Steven Levitt, that freakonomic correlator of unexpected variables, tells us that in America (where dating correlates, apparently, to income and therefore allows the racial hierarchy to be quantified numerically), Asian males have to make $247,000 more than Caucasian males to get level with them as prospective dates for Caucasian females. (The income advantages necessary for black males and hispanic males to be as attractive as whites in the eyes of white American females canvassed in the dating study cited were $154,000 and $77,000 respectively.)
Recently I've become fascinated by the way YouTube "thinks through" this perceived inequality (the relationship of race to what Professor Robert Sapolsky would call "sexual attractivity, proceptivity, and receptivity in female mammals"). Because YouTube is, apart from everything else, a way of thinking about things. It's not necessarily the way I think about things (it tends to be a specifically American take), but I find it sort of fascinating. Let's start with a slick, semi-professional spoof film on the topic, Yellow Fever:
[Error: unknown template video]
The explanations for their dating problems the Chinese-American males in this film mull (that white guys are tall, have more body hair, have good bottoms, etc) are echoed in this video of interviews with Asian-American female students, filmed on the Berkeley campus:
[Error: unknown template video]
Reasons cited by Asian females in this vid for why they prefer white males: to go up a class, because white guys are tall, because Asian girls want to experience new things, and because Asian guys are too shy, too short, too feminine, too metrosexual. What nobody says, naturally, is: "Because there's a racial hierarchy in America and I've been socialized to internalize its values, thereby attributing all sorts of attractiveness to secondary characteristics which could be arbitrarily shuffled and rearranged should the pecking order change."
Now here's a view from a black woman annoyed by all the attractive Asian females scraping the bottom of the barrel for "homeless-ass-looking white guys" when they could do much better:
[Error: unknown template video]
She thinks it's all based on a tragic misunderstanding: "All the Asian guys I talk to say that they want white girls because Asian girls want white guys. But I don't think that's true, because a lot of Asian people say that Asian people are bitter because Asian men want white women. So I think there's a little miscommunication going on in that." All we need, then, is a mediator to step in (perhaps this woman herself) and explain the misunderstanding to both parties. She seems a little frank and direct to be an ideal mediator or diplomat, though; she tells us at the end of the vid that when she visits a bubble pearl tea cafe where lots of whites-who-think-they're-asians and asians-who-think-they're-whites hang out in couples, she's like: "Please choke on your tapioca balls, please die!"
There are lots of fairly unhelpful videos, like this white-girl-dating-Asian-guy who doesn't see the problem, or this British Asian (ie Indian subcontinental) guy who puts the imbalance down to racism, but doesn't look at the problem of why racism doesn't impact the white-male-with-Asian-female combination as much. The person who answers this best, I think, is this girl, who sounds East European:
[Error: unknown template video]
She sees it as being to do not with race but with gender; men are socially less intelligent and flexible than women, and therefore men can't date so well outside their culture, and outside their comfort zones. Women can also be successful in dating without being active; they just have to wait for approaches and select from candidates. And cultural differences (like Asians' less touchy-feely personal space conventions) disadvantage Asian males. The young, she thinks, can overcome these things better than older generations.

YouTube's "way of thinking" about these problems is a "folk" way of thinking because, although it can range from crass stereotyping to citation of academic studies, it generally doesn't stretch to any theoretical models, and at a certain point those models are necessary. For instance, I think the issue we've looked at today can more or less entirely be explained by the fact that the US is a society transitioning between figure 12.3 and figure 12.2 above, but still closer to 12.3.
Recently I've become fascinated by the way YouTube "thinks through" this perceived inequality (the relationship of race to what Professor Robert Sapolsky would call "sexual attractivity, proceptivity, and receptivity in female mammals"). Because YouTube is, apart from everything else, a way of thinking about things. It's not necessarily the way I think about things (it tends to be a specifically American take), but I find it sort of fascinating. Let's start with a slick, semi-professional spoof film on the topic, Yellow Fever:
[Error: unknown template video]
The explanations for their dating problems the Chinese-American males in this film mull (that white guys are tall, have more body hair, have good bottoms, etc) are echoed in this video of interviews with Asian-American female students, filmed on the Berkeley campus:
[Error: unknown template video]
Reasons cited by Asian females in this vid for why they prefer white males: to go up a class, because white guys are tall, because Asian girls want to experience new things, and because Asian guys are too shy, too short, too feminine, too metrosexual. What nobody says, naturally, is: "Because there's a racial hierarchy in America and I've been socialized to internalize its values, thereby attributing all sorts of attractiveness to secondary characteristics which could be arbitrarily shuffled and rearranged should the pecking order change."
Now here's a view from a black woman annoyed by all the attractive Asian females scraping the bottom of the barrel for "homeless-ass-looking white guys" when they could do much better:
[Error: unknown template video]
She thinks it's all based on a tragic misunderstanding: "All the Asian guys I talk to say that they want white girls because Asian girls want white guys. But I don't think that's true, because a lot of Asian people say that Asian people are bitter because Asian men want white women. So I think there's a little miscommunication going on in that." All we need, then, is a mediator to step in (perhaps this woman herself) and explain the misunderstanding to both parties. She seems a little frank and direct to be an ideal mediator or diplomat, though; she tells us at the end of the vid that when she visits a bubble pearl tea cafe where lots of whites-who-think-they're-asians and asians-who-think-they're-whites hang out in couples, she's like: "Please choke on your tapioca balls, please die!"
There are lots of fairly unhelpful videos, like this white-girl-dating-Asian-guy who doesn't see the problem, or this British Asian (ie Indian subcontinental) guy who puts the imbalance down to racism, but doesn't look at the problem of why racism doesn't impact the white-male-with-Asian-female combination as much. The person who answers this best, I think, is this girl, who sounds East European:
[Error: unknown template video]
She sees it as being to do not with race but with gender; men are socially less intelligent and flexible than women, and therefore men can't date so well outside their culture, and outside their comfort zones. Women can also be successful in dating without being active; they just have to wait for approaches and select from candidates. And cultural differences (like Asians' less touchy-feely personal space conventions) disadvantage Asian males. The young, she thinks, can overcome these things better than older generations.

YouTube's "way of thinking" about these problems is a "folk" way of thinking because, although it can range from crass stereotyping to citation of academic studies, it generally doesn't stretch to any theoretical models, and at a certain point those models are necessary. For instance, I think the issue we've looked at today can more or less entirely be explained by the fact that the US is a society transitioning between figure 12.3 and figure 12.2 above, but still closer to 12.3.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 01:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 01:15 pm (UTC)"White men did also tend to be at a disadvantage for dating minority women. A white man needed to make $220,000 more per year to be on a par with black men in dating black women, and $59,000 more per year to be on a par with hispanic men in dating hispanic women. When it came to asian women though, they needed $-24,000 to be on a par with asian men."
Some other attractiveness-to-income correlations:
"The ugliest 10% of guys would need $186,000 more income per year than the median income (around $62,500) in order to receive as many replies as the top 10% most attractive men. A man who is 5'8" would need around $138,000 more per year to be on a par with the average man who is 3.5 inches taller."
Intriguingly, it would be possible to work out a "Gini Co-efficient of Ugliness" based on these figures, giving each male a rating between zero (totally ugly) and one (totally not ugly).
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2010-02-03 08:49 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 01:27 pm (UTC)(I can say, though, that since asian traditional families are much more homogenous in values and indoctrination, dating a white or black guy is a good way to get release from the bonds of asian social ties. An asian girl doesn't have to worry about the boy's parents judging her in an asian fashion and she can take a breather from her oppressive cultural environment that still expects her to be a wife at 28, a replacement mother to her husband and a slave to her mother-in-law for the rest of her life. Having a white man means being free of all of that. Whereas for white girls, there is no real benefit to dating asian, unless curiosity can trump the burdens of obligation. Asian men benefit more from their culture than asian women, as far as personal freedom and servitude/marital duties and roles go, so they have nothing to run from. Asian women have plenty to run from.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 01:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:Answering my own question
From:Re: Answering my own question
From:Re: Answering my own question
From:Re: Answering my own question
From:Re: Answering my own question
From:Re: Answering my own question
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 01:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 01:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 02:36 pm (UTC)it's presented as personal, an expression of that which is individual and internalised and unchangeable.... but rarely do we see something oppositional, no whites, euros or butch muscle men, for example, that might speak to a plurality....
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 03:02 pm (UTC)Hey, wait-- does such a site exist? I confess I have no idea.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 03:12 pm (UTC)Alexa Chung has officially been declared the hottest girl everywhere by everyone and It's coz she's half-English half-Chinese. the Caucasian-oriental mix is like a magic formula for making super hot girls. prove me wrong.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 05:36 pm (UTC)Her head:body ratio seems larger than the average person.
My theory:
Her attractiveness might be the result the head ratio. Children also have high head:body ratios, and don't have big breasts. So she is an outlet for latent pedophilia -- you subconsciously see a child while consciously seeing an adult.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Rapeman or useless fruitcake?
Date: 2009-04-19 03:30 pm (UTC)In my experience, men who use almost-rape tactics get the girls. I'd include fame in that, for example. If you push a woman against a wall on a first date, and try to pull her bra off, you are more likely to get a return phonecall than a useless fruitcake running around like some hearts'n'flowers puppy.
The VAST majority of mixed race straight couples are:
Black male - White female
or
White male - Asian female
GOD HELP THE BLACK GAL who wants to get her DNA around a bit.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 04:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 04:40 pm (UTC)Men, understandably, want a feminine partner. Black women don't date outside their race because they're the the least feminine. Too much mass, coarse hair, often coarse social manner. Definitely WAY too masculine for Asian males to even consider. Asian females are the most feminine, so can appeal to white males. But of course don't exactly fit our conception of beauty, so have not completely dominated.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 05:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-04-19 05:51 pm (UTC) - ExpandPeople are cultural constructs
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-04-20 07:27 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:What's Love Got To Do With It?
From:Momus is wrong again!
Date: 2009-04-19 06:37 pm (UTC)Because you know better than these women what turns them on, right, Momo? And if they don't, you (or Levitt), will make sure they toe the correct racial party line, right? Bask in all the self-loathing you want , white boy, but don't presume to speak for Asian women; to tell them why they feel the way the do, and why they are wrong to do so. That's not only a condescendingly racist claim in itself (the kind only white liberal professional anti-racists like you can muster), it's just more misogynist sexism. Yet another smug penis-equipped smart guy telling women why they don't know anything, even their own feelings and desires.
Re: Momus is wrong again!
Date: 2009-04-19 07:42 pm (UTC)Re: Momus is wrong again!
From:Re: Momus is wrong again!
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-04-20 10:15 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Momus is wrong again!
From:Re: Momus is wrong again!
From:Re: Momus is wrong again!
From:Re: Momus is wrong again!
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-04-20 08:35 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Momus is wrong again!
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-04-20 07:46 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Momus is wrong again!
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 07:37 pm (UTC)i'm curious about "folk ways of thinking" and youtube
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-19 10:54 pm (UTC)"folk ways "
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:smaller they are
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 03:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 04:22 am (UTC)Press likening her to some dangerous, sexy, yellow animal in three, two, one...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 08:43 am (UTC)I think the non-arbitrary character that is ignored in the argument is penis size.
Round-eyes besotted with Japanese women
Date: 2009-04-20 09:20 am (UTC)I think the previous poster was correct: some races conform to sexual stereotypes (actually, archetypes) more than others. Issues such as tallness and non-hairiness are hard-wired, I suspect, and are particularly noticeable across the Oriental/Occidental frontier.
In fact I wrote a (published) novel about it. It's here, under 'China Dreams': http://sidsmith.co.uk/
(Brilliant blog, Momus.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:47 am (UTC)Asians and tallness are a case in point. Anyone who has travelled to the Dongbei region in China or Hokkaido cannot fail to have noticed that the people in these areas aren't especially short, in fact they are often taller than here (Southern Europe).
However, early Asian immigration to Europe and the Sates was predominantly from South East China, where people are naturally short and this has shaped popular conception of what Asians look like.
Another case in point is Afro-american men who are eroticised in part because of all the bad boy clichés connected to them. Here, most black people are from the Carribbean and West Africa and the stereotype is that they are laidback and somewhat philandering (it is the Arabs who get typecast as the bad boys and there is a definite dating fetish among white girls who only date North Africans).
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 01:50 pm (UTC)The very elderly people in Korea are almost universally tiny. Just ridiculously short. These are the people who fought in the Korean War, and grew up during a time when the country was very poor. (A teacher told me that, when he was young, friends would ask one another "Did you eat breakfast?" as a common "How ya' doin?" kind of question. Now, they ask "Did you eat a lot for breakfast?"). People in their 40s and 50s are markedly taller, though still short by western standards, from growing up just as Korea began its steady climb to industrialized status. And a good many of the kids I teach at my high school are average height. Against my expectations, at 6'2" I am not even the tallest person at my school.
(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-04-20 03:48 pm (UTC) - Expandas many euphemisms as I can cram in there
Date: 2009-04-20 05:12 pm (UTC)If I remember correctly, Momus, you seemed to be packing a handsome haggis in that naked picture you posted on Click Opera a while back.
My upper lip perspired just writing that.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 10:43 pm (UTC)(both for you and for these girls on the videos)
Alex P.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 12:36 am (UTC)Some may say there are some alpha males, like Daniel Wu (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Wu) or Takeshi Kaneshiro (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takeshi_Kaneshiro). But their good looks seem to be too out of reach for many Chinese males.
I am tall among my peers (185cm). Some people ask me to "improve" on my look as sometimes I slouch and have unruly hair. My sister tried to sell Hayami Mokomichi's image to me, but I am repulsive to it. The UK highstreet TopMan faux-Californian surfer look doesn't work for me either.
However, I am rather enjoying the masculinity vacuum, because I can have the freedom to coolhunt quite freely.
If I must choose an invented Asian masculinity model, I would pick the Issey Miyake one. An Asian man that is creative, who wears simple and playful clothes which is tailored to his body. And ideologically, one who can utilise freely but not bounded by the mentality of Chinese language.
Still, a more tailored model of a modern Chinese man is yet to be invented. Hope that my generation can get rid of the West and luxury brands-worshipping mentality deep-rooted in our collective consciousness and try to be ourselves.
youtomb
Date: 2009-04-21 08:25 am (UTC)http://youtomb.mit.edu/blog/
MIT student who monitors YouTube, fair use, copyright and TOS issues
And a post as to how maybe YouTube might have just past its moment
http://youtomb.mit.edu/blog/?p=23
A few days belated
Date: 2009-04-22 08:56 am (UTC)成班愚才
Date: 2009-04-27 09:15 pm (UTC)The guys in the first video mentions about hair, it's just so stupid. In HK we call Caucasians as 鬼佬, ( Ghost Man) , we have been calling them this name since some centuries ago, because they are hairy with different colors other than black, it looks strange. ( at least to the ancients chinese)
I am not a racist, just try to tell the historical fact , in ancient chinese's eye, western ppl are a semi human & semi animal " thing" . Besides the look, also because chinese culture & techology was much superior than other countries, especially in Tang & Qing dynasties. At that time, if a hairy man using folks and knifes to dine (don't even how chop food into decent pieces in the kitchen frist) wants to marry a chinese girl, mission impossible.
China had just gone through a 200 years dark age & so as other eastern countries, and western worlds are at their good times now. Therefore many Asians are in US / UK to study cos " nearly" all things there are more advanced, better and faster. Easteren ppl are more superior? yes, of course, who has doubt on that???
wealth brings better education , & education brings better culture.
so , it's simple, when you are more wealthy, you got more girls.
maybe one day, while eastern ppl are using Indian or Chinese languages to communicate with each, we would see the differences.