Kimono our place!
Nov. 29th, 2004 11:02 amA little party was held last night watashi no tokoro on the Karl-Marx-Allee for twenty or so optimally funky Berlin-based people. Featuring Kaori and Mika, Mr and Mrs Cameron, Jason Forrest / Donna Summer, Jim Backhouse from Resonance FM, some friendly wheatpasters with a big bucket of wheatpaste, Craig Robinson and Hanni, Andrew Cannon, Eric, Lupo and Rika from Belleville (where I'll be playing a little show next Sunday), Mario Canario and Anne Laplantine.

Click the photo for a video of the highpoint of the party: our terrifying initiation ceremony into The Order of The White Igloo. Those who pass are sent to meet The White Archer. Those who fail are sent to meet him twice.

Click the photo for a video of the highpoint of the party: our terrifying initiation ceremony into The Order of The White Igloo. Those who pass are sent to meet The White Archer. Those who fail are sent to meet him twice.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-29 10:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-29 10:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-29 11:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-29 02:52 pm (UTC)Do you remember Stuart Paterson from the RSAMD? Any idea what he's doing now?
Cheers
Alasdair
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-29 03:13 pm (UTC)you kids are gonna suffocate somebody!
Date: 2004-11-29 04:19 pm (UTC)not-so-random X-Files quote...
Date: 2004-11-29 06:58 pm (UTC)Mulder: Why are you telling me that?
Bruckman: Look, forget I mentioned it. It's none of my business.
Chalking for WiFi Hobos
Date: 2004-11-29 09:32 pm (UTC)http://www.blackbeltjones.com/warchalking/index2.html
It's a hobo chalk language for telling others about WiFi networks.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-29 10:56 pm (UTC)-immenselbst
The White Archer
Date: 2004-11-29 11:05 pm (UTC)The White Archer, I take it, has no relation to the Green Arrow?
http://www.greenarrowfansite.com/
oFFiCiaL_w0rLd_LaNgUagE
Date: 2004-11-30 12:35 am (UTC)http://www.delaware.gr.jp/TEXT/txt_world_languag_e.html (http://www.delaware.gr.jp/TEXT/txt_world_languag_e.html)
And this one is a wonderful manifesto:
http://www.delaware.gr.jp/TEXT/txt_skip_e.html (http://www.delaware.gr.jp/TEXT/txt_skip_e.html)
Enjoy,
Sean T.
Re: oFFiCiaL_w0rLd_LaNgUagE
Date: 2004-11-30 12:46 am (UTC)we +hink +he official world language is no+ +he english of na+ive_speakers,
i+'s +he simple_english of non_na+ive_speakers, isn'+ i+!?
This is a very interesting insight. I speak this simplified English a lot because I live mostly with non-English speakers. Basil Bernstein would have called this 'Restricted Code'. But in my case it's not a class issue, or a question of limited education; I tend to censor local inflections and difficult or slangy phrases because I need to find the universality of the lowest common dominator. In fact, just about the only place I use Extended Code is on the internet, when I'm writing.
Re: oFFiCiaL_w0rLd_LaNgUagE
Date: 2004-11-30 03:52 am (UTC)Sean T.
Re: oFFiCiaL_w0rLd_LaNgUagE
Date: 2004-11-30 08:54 am (UTC)a) understand or
b) care.
There are exceptions, of course. Anne Laplantine is someone I think cares and understands about the kind of issues I do. Toog too. Steve Lafreniere in New York. One of the great joys of being in NY was being able to talk, talk, talk to art students, journalists, artists, and know they were basically on the same page. I never really felt that in England. The English were too self-conscious about class, too conservative, too intellectually phlegmatic and passive aggressive to be able to, or want to, talk that kind of talk. Scots, though, can. My friend Alasdair in Tokyo, Pat Kane, Neill Martin... anyway, sorry for the roll call... People here in Click Opera have absolutely fitted the 'extended code' description, which is why I'm so invested in these pages and these dialogues we have here.
Re: oFFiCiaL_w0rLd_LaNgUagE
Date: 2004-11-30 03:31 pm (UTC)Re: oFFiCiaL_w0rLd_LaNgUagE
Date: 2004-11-30 05:57 pm (UTC)Richard G
Re: oFFiCiaL_w0rLd_LaNgUagE
Date: 2004-12-01 01:22 am (UTC)We lap up the overspill.
Everyone understands moosique a bit. And design.
Re: oFFiCiaL_w0rLd_LaNgUagE
Date: 2004-12-01 01:29 am (UTC)We (lawyers, consultants, journalists, authors, conceptual artists, professors, bloggers, pundits) talk about the world. Meanwhile, the heartland frowns at all our nattering. They're planting soy, slaughtering hogs, and building trucks (well, sometimes), while we write letters to the NY Review of Books.
Re: oFFiCiaL_w0rLd_LaNgUagE
Date: 2004-12-01 02:55 am (UTC)Momus's mind as a container--a somewhat fixed framework into which various materials are poured. To remain coherent, the mind must maintain a certain structure and integrity. It cannot dissolve into the surrounding milieu. Something happens to materials poured into the container of Momus's head. Perhaps it's something like a chemistry laboratory, and chemical reactions take place, and bonds are broken, formed, exploded, new molecules created. Interesting question as to whether the theory of conservation of energy and mass applies to the open system of Momus's mind.
But then there is the question of choice and will. Or are those decided--in our vastly simplified hydraulic system we're cartooning here--by the materials that went in early on, which established the base formula with which all later materials would be greeted when introduced into the chamber of Momus's mind.
What am I going on about?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-11-30 10:04 am (UTC)http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,1359795,00.html
(I can already see you bristling at Carey's high/low art assumptions)