imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Subtle and important protest pop group The Books (Paul de Jong and Nick Zammuto) release their new album Lost and Safe on April 5th on Tomlab.



According to Pitchfork, which previews the track Be Good To Them Always, The Books are now less important and less subtle. They protest too much: "The Books have always maintained a documentary-like distance from their material... [but] given the sparse instrumentation and the content of these snippets ("I could hear a collective rumbling in America"), their agenda is clear, eliminating the need for the listener to draw conclusions. In that sense, "Be Good to Them Always" compares to older Books songs like "Enjoy Your Worries" the way a Michael Moore film compares to The Thin Blue Line: They've revealed their hand and diluted some of their magic in the process."

For Pitchfork, The Books' political commitment is a failing. For the emotional communists in their audience, though, The Books' use of cold, objective "documentary" vocal samples to build up a warm, unified perspective on the errata of modern America is welcome, and an achievement. What's more, this time The Books are singing more. Some of these songs sound like a Simon and Garfunkel album re-assembled in a dust-free research lab by white-gloved scientists. Committed white-gloved scientists, working for the communists.

"Lost & Safe cannot be called an anti-American, and therefore anti-Bush album," muses Cokemachine, picking up the same political theme. "There is nothing specifically referencing the U.S... However, the general tone evoked by many of the excerpts more than suggests that The Books have had enough of American culture and foreign policy."

Here now is a Books Kit. First, some of the vocal samples you will hear on The Books' new album:

"I could hear a collective rumbling in America."
"I've lost my house, you've lost your house."
"This great society is going smash."
"You are something that the whole world is doing."
"You know, I simply cannot understand people."
"A culture is no better than its woods."
"Feeling of being connected with the past."
"Look at it this way: you may fall and break your leg."
"And so one leg is shorter than the other. Can nothing more be done?"
‘The modern town hardly knows silence.”
“It will rain, it will rain.”
"An owl without knees."
"I want all the American people to understand that it is understandable that the American people cannot possibly understand."

Secondly, a thought from Professor Momus: spoken word vocal samples are not only texturally gorgeous, and good for making poetic, fresh juxtapostions in aural collage, but give a 3D perspective on the present by throwing up humanistic sentiments from a past where people spoke, thought and felt differently. It's a kind of relativistic humanism which subtly re-inforces the liberating feeling: "Things actually don't have to be this way. We have other traditions to draw on."

Next, an mp3 of another song from the new album, An Animated Description of Mr. Maps. Followed by: a message-board thread in which early-adopting freeloader-downloaders discuss the album ("There is a really great track where they sing each vocal snippet they are sampling"). Finally, a list of the venues to be played during April and May, when subtle and important protest group The Books tours the US, that great society hobbled by one short leg.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-28 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lyrane.livejournal.com
I've been listening to them for about a year now and still have trouble classifying them as "protest pop". I don't think I will anytime in the near future, either. I think "The Lemon of Pink" was about language and how it works and adapts absurdly, and I think "Lost and Safe" is about expectations and what you actually get. "Thought For Food" is hard to try and figure out and as of yet I haven't the slightest opinion on what it's about. Protest could come into the Books' music, but more as a part of their greater musical vision and the palette with which they paint the world.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-28 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Well, yes. I'm being a bit perverse painting them as a protest group. If it's protest it's very, very subtle. But I do think it's there, and it's one of the reasons I like the group. I detect a very civilised and humane perspective behind what they do. Just to hear a clip of W.H. Auden (I think it is) saying that a culture is no better than its woods... I mean, what a strong environmental point that makes! And what a nice texture his voice has, jumping out of the track like that! Guest vocals by W.H. Auden, class!

I also like the idea of folk music coming back in a postmodern guise, but with its 1960s Folk Revival political agenda intact. And I like the idea of making points obliquely, with a collage of other people's voices, mostly, rather than direct "hard-hitting" Rage-Against-Machinesque lyrics.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-28 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] facehead2k.livejournal.com
But do you think there is a place for both?

Is it as clear a divide as teach covertly vs. preach overtly?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-03-29 03:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lyrane.livejournal.com
A capital sort of class!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 07:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wilkerton.livejournal.com
yeah i think you just have to be very carefuly painting them as a protest group. i think there is a fine line between individuals who are protesters and individuals who are just flat out intelligent and acting upon their observations of the world. the latter of which i think is what they are, and is thefore part of why i love them so much. i dont think theyre protesting. i think theyre observing and commenting, like musicians often do. like more people should do i guess, in a general sense.

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags