Neato: the literal video meme
Jan. 25th, 2010 10:13 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
imomusTake a look at this video, in which a man called Dustin McLean (Dusto McNeato) has resung the Tears For Fears track Head Over Heels so that the lyrics reflect the actions in the video:
[Error: unknown template video]
Now, Dusto has done a neato job here. Not only is his parody executed excellently (it really does sound like Orzabal singing the absurd actions of the video as they happen around him), it's a classic piece of Web 2.0 satire, or even art; something that couldn't really have existed -- and certainly not at this amateur level -- before the existence of YouTube and cheap video editing tools. Dusto has noticed something interesting about pop music: the fact that the concepts in the video are very different from the concepts in the lyrics. Video ideas are often a lot more eccentric and creative, whereas lyrical ideas usually reflect normative, conservative and "universal" sentiments. Here's the original, for contrast:
[Error: unknown template video]
To put that another way, when a universal theme (such as being "head over heels" in love) has given a pop song commercial viability via an appeal to reproductive normativity (heterosexual reproduction, the contractual language of love and marriage), a certain kind of delirious excess and eccentricity can be permitted in the video, which can become -- as if to offset the slightly humdrum normality in the lyric -- thoroughly carnivalesque. It's almost as if the zany and expensive goings-on in the video conform to Bataille's idea in The Accursed Share that humans have an underlying need to conspicuously waste money and resources -- an impulse at least as strong as their need to manage their affairs and reproduce genetically in an orderly fashion.
By shepherding this carnivalesque absurdity back into the lyric of the song, Dusto McNeato creates a highly interesting parallel world where the distinction between normality and the carnivalesque is erased, as is the time-lag between "writing the song" and "making the video of the song". In Dusto's version, Orzabal is singing, apparently, his spontaneous reactions to the events happening to him in real time.
[Error: unknown template video]
Dusto (a Current TV employee credited by Wikipedia as the inventor of the literal music video, circa October 2008) also erases the distinction between the distinct creative brains of songwriter Roland Orzabal and video director Nigel Dick, and deletes the distance between "what you're hearing" and "what you're seeing" -- a disjunct we're so used to in pop videos that we don't notice it any more.
[Error: unknown template video]
In other literal videos by Dustin McLean we see a bit more satire, and diminishing returns; the Red Hot Chili Peppers' Under the Bridge becomes a satire on Anthony Keidis' pectoral vanity, Billy Idol's White Wedding is already so self-parodic it's hardly worth the trouble to take it further, Beck's Loser has unfortunately had its literal video squelched by Universal Music. Aha's Take On Me is enfeebled by the fact that the song and the original video are just as silly (and as hetero-normative) as each other, and a spoken dialogue concerning a fight over a "Magic Frame" gets a bit plot-heavy (though the line about "getting an assful of pipe-wrench" amuses some viewers).
[Error: unknown template video]
But let's return to the best literal video, the one for Head Over Heels. According to Wikipedia's page about the original song, "the promotional clip for "Head over Heels", filmed in June 1985, was the fourth Tears for Fears clip directed by famed music video producer Nigel Dick. It is centered around Roland Orzabal's attempts to get the attention of a librarian (played by a Canadian model), while a variety of characters (many played by the rest of the band) take part in shenanigans in the library. The final scene shows Orzabal and the librarian as an older married couple. The video was filmed at the Emmanuel College Library in Toronto, Canada."
I can't dissociate the appeal of the 1985 clothes, hairstyles and spectacle frames from my fascination with this clip; 1985 is bang in the middle of the revival period I called, in The anxious interval, "the goldmine". The parody is also fuelled by the appeal of the original Tears For Fears song, whose lyrics seem particularly opaque, silly and meaningless to me (why is the narrator "dreaming he's a doctor", and why is it "hard to be a man when there's a gun in your hand", and why does "nothing ever change when you're acting your age"?), but whose topline melody, chords and hooks are sort of gorgeous.
Dustin's observations here are, in fact, rather neato, as an ongoing commentary on 1985: he has Orzabal note to the librarian "you have really big glasses", and then confess that he stole the flying index cards idea from Ghostbusters, which came out in 1984. It's as if a cultural historian had turned his commentary on a pop video into a song, or actually become one of the characters in the song himself. It's as if -- in the manner of David Foster Wallace or Alasdair Gray -- footnotes had become part of the text itself. Web 2.0, Postmodernism 1.0!
[Error: unknown template video]
The literal video hasn't become as viral as other Web 2.0 micro-forms, partly because it's actually rather hard to do well, and because nobody can quite touch the originator. Tom Vondoom's Safety Dance is okay, but isn't very well sung, loses points for lines like "this is really gay", and has only scored a tenth of McNeato's views. Fever103's Sweet Dreams veers too wildly between literal commentary and far-fetched interpretation, with some strained, lame and vulgar fart and zit jokes thrown in:
[Error: unknown template video]
Birdhouse in Your Soul fails as parody, since the original They Might Be Giants song and video were already unbearably whacky and random:
[Error: unknown template video]
Deshem's take on James Blunt's You're Beautiful is much better: he strips everything back to Neato's original formula (just sing the actions) and achieves a Beckettian minimalism which made me chuckle quite a bit:
[Error: unknown template video]
[Error: unknown template video]
Now, Dusto has done a neato job here. Not only is his parody executed excellently (it really does sound like Orzabal singing the absurd actions of the video as they happen around him), it's a classic piece of Web 2.0 satire, or even art; something that couldn't really have existed -- and certainly not at this amateur level -- before the existence of YouTube and cheap video editing tools. Dusto has noticed something interesting about pop music: the fact that the concepts in the video are very different from the concepts in the lyrics. Video ideas are often a lot more eccentric and creative, whereas lyrical ideas usually reflect normative, conservative and "universal" sentiments. Here's the original, for contrast:
[Error: unknown template video]
To put that another way, when a universal theme (such as being "head over heels" in love) has given a pop song commercial viability via an appeal to reproductive normativity (heterosexual reproduction, the contractual language of love and marriage), a certain kind of delirious excess and eccentricity can be permitted in the video, which can become -- as if to offset the slightly humdrum normality in the lyric -- thoroughly carnivalesque. It's almost as if the zany and expensive goings-on in the video conform to Bataille's idea in The Accursed Share that humans have an underlying need to conspicuously waste money and resources -- an impulse at least as strong as their need to manage their affairs and reproduce genetically in an orderly fashion.
By shepherding this carnivalesque absurdity back into the lyric of the song, Dusto McNeato creates a highly interesting parallel world where the distinction between normality and the carnivalesque is erased, as is the time-lag between "writing the song" and "making the video of the song". In Dusto's version, Orzabal is singing, apparently, his spontaneous reactions to the events happening to him in real time.
[Error: unknown template video]
Dusto (a Current TV employee credited by Wikipedia as the inventor of the literal music video, circa October 2008) also erases the distinction between the distinct creative brains of songwriter Roland Orzabal and video director Nigel Dick, and deletes the distance between "what you're hearing" and "what you're seeing" -- a disjunct we're so used to in pop videos that we don't notice it any more.
[Error: unknown template video]
In other literal videos by Dustin McLean we see a bit more satire, and diminishing returns; the Red Hot Chili Peppers' Under the Bridge becomes a satire on Anthony Keidis' pectoral vanity, Billy Idol's White Wedding is already so self-parodic it's hardly worth the trouble to take it further, Beck's Loser has unfortunately had its literal video squelched by Universal Music. Aha's Take On Me is enfeebled by the fact that the song and the original video are just as silly (and as hetero-normative) as each other, and a spoken dialogue concerning a fight over a "Magic Frame" gets a bit plot-heavy (though the line about "getting an assful of pipe-wrench" amuses some viewers).
[Error: unknown template video]
But let's return to the best literal video, the one for Head Over Heels. According to Wikipedia's page about the original song, "the promotional clip for "Head over Heels", filmed in June 1985, was the fourth Tears for Fears clip directed by famed music video producer Nigel Dick. It is centered around Roland Orzabal's attempts to get the attention of a librarian (played by a Canadian model), while a variety of characters (many played by the rest of the band) take part in shenanigans in the library. The final scene shows Orzabal and the librarian as an older married couple. The video was filmed at the Emmanuel College Library in Toronto, Canada."
I can't dissociate the appeal of the 1985 clothes, hairstyles and spectacle frames from my fascination with this clip; 1985 is bang in the middle of the revival period I called, in The anxious interval, "the goldmine". The parody is also fuelled by the appeal of the original Tears For Fears song, whose lyrics seem particularly opaque, silly and meaningless to me (why is the narrator "dreaming he's a doctor", and why is it "hard to be a man when there's a gun in your hand", and why does "nothing ever change when you're acting your age"?), but whose topline melody, chords and hooks are sort of gorgeous.
Dustin's observations here are, in fact, rather neato, as an ongoing commentary on 1985: he has Orzabal note to the librarian "you have really big glasses", and then confess that he stole the flying index cards idea from Ghostbusters, which came out in 1984. It's as if a cultural historian had turned his commentary on a pop video into a song, or actually become one of the characters in the song himself. It's as if -- in the manner of David Foster Wallace or Alasdair Gray -- footnotes had become part of the text itself. Web 2.0, Postmodernism 1.0!
[Error: unknown template video]
The literal video hasn't become as viral as other Web 2.0 micro-forms, partly because it's actually rather hard to do well, and because nobody can quite touch the originator. Tom Vondoom's Safety Dance is okay, but isn't very well sung, loses points for lines like "this is really gay", and has only scored a tenth of McNeato's views. Fever103's Sweet Dreams veers too wildly between literal commentary and far-fetched interpretation, with some strained, lame and vulgar fart and zit jokes thrown in:
[Error: unknown template video]
Birdhouse in Your Soul fails as parody, since the original They Might Be Giants song and video were already unbearably whacky and random:
[Error: unknown template video]
Deshem's take on James Blunt's You're Beautiful is much better: he strips everything back to Neato's original formula (just sing the actions) and achieves a Beckettian minimalism which made me chuckle quite a bit:
[Error: unknown template video]
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 09:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 09:42 am (UTC)He should do this (http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x21zit_level-42-something-about-you_music) one next.
some of the misheard lyrics (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVf7K_KvVtg&feature=PlayList&p=5273366F019774C8&index=0) videos are funny too.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 10:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 09:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-26 06:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 10:06 am (UTC)And what do you know,the lyrics didn't sound off kilter at all until I went back and glanced at the video again at the end of the song and then I paid attention to the strange words again.
Makes me wonder how much of our brain actually pays attention to the lyrics of pop songs when listened to for the first time.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 10:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 10:40 am (UTC)I can still recall the whole first verse of I should be so lucky and I'm sure I have never made a conscious attempt to remember that.
Mind control, eh!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 10:55 am (UTC)Argh, get out of my mind, all of you!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 10:54 am (UTC)http://www.midem.com/en/Homepage/
Click the "Jan 23" to pull up her interview.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 10:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 12:41 pm (UTC)RE: slow on the uptake
Date: 2010-01-25 01:02 pm (UTC)For my money this one will always be the best (can't believe you didn't include it, actually):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj-x9ygQEGA
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 01:03 pm (UTC)No, caller, it wasn't.
Literal Video Timeline:
The form is invented: October 2008
Huffington Post article (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/03/the-7-best-literal-music_n_249976.html) on the phenomenon: August 2009
Time magazine selects (http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1945379_1945171_1945162,00.html) Total Eclipse of the Heart literal video as its #6 viral video of the year: December 2009
Click Opera sifts examples and adds Bataille references: January 2010
Total duration of meme so far: 15 months from invention
Maximum views for a literal video: 6 million for Total Eclipse of the Heart (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj-x9ygQEGA)
Cut out this handy guide, Anon, and tack it to your forehead in case you feel the need to be smug again.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 01:11 pm (UTC)That one annoys me even more than the original! And it uses "gay" as a pejorative, like the Safety Dance one. And the singing is out of tune. And it isn't by the originator of the form, Neato. In the world of parody, as in the world of pop, the wrong things get the big attention, it seems.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 01:25 pm (UTC)http://www.stsanders.com/
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 01:47 pm (UTC)At a certain point, these parodies basically start to become the way we songwriters often work: a lot of my songs are a kind of intentional misunderstanding of existing songs, or a kind of ventriloquism of internalised idols.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 02:40 pm (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQRvqkmKmKo
anything that debunks Queen is fine by me
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 02:52 pm (UTC)Excellent! He's reverse-engineered Robert Ashley!
At a certain point
Date: 2010-01-25 03:29 pm (UTC)Frank Zappa
"Bollocks, it's all shite!!!"
Train Spotting
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 01:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-28 03:18 am (UTC)And I get zero mileage out of "unoriginal" or "out of tune". The video is sillier and therefore easier to make fun of, therefore funnier, therefore less gay.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 02:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 02:40 pm (UTC)You buffoon, you forgot to mention that there are precedents in ancient Greece and Rome!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 03:02 pm (UTC)There. Happy now?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 03:18 pm (UTC)ABOUT THE SCROLLS
Date: 2010-01-25 03:42 pm (UTC)http://www.worldofquotes.com/proverb/Jewish/1/index.html
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 11:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-26 10:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 01:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 01:59 pm (UTC)[Error: unknown template video]
I really should have shown these at the seminar last week which was looking at how the internet collapses the distinction between the amateur and the professional.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-25 02:01 pm (UTC)[Error: unknown template video]
acxcgg
Date: 2010-01-25 07:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-26 04:30 am (UTC)jam on it
Date: 2010-01-26 04:59 am (UTC)Re: jam on it
Date: 2010-01-26 08:11 pm (UTC)Urichipangoon
Date: 2010-01-26 06:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-26 05:20 pm (UTC)[Error: unknown template video]
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-26 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-26 07:09 pm (UTC)sheesh
Date: 2010-01-27 09:23 am (UTC)Its too late and i should be asleep but i must keep watching videos. . . i am jazzed!!!
probably cause i made some music . . .
was looking on emusic to get some Ryuichi Sakamoto. . . unfortunately not impressed by 20 second preview of songs. . . they didnt have yellow trippy orchestra or whatever his hold synth band was. Did get the untitled soundtrack though . .. speaking of which
Have you seen the Untitled movie yet? It was sooo goood. .. . .check out the trailer
here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9myaiQs3GI
PS. love your comment on how right wingers tend to focus on individual responsibility and left wingers on social culpability. This is a political trend i have often seen myself, yet never put to words. When such discussions arise I tend to promote doubt in others ideology as an ideology, with a thriller lean to the left. I think your environment (where your from, who your parents are, who you associate with, etc) are major players in who you become. I guess that is why i am always looking and never satisfied. However once your hand is dealt, its you who decide how to play 'em. . . .existentialism?
Re: sheesh
Date: 2010-01-27 09:47 am (UTC)Seen from a wider angle, though, the individual / social distinction dissolves. The individual is just a microsite where social constructions play out. This doesn't mean they're easily changed. What's arbitrary can also be binding.