imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
The photo below (Anja Niedringhaus, AP) shows a classroom in Jebaliya, Gaza. The name cards represent pupils of the Fakhoura School killed by Israeli army shells last month.



But Israel's actions in Gaza have affected classrooms elsewhere. "We are a group of students concerned about the university's continuing support for Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank," University of Plymouth students say on their occupation blog, "indicated by the university's investments with BAE Systems who have sold 236 F-16 fighter planes to the Israeli state, and its silence over the recent atrocities and human rights abuses perpetrated by Israel in the Gaza Strip."



"As a result we have occupied room 202 in the Smeaton Building in solidarity with the people of Palestine and to directly protest against the university's complicity in Israeli war crimes.... The occupying students would be keen for lectures to continue in this room without interruption. We are willing for a small group to remain unobtrusively at the back of the room, as a symbolic presence."

Cue obligatory flip references to Citizen Smith, the counter-revolutionary UK sitcom from 1977 in which "a young Marxist urban revolutionary living in Tooting, South London, is attempting to emulate his hero Che Guevara. Wolfie is the self-proclaimed leader of the Tooting Popular Front (in reality a small bunch of his friends) the goals of which are "Power to the People" and "Freedom for Tooting". In reality, he is an unemployed dreamer and petty criminal whose plans fall through due to laziness and disorganisation."

But in this case it isn't just a "small bunch of friends". The UK, over the past month, has seen an extraordinary (and under-reported, though The Guardian did post an article) series of student occupations. There are or have been occupations at Edinburgh, Glasgow, Goldsmiths, Sheffield, the University of East Anglia, Cambridge, Bradford, the London School of Economics, Queen Mary, King's College, SOAS, Byam Shaw and Leeds, each with its own occupation blog (click the links for heartening photos of "revolting students" strumming guitars, preparing vegan food, picketing, pamphleteering and generally acting as if it were 1968 all over again).



Many students have been demanding -- and getting -- scholarships at their universities for Palestinian students; another way classrooms in Gaza and classrooms in the UK are now being linked, and a vindication of the occupations in itself. In some colleges the protests have widened into issues about budget cuts and a streamlined "Education PLC" attitude.

The Gaza shelling may now be over but, as Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports today, many (including Hillary Clinton) are extremely frustrated by the attitude of the Israeli authorities to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza:

"When Senator John Kerry visited the Strip, he learned that many trucks loaded with pasta were not permitted in. When the chairman of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee inquired as to the reason for the delay, he was told by United Nations aid officials that "Israel does not define pasta as part of humanitarian aid - only rice shipments." Kerry asked Barak about the logic behind this restriction, and only after the senior U.S. official's intervention did the defense minister allow the pasta into the Strip. The U.S. senator updated colleagues at the Senate and other senior officials in Washington of the details of his visit.

"The issue of humanitarian aid is central to a major debate between Israel's foreign and defense ministries. The former supports broadening the amount and types of aid, while the defense ministry opposes anything it considers "concessions" to Hamas. A senior source dealing with humanitarian aid issues on the Israeli side said that Gilad has prepared a list of "humanitarian aid items" and refuses to broaden it. "Authority is in the hands of one person, and he is not willing to help," the source said. "This is outrageous. Why should a senior American official issue a protest on pasta in order for us to recognize that we need to allow it into the Gaza Strip?"

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-25 05:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kumakouji.livejournal.com
I think you're wrong about this.

[livejournal.com profile] uberdionysus and I had a big disagreement over an entry he wrote in his journal about the media neglecting certain issues and not giving them the due coverage they deserved.

His angle is very similar to yours in that you're both basically accusing people of not caring enough or not caring "the right amount".

My response to you is the same response I gave to him -- where do you draw the line between genuinely caring enough and only paying superficial lipservice to an issue? It's so subjective and it opens yourself up to criticism.

You could argue that these kids are just upper-middle class tourist activists who don't really care, just like [livejournal.com profile] uberdionysus accused the US media of not giving a shit. But you then open yourself up -- what the fuck are you doing? Why are you buying that coffee from starbucks when you could put that little bit of money you spend aside and send it to people in need? Why aren't you spending your free time campaigning to stop such and such atrocity? It's because you're apathetic and don't give a shit right?

My view is this: Even if one person turns up to one demonstration and thats it, it's something. Rather than criticising other people for what they don't do, why don't you do something?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-25 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
The "you" there is krskrft, right?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-25 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kumakouji.livejournal.com
It's anyone who feels the need to criticise other people's lack of action. Technically I should have written "But one then opens oneself up" and so forth, because that would be more correct, but it sounds unnatural.

"From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I shall not put" blah blah blah...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-25 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kumakouji.livejournal.com
Wait... "more correct"? Is that proper English?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-25 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Pull your head out of your Kumakouji, if the muscle relaxes. You seem to be addressing and/or oedipally threatening Momus by making your comment a response to his and then loading it with the word 'you'.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-25 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kumakouji.livejournal.com
Your reading comprehension is exceedingly bad.

Where did Momus ever accuse these students of being tourist activists? He didn't, that was krskrft. If you'd have bothered to read the comments properly the context would be clear.

If reading's too much of a challenge for you -- put your mouse in the middle of [livejournal.com profile] silenceinspades userpic where he makes his last reply to krskrft. Now Scroll down and you'll notice my userpic lines up exactly. SURPRISE, I was replying to exactly the same comment as him!

Moreover, how is anything I wrote remotely threatening?

Moron.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-25 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
NOW YOU'RE CALLING ME A MORON, AND ON MY OWN BLOG?

(Jokes, bro.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-03 12:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] microworlds.livejournal.com
BRO?????????????????????????? OH MY GOD MOMUS HAS TURNED INTO A SKATER EVERYONE RUN FOR THE HILLS THE APOCALYPSE IS HERE!!!!!!!!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-25 11:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krskrft.livejournal.com
I'm using social class as a lens to criticize their demonstration. Again, I'm sure a lot of tourist activists show up to WTO/World Bank protests and the like, but I have a hard time criticizing those demonstrations since they occur at the locus of an issue, bring out large masses of demonstrators, and therefore bring real, valuable attention to important issues of social justice.

All that occupying a school cafeteria does is keep a bunch of other students from being able to eat there.

Krsrkjft doth protest too much.

Date: 2009-02-26 11:52 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Dear people's front of Judea.

These protests aren't ideal (what is?), but do you think they chose between making an organized protest and doing this? No, they chose between doing this and doing nothing. You disdainfully call it an activism test-bed, but activism needs to start somewhere.

And the claim that you "use social class as a lens to criticize their demonstration"? Ha! Class hatred is a valuable source of energy, don't waste it on petty, jealous, infighting.
-David

Re: Krsrkjft doth protest too much.

Date: 2009-02-26 12:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krskrft.livejournal.com
A bunch of well-off kids attending a $40,000 a year, private New York City university chose to do this vs. doing nothing? I'm sorry, but I don't buy it. If they were going to university in a cow town, then perhaps that argument might fly, but there are so many loci of power in NYC, not to mention media outlets willing to pay attention to well-organized demonstrations. I don't buy that it was either occupy the school mess hall or nothing. Nope, not in NYC.

Re: Krsrkjft doth protest too much.

Date: 2009-02-26 01:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Class hatred is a valuable source of energy, don't waste it on petty, jealous, infighting.

Ha, I want that on a t-shirt, in lettering that tapers down smaller and smaller.

Re: Krsrkjft doth protest too much.

Date: 2009-02-26 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Haha, yr right, my post was (unintentionally) ironic, and strikingly so. I should have settled for writing "why waste it on infighting?", but I was riding high on twinkies and Krskrft's "pur et dur"-phrasing.

I'll go back to my own activities and let krskrft sort out her/his feelings by her/himself.
-D

Krsrkjft doth protest too much.

Date: 2009-02-26 04:29 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Dear people's front of Judea.

These protests aren't ideal (what is?), but do you think they chose between making an organized protest and doing this? No, they chose between doing this and doing nothing. You disdainfully call it an activism test-bed, but activism needs to start somewhere.

And the claim that you "use social class as a lens to criticize their demonstration"? Ha! Class hatred is a valuable source of energy, don't waste it on petty, jealous, infighting.
-David

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-01 04:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xoskeleton.livejournal.com
what the fuck is a "tourist activist"? What are people supposed to be "professional/indigenous activists"? Not too many people can or want to make "activism" the central focus of their lives. Activism is something that people do, generally when they are under political, economic, or military threat or when they feel moral outrage.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-03-01 05:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krskrft.livejournal.com
That's simple. It's somebody who wants the feeling of excitement and/or self-importance that goes along with protesting for a cause, but doesn't care about any of the important details, such as how the protest is planned, if it's linked to rational goals, etc. In other words, they want all the romantic, necro-retro side benefits of engaging in the act, but they don't want to put any real effort into determining what their protest will represent, or how the protest will represent it.

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags