Thoughts on 7/7
Jul. 7th, 2005 08:03 am1. Is everyone I know okay?
2. Why do the fuckers always hit public transport?
3. Only two reported killed right now, which is no more than traffic accidents might have killed (the deaths of two pedestrians under cars would have gone pretty much unreported).

4. I suppose this will just click more locks on the manacles of the "security state". The tedious bag checks, citizens treated as potential criminals, the erosion of the civil justice system, queues and paranoia, the compulsory carrying of ID cards. We're all now guilty until proven innocent, and especially those of us who look like strangers, who look like people who think differently. Higher suspicion means higher anomie and higher stress. The delights of the high density city are displaced by the stresses and (still largely imagined) dangers of the high density city. The high density city is always poised delicately between heaven and hell; this tips things over to the hell side. And yet I still believe in the utopian potential of big cities.
5. London going to work is rational, but these attacks are rational too. The attacks are not "crazy" or "meaningless" or "deranged" or "the work of lunatics". One rationality is imposed on another. Two incompatible rationalities in one place. A sign that different rationales exist. But a bad day for difference and for pluralism, when the idea of difference is tainted with the idea of murderousness. Difference is not automatically murderous, just as unity is not automatically benign.
6. Of course it's Al Qaeda. It's not the IRA, it's not some lone hater (like the tube train driver who planted the Admiral Duncan and Brick Lane nail bombs because he hated immigrants and gays). The motive was clearly to send a message to the G8 meeting. Terrorism had slipped a bit on the agenda, replaced by climate change and African debt relief. 7/7 puts terrorism back on the agenda. It will give the Western leaders a pretext for more bold, nakedly aggressive acts which escalate the Middle Eastern situation. It makes an invasion of Iran, for instance, more likely. Bin Laden would love that. His agenda is served by goading the West into acts of aggression which polarize and radicalize "the Arab street". No more middle ground, no more tolerance, no more openness.
The precarious delights of the city tip over into some kind of Hieronymous Bosch hell scene, and suspicion attaches with tedious inevitability to otherness.
2. Why do the fuckers always hit public transport?
3. Only two reported killed right now, which is no more than traffic accidents might have killed (the deaths of two pedestrians under cars would have gone pretty much unreported).

4. I suppose this will just click more locks on the manacles of the "security state". The tedious bag checks, citizens treated as potential criminals, the erosion of the civil justice system, queues and paranoia, the compulsory carrying of ID cards. We're all now guilty until proven innocent, and especially those of us who look like strangers, who look like people who think differently. Higher suspicion means higher anomie and higher stress. The delights of the high density city are displaced by the stresses and (still largely imagined) dangers of the high density city. The high density city is always poised delicately between heaven and hell; this tips things over to the hell side. And yet I still believe in the utopian potential of big cities.
5. London going to work is rational, but these attacks are rational too. The attacks are not "crazy" or "meaningless" or "deranged" or "the work of lunatics". One rationality is imposed on another. Two incompatible rationalities in one place. A sign that different rationales exist. But a bad day for difference and for pluralism, when the idea of difference is tainted with the idea of murderousness. Difference is not automatically murderous, just as unity is not automatically benign.
6. Of course it's Al Qaeda. It's not the IRA, it's not some lone hater (like the tube train driver who planted the Admiral Duncan and Brick Lane nail bombs because he hated immigrants and gays). The motive was clearly to send a message to the G8 meeting. Terrorism had slipped a bit on the agenda, replaced by climate change and African debt relief. 7/7 puts terrorism back on the agenda. It will give the Western leaders a pretext for more bold, nakedly aggressive acts which escalate the Middle Eastern situation. It makes an invasion of Iran, for instance, more likely. Bin Laden would love that. His agenda is served by goading the West into acts of aggression which polarize and radicalize "the Arab street". No more middle ground, no more tolerance, no more openness.
The precarious delights of the city tip over into some kind of Hieronymous Bosch hell scene, and suspicion attaches with tedious inevitability to otherness.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:07 pm (UTC)with roll calls
full: http://www.livejournal.com/community/london_070705/2794.html
A-M: http://www.livejournal.com/community/london_070705/20464.html
N-Z: http://www.livejournal.com/community/london_070705/20636.html
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:53 pm (UTC)Also, if you're trying to spread material as far and as wide as possible, surely the last place to blow up your bomb would be down a tube tunnel?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:09 pm (UTC)From the Washngton Post
Date: 2005-07-07 12:23 pm (UTC)Re: From the Washngton Post
From:Re: From the Washngton Post
From:Re: From the Washngton Post
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:13 pm (UTC)sadly, it looks like many more than 2 people have lost their lives now...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:20 pm (UTC)the tubes are designed to be largely bomb resistant due to the IRA heritage.
(no subject)
From:G8 plus Olympics
Date: 2005-07-07 12:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:25 pm (UTC)Point to add: I really think the rest of the world is now trapped in a self-fulfilling vision of an epic struggle possessed by the Bush and Bin Laden. We expect such summer blockbusters, and drag the rest of the globe along.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:30 pm (UTC)Umbrellas. So very London. Hope you get well soon.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:Al-Queda claims (allegedly)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:35 pm (UTC)Jamaat al-Tandheem Al-Sierri (secret organization group)
Organization of Qaeda't al-Jihad in Europe
In the name of God the most merciful...
Rejoice the nation of Islam, rejoice nation of Arabs, the time of revenge has come for the crusaders' Zionist British government.
As retaliation for the massacres which the British commit in Iraq and Afghanistan, the mujahideen have successfully done it this time in London.
And this is Britain now burning from fear and panic from the north to the south, from the east to the west.
We have warned the brutish governments and British nation many times.
And here we are, we have done what we have promised. We have done a military operation after heavy work and planning, which the mujahideen have done, and it has taken a long time to ensure the success of this operation.
And we still warn the government of Denmark and Italy, all the crusader governments, that they will have the same punishment if they do not pull their forces out of Iraq and Afghanistan.
So beware.
Thursday 7/7/2005
Jamaat al-Tandheem Al-Sierri (secret organization group)
Organization of al Qaeda't al-Jihad in Europe.
Re: Al-Queda claims (allegedly)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:44 pm (UTC)Well, hardly...
Rather prone to hyperbole aren't they.
Re: Al-Queda claims (allegedly)
From:no point?
From:Re: Al-Queda claims (allegedly)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:40 pm (UTC)I would prefer a statement which condemned the attacks as "rational", or a statement which admitted that the attacks used the same language of violence that the G8 nations themselves use when they bomb civilian areas from 50,000 feet.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:40 pm (UTC)I worry about the effect on our liberties. Defeat isn't in these pigs winning anything through activities like this, defeat can only come from how our societies react.
Got off lightly ?
Date: 2005-07-07 03:46 pm (UTC)Re: Got off lightly ?
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-07 09:16 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-07 03:06 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-07 03:09 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:or
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:re: Etiquette
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-07 07:48 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:49 pm (UTC)i had hoped #3 of your entry could have stayed true ...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:03 pm (UTC)This from a friend at ucl (a regular commuter)
We're all fine - thanks for your concern.. the 'war on terror' always looks most frightening from a distance.. that's why the 'war-on-terrorists' keep gaining ground..
At least some are not falling for the terror rhetoric. Hopefully this attitude is widespread.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-08 12:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:UK Needs to Relook at Immigration Policies
Date: 2005-07-07 02:04 pm (UTC)Re: UK Needs to Relook at Immigration Policies
Date: 2005-07-07 03:06 pm (UTC)Re: UK Needs to Relook at Immigration Policies
From:Re: UK Needs to Relook at Immigration Policies
From:Re: UK Needs to Relook at Immigration Policies
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-07 07:18 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: UK Needs to Relook at Immigration Policies
From:Re: UK Needs to Relook at Immigration Policies
From:Re: UK Needs to Relook at Immigration Policies
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 03:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:56 pm (UTC)no machine guns
Date: 2005-07-07 03:17 pm (UTC)Re: no machine guns
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 03:28 pm (UTC)It's bad enough that the US government instituted policies of racial profiling, etc, but it's even worse when random strangers think "Terrorist" whenever they see someone with dark skin. Shops and mosques being vandalized, people getting death threats, etc...
I sincerely hope the people over there act a bit more rationally than those over here and avoid the interpersonal terrorism of racism.
Lousy strikes
Date: 2005-07-07 04:42 pm (UTC)I don't know, if this is too early cynicism, but was the Madrid strike 2003 or 2004? Will the London attacks be *emotionally* forgotten (by everybody else but the poor British people) even more soon than that?
Only the bus explosion offered in London some potential material for emotionally touching home-videos shot by soem coincidental passer-by, the material which was available in loads all during and after the WTC 9/11. An important factor for the internet era digital-media-web-people globally.
No lots of home-video footage in the web; no unforgettable quality in the long run.
From far-away,
East
Hmmm
Date: 2005-07-07 04:59 pm (UTC)Not that there is big possibility that it would exists extremists of those kinds doing this. But then there is a possibility that they would blame "those kinds of people" and make the middle-classers believe even more in the "truth" that if the left-wings or the greenies get the power chaos will will emerge.
the power of nightmares
Date: 2005-07-07 05:36 pm (UTC)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/3755686.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1327904,00.html
Re: the power of nightmares
Date: 2005-07-07 07:41 pm (UTC)"In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion."
Was what happened "real" enough for you or is it an "illusion"?
Re: the power of nightmares
From:Re: the power of nightmares
From:Re: the power of nightmares
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-07 10:22 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: the power of nightmares
From:Re: the power of nightmares
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-08 12:30 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: the power of nightmares
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-08 01:02 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 06:12 pm (UTC)a small but crucial difference: terrorists kill innocent men, women and children on purpose.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 07:14 pm (UTC)I was at Liverpool Street. Missed the bomb by one train. My first thought was someone did themselves a good job.
Rob.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-08 01:40 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-08 02:22 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-08 03:47 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-07-08 05:57 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: