(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-21 04:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charleshatcher.livejournal.com
It's a thumbs-down from me on the shoes. And the less said about the watch, the better.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-21 05:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
It tells the time and doesn't spare my feelings either.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-21 06:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charleshatcher.livejournal.com
I'm sorry. That was a horrid comment. It just seems that your fashion sense is becoming less outré; I suppose I'm just feeling nostalgia for your orange, oversized, New York era watch. But that is not an excuse.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-21 12:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Quite all right, my dear fellow.

I don't recall ever having had an orange watch... a white Swatch, perhaps... And I do still do 'outre', although it's true, the New York years were rather more bold. Manhattan does that to you.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-21 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charleshatcher.livejournal.com
Is there anything that isn't Bush's fault?

(And you're right about the watch (http://www.imomus.com/dailyphoto160301.html)).

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-21 11:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] w-e-quimby.livejournal.com
I like the blazer and the turtleneck, however. I want a huge black turtleneck and I haven't found one yet. I'm on the look. The fuzzy-looking beige pants are nice, too.

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags