I was particularly interested in the Derek Ridgers pictures The Observer ran yesterday documenting the New Romantic scene at the Blitz Club. Ridgers once photographed me for the NME (and his girlfriend was the infamous Betty Page, who wrote the NME's backlashing zero-out-of-ten review of my Hippopotamomus album). Here, his pictures accompany an interesting article by David Johnson, Blitz Kids and the New Romantics, which dates the style movement very specifically and, I think, accurately.

"If we recast the 80s as a subcultural timeline," ponders Johnson, "the decade actually spanned six years. They began in June 1978 when David Bowie's world tour hit the UK and ended with Do They Know It's Christmas? in December 1984, when Band Aid confirmed rival groups who had risen on the same wave as a new pop establishment."
Now, Johnson is careful to disentangle the New Romantics from Thatcherism, which he says wasn't really invented until Thatcher's second term. But there is something about the New Romantic style that feels... right-ish, in a political sense. Looking at Ridgers' pictures, one sees the elements: heightened, theatricalised punk, proto-Goth, Blade Runner-esque sci-fi dystopia, World War II (apparently there were pictures of Churchill on the wall at the Blitz Club, a shabby basement wine bar), a dialectic between austerity and opulence, and a style I'd triangulate with the style specification: pierrot / matelot / aristo / gigolo / fascista.
[Error: unknown template video]
Locating the start of New Romanticism in Bowie's 1978 tour is wise, because a lot of this style did originate there. Those of us who attended those concerts (I caught the Glasgow Apollo gig) were given a tabloid-style publication entitled ISOLAR, consisting mainly of full-page photos of Bowie in production stills from the Just A Gigolo film and examples of the painting and drawing he'd done in Berlin. In Just A Gigolo Bowie plays a Prussian aristocrat. On stage -- as this Japanese video attests -- Bowie was in role as a blond matelot or sailor, a look which you can see directly copied by Spandau Ballet in Derek Ridgers' photo. Later, he would pose as a pierrot and recruit Blitz kids (paying them just fifty quid each) to appear in his Ashes to Ashes video. The pierrot, matelot, aristo and gigolo were all Bowie roles. Even the fascista wasn't outside his repertoire; Bowie had, in 1976, proposed himself as a possible dictator for Britain, praised Hitler's stagecraft, and professed a fascination with the links between the Nazis and Arthurian legend.

For someone of a leftish disposition, New Romantic style could be somewhat disturbing. Scottish band The Skids issued their 1979 album Days in Europa in a sleeve which seemed to celebrate the 1936 Berlin Summer Olympics, generally thought to have whitewashed Hitler's regime and its Aryans-only sporting policies. The Skids' label Virgin later re-released the album with a less controversial sleeve.
My Book of Scotlands contains a reference to this anxiety. Scotland 137 reads: "When David Bowie was calling himself the “Führerling” in his 1970s interviews, most people took the declaration that he would make a great fascist leader of Britain with a pinch of salt, or some other white powder. But Scotland took him seriously, and by 1980 he was firmly established in power in our land. The main result, as I recall, is that we were all forced to wear baggy “Bowie trousers,” emphasise our cheekbones, and tease our hair into New Romantic styles featuring blond highlights. Following the release of his disappointing Tonight album, however, Bowie’s Gleneagles HQ was the target of a swift and decisive military coup. Since then, singers have been explicitly forbidden to run countries, and trousers tend to be tighter."
[Error: unknown template video]
The reason that even lefties like me were willing to give Bowie (and, to a lesser extent, the New Romantics who picked up on his late 70s style, making it the style of the early 80s) the benefit of the doubt is that between the coke-spun provocations of 1976 (the Victoria station "salute" and so on) and this articulate interview he gave Alan Yentob in 1978 -- still my favourite Bowie interview ever -- the Führerling of New Romanticism seemed to swing significantly leftwards in his attitudes. He later attributed this to sane friends in Kreuzberg taking him aside and challenging his views; whatever the reason, on his 1979 and 1980 albums Bowie was singing responsibly about how "to be insulted by these fascists is so degrading", championing immigrants and refugees, and decrying domestic violence. The intelligent, charming and disarming man in the Yentob interview displaced the alarming fascist apologist.
Then again, Bowie would never again inspire an entire movement. Perhaps there are more connections between right-wing populism and popularity -- and between fashion and fascism -- than we care to admit.

"If we recast the 80s as a subcultural timeline," ponders Johnson, "the decade actually spanned six years. They began in June 1978 when David Bowie's world tour hit the UK and ended with Do They Know It's Christmas? in December 1984, when Band Aid confirmed rival groups who had risen on the same wave as a new pop establishment."
Now, Johnson is careful to disentangle the New Romantics from Thatcherism, which he says wasn't really invented until Thatcher's second term. But there is something about the New Romantic style that feels... right-ish, in a political sense. Looking at Ridgers' pictures, one sees the elements: heightened, theatricalised punk, proto-Goth, Blade Runner-esque sci-fi dystopia, World War II (apparently there were pictures of Churchill on the wall at the Blitz Club, a shabby basement wine bar), a dialectic between austerity and opulence, and a style I'd triangulate with the style specification: pierrot / matelot / aristo / gigolo / fascista.
[Error: unknown template video]
Locating the start of New Romanticism in Bowie's 1978 tour is wise, because a lot of this style did originate there. Those of us who attended those concerts (I caught the Glasgow Apollo gig) were given a tabloid-style publication entitled ISOLAR, consisting mainly of full-page photos of Bowie in production stills from the Just A Gigolo film and examples of the painting and drawing he'd done in Berlin. In Just A Gigolo Bowie plays a Prussian aristocrat. On stage -- as this Japanese video attests -- Bowie was in role as a blond matelot or sailor, a look which you can see directly copied by Spandau Ballet in Derek Ridgers' photo. Later, he would pose as a pierrot and recruit Blitz kids (paying them just fifty quid each) to appear in his Ashes to Ashes video. The pierrot, matelot, aristo and gigolo were all Bowie roles. Even the fascista wasn't outside his repertoire; Bowie had, in 1976, proposed himself as a possible dictator for Britain, praised Hitler's stagecraft, and professed a fascination with the links between the Nazis and Arthurian legend.

For someone of a leftish disposition, New Romantic style could be somewhat disturbing. Scottish band The Skids issued their 1979 album Days in Europa in a sleeve which seemed to celebrate the 1936 Berlin Summer Olympics, generally thought to have whitewashed Hitler's regime and its Aryans-only sporting policies. The Skids' label Virgin later re-released the album with a less controversial sleeve.
My Book of Scotlands contains a reference to this anxiety. Scotland 137 reads: "When David Bowie was calling himself the “Führerling” in his 1970s interviews, most people took the declaration that he would make a great fascist leader of Britain with a pinch of salt, or some other white powder. But Scotland took him seriously, and by 1980 he was firmly established in power in our land. The main result, as I recall, is that we were all forced to wear baggy “Bowie trousers,” emphasise our cheekbones, and tease our hair into New Romantic styles featuring blond highlights. Following the release of his disappointing Tonight album, however, Bowie’s Gleneagles HQ was the target of a swift and decisive military coup. Since then, singers have been explicitly forbidden to run countries, and trousers tend to be tighter."
[Error: unknown template video]
The reason that even lefties like me were willing to give Bowie (and, to a lesser extent, the New Romantics who picked up on his late 70s style, making it the style of the early 80s) the benefit of the doubt is that between the coke-spun provocations of 1976 (the Victoria station "salute" and so on) and this articulate interview he gave Alan Yentob in 1978 -- still my favourite Bowie interview ever -- the Führerling of New Romanticism seemed to swing significantly leftwards in his attitudes. He later attributed this to sane friends in Kreuzberg taking him aside and challenging his views; whatever the reason, on his 1979 and 1980 albums Bowie was singing responsibly about how "to be insulted by these fascists is so degrading", championing immigrants and refugees, and decrying domestic violence. The intelligent, charming and disarming man in the Yentob interview displaced the alarming fascist apologist.
Then again, Bowie would never again inspire an entire movement. Perhaps there are more connections between right-wing populism and popularity -- and between fashion and fascism -- than we care to admit.
coke and politics don't mix
Date: 2009-10-05 07:02 am (UTC)now that i think of it, even neil young was talking about a fondness for reagan at one point in the 80s, for god's sake. stay away from the hard drugs, that's all i can say...
Re: coke and politics don't mix
Date: 2009-10-05 07:44 am (UTC)Re: coke and politics don't mix
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-05 06:41 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: coke and politics don't mix
Date: 2009-10-05 11:38 am (UTC)Re: coke and politics don't mix
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-05 06:42 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: coke and politics don't mix
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-05 08:31 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: coke and politics don't mix
From:Re: coke and politics don't mix
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-05 09:11 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: coke and politics don't mix
From:Re: coke and politics don't mix
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-06 04:45 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 07:23 am (UTC)It's really quite extraordinary, given the massive pro-American cultural bias of the post-war period, that Europe could have been our America, but there it is, that's how it felt. Europe was the place that seized our imagination, and Bowie's relocation to Berlin was tremendously important in that cultural shift.
Cameronian Classicism
Date: 2009-10-05 07:54 am (UTC)Re: Cameronian Classicism
Date: 2009-10-05 06:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 07:59 am (UTC)it is party or mostly to do with doused drugs? and the action of shooting for fame?
A certain amount of musicians visually explore or lyrics explore the theme... but I never could tell what they were coming or going with any of it: how serious they were. when someone's shooting loads of drugs and ranting about some shit... you know... its a bit of a circus any way you look at it.
but its fun and kinda sexy right?
and over the top. kinda anti-hippie. which is good. Its being honest about ones true intentions. to dominate. Right?
But its used in differnt ways maybe.
Like a lot of noise music is kinda fascist.
there the gay s/m thing thats fascist...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 08:01 am (UTC)Simple explanations hold the most romantic power - they sucker us in by presenting a world we can understand, one that's the way we'd like it to be. And authoritarian explanations tend to be the simplest. Throw in some nice shiny jackboots and you have a winner!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 08:14 am (UTC)... and you claim to be a Bowie fanatic!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 08:35 am (UTC)The quote I meant to reach for was from Fantastic Voyage: "shoot some of those missiles... think of us as fatherless scum... it won't be forgotten... or we'll never say anything nice again, will we?"
But that's not quite so politically specific.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 08:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 08:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-05 08:56 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-05 10:12 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:fuck the queens and kings
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-05 02:08 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: fuck the queens and kings
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 09:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 12:17 pm (UTC)One's fun and free, the other's disingenuous and boring.
Oh.
Date: 2009-10-05 09:43 am (UTC)Re: Oh.
Date: 2009-10-05 09:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 11:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 03:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 11:13 pm (UTC)Cities on the US West Coast seem to have a number of creative types who flirt with fascist imagery. I can only guess that it's because of the ever-present baby boomer liberal/hippie vibe? No idea. Don't know anyone on the East Coast who does it. It's rather corny and obvious, but there you go.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:vincent shallow
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-06 04:47 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: vincent shallow
From:Re: vincent shallow
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-06 05:51 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: vincent shallow
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-11-07 10:16 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-06 07:48 pm (UTC)Richard
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-05 05:19 pm (UTC)Best Bowie interview
Date: 2009-10-05 05:34 pm (UTC)I'd be interested to know what a psychologist would make of that one, but I suspect the analysis would be fairly mundane, along the lines of Bowie being deep in character while simultaneously coked up to the forehead.
bing + bowie = david crosby?
Date: 2009-10-05 06:52 pm (UTC)Re: bing + bowie = david crosby?
Date: 2009-10-05 07:25 pm (UTC)[Error: unknown template video]
Re: bing + bowie = david crosby?
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-05 09:10 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: bing + bowie = david crosby?
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-06 01:03 am (UTC)Where do you draw the line between fascist and campy?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-06 01:12 am (UTC)To answer your question, campy fascist seems technically harmless, but should the social wind change it might not be so innocent. Then again, I don't think the simu-realm can be the cause of "the wind changing" throughout society. I think it probably merely reflects or heralds such changes. So "don't kill the messenger" would probably be the lesson to draw.
(no subject)
From:viva
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-06 05:17 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-06 05:56 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:all those tight uniforms and no gays to be found anywhere!!??
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-10-07 06:17 am (UTC) - ExpandGay in Japan
Date: 2009-10-06 07:56 am (UTC)"The east beckons me. But I'm a bit scared of moving over there."
"Japan?"
"Yes. Cos I'll fall in love so much with the lifestyle that I'll get very Zen about it and won't write anything any more."
A couple of years earlier, in a very different interview with Playboy magazine (http://www.playboy.com/articles/david-bowie-interview/index.html) (the source of a lot of the cokehead fascism stuff), Bowie also talked about Japan, saying -- interestingly -- that it was the only place that tempted him to be gay these days:
PLAYBOY: Yet the fact remains that you've never been seen with a male lover. Why?
BOWIE: Oh, Lord, I got over being a queen quite a long time ago. For a while, it was pretty much 50-50; and now the only time it tempts me is when I go over to Japan. There are such beautiful-looking little boys over there. Little boys? Not that little. About 18 or 19. They have a wonderful sort of mentality. They're all queens until they reach 25, then suddenly they become samurai, get married and have thousands of children. I love it.