imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Congratulations to Jeremy Deller for winning the British art world's most prestigious prize, the Turner, last night. It's a sign of the times that an art world figure like Deller seems much closer to life, art -- and even what I think is important about music -- than anyone winning music awards in Britain in 2004.



UK rock and pop awards in 2004 showed pop music, and specifically rock, to be in a terminally mannerist and museumlike place; dead, irrelevant, tongue-in-cheek, out of touch with contemporary events, as conservative and hung up on the past as opera or classical music at their most decadent, smug, pastichey and tribute-ridden. Awards like the Brits and the NME Carling this year went to sadly Spinal Tappish bands like The Darkness, The Libertines and Kings of Leon, whose moronic-ironic pomo neo-primal rockism seemed to narrow the world down to retro-reverence and in-joke tribute-nudges to rock's heyday, the 1970s (did I mention that satanist-turned-celebrity dad Ozzy Osbourne won the NME's 'Godlike genius award'?).

This year's Turner prize not only shows an artist better in touch with social realities than any of the awarded music artists -- Deller's most famous video is his 2001 reconstruction of the 1984 miner's strike, 'The Battle of Orgreave' -- but also better in touch with music itself: his most famous 'painting', shown above, is 'The History of the World' (1997), a blackboard diagram of the links between brass bands and early 90s rave culture. (Deller later expanded the work by recording colliery brass bands playing the greatest hits of acid house.) 'The History of the World' may contain an art world retro-70s allusion -- a nudge-nudge heads up to one of the art world's own 'godlike geniuses' of the 1970s, Josef Beuys, one of whose arcane (yet highly political) lectures I attended in 1981. Beuys' blackboard that day linked the imprisoned Scottish hunger-striker Jimmy Boyle with the striking workers at British Aerospace's Coventry workshops.



Deller's ludic and ludicrous genre fusions parallel my own. But I also like his interest in society and history, his objectivity. I think the recognition in an art world award ceremony of these concerns shows that, while the rock world is currently as detached and anti-social as a junky, the art world is in rude health. 'The Battle of Orgreave' is a video folk history the same way a track like 'Cockle Pickers' on my forthcoming 'Otto Spooky' album is an electronic folk recitative. They both tell true stories; my song recounts the death of a Chinese cockling crew earlier this year at Morecambe Bay in northern England.

On winning his third or fourth award at the 2004 Brit Awards ceremony, Justin Hawkins of The Darkness declared 'We should thank our collective parents for bestowing on us the gift of rock'. Jeremy Deller, in his Turner interview, preferred to quote Lenin: 'One of my favourite quotes is by Lenin: "Everything is connected to everything else." I'm more into the social relationships, rather than the political... My work is quite slight, but in a good way.' Can we imagine an award-winning musician saying anything that humble, or being that interested in life? (I'll actually make an exception for Bono, whose insane messianism at least leads him to make useful declarations like his recent pledge to devote the rest of his life to fighting poverty, or his use of an appearance at an Apple Expo in LA to declare cars and roads 'ugly' and hope they disappear one day.)



Here's the lyric to the NME's single of the year, 'Don't Look Back Into The Sun' by The Libertines. I quote it very much in the spirit of 'nothing much to see here, folks, move along please':

Yeeeeeeeaaaaaaahhhhhhh!

Don’t look back into the sun
Now you know that your time has come
And they said it would never come for you oh oh oh

Oh my friend you haven’t changed
You're looking rough and living strange
And I know you got a taste for it too oh oh oh

And they'll never forgive you but they wont let you go
She'll never forgive you but she won't let you go, oh no

Don't look back into the sun
You got your past, but you're on the run
And all the lies you said, huh did you say?

But when they played that song at the Death Disco
It started fast but it ends so slow
And all the time it just reminded me of you

And they'll never forgive you but they won't let you go (LET ME GO!)
She'll never forgive you but she won't let you go, oh no

Dig through layer on layer of lazy, half-digested, half-understood references (Oasis' 'Don't Look Back in Anger', Bob Dylan's 'don't look back', David Bowie's 'Look Back in Anger', the play of the same name by John Osborne, 'Black Hole Sun' by Soundgarden... who knows, and who really cares?) and you might find the core of this half-assed song -- the vague and veiled heroin reference in 'taste for it' and 'never let you go'. Just like some tedious old junky (or, even worse, an 'air junky' just going through the motions in ironic-moronic-reverent mode), rock music prefers to stay in its bedroom listening to old records than go out and join the dots of all the interesting, funny, trivial or important stuff going on in the world.

Next year Jeremy Deller will collaborate on a touring show of British folk art, 'a vernacular parade of spray-painted cars, flower arrangements, gurning competitions, crop circles and images of mad sporting activities - an exhibition by people who don't normally get exhibited, curated by an artist who believes there may be nothing more important.' Human-scaled, humane, humble, collectivist... it's the kind of interesting scheme you could imagine an award-winning visual artist or folk singer cooking up, but never, these days, an award-winning rock singer.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 09:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] porphyre.livejournal.com
You chalkboard strongly reminds me of MusicPlasma, (http://www.musicplasma.com/) which I'm sure you're already aware of. Just thought I'd note.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 09:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Although MusicPlasma managed to connect me to Madonna, I doubt it would ever be so deliciously loopy as to connect brass bands to acid house. You still need humans -- and specifically artists -- to do that kind of stuff.

brass bands ---> music <--- acid house

Date: 2004-12-07 09:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] porphyre.livejournal.com
*chuckles* but that only makes SENSE to me...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 10:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] class-worrier.livejournal.com
A fine rant.
I agree with you on this current crop but can't share your views on rock in general.
I'm off to listen to AC/DC back-to-back with corkscrew king in a non-ironic way.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 10:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sparkligbeatnic.livejournal.com

Interesting that Beuys shows up here. About an hour ago I was listening to the 'Ja/Ne' piece.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 10:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 33mhz.livejournal.com
Ooh, they have a drawing of a hand making a rude gesture on their podium! What high-spirited youth!

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 10:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
The finger was designed as the NME awards symbol back in the days when the awards were called 'the Brats' and were supposed to be a finger up at the Brits, which had gotten too staid and boring. Now, of course, there's very little to distinguish either ceremony. The Darkness, a retro comedy 70s-style rock band, cleans up at the Brits whereas The Libertines, a retro, er, tragedy 70s-style rock band, cleans up at the Brats, which have by now been renamed 'The NME Carling awards' in honour of their corporate sponsor, a lager and beer company. So now it looks as if the raised finger is simply a piece of loutish aggro after a British bout of weekend binge drinking.

Of course, we shouldn't forget that the Turner Prize is also sponsored by a drinks company -- Gordon's gin. And that the Tate, the institution that hosts the prize, was founded by another company dealing in addictive vice -- sugar moguls Tate and Lyle. Sponsorship is not the problem.

Now if only the British government would make heroin legal, and plough the profit they make from it into the arts, and into new prizes like the Turner, then bratty bands would make less money singing about it and we could turn the proceeds to as creative a use as the Tate has turned sugar.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 11:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
By the way, on that last point, the British government, by helping to police post-US invasion Afghanistan, is already doing a fair bit to subsidize the global heroin trade: heroin production in Afghanistan is now at far higher levels than it was while the Taliban were in power. Why not go the whole hog and control the whole thing, channelling the money into something useful rather than into the pockets of dealers?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qscrisp.livejournal.com
Like the opium trade in China.

I mean, that's what the situation reminds me of.

This (http://my.opera.com/quentinscrisp/journal/54) is only very vaguely related (in that it's about art), but I thought it might be of interest.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Yes, interesting stuff, Quentin. I'd been thinking about writing something about porn too. It seems to have been the aristos -- the courtiers, samurai, libertines, princes and pashas -- who mostly had the time, the leisure and the refinement necessary for pursuit of sex for its own sake. America's lack of an aristocratic tradition has cut it off entirely from elegant pornography.

The clouds and the rain

Date: 2004-12-07 10:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qscrisp.livejournal.com
On that subject, I bought this book (http://www.brandywinebooks.com/si/1261.html) the other day. Quite fascinating. Published in the sixties it has the quaint but (for me) frustrating feature of all the naughty bits of the text being written in Latin. Anyway, there's an interesting quote heading the preface that runs:

Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at all seasons, madam: that is all there is to distinguish us from other animals. (Beaumarchais' Figaro)

Orgreave in Taipei

Date: 2004-12-07 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I saw Deller's "Battle of Orgreave" piece in the Taipei Biennial (http://www.taipeibiennial.org) a few weeks back, and was smitten. The piece has a whole section of the exhibit to itself-- a projection room for the video, big text panels telling the story, and rows of glass cases filled with artifacts from the riot (the real one, and Deller's re-staged version). His piece easily upstages the big names (Koolhaas, Ono, Varda) and is one of the only worthwhile things in the much-beleaguered show (check out all the curatorial catfight gossip (http://publish.pots.com.tw/english/Arts/2004/10/29/333_20_art/) in Taipei's POTS magazine).
It's up at TFAM (http://www.tfam.gov.tw/english/index.asp) through the end of January, in case anyone's stopping by Taiwan.

- samantha
http://www.samanthaculp.com/newterritories

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freddster.livejournal.com
re: the libertines, i couldnt agree more.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silenceinspades.livejournal.com
though the current music scene is, i guess, sad, hasn't it always taken time for rock to catch up to the rest of the art world? i tend to think of bands like the libertines or the darkness as hollywood films. corporations have a lot of money invested in them and therefore they can not do anything that people have not seen or heard before. you don't want to scare the record buying public. you just want to scare their parents, though not too much. current rock's ironic love of the 70s and hollywood's love of the 50s and 60s can come across as just an attempt to sell product to the adults who came of age during this time.

i'm in babyshambles

Date: 2004-12-07 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cubitt.livejournal.com
I will agree with you that comparing certain bands to hollywood films, or more accurately, classic hollywood films could be used to talk about the Darkness. The music is plastic, the look plastic, the lyrics plastic. Hehe, sorry, I'm listening to the Kinks.

But like the comment a little below yours, the Libertines are far from being the radio-friendly corporate rock band as the reading of any bio would tell. As much as Momus seems to despise them, there is nothing wrong with a simple, nostalgic guitar melody. The lyrics are not always winners, but they aren't trash, and some are gems.
I also the find the voices of Peter Doherty, who now fronts Babyshambles, and Carl Barat to be extremely soothing. The accents shine through and allow me to recall even more classic groups like, well, the Kinks.

Never forget Arthur.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anarchivist.livejournal.com
i thought of the television personalities song, which i guess makes sense.

in the words of Jagger/Richards

Date: 2004-12-07 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pookiedrawers.livejournal.com
"I said ah know, it's only rock and roll but ah LIKE it, LIKE it, yes ah DO!"

or Neil Young "hey hey, my my / rock and roll can never die / there's more to the picture, than meets the eye / hey hey, my my.."

Agreed on the Darkness although their pastiche is so masterful that I can't help but admire it. A little. Their video is hilarious. This is theater for the common people, it's escapism and fun and there's a place for that in society. The world would be too boring, serious and dreary otherwise. The Libertines are a whole different thing. I haven't heard their recent stuff but saw a wonderful show by them a few years ago. Some of their lyrics on the first album are rather oblique and intriguing. But rock and roll doesn't have to have great lyrics, a good melody can make up for that.

Art and rock (especially that which falls under "rockism", an odious term - Mick and Keith would not dig it!) are apples and oranges. Art is much more cerebral while rock appeals to body AND mind. Music provokes an immediate, emotional response. Although someone told me once that he cried while viewing a color field painting. But maybe his girlfriend had just broken up with him. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bardot.livejournal.com
it's a karaoke world, just like malcom mclaren said, isn't it?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 04:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
McLaren was indeed right about that.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bardot.livejournal.com
a new statement needs to be made with pop music that doesn't draw from the past so much. that way, we can have something to be derived from in the future. i'm just thinking of the kids.

ps: love that icon. it is very "bring it!"

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 06:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Go ahead, Wendy, make my day!

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autokrater.livejournal.com
i am always somewhat amazed by rock lyrics/subject matter today.not amazed that the songwriters can only come up with the same material,but amazed at how fucking mediocre it is..and how people still buy it up like it's exciting. i do not understand. i am open to many different forms of music but modern rock music just makes me angry and bored. how can one like this material..it has this feeling to it that it has been done over time and time again. i hate the chord structure..it's so predictable..and the singing is the worst.the lyrics are always angsty and stupid like they were written by some pimple-ridden kid in middle school.but people well past middle school levels enjoy this stuff..i don't get it.

wild and free

Date: 2004-12-07 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qscrisp.livejournal.com
Hello Koalas in Love. I agree. I've noticed since coming back to Britain last year and absorbing the music scene as if afresh how there is a predominance of an overproduced grungey and yet sugary power-chord guitar thing going on. All the singles sound as if they're recorded by the same producer. There's a very self-conscious, affected attempt to appear 'wild and free' that is built into the production and video imagery, which I found interesting for about five minutes on my return, until I saw it for what it was.

Re: wild and free

Date: 2004-12-08 08:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autokrater.livejournal.com
hey,
yes,that seems to be one of the "sounds" now..as you said really good production,grungy,with angsty lyrics but with catchy poppish hooks.i think that is just what the punk pop movement has kind of turned into..like they can't be too dark and such so they got to keep the guitar riffs catchy..but the lyrics are darker.
even worse than that is that grungy american rock sound..like nickleback,three doors down,creed..whatever.i think that totally belongs back in the mid 90's and the fact that people can even still like that.in fact,when i was in high school i noticed a lot of people still on the wave of that type of music. i saw many cd books just filled with nirvana,pearl jam,alice in chains ,soundgarden,green day,bush..it was horrid. i wondered if these people had ever moved on with music.but that genre is still here..slowly dragging on and mutating slowly.and there is still an audience for it which is just weird.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Wasn't there a new music award set up recently? I can't remember what it's called but it was billed as 'The Turner Prize for Music'. Who'd be on the shortlist for that?

Ah, I've just googled "turner prize for music" and it turns out it's called The New Music Award. Exciting. http://www.prsfoundation.co.uk/thenewmusicaward/

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jliv.livejournal.com
I think we are both gonna have to face it: rock music just doesn't belong to us old farts anymore. And it shouldn't. "Rock n' roll" was invented by the forces of consumerism around the same time the "teenager" was invented, and the two are inexcorably linked. At its heart, "rock" is the sound of very young people becoming aware of their own power, and trying to use it to assert their own uniqueness. Therefore, it bears all the naivete and silliness a 16-year-old can manage. Being older, we can easily laugh at the "cool" posturing, since we all realized in our late 20's the styles and poses were inherently silly, but when we were 16, it was everything.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I don't buy that argument. I think rock has changed its status in society. It was once a music the authorities didn't want you to listen to. Now it's a music they do want you to listen to. I also think that once rock attracted creative, non-conformist, experimental personalities. Now it attracts quite the opposite.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 07:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jliv.livejournal.com
It's because the "authorities" have figured out a way to market rebellion in pursuit of profit, in the lucrative teenage market. Like I said, the two are dual creations. Anyhow, a young David Bowie in 2005 would most likely be pursuing a film career. Witness Jonathan Caouette's "Tarnation", made for $200 using iMovie.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 07:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Talking of D. Bowie, I wasted spent about an hour last night tracking down web pages about and mp3s of two bands, The Arcade Fire (http://www.mergerecords.com/media.php?query_band_id=98) and The Secret Machines (http://www.bandbuilder.com/secretmachinesplayer/player.php), because apparently D. Bowie is raving about them on his website. I found them both pretty derivative and uninspiring. The Arcade Fire had a David Byrne thing going on, but really, you know, a rather mediocre David Byrne thing, a lot less interesting than, say, 'Fear of Music' (1979), like the whole thing had just got diluted. Secret Machines were just melodic American alt.rock ordinaire. No fires, and no secrets, here, I'm afraid. Move along, folks, it's just rock music after the moment has passed, nothing to see...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 08:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] encyclops.livejournal.com
I was thinking about the rock/art collisions I was just too young to fully understand in the late 70s / early 80s when I was reading your post, and Talking Heads were indeed the first act to come to mind. I think you nailed it with your comment that rock's status in society, and its perceived value to those who would 20 years ago have tried to say something with it, has changed. I like some of the newer stuff well enough (e.g. Franz Ferdinand) but while the sounds are exciting they not only fail to engage my mind, they fail to engage my emotions the way I want them to. I don't know if I'm just getting old and less likely to fall in love with a musical aesthetic, or if they really don't and won't make them like they used to. The new bratty guitar bands were fun for a moment but they're so nostalgia-driven, all sound and vision but nothing to say. Is the alternative really crawling up your own ass like Radiohead? I love the sounds of rock and it's hard to accept that they're swallowing their own tails from here on out.

droit de senorita

Date: 2004-12-08 02:50 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Look, I've got a lot of Tate mates and I'm someone who didn't go there until 1990 because of the slavery/sugar issue. The art was AMAZING although the Langlands/Bell thing got embargoed. I felt edified somehow: the popular favourite, Yinka Shonibare, makes post-Ofili Nigerian astronaut suits like you'd wanna wear while reading Kodwo Eshun's Higher Than The Sun

What JD seems to be channelling in the diagram above is an art-world Pete Frame's Rock Trees. I can deal with that; he's someone I've interviewed a lot in my job and his Bush/Texas film made me cheer. (even so, I've got worse news for Dubya - by the time office workers go back to work his moniker will be tripster slang for weed and he'll be gradually exposed as what would happen if Bart Simpson was President and Monty Burns was doing the backlines like Cheney. Fortunately for Hunter S. Thompson, he saw a world-class groupie in Bush when the idiot was half-cut and passed out cold in his bath. Oh but then he found Jebus so it's okay, right? Even my art-hata friends want to go to this because it seems at last that the world is interested in ART about politics, which Nick dissed the last time we were in the v. PC Whitechapel. Maybe you didn't know why you were complaining: I might do - it's probably because when mainstream creative intervene in politics, nobody else does anything about politics. This year, that normal belief went out the window and EVERYONE is at it, from cycle couriers to people who thought 'I have a plan' wasn't enough. I thought I was the only one planning a weird 365-day art project about the quiet Americans (the people who don't wear sequinned jumpers to potluck neighbourhood suppers because of what the neighbours might think). Hmm. But first, it's better to go East.

G'night N. Sx

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-08 10:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charleshatcher.livejournal.com
I'd like to hear your thoughts on Joy Electric (http://www.purevolume.com/JoyElectric).

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-09 06:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jliv.livejournal.com
Ironically, after our LJ exchange I went home after work, took a nap with the TV on, and in a semi-lucid state caught a Clash documentary. I was thinking about the death of rock in the context of this documentary; there was a lot of live footage that captured the sense of urgency in their music, during the early days of Reaganism/Thatcherism. It illuminated how there's an appalling lack of political and social awareness reflected in current music. Anyhow, after reading up on Jeremy Diller's works, I could see how that awareness and rage has moved into the visual arts.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 08:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kojapan.livejournal.com
Gotta say I agree with you, film is quickly becoming a popular medium in artistic expression for young renegades and dreamers. Cheaper equipment and a new acceptance of indie and experimental material has brought that on. And not surprisingly the best stuff at my school (which is a little podunk art school) comes from non-film majors who are simply passionate about creating films. Maybe that's what music is missing- passion for the creation of your art.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-12-07 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jliv.livejournal.com
There's only so much you can do with Link Wray's blown amplifier. The exciting thing about film is that with digital film, the production costs have dropped exponentially, and the options of expression are endless. And music, in whatever form, will always be an integral part of the filmmaking process. I recently donated gobs of throwaway music compositions to a documentarian friend of mine, who is sifting through them for inspiration. I'm excited to see what he comes up with.

from brass bands to . . .

Date: 2004-12-08 08:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rogerlodge.livejournal.com
In case you're ever in need of an idea for what to write, I'd love to read your take on Acid House!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-30 03:50 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
you suck

the libertines are a great band

try up the bracket. if you even know what that means