A sinister totalitarian organisation seeks world domination. It's us.
As a kid I played -- innocently, guiltily -- in the shadow of the Cold War propaganda of the Bond films. I guided a model Aston Martin DB6 around the carpet and enjoyed pushing the button that activated the deadly weapons that this car, alone amongst my toy cars, possessed. I watched the films, in which the British secret agent quipped and killed his way to inevitable victory over eccentric totalitarians with foreign accents and plans for world domination. It all seemed like innocent fun.

It was only later, as my political and ethical sympathies evolved, that I began to feel the Bond franchise might be infused with toxic values. Not just the values inscribed into the Bond themes and songs -- "he's got a license to kill", "you've got to give the other fellow hell", "live and let die" -- but the stuff I started hearing about Ian Fleming himself. That he was a right-wing xenophobe who talked about "niggers" in his books, or stereotyped Koreans as "the cruelest people on earth", who boasted that he'd killed a man while working for naval intelligence, and claimed to be one of the key figures in the creation of the CIA. It was even annoying that he'd named his villain Auric Goldfinger after the Jewish, Marxist architect Ernő Goldfinger, creator of the Modernist Trellick Tower and architect of the offices of the Daily Worker newspaper and the British Communist Party HQ. And yet every time a new Bond film came out the lifestyle press spouted reams of stuff about how suits and guns and dry martini and British males who killed foreigners were sexy again.

This week a new piece of back story to the Bond saga emerged. A BBC Radio 4 documentary called M is for Maxwell Knight looked into the background of the man on whom Fleming based the character of spymaster M. Some pretty unsavory details emerged; Knight "believed that socialism, and its attack upon the British Empire and commerce, constituted an existential threat to the British way of life and British government". And so Knight joined the British Fascisti Party.
Christopher Andrew, who's writing the official history of MI5, pops up to explain this one: "At the time the only fascists who were around were Italian fascists. And there were a lot of traditional conservatives and right wing radicals who thought that the best thing that had ever happened to Italy was Benito Mussolini coming along and getting the trains to run on time. So we shouldn't confuse the British Fascisti, or the British Fascists, of the mid- and late 1920s with the British Union of Fascists of the late 1930s, still less the further-right Right Club, and still less with the Nazi party." It was at this time that Knight, who'd become the Fascisti's Director of Intelligence, started working for British government intelligence, concentrating mostly on infiltrating left wing organisations. He encouraged fellow Fascisti members to join the Communist Party of Great Britain as spies.
Knight was close with Oswald Mosley and William Joyce, who became Lord Haw Haw when he moved to Berlin to make English-language broadcasts on behalf of the Nazis. Heather Joyce, Lord Haw Haw's daughter, remembers a visit Knight made to her father in the 1930s. "I did see him twice when he was in his uniform, and looking very handsome and impressive. They undid their belts, because they were going to eat, you see, and they sat over in the corner and everybody got up and... gave the fascist salute." Just as I, as a child, was playing with James Bond toys, so Heather and her sister were walking around in black shirts made for them by their parents.
Now, one line of thinking we could legitimately follow when we learn this stuff is that the beloved M from James Bond is an extremely right wing figure, that Fleming's slurs on communist architects and Knight's infiltration of communist organisations come from the same basic worldview, and that the Bond franchise to this day -- including all those style mag features on the sexiness of Anglo-Saxons in suits carrying guns -- has reactionary attitudes deep in its DNA. But Christopher Andrew draws a very different lesson: "British intelligence became world class because it was better at using eccentric and unconventional talents," he says, successfully turning "being a fascist" into "just being terribly British and charming", an argument which clearly cuts both ways and smears a lot of charming British eccentrics with some nasty slime. Andrew has an equally British explanation for Knight's later metamorphosis into a TV presenter of animal programmes on the BBC: "He had an unusual set of social skills," he tells us. "By unusual, I mean that he got on just as well with animals as with human beings. So what he's recognised as is a wonderful British eccentric with a wonderful ability for getting humans and animals to do what he wants them to do."
A sinister totalitarian organisation is seeking world domination. It's us, the British.

It was only later, as my political and ethical sympathies evolved, that I began to feel the Bond franchise might be infused with toxic values. Not just the values inscribed into the Bond themes and songs -- "he's got a license to kill", "you've got to give the other fellow hell", "live and let die" -- but the stuff I started hearing about Ian Fleming himself. That he was a right-wing xenophobe who talked about "niggers" in his books, or stereotyped Koreans as "the cruelest people on earth", who boasted that he'd killed a man while working for naval intelligence, and claimed to be one of the key figures in the creation of the CIA. It was even annoying that he'd named his villain Auric Goldfinger after the Jewish, Marxist architect Ernő Goldfinger, creator of the Modernist Trellick Tower and architect of the offices of the Daily Worker newspaper and the British Communist Party HQ. And yet every time a new Bond film came out the lifestyle press spouted reams of stuff about how suits and guns and dry martini and British males who killed foreigners were sexy again.

This week a new piece of back story to the Bond saga emerged. A BBC Radio 4 documentary called M is for Maxwell Knight looked into the background of the man on whom Fleming based the character of spymaster M. Some pretty unsavory details emerged; Knight "believed that socialism, and its attack upon the British Empire and commerce, constituted an existential threat to the British way of life and British government". And so Knight joined the British Fascisti Party.
Christopher Andrew, who's writing the official history of MI5, pops up to explain this one: "At the time the only fascists who were around were Italian fascists. And there were a lot of traditional conservatives and right wing radicals who thought that the best thing that had ever happened to Italy was Benito Mussolini coming along and getting the trains to run on time. So we shouldn't confuse the British Fascisti, or the British Fascists, of the mid- and late 1920s with the British Union of Fascists of the late 1930s, still less the further-right Right Club, and still less with the Nazi party." It was at this time that Knight, who'd become the Fascisti's Director of Intelligence, started working for British government intelligence, concentrating mostly on infiltrating left wing organisations. He encouraged fellow Fascisti members to join the Communist Party of Great Britain as spies.
Knight was close with Oswald Mosley and William Joyce, who became Lord Haw Haw when he moved to Berlin to make English-language broadcasts on behalf of the Nazis. Heather Joyce, Lord Haw Haw's daughter, remembers a visit Knight made to her father in the 1930s. "I did see him twice when he was in his uniform, and looking very handsome and impressive. They undid their belts, because they were going to eat, you see, and they sat over in the corner and everybody got up and... gave the fascist salute." Just as I, as a child, was playing with James Bond toys, so Heather and her sister were walking around in black shirts made for them by their parents.Now, one line of thinking we could legitimately follow when we learn this stuff is that the beloved M from James Bond is an extremely right wing figure, that Fleming's slurs on communist architects and Knight's infiltration of communist organisations come from the same basic worldview, and that the Bond franchise to this day -- including all those style mag features on the sexiness of Anglo-Saxons in suits carrying guns -- has reactionary attitudes deep in its DNA. But Christopher Andrew draws a very different lesson: "British intelligence became world class because it was better at using eccentric and unconventional talents," he says, successfully turning "being a fascist" into "just being terribly British and charming", an argument which clearly cuts both ways and smears a lot of charming British eccentrics with some nasty slime. Andrew has an equally British explanation for Knight's later metamorphosis into a TV presenter of animal programmes on the BBC: "He had an unusual set of social skills," he tells us. "By unusual, I mean that he got on just as well with animals as with human beings. So what he's recognised as is a wonderful British eccentric with a wonderful ability for getting humans and animals to do what he wants them to do."
A sinister totalitarian organisation is seeking world domination. It's us, the British.
no subject
no subject
Yes, there was some really crazy cross-fertilization going on in the British intelligence world prior to 1991 -- and also in the intersection between fascism and the military/imperialist complex. Random example: Major General J. F. C. Fuller -- military spokesperson for Moseley's fascists -- was, during WW1, the chief tactician of the Machine Gun Corps' Heavy Branch, the world's first armoured unit. He pretty much invented the doctrine that later got named Blitzkrieg and associated with the Nazis; he was one of the authors of Plan 1919, the allied combined-arms motorized assault on Berlin planned for spring 1919. Barkingly patriotic, drifted into fascism during the 1930s because he thought the west was doomed, otherwise, to be overrun by non-white persons ... and he was also second string only to Aleister Crowley in the A.A. (http://www.thelemapedia.org/index.php/A.%27.A.%27.) (before splitting with him acrimoniously in 1913).
Magick, eccentric hyperpatriotic generals, and blitzkrieg: what's not to boggle at?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-29 10:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
My feeling is that pop music is too easily available, too ubiquitous, and that that's what has devalued it to close-to-zero. Music should become rare and difficult-to-find again. Instead of streaming music, we should be hiding it like Easter eggs or buried treasure.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-29 10:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-29 10:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Care of dr__ben...
Re: Care of dr__ben...
Re: Care of dr__ben...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-29 10:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm reminded, for some reason, of Judge Dredd. I believe the creator of the character - I forget his name - basically wanted to create the portrait of a fascist. Apparently he was a bit disturbed when everyone loved his character and thought he was a hero.
I don't suppose Ian Fleming was similarly disturbed at people loving James Bond.
I think the attraction is in the coldness of it, somehow.
no subject
This entry is of a similar nature to what Gavin McInnes wrote about Communists (http://streetbonersandtvcarnage.com/blog/commies-arent-cool/) on his website/blog yesterday, except you're denouncing the fascist extreme-right, and he's denouncing the fascist extreme-left.
I think we should just all agree that Fascism and extremes aren't the way to go.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
the way to go
(Anonymous) 2009-01-29 03:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: the way to go
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-29 15:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: the way to go
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-29 15:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: the way to go
Re: the way to go
Re: the way to go
Re: the way to go
Re: the way to go
Re: the way to go
Re: the way to go
Did you see the latest Bond flick?
Bond fights an evil corporation that topples Latin American democratically-elected governments with the help of the CIA, in order to control the water supply and make money off the indigenous population when global warming arrives. It specifically paints up the pre-coup Haitian government and Evo Morales's government in Bolivia in a positive light.
Some weird shit right there.
Re: Did you see the latest Bond flick?
Re: Did you see the latest Bond flick?
(Anonymous) 2009-01-29 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Did you see the latest Bond flick?
Re: Did you see the latest Bond flick?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-29 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)I was going to say “you dismiss the long history of a British liberal left in four words. You can’t say Bond is Us”, although I think the two go hand in hand. The ‘good guy’ side of colonialism (charity, the World Service, internationalism as shown on Click Opera) can pave the way, encouraging trust, for ‘bad guy’ to get away with much more.
The key is ‘domination’, and here the problem is compounded. Are good schools, good hospitals, stable governments who don’t dehumanise “the people” domination? Bring it on. That is what we used to believe would happen if Bond helped remove a corrupt system.
But isn’t there a new generation who believe that their government is not only incompetent but actually dangerous? Aren’t they asking why the double benefits their parents had have disappeared (socialised protection in the workplace, capitalist windfalls on the property ladder). One things sure - their spy would be a much richer character..
extreme right wing in film
(Anonymous) 2009-01-29 02:15 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-29 15:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-29 15:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-29 19:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-29 19:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-29 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)Jamesy
"For a European, you are exceptionally well cultivated"
Re: "For a European, you are exceptionally well cultivated"
Re: "For a European, you are exceptionally well cultivated"
Re: "For a European, you are exceptionally well cultivated"
no subject
PS--I'm not a big fan of the Bond movies. They're thin, repetitive, and boring, so that after about fifteen minutes you'd give almost anything to go dig some ditches.
no subject
[Error: unknown template video]
(no subject)
no subject
[Error: unknown template video]
But, as I say, I've never seen the film! I'm sure the portrayal of Japan would annoy me even more than Lost In Translation's did.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-29 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I have ordered a copy of "Deceiving The Deceivers".
Another M who intrigues me is ex British Intelligence George Markstein, the person who worked with the late Patrick McGoohan on the original Prisoner stories and is behind the desk No6 thumps as he hands in his resignation.
Here is the real Village (http://www.secretscotland.org.uk/index.php/Secrets/InverlairLodge) in Inverness Markstein told Mc Goohan about.
There is also a rare Adam Curtis series called "The Living Dead" on Google video which studies in episode two the paranoid hall of mirrors in the CIA during the era of "mind control" experimentation.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8179092243297154729
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
"They were the final generation to be able to compare and contrast the late Cold War/Space Age society with the Post-Cold War/Information Age society using their own personal experiences and memories."
The word "nomadic" also appears. Now, nomads usually move from one place to another, but this generation moves from one time to another. It's a bit like Aki Sasamoto's idea of "hoppers" -- these are people who learn a kind of critical cultural relativism from seeing different eras with different values, but also maybe learn Zelig-like conformity skills. They change with the time, or place.
I'm technically described as belonging to Generation Jones (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Jones) -- same one as Obama. We get our basic mindset from the transition from the very optimistic and affluent 60s to the recessionary, nervous 70s. So actually the kind of transition we're going through now (from market-oriented neo-liberalism to market meltdown and recession) makes us feel almost comfortable. I must say I'm personally feeling very cheerful about it, for many different reasons.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-30 06:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject