imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
The first performance of Joemus the band last night at West Germany in Kreuzberg was pretty dire, to be honest. If only I'd listened to Mark E. Smith! In Slates he shouts at The Fall, bashing out a primitive riff behind him: "Don't start improvising, for god's sake!"



What we did last night -- playing everything live by hand, with no material prepared (unless you count the paper masks Joe and Bastien assembled) and just making it all up as we went along -- is very much a Berlin thing to do. When I do shows outside Berlin, I both respect and disrespect the audience. I respect them in the sense that I give them highly-edited, polished pieces of music I know in advance they're going to like. I disrespect them in the sense that I don't "challenge" them by doing anything too weird and unexpected. But because Berlin is a big laboratory, an experimental city, I like to try out different things when I play live here. My last show consisted of remade versions of songs I'd written in my teens and rejected because they were embarrassing. This time, we decided to improvise. The idea was to recreate onstage the process of making the Joemus album, rather than simply recreate the finished album.

The results -- when I listened back to the recording I made -- were depressing. Joe and Bastien had technical problems, while I flailed around trying not to rhyme "park" with "dark" and "tree" with "sea". There was one moment when the ghost of a nice song -- something a bit like Gilbert and Lewis (from Wire), a bit like Modern English, a bit early 80s and melancholic -- emerged. Here it is:

Modern English (mp3 file, mono, 4MB, 4mins 18secs)

At other moments I rapped (in the "Cockney menace" style of my collaborations with o.lamm and Hypo) about a Mrs Abraham Jones ("running from a burning Bible, with her hair on fire, with blood spilling from her foot, screaming of nothing and frightened of the world") or made up a tale of "three significant stalkers, stalking me all the time". It's the kind of improv I do in my art performances with language, and I've done it successfully in a musical context with, for instance, the loop-building pedal delay trick and Tomoko Miyata's bowl music.

But this time -- perhaps because I know Joe's capable of shining when he broaches shaped pop structures -- my feeling is it fell flat. We never really got started. We could've done so much more with the audience's time and attention. I came away from the first Joemus-as-band show more than ever convinced that you should do this kind of brainstorming in private, edit ruthlessly and meticulously, and only confront the public when you've got something worth showing them. Even in Berlin.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 09:51 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Yep, you were rubbish last night. Stick to the karaoke in future.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 09:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I really appreciate your coming all that way last night, whoever you are. I see from your IP address you're already back in Holland.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 09:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skazat.livejournal.com
I do like the paper masks.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 10:08 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You were fucking awful last night, Momus/Joemus. And I've seen some bad performances in my time. But at least you're man enough to admit it.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 10:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Other lyrical gems that emerged: a song called Fantastic Hidalgo and another one telling a disgruntled pig he was an "epic fail".

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 10:12 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"Epic fail", eh? You, sir, are truly "down with the kids"!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 10:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kumakouji.livejournal.com
Aleatoricism is improvisation without the guilt of a bad performance.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 10:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Yeah, we should just have directed everyone's attention to the aircon and the gentle pattering of rain on the window panes.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 10:18 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
it was a real stinker.oh well.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 10:23 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
So you died a death? Too self-indulgent even for Berlin? Ah, this improv business. Not quite as easy as singing along to an ipod, is it Momus?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 10:45 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Good on you for posting this Nick. Just wish to God you would stop trying to fit in with that contemporary art bullshit as it is a complete waste of your real talents. I appreciate that you may need it as a learning process or whatever, but it is a shame to hear you occasionally poo-poo your genuine talent: writing witty, original and infectious songs. They may be considered ephemeral by the contemporary art establishment but by God they're a hundred times more relevant, engaging and entertaining than most of the keech that passes for art today. Just get yourself a decent singer - like Kahime - and I guarantee you'll make music that will mean something to people'. Nowt wrong with making a wee bit of money,either as long as it's just a by-product. If you really don't want it you can set up a music school or something.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tropigalia.livejournal.com
haha momus is a much better singer than kahimi. i agree, though, it's odd that as a musician momus is underrated when it's the role he seems best suited to.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-26 01:46 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
he needs someone out the front of the shop to be the public face. if they can sing as well even better

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 10:50 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Don't let the anons get you down, Momus! We all screw up every now and then. We all give monumentally poor performances on occasion. We all foolishly give way to our desire to do cringeingly embarrassing so-called improv, once or twice in a lifetime. We're all left red-faced by our balls-achingly unfunny and uninspiring noodlings with silly voices in front of a life audience, from time to time. It's not just you, Momus!

the Fall flat?

Date: 2009-06-25 10:57 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
As this anon said in a brief hello after the show last night- in my opinion it was great fun. Obviously I haven't heard the recordings, but I liked it precisely because I don't see stuff like this in Berlin. Maybe I don't know about the right shows? Or I know shows that do the noise/improv without much to grab hold of -like audible words, and/or any humour as such. Or perhaps my view has been shaped by local acts from a few years ago that tried to put on the perfect show with costumes, rehearsed routines, tight backing tracks and so on. There was a ramshackle-ness I know from various gigs I saw in Brighton/London, but rarely here. I thought it might be tricky for non-native english speakers to get a grip on your words, but otherwise.. Okay so there was tech problems, such is a variable in electric/electronic instruments. And once or twice it seemed you were playing against each other -however that made for more revelatory bits when you all came together for a passage. Also, I don't mean to dis any friends you may have in the support bands, but compared to them, musically and engagement-wise you were definately a step or two up. I could go on, but these are my initial thoughts and I'd love to see more Joemus here in Berlin, improv or rehearsed. Thanks! And by the way, the 'cockney menace' had me in a near fit, perhaps because it reminds me of similar'ish stuff me and friends did in London (though for the most part in private or off the cuff rather than audience situations). Tom

Re: the Fall flat?

Date: 2009-06-25 11:10 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I don't think we need even set it up as polished vs. ramshackle; it's great that both can exist, and that we can have access to both if we want it. To this day, the best live act I've witnessed are Massive Attack on the 100th Window tour (supported by UnitedVisualArtists and their amazing light show) who were immaculately polished, and, for me, pushed out the boundaries of what a live show could be - in one direction. Perhaps shows like this push it out in the other direction, with neither being inherently more worthy than the other.

Also, public failures are important because they give us all breathing space. If we could fail in front of each other a little more I think it may serve to loosen up the creative juices on a wider level. Learn to fail or fail to learn, as they're fond of saying in Positive Psychology ...

Re: the Fall flat?

Date: 2009-06-25 11:20 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
(even that comment wasn't quite as polished and articulate as I would have liked it; doesn't quite communicate exactly what I wanted to say; but, what the hell! - we're just a bunch of people attempting to communicate meaning to each other ...)

What happens when you fail? What is it to fail?
Have we been conditioned to expect a 'finished product'? What is a finished product?

Re: the Fall flat?

Date: 2009-06-25 11:25 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I wasn't meaning to set up a polished vs ramshackle debate, just saying why I enjoyed the show and arguing in it's favour. From my viewpoint it wasn't a failure.

Re: the Fall flat?

Date: 2009-06-25 11:33 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
sorry, those questions weren't necessarily directed at you, but I thought they may be interesting in relation to the subject.

As a sidenote, art galleries are places that, at their best, make it their project to confound expectations; in other words, the visitor often does not know what to expect, and in this sense they are one of the few places within a society that has the ability/freedom/will to do this. And perhaps this is part of the appeal of the gallery.

What about the gig? Are expectations useful?
Also, I wonder if the venue charged money for the Momus gig, and how this might have affected things ..

(Disclaimer: My opinion is not rooted within any of the aphorisms used here. Please challenge vigorously!)

Re: the Fall flat?

Date: 2009-06-25 11:40 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It was 6 euros, for Joemus and two other acts, in a place that occasionally calls itself a gallery but is primarily a music venue, (and nothing you could compare to whichever place hosted Massive attack on the 100th Window tour!)

Re: the Fall flat?

Date: 2009-06-25 12:03 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Haha, it was actually the Carling Academy in Manchester! I've visited about three Carling Academy's (I think they're known as O2 venues now) and they were all exactly the same. Generally I prefer it when there isn't so much of a divide between audience and band (I saw an amazing band called 'Quack Quack' in a gallery in Glasgow (CCA) and the audience could pretty much circle around the band - this worked really well with the music to create a sense of a tribal happening or something similar), but MA used the Academy so well, and really exploited the potential of a big venue (and presumably, big money!).

6 Euros seems like a good price to me!

Re: the Fall flat?

Date: 2009-06-25 11:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I don't mean to dis any friends you may have in the support bands, but compared to them, musically and engagement-wise you were definately a step or two up.

I'm sure Tasos and Rinus won't mind if I give potted reviews; I liked the textures in Tasos' set, but I've seen too many solo artists using this sample/repeat layering thing over the last four years or so, and it's no longer enough to dazzle audiences. Your heart begins to sink when you see someone's going to do a show this way, because you know it's going to be a succession of sounds in short loops, building to a climax and then ebbing away. However interesting the individual sounds might be, it turns into a big grey soup, and nothing like "composition" (ie surprise) will ever intrude. It's overdone, and I wish people would just trash their copies of SooperLooper (http://www.essej.net/sooperlooper/) and try something else.

As for Topmodel, I've seen great shows by them, and endorsed (http://imomus.livejournal.com/397896.html) them in my Spanish music mag column. But last night was their weakest show so far; the Casios sounded as if the batteries were flat, the scat singing in a made-up language went nowhere, and the set wandered through a wilderness of half-hearted abstraction, leaving the audience fatigued and uninvolved. Their usual sense of fun and invention seemed to have abandoned them.

And then we came on and sounded like -- as Rinus put it afterwards -- a Topmodel remix!

two helpings of soup

Date: 2009-06-25 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I agree regarding Tasos' set, though the main problem for me with it was that he did everything twice- he built it up to the climax then it ebbed away a little, only for him to repeat it all when he should have stopped there with some impact in tact. All that happened is more people left for the bar or balcony. I don't understand the lack of awareness in such shows- at least Joe knew when certain things had done their job and probably wouldn't benefit from going on (and on)!

Re: two helpings of soup

Date: 2009-06-25 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
One other thing though, just to even out my critique- I'm not much of a loops/drones fan anyway, so not the best qualified to comment on if it was good in terms of that area of music-making. Don't feel trashed, Taros!

charming failure

Date: 2009-06-25 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rinusvanalebeek.livejournal.com
all true nick,


but somehow it is true for all of us,
(as you already pointed out)
i don't know what kind of grim ghost we woke up on that eve.

for me it was an uncomfortable situation all through the set,

and this got transmitted to mireia and magnus the other two topmodels.

with a different positioning
(in front of the speakers, so that we could actually hear what we were doing, it would all have been different. now i could only guess what it was like, while playing as my own automatic pilot)

topmodels birthday is on 7th of july,
no idea yet where to celebrate.

but for sure we will celebrate
as you indicated, too many great moments, fun and happyness to stop now.

see you on our next appointment on our mutual berlin tour

greetings from flughafensstrasse,

rinus





maybe it is the kind of bash on the nose you need sometimes.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 11:15 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
this doesn't change the fact that I'm squirming in anticipation of experiencing my first live Momus show, whenever that may be

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-09 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Lucky you. I can’t get myself any hope, for I don’t think he’ll be in Brazil anytime soon. If he would, I’d totally be hitchhiking to wherever it was. And, should it turn out bad, I’ll pretend it’s an art statement (I’m not being sarcastic).

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 11:25 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Photos from last night. Hope it works

Image (http://www.flickr.com/photos/postmodern-gipsy/3659090243/)

Image (http://www.flickr.com/photos/postmodern-gipsy/3659090105/)

Image (http://www.flickr.com/photos/postmodern-gipsy/3659089941/)

Image (http://www.flickr.com/photos/postmodern-gipsy/3659888058/)

Image (http://www.flickr.com/photos/postmodern-gipsy/3659887900/)

Image (http://www.flickr.com/photos/postmodern-gipsy/3659887678/)

Male bonding

Date: 2009-06-25 12:30 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
A diehard Robinson Crusoe, with Asian Friday, male bonding and .. joshing with the lads?! (Hold on - have you Photoshopped yourself into your own group photo?)

We could surmise that male bonding is what audiences pay for. The rock band. "Top Gear" - motoring as excuse to watch ribbing, snigger, pisstake.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 12:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Chrizzi He posted a very short video clip that starts just where my mp3 clip leaves off:

Clip (http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=97484682711&ref=mf).

RIP in WC1

Date: 2009-06-25 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Nick, GhettoNet won't let me into email but just thought you should know Steven Wells died on Tuesday (cancer) and if you search around, he didn't go quietly. S x

Re: RIP in WC1

Date: 2009-06-25 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Yeah, I read that on my Facebook page today (via Dickon). Shocking and sad. I only met him once (with you, Suzy), but he struck me as essentially rather similar to Serge Gainsbourg, in the sense that his provocative and brazen public persona was basically a defence strategy for a rather shy, moral and decent person to hide behind.

Re: RIP in WC1

Date: 2009-06-25 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Had the dubious and unhappy job of telling Helen and Imo; am sure he'd love what you said (like Serge, he also had a thing for posh birds LOL). Am sure he helped plan the Jismist art movement thing too but maybe it's just because that was particularly extra splurtastic.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 01:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandroha.livejournal.com
) smailing

Quite like

Date: 2009-06-25 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I actually quite like the Modern English track you've put up here. Reminded me a little of the work Gilbert and Lewis did with Matt Johnson on Burning Blue Soul. Sounds like the rest of the gig was a crock of sh!te though.

Cheers,
Jake. (do you remember me from my days at Which? magazine?)

More

Date: 2009-06-25 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
If this is your unprepared I can't wait to hear you after practice.

Are you planning to come to Vienna in the distant future?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thomascott.livejournal.com
Kudos for trying it and for writing an honest self-review.
One of my friends attended the gig and I'm curious to learn what he thought of the performances.
I saw some brief bits of phone-shot footage on FB, but nothing is showing up on youtube yet.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dogsolitude-v2.livejournal.com
As one of my mentors said after a particularly awful Maths lesson I'd delivered: "don't worry, you're allowed a bad one"

I really felt as if I'd let my little audience of 25 mathematical neophytes down something rotten, and I was pretty upset about that, so I can sympathise with how you feel there.

I can also really appreciate your points on only putting out well-honed and beautifully-produced stuff. My music production skills are pretty awful and most of the tracks I've done sound rather dismal, so I have a stack of unfinished stuff on my HD. Plus I'm panicking a bit because I've got a job as a web developer now, and something I've done is due to go live next week and I keep finding bugz...

Don't beat yourself up too much over this (easier said than done, I know!) Over the years you've provided the world with loads of high-quality material that's provoked thought and laughter in the audience. Having a crack at something a bit different and finding it a bit 'meh' is part of the process I guess.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 09:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] subalpine.livejournal.com
well, the 'Modern English' clip sounds terrific, though.

of course i haven't heard the rest of the performance, but if anything I think it makes a pretty convincing case for improvised performance & selective (but minimal) editing.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 09:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eclectiktronik.livejournal.com
There is always something to be said for an artist who takes a risk, and doing something experimental involves precisely that: improvisation can work and can go wrong. That is the binary. you can't have one without the other, otherwise it wouldn't be improv !

And it is refreshing to read such reflective, concise self criticism too - many artists would have refused to accept such 'failure', real or perceived. It is also a question of how you perceive failure - if you intended to improvise, and really improvised, then from that angle, it wasn't failure. Here, it just didn't work out as you'd liked sonically, but that's a bit beside the point.

So, do keep improvising. You have to take the rough with the smooth as it were. Personally, my live work is generally all improv, but I have prepared the materials I want to use beforehand, so it's not completely left to chance. In my case using broken and scrap appliances, there's always the probability something will break down, not react as planned, or fuck up in some other way. I've learned to love this though, the spur of the moment decisons and discipline it requires to keep things moving are addictive!

And within any given show, there are moments I think were special, and plenty of dull or inconsistent parts. I'm sure your show was the same. Listen to it again later - no performance is ALL bad.

here's some of my recent silliness, hopefully it'll make you feel better!

twit opera should have read

Date: 2009-06-25 09:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silkytooth.blogspot.com (from livejournal.com)
"Joe and Bastien had technical problems, while I flailed around"

joe

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-25 11:41 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
momus this seems to really have dented your confidence.i never saw the gig last night so cant pass judgment.
you usually brim with verve and experimental zeal so why the second guessing ?maybe because there were three ..you feel responsible. forget your "proper"upbringing and social mores etc. great art is made by confident and self obsessed sociopathic narcissists . not polite considerate gentlemen. so do not apologize.
once the dust has settled and your reevaluating your career, it will probably be a highlight. sometimes you dont know how good you are until time passages illuminate ,as they say.
on saying that i saw your "rehearsed" show in stereo glasgow last year.still my fav gig of all time so maybe you have a point. maybe mix and match..but keep on pushing that envelope...

don't give up

Date: 2009-06-26 10:04 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
just listened to that mp3 and watched that facebook video...although it seems like some kind of rehearsal footage - it shows promise.

peace
jhon g

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-26 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 24pfop87.livejournal.com
Wonder if you're not being a little hard on yourself. As a member of the audience on the night, I thought it lived up to its billing, namely an attempt to capture 'the moment of unfamiliarity' as you put it. Creativity doesn't arrive fully formed, and I found the disarray, the freewheeling uncertainty and the fitful brilliance very moving. Slightly ridiculous (and what's wrong with that?) but artistically generous and adventurous. The standing around awkwardly at the end was a fitting coda!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-27 01:06 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Maybe it felt worse than it looked.

One of my favourite ever concerts was the one you did in that pub in Hackney 3 years back before about 40 people (about half of whom were in the pub anyway, probably), where you forgot the words and came out with that same ME Smith quote as you do here (though with Smith you never know if he's being sarcastic, or even whether the character in the song is).
Great stuff, though.

Stephen Parkin

calm down!

Date: 2009-06-28 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tropengold.livejournal.com
hey, don't worry 'bout the concert. i found the whole ting interesting, esp. i am finding it quite nice, that people discuss about it afterwards.. it is like a family-talk or something..
and to be honest - i liked it, that momus tried to improvise.. it is too easy to stick to the familiar and routine things.
actually i would like to give joemus another live-try!!
chrizzi