Japan hand

[imomus]

"Japan hand" is a term I dislike. There's something colonial or corporate about it, something (let's drop the false distinction between those historical phases) colonial-corporate. It's used in phrases like "longtime Japan hands" or "experienced Japan hands", and it basically means "foreigners living in Japan", with the sense that they've been posted there and left to accumulate some kind of marginal seniority based on arcane knowledge of "the natives" and "the tricky situation on the ground".

"Japan hands" also contains an ambiguous positionality; these "hands" are "lending a hand", like deckhands on the deck of a ship. But who's their captain? What language do their instructions come in? Are they under the command of the Japanese, or of corporate and governmental headquarters in far-off lands? Is Japan a ship? Is it moving, going somewhere? If so, who determines its direction, Japanese or foreigners? How many foreign hands are allowed on the ship's wheel, and how much of an effect can they have?



"Japan hands" tend to eke out their time in Japan as liminal observers, spies of a kind. Some "report back" to the West with foreign-language books explaining the Japanese to non-Japanese with apparent expertise. They sometimes seem to have a common purpose in the form of a vague -- yet slightly hopeless -- wish that Japan were different, which is to say less different, more like the West. They combine this wish for difference-that-is-less-different with a wish (equally hopeless) that they themselves could cease, in the eyes of the Japanese, to be different. They want both to change Japan, and to become Japanese without changing themselves. Generally they remain loyal to a home audience, framing Japan for head office and the foreign public for whom they pass as "Japan experts" rather than the Japanese audience for whom they are -- and will always be -- foreigners, people who don't quite understand.

The french verb assister catches the shadowland ambiguity of the Japan hand's position; it means both attending something as an audience member and helping change it as a participant. It's in the nebulous semantic territory between these two senses of assister that the "Japan Hand" dwells and -- inevitably -- ages, preparing either to die in Japan, or to leave one day.



I've noticed a small exodus of creative foreigners from Japan recently -- people I thought were there longterm, people who seemed to be heading for "Japan hand" status. The recession, while it makes Japan cheaper, may be making Tokyo a less exciting or practicable place to pursue a creative career in. Photographer Zoren Gold, who seemed like a fixture in his airy house atop a hill in Nakameguro, recently exchanged Japan for California, taking his muse-model Minori with him. Actually, they met in LA, so I suppose they had roots there. The artist Pol Malo, after eleven years in Japan, is now (according to his Art-It blog) "moving from kyoto to berlin. see you once i get there". Musician Digiki (Antonin Gaultier) is also considering a move from Tokyo to Berlin. Another Art-It blogger, Hanayo, has already been here for a decade. I wonder if the Japanese call her a "Germany hand"?

A small example of "Japan hand" frustration: Marxy recently twittered on the Neojaponisme feed: "The "Kitano Affair" reveals how lame the Japanese media is. A guy's career is ended and no one can reveal exactly why?" Background, via Japan-Zone: "Popular talento Kitano Makoto (50) gave a press conference at the Westin Hotel in Osaka to apologize for the verbal gaffes that may yet end his career. Long known as a straight talker, he has a history of upsetting people with the things he says on his radio show. He bowed repeatedly to reporters and said that he had allowed his image as a "dokusetsu" (poison tongue) talento to become his "curse." Neither Kitano nor his Shochiku Geino management have clarified exactly what he said that caused the latest uproar, but they denied Internet rumors that his target had been either a certain religious organization or show business management agency (the strongly politically affiliated Soka Gakkai organization is sometimes referred to as a cult, while the Burning agency is said to be a front for the yakuza). Kitano was in tears as he talked about his family and how he had asked them to be patient with him until he got his career back on track. He has been dropped from all his regular radio and TV shows, the last one having been broadcast on Monday. His forced sabbatical is open-ended but he insisted yesterday that he doesn't want to quit show business and will aim to get back on the air someday."

Now, I'm not sure what Marxy's definition of "the Japanese media" is, but in far-away Berlin the Japanese community somehow knows all about this story. They tell me that Kitano said something about the boss of Burning Agency being gay, and that as a result Kitano has had to apologise tearfully. He'll never work in Tokyo -- at least not in anything related to the entertainment industry -- again, I'm told. Japanese in Berlin know this from a combination of sources, all freely available on the web. Their view is not that Kitano (and other "poison tongues") should be allowed to speak up, point fingers, accuse, open Pandora's Box, "advance towards a more transparent media landscape", etc, but that his enforced retirement sends a good sign, spelling out loud and clear the message that people shouldn't slander each other in public. As on most issues raised, the Japan hands and the Japanese have completely different takes on this story.

There are zones of cultural convergence between the West and Japan which succeed better. Art-It's move from a paper to a web magazine has been excellently implemented -- the registration process is rather mendokusai, but the results (a big range of interesting content) well worthwhile. The image I've borrowed here is from Roger McDonald's Art-It blog. Tagged "pataphysic past fashions", it shows an "intentionally faked photograph" produced in 1974 by radical Japanese fashion label The Afro Ninja Destiny.

McDonald takes up the tale: "The label probably produced one collection in its existence, presented in a thin photocopied booklet titled ‘The Closet of Richard Aoki’ (Richard Aoki, 1938-2009, was one of the first members of The Black Panther Party, eventually promoted to the position of Field Marshall). The label is thought to have operated from a large lean-to shelter constructed by fashion students in Northern Nagano prefecture. This photograph shows a woman (perhaps a model) in a winter costume which was included in ‘The Closet of Richard Aoki’. Created in layers almost solely from silk and home-spun wool, the woman holds a classic andon lamp. On the wall behind her are two posters: The official 1973 release version poster for the film ‘Enter the Dragon’, starring Bruce Lee, and a single page from the Black Panther newspaper with an image by Emory Douglas. Note the unusually heavy looking left arm of the woman’s kimono which probably contained kindling and wood for fire-making."

No hands are visible in the image.

Comments

[imomus.livejournal.com]

I'd recommend you listen to Malcolm McLaren talking about the criminal rackets behind the Juke Box networks of the 1950s (http://www.mininova.org/tor/2123550) (via an illegal torrent, appropriately enough). Gangsterism and the music industry go hand-in-hand, and not just in Japan. Sure, you can campaign against it, but people ultimately don't care. There are better things to fight for / against.

"Doc, uh, my brother's crazy, he thinks he's a chicken."

"Well, why don't you turn him in?"

"I would, but I need the eggs."

It's the same with music hoods. We'd turn them in, but they deliver the goods. We need the eggs.

[(Anonymous)]

Absolutely there was a connection between the mafia and the music industry in the U.S. But you get the key difference: the government moved against the mob with arrests and hearings and you can now write books about it.

Kitano did not even accuse Burning of being mafia, but subtly hinted at it. And now he's blacklisted out of an industry and the mass media cannot write a simple story on what exactly he said to be blacklisted. He did have fans, and you'd think that they would want to know what exactly was so bad about what he said to have his career ended.

I can imagine a Western dystopia where Momus releases Little Red Songbook, is suddenly kicked out of the music world, and at his final press conference, they ask, "Was it about Wendy Carlos?" And Momus answers, "No." And even though everyone in the room knows it was because of Wendy Carlos, no one can put this fact into print, fearing the wrath of Carlos. There is internet speculation and the song shows up on YouTube. But since no major industry person will go on the record to confirm or deny, Momus disappears and the story is never resolved.

And then Bizarro Momus writes an essay online condemming Momus and telling him that he deserved to get kicked out of the music industry for slandering Wendy Carlos' "religious beliefs."

Marxy

[imomus.livejournal.com]

I actually, to this day, can't talk about Wendy Carlos, because of a legal agreement we signed when we settled out of court.

Hisae tells me your explanation (via the YouTube clip) is only a very minor part of Kitano's current disgrace. It also connects to religion, to a female singer (Linda Yamamoto) whose nude pictures he criticised a while back, to a series of tours he was giving which promised to blow the lid off the entertainment industry (one of which was secretly taped), to a rivalry between jimushos, and so on. He was finally singled out "as an example", pour encourager les autres, rather as I was in the... in the case I can't talk about.

[(Anonymous)]

It's like 2004 all over again! Momus dukes it out with Marxy, Momus is caught red-handed knowing bugger all about a subject matter he himself chose, Momus retreats from calling out the victim as a slanderer to shrugging his shoulders and saying who cares about corruption... priceless. Ah, it's a short journey from moraliser to nihilist, eh Momus?

[imomus.livejournal.com]

Not being a "Japan hand" (the main topic of today's entry, along with the coolness of the relaunched Art-It magazine, and the exodus from Tokyo of foreign talent), I don't stake everything on my knowledge of what's going on. What interested me here was the difference in interpretation, which turns out to extend to the facts too: Marxy's account, according to my Japanese friends, is also not the correct one.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't stake everything on my knowledge of what's going on.

Thank God for that.

[imomus.livejournal.com]

the mass media cannot write a simple story on what exactly he said to be blacklisted.

Might that not be because there isn't a single, simple reason? Mightn't it be a whole combination of things he said, rather than a single line-crossing utterance of the kind Marxy is suggesting? That's what I'm hearing. I know it doesn't square with Marxy's conspiracy theories, which are better served by "He said one forbidden thing, and crossed one all-powerful figure, and the totally controlled and collusive press can't report this".

[(Anonymous)]

Whether it was the one comment or a host of reasons, the bottom line is that the mainstream media here did not quote what was said as one of the factors or the single deciding factor for Kitano's ousting. Or even as a possible-maybe-do-you-think? option. There is a hell filled with gyôkai examples like this -- it's non-journalism.

Please live here for many years, read Japanese by yourself and watch developments in the entertainment business every day. I promise you your opinion will change.

Other than that, an entry on Japan Hands is a great idea!