Flipwhack metaloop
Jul. 14th, 2009 08:45 amCompletion of this Customer Service Feedback (Flipwhack Metaloop) Poll should take less than five minutes. In accordance with government man-hour waste reduction guidelines, if you can suggest ways in which this poll could be shortened or simplified, please post them line by line to Twitter.

[Poll #1429518]

[Poll #1429518]
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 06:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 07:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 07:49 am (UTC)while it never crossed my mind, before reading this poll, that Momus might occasionally be writing some of the Anonymous comments, I could totally see him writing this one here.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 08:34 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 09:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 09:35 am (UTC)Your blog has mellowed in the past year or so and is a bit more playful - which I like.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 07:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 09:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 12:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 10:22 am (UTC)Who are these (batshit insane) people?
"In my spare time I like bombing animal testing labs with the A.L.F and campaigning for Raw Foodism to be taught in schools."
The structure of seeming.
Date: 2009-07-14 10:32 am (UTC)Re: The structure of seeming.
From:Re: The structure of seeming.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 10:59 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: The structure of seeming.
From:Re: The structure of seeming.
From:Re: The structure of seeming.
From:Re: The structure of seeming.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 06:40 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: The structure of seeming.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 07:10 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: The structure of seeming.
From:Re: The structure of seeming.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 04:30 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 12:27 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 02:40 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 03:17 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Self-contradict Opera strikes again.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 06:58 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Self-contradict Opera strikes again.
From:Re: Self-contradict Opera strikes again.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 07:16 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Self-contradict Opera strikes again.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 07:31 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 06:54 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Japologists
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 09:05 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:there are progressive cities
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 07:18 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 10:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 10:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 10:33 am (UTC)そろそろ。。。。とLewisは思っていることろ。
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 10:37 am (UTC)8 (21.6%)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 11:39 am (UTC)• I had trouble with some of the answers because the options were too either/or, when I'm somewhere in the middle. Like, sometimes I think the Japan articles are quite interesting, and other times I find them a little tiresome. To be honest though, I'm not particulary interested in Japan, so your success rate with me is actually fairly high. My favorite Japan article in recent memory was the one about women's hairlines. That was great.
• Also, not all Anons are created equal, but I think there is a sufficient number of Anons who further and enhance the debate that they outweigh the ones who bring down the level of discourse.
• On the last question you should've written "Click all that apply." I didn't realize I could pick more than one.
• I could be totally wrong about this, but Twit Opera feels like an American to me.
• What did you have for breakfast this morning?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 11:51 am (UTC)Twit Opera has used too many British colloquialisms correctly to be an American.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 10:37 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 11:57 am (UTC)Anonymously yours,
Henry Wessells
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 12:02 pm (UTC)Click Opera Revisited
Date: 2009-07-14 01:06 pm (UTC)Re: Click Opera Revisited
Date: 2009-07-14 01:16 pm (UTC)We may want to quote you when Click Opera is published as a 24,000-page paperback.
Re: Click Opera Revisited
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 02:06 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Click Opera Revisited
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 02:18 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Click Opera Revisited
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 02:53 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Click Opera Revisited
From:Re: Click Opera Revisited
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 03:05 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Click Opera Revisited
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-14 03:15 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 02:49 pm (UTC)Funny but I can't answer it all in good conscience. Maybe.
Yay! A poll!
Date: 2009-07-14 04:36 pm (UTC)Apart from the lack of the option to answer "I do find click opera annoying, but that's part of the fun" and any way of suggesting it's about time you realised post-modernism is and always has been incoherent (please note, I understand this will never happen, though I prefer to think of this as willful ignorance :)), that was admirably thorough and as light as a leaf in the breeze. Please don't convert to Catholicism, though - at least, not if you're going to blog about theology: that would be even more annoying than your post-modernism.
When are your books actually released into the wild in the UK? I enjoyed the extracts from the Book of Scotlands a lot.
Best wishes,
Simon.
PS
Date: 2009-07-14 04:47 pm (UTC)I think it's about time you invited your readers to tell you what they have had for breakfast, as well.
Simon
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 04:51 pm (UTC)sniff sack of doggy poop
turn around and tell a friend
umptious bumptious gullyhen
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 06:24 pm (UTC)Dr. Momus,
Date: 2009-07-14 09:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 09:58 pm (UTC)Anyway, I found this blog, friended you, and have been reading it ever since. I'm not an artist or performer by a long shot, but your blog gives me a new window on various things that I would never have otherwise bothered to think about.
I live in a world of html, css, .Net classes and stuff like that. Most of my friends are in the alternative/Industrial scene, and it's rare that I get a chance to chat to those who work in creative industries, the media, performance art and suchlike. The nearest I get to that in everyday life is designing the odd banner-advert in Photoshop.
When I was 16 I had to make a choice in my A-levels: Maths and Sciences or Art, Theatre Studies and English. I often wonder where I'd've been if I'd've insisted on studying the creative side of things, and developed that part of myself instead. Sure, I stil have a crack at writing the odd song on my PC, or doing a bit of artwork/photography, but it's not the same as developing these skills full time, and really living it.
...So your blog has allowed me to peep in to this world, sort of by proxy. I get a window into the life, world, works and interests of someone who's 'lived it'.
:o)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-14 11:16 pm (UTC)I keep hard copies of some of your old essays, the ones I love best or which stimulate me the most (even today) or which have inspired me. I don't get the same kick from "today I ran into another Japanese chick at the market".
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-15 03:13 am (UTC)- if so, i'm interested ;-) what are you going to do with the answers?!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-15 03:32 am (UTC)But you're posting more and more entries like this, which seem to reveal growing unhappiness (maybe there are other things going on; maybe I'm just stupid).
Perhaps you could stop reading/replying to comments? It would save your time for the other things you might like to do, and your entries always get more interesting when you're out doing things!
Momus' Calvinist Essence
Date: 2009-07-15 03:35 am (UTC)http://www.trouw.nl/religie-filosofie/nieuws/article2050113.ece
Re: Momus' Calvinist Essence
Date: 2009-07-15 07:49 am (UTC)"You aren't a Calvinist at all. A Catholic, rather. In every aspect your life differs from that of the Calvinists... You are a hedonist."
But I'd say it's a little more complicated than an online quiz score can describe. I'd say I'm a post-Calvinist -- in other words, all the things I am are defined by Calvinism, but negatively. A flipped mirror image, trying desperately not to be the thing that, ironically, defines him even in defiance. A man saying "No!" to the big "No!", and therefore saying "Yes!" to it, in a way. An arrow pointing out of frame, but still framed. A playa reading Pat Kane's The Play Ethic, congratulating himself -- prematurely -- on being free of the Work Ethic.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-15 07:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-07-15 07:25 am (UTC)http://twitter.com/theplayethic/status/2647483609
(no subject)
From: