imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
"Learning from Japan" is a theme I keep coming back to, a sermon I keep preaching. Opposed to the crude view I call "Japan Original Sin" (people who harp on about research whaling, war criminal shrines and textbook lacunae, and with whom one eventually, inevitably, ends up playing a futile game of Atrocity Snap), the "Learning from Japan" meme simply suggests that Japan's difference from Western practice is valuable, precisely, to the West. We can't learn anything from people who think as we do. For the same reason, men can learn more from women than they can from other men.



The architecture world will get a chance to learn from Japan -- and from a woman -- in 2010; SANAA's Kazuo Sejima has been chosen as the curator of The Venice Architecture Biennial. I'm pretty sure she's the first Japanese to get this job; she's certainly the first woman to do so. A clue to her focus comes in a brief statement she's released saying that "a significant point of departure could be the concept of boundaries and the adaptation of space... it could be argued that contemporary architecture is an afterthought and perhaps an easing of borders themselves." That's a fresh thought already; architecture as an easing of borders in a time when they're generally stiffening.



I blogged last week about a new book from Lars Müller, The SANAA Studios 2006-2008. Learning from Japan: Single-Story Urbanism. My title today comes from there. The blurb explains: "During three spring seasons between 2006 and 2008, Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa taught at the School of Architecture at Princeton. The SANAA Studios explored Japan's contemporary society as a context for architecture and considered its particular perspective on space, the personal and the public realm. Design exercises were situated within the specific demographics and social variables of three distinct sites in Japan...

"As an overall thematic it asks: What can we learn from SANAA?" Browsing the book at Pro-qm, I got the strong impression that what we can learn from SANAA is something to do with a relaxing, elegant lightness and understatement, something to do with minimalism and gentleness, and something to do with a feeling of calm that permeates Japan very noticeably whenever you spend time there. Iwan Baan's photographs of SANAA buildings filled with schoolchildren or middle-aged culture tourists made me think of Alasdair Gray's excellent maxim: "Work as if you live in the early days of a better nation."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-10 12:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Monarchs had, so to speak, materialized oppression: the democratic republics of the present day have rendered it as entirely an affair of the mind, as the will which it is intended to coerce. Under the absolute sway of one man, the body was attacked in order to subdue the soul; but the soul escaped the blows which were directed against it, and rose proudly superior. Such is not the course adopted by tyranny in democratic republics; there the body is left free, and the soul is enslaved. The master no longer says, "You shall think as I do, or you shall die": but he says, "You are free to think differently from me, and to retain your life, your property, and all that you possess; but you are henceforth a stranger among your people. You may retain your civil rights, but they will be useless to you, for you will never be chosen by your fellow-citizens, if you solicit their votes; and they will affect to scorn you, if you ask for their esteem. You will remain among men, but you will be deprived of the rights of mankind. Your fellow-creatures will shun you like an impure being; and even those who believe in your innocence will abandon you, lest they should be shunned in their turn. Go in peace! I have given you your life, but it is an existence worse than death."

Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (http://books.google.de/books?id=ZID9VvvWiaIC&pg=PA117&lpg=PA117&dq=toqueville+free+henceforth+stranger&source=bl&ots=mSqlKKlTsF&sig=1Y8tBXf4_RoQSelnTdgdiwq8I5E&hl=en&ei=3Fv5Sqe7JdTJ_galt6G-DA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=henceforth&f=false)

The end of geography

Date: 2009-11-10 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The world's eyes are on Berlin. Momus is in Manchester, via Japan!

We currently represent people in parliament using a geographical bloc. But do my opinions echo everyone in my constituency? Of course not. In the digital age geography has changed meaning. Formerly used to offer me some kind of voice, geography is now used to silence me, secure me in tiers of compromise as representatives get unnecessary. "You will never be chosen by your fellow-citizens" – why should anyone be? Perhaps they know that the president is just a king with a shelf life.

Re: The end of geography

Date: 2009-11-10 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
The world's eyes are on Berlin.

I found all those celebrations plastic and hollowly triumphalist. The message was very much "we have nothing to learn from the former communist nations that stood here twenty years ago and everything to teach them".

We should instead be looking at what was good, lasting and valuable about those societies, and trying to incorporate those elements into our own future. Because there were remedies being prepared in those prematurely-terminated societies which answer our gravest maladies with some acuity and precision.

Re: The end of geography

Date: 2009-11-10 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The more Soviet and east European culture I see, the more I think that their lives paralleled the west much more than we admit (a Sixties full of optimism, a Seventies with housing shortages and strife. I've even seen 1980s Soviet films return to 1950s retro, which I thought was a meme only the West had) but with security, equality and so on.

(Although didn't some pro-west east German say, upon the demise of the intelligentsia, "You don't need academics when you've got Greenpeace" ie capitalism uses action not theory).

Re: The end of geography

Date: 2009-11-12 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
why don't you list some of those remedies? and are you sure that none of those societies didn't self-destruct?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-11-10 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
From an '81 interview with David Sylvian:

D: I am interested in this "society" thing of Japan. I think up 'til now in all the countries I've been it's the only country which have been doing a well society. It's a deeply interesting thing. I see why Japan has been a well society, and also I can understand why young kids dislike growing up in Japan's social environment. For a social system to run smoothly, usually sacrifice will have to be made though you won't realize it when you're young. In Britain there's completely no discipline between one another, and there's no feeling of community.

Q: I think it's probably because individualism has been too widespread and overdone in Britain or in Europe……

D: Yeah, it's been overdone. Everyone is all after freedom which is in fact unnecessary. Because people have always seen themselves as free, therefore being free also has been considered to be the most important thing. But it's not so at all. People have been depending too much on being an individual and the freedom to choose what one wants to do. To me, I don't think these things are important. I think I can go on living in a community environment if I could be one strong enough person. I believe no one would want their characters to be repressed by others. But I feel that people whose minds aren't stable, themselves can't do anything but to prove that they are independent individuals.

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags