imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
"Learning from Japan" is a theme I keep coming back to, a sermon I keep preaching. Opposed to the crude view I call "Japan Original Sin" (people who harp on about research whaling, war criminal shrines and textbook lacunae, and with whom one eventually, inevitably, ends up playing a futile game of Atrocity Snap), the "Learning from Japan" meme simply suggests that Japan's difference from Western practice is valuable, precisely, to the West. We can't learn anything from people who think as we do. For the same reason, men can learn more from women than they can from other men.



The architecture world will get a chance to learn from Japan -- and from a woman -- in 2010; SANAA's Kazuo Sejima has been chosen as the curator of The Venice Architecture Biennial. I'm pretty sure she's the first Japanese to get this job; she's certainly the first woman to do so. A clue to her focus comes in a brief statement she's released saying that "a significant point of departure could be the concept of boundaries and the adaptation of space... it could be argued that contemporary architecture is an afterthought and perhaps an easing of borders themselves." That's a fresh thought already; architecture as an easing of borders in a time when they're generally stiffening.



I blogged last week about a new book from Lars Müller, The SANAA Studios 2006-2008. Learning from Japan: Single-Story Urbanism. My title today comes from there. The blurb explains: "During three spring seasons between 2006 and 2008, Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa taught at the School of Architecture at Princeton. The SANAA Studios explored Japan's contemporary society as a context for architecture and considered its particular perspective on space, the personal and the public realm. Design exercises were situated within the specific demographics and social variables of three distinct sites in Japan...

"As an overall thematic it asks: What can we learn from SANAA?" Browsing the book at Pro-qm, I got the strong impression that what we can learn from SANAA is something to do with a relaxing, elegant lightness and understatement, something to do with minimalism and gentleness, and something to do with a feeling of calm that permeates Japan very noticeably whenever you spend time there. Iwan Baan's photographs of SANAA buildings filled with schoolchildren or middle-aged culture tourists made me think of Alasdair Gray's excellent maxim: "Work as if you live in the early days of a better nation."

WTF???

Date: 2009-11-10 10:11 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
it's not a "stereotype" to assert that the photo oozes Platonism.

Re: WTF???

Date: 2009-11-10 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Really? You don't think you were stereotyping the image a teensy bit with this stuff:

t's just more cold, detached, cartesian, rectilinear thinking; hardly what the world needs more of now, from japan or anyone else. we need more warm, organic, soft, vague, unfinished, you get the idea...

The building Sejima is holding in her hands in Annie's picture, to my mind, cuts right across these stereotyped binaries -- cold / warm, soft / hard etc. If you actually experience the New Museum in person you'll find something that looks like the International style, yet also looks distinctively Japanese, a piece of Omote Sando on the Bowery. You'll see something hard-edged and pragmatic, and yet eccentrically stacked and tipped; quirky. You'll see something with smooth faces which are nevertheless diffused by a fascia of metallic mesh which lends a soft pearly glow to the whole structure.

Image

Re: WTF???

Date: 2009-11-11 12:34 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
nice try. but i submit to the floor for a vote: whether the image in the photo and the 2nd image is either more cold, modern, rectilinear and platonic or warm, amodern, vague and organic.

and i still have no idea what you're talking about with the "stereotyping the image" comment...i was pointing out how it's rife with platonic symbolism. what does that have to do with stereotypes????

Re: WTF???

Date: 2009-11-11 09:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
You persist in thinking in stereotypes. Think outside your adjective clusters! Why can't something be modern and warm, rectilinear and organic? Don't you notice how the successive skewed boxes make a curve, if you plot their averages?

And haven't you considered how, if Sejima was holding a gherkin shape in the photo, it would just look like an erect cock or a cactus, and recall times when life was hard and a brutal social Darwinism favoured men above women? Why should the "amodern" necessarily be "warm" for a woman architect who, in the "amodern" period, would never even have been an architect at all?

speaking of organic

Date: 2009-11-11 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
a thing that is organic is different from a thing that is simply natural or made of natural materials. a thing that is organic must possess the generative dynamism characteristic of living things. we are trying to arrive at things that are organic by making a thorough study of the amazing process by which certain units (genes) generate a living whole while contending with (or more correctly, being defeated by) the environment. in each project we discover a characteristic material and are drawn irresistibly into a journey-like sequence, a process by which that material, after a hard-fought, tortuous struggle, generates a certain whole. a certain whole does not necessarily mean a building. it may only be a piece of furniture or some small object, or surpass architecture in size and become a city. It may hug the ground or rise like a building. like living things, things that are organic take various forms and survive in various ways in response to their respective environments.' - kengo kuma

http://www.designboom.com/weblog/cat/9/view/8127/kengo-kuma-studies-in-organic.html

Re: speaking of organic

Date: 2009-11-11 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Nice quote!

Re: speaking of organic

Date: 2009-11-12 07:38 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
this is such fucking sophistry.

Re: WTF???

Date: 2009-11-13 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Why should the "amodern" necessarily be "warm" for a woman architect who, in the "amodern" period, would never even have been an architect at all?

great point. also, let's all leave margaret thatcher and condoleeza rice alone; they wouldn't have even been able to rise that high in govt's of ages past.

Re: WTF???

Date: 2009-11-11 12:37 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
it cuts across binaries????---it's a stack of right angled blocks for fuck's sake. oh, and some "quirky" lighting effects. this is a million miles from being warm and organic.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-11 06:06 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Don't worry, at least one of us anons agrees with you. ^_^

Re: WTF???

Date: 2009-11-12 03:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] count-vronsky.livejournal.com
love this building.

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags