Kyoto Grump Radio
Sep. 19th, 2004 10:31 pm
He's in Kyoto dressed in a funny eyepatch and hat, but he's not laughing. In fact he's grumping about everything. And you lucky, lucky people can listen for an hour!
Why didn't a single British person take a bath for five hundred years? Why can't you pay in cafes with used underwear? Why does blue light make girls more beautiful? What's wrong with pointing your toes at the Buddha? Why has Oscar Niemeyer got a bit boring? What'll happen if Bush gets in for another term? And where should Momus send this tape, Al Jazeera or LiveJournal?
Kyoto Grump Radio (27.59 MB mono mp3 file, 60 minutes)
:)
Date: 2004-09-19 07:54 am (UTC)-roddy
The Complaint Project
Date: 2004-09-19 08:12 am (UTC)Re: The Complaint Project
Date: 2004-09-19 08:26 am (UTC)Re: The Complaint Project
Date: 2004-09-20 11:30 am (UTC)Re: The Complaint Project
Date: 2004-09-20 07:03 pm (UTC)Re: The Complaint Project
Date: 2004-09-21 11:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 09:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 09:30 am (UTC)you seem to dislike gw bush very much, are you rally sure he's so evil? i mean, he semes just another american president, just a bit funny with his christian quotes and silly sentences he drops sometimes ... am sure america had such presidents before- nixon maybe? what's the difference? pepsi supports democrats, and coca-cola republicans ... anyway, i find this antibush hysteria a bit like 1968 maoists screaming us-ss, what was so hypocritical and actually not even stupid but evil ... war in iraq is of course terrible and just for israel's purposes /?/ but for years westerners didn't care for sudan, tibet, burma and places i'am not even aware of and now they are so human rights caring and everything ... now when america said A they should finish this iraq abortion somehow and not leave it the way it is, maybe ... anyway, i really dislike america, or maybe more- am not interested in it, but, why do people think one person can change anything in it? it just seems naive, but i don't know america much, so maybe it works like that- with a president everything changes below /sorry for my english, i'm not sure if it's even understandable/
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-20 01:02 am (UTC)Anyway, after that I thought oh my god, bush is going to be re-elected.
Anna
P.S. Wer A sagt muss nicht B sagen, er kann auch erkennen dass B falsch war. (gospodin Brecht)
W is for Warmonger
Date: 2004-09-20 08:33 am (UTC)I write this as an American who is profoundly embarrassed for our country whenever I even think of "W" and who knows that even though Democrats aren't yet different enough from Republicans, even small differences today count for enormous changes in the future. If Bush is elected again (so to speak), I will consider this the beginning of the new Dark Ages which we've been teetering on the precipice of for the last four years.
By the way, I haven't even listened to Momus's latest radio piece yet. But last week I did some more disorienteering of my own and disappeared into the wilderness while I finally listened to the "Osaka hour." I was amused to discover, upon rechecking that entry, that the "rubber tears" the bartender was wearing and which Momus found so fetching were actually "rabbit ears." So much for British and Australian accents to confuse a dumb American, but I still think rubber tears are more original.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 10:03 am (UTC)I don't know, but I think you've just answered why he was single. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 01:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 07:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 10:18 pm (UTC)As an American, I pledge to give my all to deliver the state of Michigan to John Kerry.
Here's to a one-term-Bush,
Joe
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 10:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-20 12:17 am (UTC)"horribly efficient choruses" - that's wonderful.
cheers!
Played you on my radio show tonight. I'm sure you would've much preferred a more recent selection than "Platinum" (is that too a song with a horribly efficient chorus?) but I still find it, and Enlightenment, lovely.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-20 07:45 pm (UTC)I read some of your poetry and it strikes me as strong:
We spoke, but of what, I somewhat forget
remembering most, the color of your hair,
and the world like salt smoke.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-20 11:32 pm (UTC)http://plagiarist.com/poetry/1143/
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-20 12:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-20 09:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-20 06:22 am (UTC)great!
Date: 2004-09-21 08:02 am (UTC)Tim
http://www.travelersdiagram.com/
Re: Another complaint
Date: 2004-09-23 07:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-28 08:42 pm (UTC)Also: I think environment is partial geopolitical destiny (but am not an Earth Liberation Front wacko -- I'm much more a Sierra Club type) and am ashamed that the Bush administration didn't take the opportunity to offer up a valid alternative to Kyoto to show that it too took the environment seriously. Bush must have privately done so; his Crawford ranch operates purely outside the power grid via renewable energy sources and is environmentally friendly. But to not extend that to a public show of "hey, we take the environment seriously too" was a major misstep. I also know how easy it is to get into the recycling habit, and indeed my hometown was recently ranked as one of Men's Health magazine's Top 3 Best Recycling Towns in the U.S. I just think Kyoto spells total disaster for capitalism (which is the economic system I believe in), am relieved the U.S. didn't ratify it, and think we should have been first to offer up a viable alternative that would ensure better earth stewardship without completely decimating the U.S. economy.