Is your daily paper transvaluing values?
As 2009 dawned, I found myself rearranging my newspaper bookmarks. The website of UK newspaper The Guardian has been my main -- almost exclusive -- newspaper site for years; I hit the front page several times a day. But this year, for various reasons, I've felt the need to see whether I can replace The Guardian with something else. I turned to two rather odd newspapers, The International Herald Tribune and the Japan Times.

These papers are odd because they're, in some way, parachuted into the cities they're based in, Paris and Tokyo. They're both English-language papers in non-English-speaking capitals, and there's a blurriness and precariousness in their identity which I find, actually, very valuable, and which matches something in my own. I also like a certain quietness and restraint in their manner. Until fairly recently, the culture section of the Japan Times, for instance, was dominated by a column on yakimono pottery.
The International Herald Tribune (the only newspaper I've ever heard David Bowie endorse, incidentally) may speak English, but its outlook is cosmopolitan. It's linked with Monocle magazine and The New York Times. But it also covers Paris rather well; there's an interesting video story today (very much in the style of the video reports on the Monocle site) about the progress of new Paris art centre Le CentQuatre. The lead story on the paper's front page this morning was a style story: In the lap of luxury, Paris squirms. The focus was on how the recession is impacting luxury fashion brands, but I liked the way writer Elaine Sciolino presented this: "The recession brings anxiety to France but also a welcomed values debate on the French way of life."
"Only in France is the recession lauded for posing a crisis in values," writes Sciolino. "There is... an underlying satisfaction here that an era of sometimes vulgar high living is over and that a more bedrock French way of life will emerge. Some French intellectuals want to go much further, calling for the death of the entire luxury industry as a sort of national ritual of purification. "Since the ancient Greeks, luxury goods have always been stamped with the seal of immorality," said Gilles Lipovetsky, a sociologist who has written several books about consumerism. "They represent waste, the superficial, the inequality of wealth. They have no need to exist."
This is a post-materialist message, and it's something I don't find much of in the Anglo papers, even The Guardian. On the front page of The Guardian today we had Dan Black, one of the paper's music tips for 2009 -- a somewhat annoying young man who sounds like an estate agent doing karaoke versions of Britney Spears numbers -- telling the paper that in ten years time "I'll either be swimming in a swimming pool full of champagne and diamonds or crying in a gutter trying to get ten pounds to buy a bag of skag." Black, like Britain, is still oriented to America, to consumerism as a selfish "guilty pleasure", to money-as-drugs, to bling. His vision of his future in Britain is a parody of a high Gini coefficient; he'll either be massively wealthy or homeless.
The cultural coverage in the Japan Times is much more to my taste. In the art section we have Donald Eubank on Brazilian artist Vik Muniz and his work with Brazil's catadores, people who recycle rubbish for a living: "An estimated 3,000-5,000 people live in the dump, 15,000 derive their income from activities related to it, and some that Muniz met in Jardim Gramacho come from families that had been working there for three generations. "These people are at the other end of consumer culture," he says. "I was expecting to see people who were beaten and broken, but they were survivors." His aim — besides the creative challenge — was to see... if the experience of creating art could change people".
There's a sense in both The International Herald Tribune and The Japan Times that the papers know what time it is; that they realise a "transvaluation of all values" (in Nietzsche's phrase) is necessary at this point. Even while it reports David Miliband's important public recognition that the War on Terror was a mistake, The Guardian doesn't seem to have taken this transvaluation thing on board. For instance, a story about a minister who said she saw "green shoots" in the UK economy basically takes for granted that green shoots mean economic growth, and that that's good, and its absence bad. There's no actual green perspective in the green shoots story -- it lacks the angle Sciolino wrote into her IHT story about how economic downturn is an opportunity to rethink priorities.
Another Japan Times story I love today is Antiforeigner discrimination is a right for Japanese people. Here, Gregory Clark plugs -- without mentioning him by name -- the ridiculous Debito Arudou (David Aldwinckle), who has plagued his host country with lawsuits alleging discrimination against foreigners (in, for instance, barring him from certain bathing houses frequented by troublesome Russian sailors). Clark boldly says something I've long believed too: "Japan girai — dislike of Japan — is an allergy that seems to afflict many Westerners here... It is time we admitted that at times the Japanese have the right to discriminate against some foreigners. If they do not, and Japan ends up like our padlocked, mutually suspicious Western societies, we will all be the losers."
What I enjoy here is that an article by a foreigner in a foreign newspaper takes the side of Japanese against foreigners. That seems to express very well the complexity and ambivalence of these cuckoo newspapers, and the awareness, typical of sensitive foreigners, of one's own fragility and awkwardness. This guilt, for me, is at the root of consideration for others. It transcends selfishness, and to achieve it you have to be slightly decentred, as these odd expat papers are. I think their willingness to transvalue values is all tied up with these newspapers' transplanted, lateral, parallax positions in foreign cities.

These papers are odd because they're, in some way, parachuted into the cities they're based in, Paris and Tokyo. They're both English-language papers in non-English-speaking capitals, and there's a blurriness and precariousness in their identity which I find, actually, very valuable, and which matches something in my own. I also like a certain quietness and restraint in their manner. Until fairly recently, the culture section of the Japan Times, for instance, was dominated by a column on yakimono pottery.
The International Herald Tribune (the only newspaper I've ever heard David Bowie endorse, incidentally) may speak English, but its outlook is cosmopolitan. It's linked with Monocle magazine and The New York Times. But it also covers Paris rather well; there's an interesting video story today (very much in the style of the video reports on the Monocle site) about the progress of new Paris art centre Le CentQuatre. The lead story on the paper's front page this morning was a style story: In the lap of luxury, Paris squirms. The focus was on how the recession is impacting luxury fashion brands, but I liked the way writer Elaine Sciolino presented this: "The recession brings anxiety to France but also a welcomed values debate on the French way of life."
"Only in France is the recession lauded for posing a crisis in values," writes Sciolino. "There is... an underlying satisfaction here that an era of sometimes vulgar high living is over and that a more bedrock French way of life will emerge. Some French intellectuals want to go much further, calling for the death of the entire luxury industry as a sort of national ritual of purification. "Since the ancient Greeks, luxury goods have always been stamped with the seal of immorality," said Gilles Lipovetsky, a sociologist who has written several books about consumerism. "They represent waste, the superficial, the inequality of wealth. They have no need to exist."
This is a post-materialist message, and it's something I don't find much of in the Anglo papers, even The Guardian. On the front page of The Guardian today we had Dan Black, one of the paper's music tips for 2009 -- a somewhat annoying young man who sounds like an estate agent doing karaoke versions of Britney Spears numbers -- telling the paper that in ten years time "I'll either be swimming in a swimming pool full of champagne and diamonds or crying in a gutter trying to get ten pounds to buy a bag of skag." Black, like Britain, is still oriented to America, to consumerism as a selfish "guilty pleasure", to money-as-drugs, to bling. His vision of his future in Britain is a parody of a high Gini coefficient; he'll either be massively wealthy or homeless.
The cultural coverage in the Japan Times is much more to my taste. In the art section we have Donald Eubank on Brazilian artist Vik Muniz and his work with Brazil's catadores, people who recycle rubbish for a living: "An estimated 3,000-5,000 people live in the dump, 15,000 derive their income from activities related to it, and some that Muniz met in Jardim Gramacho come from families that had been working there for three generations. "These people are at the other end of consumer culture," he says. "I was expecting to see people who were beaten and broken, but they were survivors." His aim — besides the creative challenge — was to see... if the experience of creating art could change people".
There's a sense in both The International Herald Tribune and The Japan Times that the papers know what time it is; that they realise a "transvaluation of all values" (in Nietzsche's phrase) is necessary at this point. Even while it reports David Miliband's important public recognition that the War on Terror was a mistake, The Guardian doesn't seem to have taken this transvaluation thing on board. For instance, a story about a minister who said she saw "green shoots" in the UK economy basically takes for granted that green shoots mean economic growth, and that that's good, and its absence bad. There's no actual green perspective in the green shoots story -- it lacks the angle Sciolino wrote into her IHT story about how economic downturn is an opportunity to rethink priorities.
Another Japan Times story I love today is Antiforeigner discrimination is a right for Japanese people. Here, Gregory Clark plugs -- without mentioning him by name -- the ridiculous Debito Arudou (David Aldwinckle), who has plagued his host country with lawsuits alleging discrimination against foreigners (in, for instance, barring him from certain bathing houses frequented by troublesome Russian sailors). Clark boldly says something I've long believed too: "Japan girai — dislike of Japan — is an allergy that seems to afflict many Westerners here... It is time we admitted that at times the Japanese have the right to discriminate against some foreigners. If they do not, and Japan ends up like our padlocked, mutually suspicious Western societies, we will all be the losers."
What I enjoy here is that an article by a foreigner in a foreign newspaper takes the side of Japanese against foreigners. That seems to express very well the complexity and ambivalence of these cuckoo newspapers, and the awareness, typical of sensitive foreigners, of one's own fragility and awkwardness. This guilt, for me, is at the root of consideration for others. It transcends selfishness, and to achieve it you have to be slightly decentred, as these odd expat papers are. I think their willingness to transvalue values is all tied up with these newspapers' transplanted, lateral, parallax positions in foreign cities.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-15 12:43 pm (UTC)(link)Well, you'll find the exact same post-materialist message on the New York Times website, because Elaine Sciolini is in fact a Times foreign correspondent and that story was first published there. Since the Times bought out the IHT, the vast majority of its stories are sourced from the Times and there are very few IHT-only correspondents. These days, the paper is mostly a stripped-down Times with the international stories to the fore instead of the purely American ones.
no subject
(no subject)
Sleekit News
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-15 14:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
Donald Eubank actually asked me to contribute to the Art section of the JT last time I was in Japan, and that always disposes me well towards a newspaper, obviously!
no subject
"Here, Gregory Clark plugs -- without mentioning him by name -- the ridiculous Debito Arudou (David Aldwinckle), who has plagued his host country with lawsuits alleging discrimination against foreigners (in, for instance, barring him from certain bathing houses frequented by troublesome Russian sailors)."
If I was a hotel owner and I didn't want to allow gay couples to rent my rooms because they offend my moral sensibilities, should I be allowed to turn them away?
no subject
I would definitely put a "No Debito" sign outside any institution I started in Japan -- the man is a serial legal harrasser.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-16 01:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-16 01:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
--nah, just Rupert Murdoch.
(no subject)
Dan Black
Many of the Kitchenware alumni are successful in music, long after their 'pop' career has finished. Wendy Smith of Prefab is a music project officer at the Sage Gateshead, and Martin McAloon now works for Generator - the North East's music development agency. Martin Brammer of the Kane Gang has written songs for all sorts of soft soul acts - from Tina Turner to Lighthouse Family.
Martin Stephenson of the Daintees still gigs (pubs and clubs mostly, but it's a full time job), and Paul Handyside of Hurrah! also plays occasionally, though it's not his day-job.
If you'd told any of these people, thirty years ago at the birth of Kitchenware, that they'd still be involved in music in 2009, they'd probably have been delighted. None of them are in the gutter, and none are floating in a swimming pool full of coke. But they're all successful in being involved in music and creativity. There are many ways of measuring success and failure - or perhaps it's not even relevant?
Re: Dan Black
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-15 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-15 16:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
As for the British political situation - guilty as charged. The only God Britain has left is America - and the leadership of the two main political parties is made up entirely of true believers.
no subject
When's the first bling burning, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonfire_of_the_Vanities) Savanorola?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-15 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)Let's assume that there can. Of course the Japanese can 'do what they want' in their own culture, in the sense that it's something that just happens anyway, decided by the hegemony either of political power or of cultural majority, but at the same time, I then have the 'right' to get very annoyed when Japanese people ask me what I think about Japan and only want to hear about how wonderful it is, and walk away satisfied (only if you oblige with flattery), and make no further attempts to get to know 'the gaijin'.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
(Anonymous) 2009-01-15 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)What?
First of all there's no such thing as "affirmative action law" in the US. It's a series of local regulations that are by no means universal. And it is extremely arguable that encouraging preferences (a positive act) contradicts banning discrimination (a negative act), an argument that is generally taken up by all manner of racists and extreme right wingers.
But the biggest WTF is the casual statement that Obama is an affirmative action president. This is so wrong in so many ways, not even the vile Republican smear machine could stoop down to use during the campaign. He was from the get-go the most qualified person to go for the job in many years. Period. (I'm not a knee-jerk Obama supporter/worshipper, by the way.)
I really like your blog and I really hope that your "love" for this piece doesn't include that awful paragraph.
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
I think what you're not registering is that "discrimination" is one of these words like "criticism" that has both a popular pejorative meaning and a technical neutral meaning. Just as it's extremely important to criticize, in the sense of assessing things with some degree of objectivity, it's extremely important to discriminate. As I say further up the page, there can be no justice without discrimination. John Maynard Keynes could not have implemented the socialist welfare policies that prevailed in the Britain I grew up in -- progressive taxation, socialised medicine, unemployment benefit and so on -- without discriminating in the precise, neutral sense: targeting money to those who lacked it, and harvesting money from those who had it. This "corrective" discrimination is the basis of socialism.
In the case Clark is discussing, a few Japanese institutions (private ones, who have as much right to turn people away as does, for instance, the door guy at the Berghain Club here in Berlin -- he turns away about one in ten, for purely arbitrary reasons based on appearance) have barred foreigners after bad experiences with Russians. To those who sue and make a big fuss about this (really just one man, the ridiculous Debito), Clark is responding that discrimination and racial profiling happen for positive reasons as well as negative ones: they are what happens when Justice takes off her blindfold and looks. Affirmative action is one type of positive racial profiling. Aid is another; aid agencies would waste their time helping white South Africans or Jewish settlers on the West Bank, when it's black South Africans and Palestinians who most urgently need assistance.
The same is true in Hokkaido: the sentos have a right (the same right as a trendy techno club in Berlin) to refuse admittance to people who wouldn't fit in. White people in Japan make a pretty unconvincing victim category: cry me a river!
To summarize: Justice does not mean applying the same treatment to everybody. It means treating people differently according to their needs and abilities, and according to how they act. It's the difference between equality of opportunity (which the West tends to mistake for justice) and actual justice.
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-15 19:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-15 21:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-16 07:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-16 13:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Re: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
(Anonymous) - 2009-01-16 18:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Are you sure you wanna endorse this Gregory Clark guy?
Seen 'Fauxmus'?! (off topic)
Re: Seen 'Fauxmus'?! (off topic)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-16 06:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Revaluing Grauniad
no subject
Puritans love disasters. No sooner has some calamity befallen mankind than some hair-shirted scold emerges from his priest hole and starts wagging his finger. The message is always the same: ‘You are being punished for your immoral lifestyle.’
http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/columnists/3213126/status-anxiety.thtml
Go ahead--call them "right wing". But which article bothered to take note of people losing their jobs?
no subject
A Different Vision for Japan
http://steve-s.livejournal.com/53180.html
Please feel free to read and comment.
Thanks,
Steve