imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Performing at The Barbican last night felt like a bit of a homecoming; ten years ago I was living (on the last of my Japanese publishing royalties) in a penthouse flat just next to the vast and bewildering arts bunker. From the orange plastic-themed kitchen of my flat, which topped a 1970s office block, I looked out over the Barbican's towers, its raised concrete walkways, its ziggurat apartments cascading with plants.



The Barbican is, itself, all orange plastic and paint now, after a bit of a redesign inside. Once upon a time I'd routinely deplore this place, comparing it unfavourably with the light, airy, accessible, ingenious, flexible and futuristic Pompidou Centre in Paris. For a major, massively expensive arts centre, The Barbican is in the wrong place (they should have put it bang in the middle of Trafalgar Square), designed by the wrong people (most people know Piano and Rogers, but who recalls the faceless construction company that, between 1962 and 1982, put The Barbican together, painful piece by piece, on a site consisting of leftover rubble from WWII?) and has entirely the wrong attitude.

It's almost impossible to find the entrance. You go up some concrete steps, down some others, and -- unless you follow the painted thread -- get quickly lost in a warren of ramps and lifts leading to areas called "minus one" and "minus two", or to a glass walkway leading to a cul-de-sac with a view of a pond and some flats. You half expect to confront a minotaur.

But The Barbican has grown on me. It has its own charm. With age, it's becoming more weird, eccentric and unique. Yesterday, before running through the Brel show in the big theatre, I had a good rummage through the building. There's a fantastic installation in The Curve gallery just now by an artist with a Polish name, who's transformed the entire gallery into a musty warren of rooms in a 1941 military bunker.

The conservatory upstairs is -- like a lot of the complex -- evocative of one of those 1970s sci- fi movies set on an orbiting ecosystem; under graph-paper glass lush bamboo, orchids and koi ponds create a secret, empty world of paths, ladders, fecund plants, hidden upper walkways. It must be one of my favourite places in London.

Even the gents toilet at the back of the cafe is amazing. The big, solid quirky-yet-quality 70s fittings so typical of The Barbican (a chunky oblong tap that juts out of the wall) greet you, then a long curved, tiled corridor leads you to the urinal. Instead of sharp corners everything has rounded edges; ceiling panels, concrete detailing, it's all organic in the way they found futuristic back in the 70s, and yet also discreetly luxurious. Never has a building boasted more bowel-shaped "bowels".

The artists' quarters backstage are as warren-like and confusing as the rest of the complex -- it's as if the whole place is expecting an imminent visit from Ghengis Khan, and intends to fox, split, entrap and slaughter his army. To get backstage you have to come down a ramp, go through the artists' entrance, descend a confusing set of brass-handrailed stairs, go along a gallery past a "choir room" used, incongruously, for catering, descend another staircase...

Everything is curved, split-level, windowless. You aren't sure whether you're above ground or below it, on earth or up in space, in 1980 or 2009.

And then you're ushered to a side door by someone wearing headphones, down some steps in the dark, up some more, and suddenly you're standing in a vast room, singing an intimate, hesitant song from the stage, and behind the dazzling follow-spot two thousand people are sitting, listening intently. Some, you later learn, are weeping.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-23 12:45 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I had a dream last night in which you had written a much-anthologized and beloved short story. I was assigned to read the story during a classroom test, and it began with an epigram from Morrissey. Shocked by the opportunity to read such a work, which instructed the readers to provide orchestral accompaniment when it was read, I kept flipping through the pages -- which were marked beautifully with verse and prose -- but couldn't read a word. I got up from my test, left the room, and hailed a cab. Then I took it right back to where I had originally hailed it.

I was down in love, spurned by women in the worst of unrequited relationships. Walking past churches which were grotesque parodies of the ones I grew up in, I had a revelation: I needed a man, not a woman. The story clicked, the music was understandable, and the words of your story were legible again.

-Kevin

Voir Un Ami Pleurer

Date: 2009-10-23 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Matilda, my daughter, and I enjoyed the show immensely, as I noted did the large group of people seated around us. I would have thought it was rather evident from the billing what the curator was trying/going to realise with the show. Galas is Galas and no Lena Zavaroni, and of course one feels like lying down after listening to her sometimes but I thought she set an interesting counterpoint. And indeed I was moved to tears on a couple of occasions during the performances, the opening rendition of Ne Me Quitte Pas by Momus and O'Sullivans version of Les Vieux. I really do think there is an unhealthy amount of preciousness around Brels music, and whilst the sound on occasion was not optimum I thought the evening a Flemish success!! In fact I've been trawling YouTube all day to see if I can find a captured clip of Arno's Bruxelle.

maf

Re: Voir Un Ami Pleurer

Date: 2009-10-23 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
ps. and the prolonged thumping applause coupled with the cries of "More..more" at the end of the finale would seem to suggest that the majority of the audience were equally satisfied.

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags