this day."

Bush "has continuously declared (his) support for a Palestinian state"? Well, that's one thing he's got going for him. Palestinians have only been there for thousands of years; they should damned well have a "State" by now. But that doesn't negate the fact that the US has been Israel's largest political supporter, financial benefactor and media champion. And it's ironic that Israel has been censured by the UN more often than any other nation. And doubly-ironic that almost every such critical resolution has been vetoed by the US.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-01 10:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kubia.livejournal.com
It's certainly convenient that most people outside of the Middle East have no idea about the details of foundation of the State of Israel (back-room deals between the British and the US, huge waves of Jewish immigrants flooding Palestine long before WWII

Oh, I'm well aware of that. And as far as I know, it was a UN decision to found the state which was being answered immediately by means of violence. I'm just not buying into the "it's our territory-we should have a state"-argument that's put forward there. Have you ever read Edward Said's memoir? He goes on constantly about his palestine roots even though his family owned nothing but a family home in what is now Jordania, I think.

Leaving moral arguments about the right of existence for a Palestine state aside, my sole argument was that Bush speaking out in favour of it only indicates that the support of Israel is not as one-sided as it may appear and that the idea of Israel being a US-watchdog for the Middle East is not as convincing as it might have been at the height of the Syria-Israel conflict.

And finally, yes, I think I'm quite able to remember the atrocities the generation of my grandparents committed and whose victims were, among others, of Jewish origin, either secular, assimilated or zionist. And I am quite sure that "victim" would be an appropriate description. Given your knowledge on the topic, I'm quite positive that you don't underestimate the impact this had on e.g. the Zionist movement. You might also want to check out <href="http://www.matthiaskuentzel.de/contents/islamica-antisemitism-and-its-nazi-roots">Matthias Küntzel's writings on the connections between German nationalism and Islamic antisemitism, which adds other factors to the debate.

Bst, C.

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags