Punk rock!
Dec. 26th, 2008 11:37 amI'm relieved to have come to the end of my Creation Years re-release schedule, because I'm the kind of person who dwells more happily on the present and the future than the past. But I wanted to end with this little postscript. I friended Alan McGee on Facebook on Christmas Day, and he friended me back. Neither of us sent a message, but I think in general we have good memories of our association.
I'm not going to bother drawing the re-release program to Alan's attention -- he retired from the music industry this September, he's not on the best of terms with Sony, our contracts weren't written on paper, the albums paid for themselves long ago and are without significant commercial value anyway. What interested me was something much more general: the question of outcomes.
Alan and I are the same age, both born in the West of Scotland in 1960. We're probably distantly related -- we have the same stubborn golf ball chin, the same petulant cherry lips, a mixture of Scottish and Irish blood, and somewhat hyperactive alpha-type personalities. There's a class gap, but it's not vast -- before he started Creation Records, Alan was at British Rail, which is exactly where my Grandpa Currie worked all his life. Alan now writes music columns for The Guardian, I write design journalism for the New York Times.

But obviously there's at least one huge difference in outcomes. Alan McGee discovered Oasis and is enormously rich. This means that his Facebook page is, in a sense, a glimpse into what life might be like for me had I become an enormously successful pop star. It makes an interesting -- sometimes surprising -- contrast to the life I'm actually having.
For a start, as an enormously wealthy person I'm not spending Christmas coughing painfully in a dark Berlin flat shared with a Japanese girl and a rabbit. I'm in the Maldives, a chain of tropical islands in the Indian Ocean, staying, probably, at the Hilton, whose subaquatic restaurant you see above. I'm very glad to be here, but I'm spending more time on my beach house patio watching Fleetwood Mac and Glasvegas videos on YouTube, or Twittering updates to my Facebook page, than exploring the Buddhist and Islamic heritage of this island, or its fish, flowers and fauna. In fact, you might say that I'm treating this more as a drug high than a travel experience; a soma half-holiday.
Although my failed Berlin self looks remarkably happy in his Facebook photos, prancing around dressed as a Japanese robber or leaping for joy in front of an art museum, my successful, enormously wealthy Maldives self looks rather glum, evasive and insecure in photos. I've bought a big white mansion in Wales "only because Led Zep have one down the road". My spelling and punctuation have gone entirely to pot, which is worrying, because I'm still writing for the newspapers (but copy editors will fix that). I appear to have lost all my hair (instead of just half of it), and I keep a peculiar trilby hat on at all times, even in bed.
Photographed alongside football and music world celebrities I look awkward, paranoid, nervous. I never smile. My cellphone, keys and personal organiser are beside me at all times. There's no sign of a significant other, but that's probably because she appreciates privacy. My successful self has approximately the same number of friends as my failed self, but they're -- in general -- older, more British, more supportive, less pretty, less articulate. They seem to be doing well, but the most important thing in their life is that they know me -- a very wealthy and successful person -- and that we might, you know, hang out one day. This bores me slightly. My life is full of unfulfilled promises to meet up with people abuzz with the idea that I'll transform their lives, and make them winners.
As a restless, risk-addicted entrepreneurial type, my tycoon self isn't enjoying being retired, living off art collecting ("upcoming artists like Howard Hodgkin") and property deals. On the Maldives beach my body is incongruously white. I'm a working class Glaswegian, and it's a fucking miracle I'm here at the Hilton, but somehow that miracle, thanks to the hedonic treadmill and my own restless personality, is not quite enough to guarantee the huge happiness that the world believes belongs to the successful, and the successful alone.
Anyway, thanks, Alan, for adding me -- and thank you for giving me the chance to make these six albums. You're probably happier than you look.
I want to end with a word about Harold Pinter. The man was a colossus, both artistically and as the conscience of a West that seemed, this decade, to have abandoned its moral compass. In his plays Pinter -- the missing link between Beckett and Steptoe and Son -- hinted at "the weasel beneath the cocktail cabinet". Later, in his poetry, activism and especially his excoriating Nobel Prize talk he turned his fire on the weasels in the Cabinet Office. 2005 was a time when many were thinking these things ("I haven't heard anything about the US population saying: 'We can't do this, we are Americans,'" Pinter told The Guardian) but lacked the daring or the literary skill to say them. Pinter had both in spades.
I tutored my sister through The Homecoming to get her into drama college, and it's my favourite play of his -- an extraordinary combination of Ionesco-esque (a much clumsier word than "Pinteresque") plot audacity, the kind of Cockney music hall echoes heard in Eliot's The Wasteland, Jewish vaudeville acts, Orton, Berkoff, Freud. Pinter's poetic ear was attuned to undertones of violence and sudden switches in power. Here's a scene from the best production of The Homecoming, Peter Hall's 1973 film starring Vivien Merchant, Pinter's first wife:
[Error: unknown template video]
I used to listen to the box set vinyl version of this production of The Homecoming in the same listening bunker I'd play Birthday Party and PiL Records in. Nick Cave had taken the name of one of Pinter's plays for his band, John Lydon shared his taste for absurdist menace. Neither of them retained their fierceness or their fight the way Pinter did. "Punk rock!" as Alan McGee would probably say.
I'm not going to bother drawing the re-release program to Alan's attention -- he retired from the music industry this September, he's not on the best of terms with Sony, our contracts weren't written on paper, the albums paid for themselves long ago and are without significant commercial value anyway. What interested me was something much more general: the question of outcomes.
Alan and I are the same age, both born in the West of Scotland in 1960. We're probably distantly related -- we have the same stubborn golf ball chin, the same petulant cherry lips, a mixture of Scottish and Irish blood, and somewhat hyperactive alpha-type personalities. There's a class gap, but it's not vast -- before he started Creation Records, Alan was at British Rail, which is exactly where my Grandpa Currie worked all his life. Alan now writes music columns for The Guardian, I write design journalism for the New York Times.

But obviously there's at least one huge difference in outcomes. Alan McGee discovered Oasis and is enormously rich. This means that his Facebook page is, in a sense, a glimpse into what life might be like for me had I become an enormously successful pop star. It makes an interesting -- sometimes surprising -- contrast to the life I'm actually having.
For a start, as an enormously wealthy person I'm not spending Christmas coughing painfully in a dark Berlin flat shared with a Japanese girl and a rabbit. I'm in the Maldives, a chain of tropical islands in the Indian Ocean, staying, probably, at the Hilton, whose subaquatic restaurant you see above. I'm very glad to be here, but I'm spending more time on my beach house patio watching Fleetwood Mac and Glasvegas videos on YouTube, or Twittering updates to my Facebook page, than exploring the Buddhist and Islamic heritage of this island, or its fish, flowers and fauna. In fact, you might say that I'm treating this more as a drug high than a travel experience; a soma half-holiday.
Although my failed Berlin self looks remarkably happy in his Facebook photos, prancing around dressed as a Japanese robber or leaping for joy in front of an art museum, my successful, enormously wealthy Maldives self looks rather glum, evasive and insecure in photos. I've bought a big white mansion in Wales "only because Led Zep have one down the road". My spelling and punctuation have gone entirely to pot, which is worrying, because I'm still writing for the newspapers (but copy editors will fix that). I appear to have lost all my hair (instead of just half of it), and I keep a peculiar trilby hat on at all times, even in bed.
Photographed alongside football and music world celebrities I look awkward, paranoid, nervous. I never smile. My cellphone, keys and personal organiser are beside me at all times. There's no sign of a significant other, but that's probably because she appreciates privacy. My successful self has approximately the same number of friends as my failed self, but they're -- in general -- older, more British, more supportive, less pretty, less articulate. They seem to be doing well, but the most important thing in their life is that they know me -- a very wealthy and successful person -- and that we might, you know, hang out one day. This bores me slightly. My life is full of unfulfilled promises to meet up with people abuzz with the idea that I'll transform their lives, and make them winners.
As a restless, risk-addicted entrepreneurial type, my tycoon self isn't enjoying being retired, living off art collecting ("upcoming artists like Howard Hodgkin") and property deals. On the Maldives beach my body is incongruously white. I'm a working class Glaswegian, and it's a fucking miracle I'm here at the Hilton, but somehow that miracle, thanks to the hedonic treadmill and my own restless personality, is not quite enough to guarantee the huge happiness that the world believes belongs to the successful, and the successful alone.
Anyway, thanks, Alan, for adding me -- and thank you for giving me the chance to make these six albums. You're probably happier than you look.
I want to end with a word about Harold Pinter. The man was a colossus, both artistically and as the conscience of a West that seemed, this decade, to have abandoned its moral compass. In his plays Pinter -- the missing link between Beckett and Steptoe and Son -- hinted at "the weasel beneath the cocktail cabinet". Later, in his poetry, activism and especially his excoriating Nobel Prize talk he turned his fire on the weasels in the Cabinet Office. 2005 was a time when many were thinking these things ("I haven't heard anything about the US population saying: 'We can't do this, we are Americans,'" Pinter told The Guardian) but lacked the daring or the literary skill to say them. Pinter had both in spades.I tutored my sister through The Homecoming to get her into drama college, and it's my favourite play of his -- an extraordinary combination of Ionesco-esque (a much clumsier word than "Pinteresque") plot audacity, the kind of Cockney music hall echoes heard in Eliot's The Wasteland, Jewish vaudeville acts, Orton, Berkoff, Freud. Pinter's poetic ear was attuned to undertones of violence and sudden switches in power. Here's a scene from the best production of The Homecoming, Peter Hall's 1973 film starring Vivien Merchant, Pinter's first wife:
[Error: unknown template video]
I used to listen to the box set vinyl version of this production of The Homecoming in the same listening bunker I'd play Birthday Party and PiL Records in. Nick Cave had taken the name of one of Pinter's plays for his band, John Lydon shared his taste for absurdist menace. Neither of them retained their fierceness or their fight the way Pinter did. "Punk rock!" as Alan McGee would probably say.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 12:23 pm (UTC)"2005 was a time when many were thinking these things but lacked the daring or the literary skill to say them. Pinter had both in spades."
Regardless of how I feel about this issue, you can't evoke Godwin's law and expect to be taken seriously. All I see in that Guardian piece is a lazy tirade of the 'Reductio ad Hitlerum' variety.
()
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 01:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 04:19 pm (UTC)After living in the U.S. for the last 8 years I've grown, to put it mildly, impatient with people who are afraid to look at the similarities between Hitler's rise to power and the neocon's power grab.
I'm a supporter of the EFF but I'm not following any "laws" made up by some internet dude.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 01:30 pm (UTC)cockney red
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 01:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 01:38 pm (UTC)For a channel which has become hybridised with Channel 5 mentality, becoming the supposed Channel Nine while actually becoming just another cable channel, it was somewhat daring for its alternative Xmas message to the Queen to be given by the Iranian President.
I know it was just a part of his work but I admired Pinter's talking around a situation style, when two voices would prattle on inanely almost ignoring each other but somehow creating a third dialogue. Real Life.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 02:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 02:44 pm (UTC)I think David Bowie makes a pretty good job of being David Bowie -- I'd be rubbish at it, what with my tombstone teeth and wonky eye.
(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-26 03:39 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-26 04:41 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-27 09:35 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-27 09:38 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 06:37 pm (UTC)RIP Pinter.
plutonic luv
Date: 2008-12-26 07:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 07:47 pm (UTC)But I do want to say that being critical (in the non-blame way, ie equivocal and considered, praising some things, questioning others) is a much bigger thing than the jealousy it often gets mistaken for. Criticism is about caring about things-in-themselves -- more, sometimes, than the relationships between the people involved. And of course for that reason it can be risky and destructive as well as creative and constructive.
I do think it's a risk worth taking, but there's a Catch-22. If you don't have the social bonds with someone to assure them that, whatever you say, you still love them, it's likely that your criticism will be seen as blame and rejected. But if you do have those social bonds, it's hard to judge objectively, and the relationship will tend to take precedence over the criticism.
I've been thinking about this recently because I've been working with an editor on my book, and an editor is there to offer criticism. Since it's the first time I've worked with a literary editor, I've had to learn not to be touchy, snappy, defensive, possessive, or to assume that my own built-in literary editor had done the whole job already.
Prank Rock
Date: 2008-12-26 08:47 pm (UTC)Re: Prank Rock
Date: 2008-12-26 09:19 pm (UTC)1. What would it be like to be very wealthy?
2. Great! Much better than being poor.
3. Actually, maybe not so great. Everyone would want a piece of you, and having those houses and holidays would be a big hassle, and somewhat hollow in the end.
4. Thank god I'm just a poor post-rationalising underachiever!
There's a lot of this stuff in Christianity and Socialism, and in British people. Nietzsche and the Americans won't have any of it, of course.
Re: Prank Rock
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-26 09:36 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Prank Rock
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-26 09:46 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Prank Rock
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 09:47 pm (UTC)The crazy freak from the billiards room very kindly accepted my Facebook friending attempt a while ago and so far I've managed to draw no attention to the fact that he is part of an AMERICAN ROCK LEGEND and I am sitting here coughing up blood from hand rolled cigarettes, when originally he was the jerk who ruined our pool game. Turns out he's a pretty nice guy.
But the thing is though, I do have my rewards, and if I were to talk about them out of context I would get a pretty harsh reception I'm sure. And I bet the Maldives could use the income considering what happened to the tourist industry (and tourists of course) in the Pacific a few years ago. I wonder if they have new official maps yet.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-27 12:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-26 11:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-27 12:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-27 08:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-27 11:50 am (UTC)Things -- our inevitable differences in style and perspective -- get blown out of all proportion. But let no-one say that, were the tables turned -- were I enormously rich, and wearing a silly hat, for instance -- I wouldn't chuckle when people called me on it. I really hope I wouldn't have become the type to pull super-rich hissy fits. Sir Ben Kingsley (who even asks his cat to call him "Sir Ben" at all times) springs to mind.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-27 04:38 pm (UTC)-Jace
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-27 06:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-28 12:38 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-28 09:11 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-28 10:43 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-29 04:16 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-29 11:42 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-29 12:43 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-12-30 11:16 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-03 05:36 pm (UTC)This perhaps randomness of outcomes happens too with rewards in life.
So Alan McGee got lucky and rich--think of how many other would-be music or property entrepreneurs put in similar luck and were not equally rewarded. Think of how much more famous you are than many other musicians and artists, you have people who recognize you as an interesting person, artist, musician, writer, person on your blog, in the NY Times, previously in Wired. Most musicians, artists, people in life chug along with zip, zero, no recognition outside of a few friends/family/lovers. They work their 9-5's. or play out with their bands and try to get art shows and writing gigs, and most get lost in the shuffle. For most artists/musicians/writers, even having had records put out, no less by a "legendary" in some circles label like Creation, would be a miracle/having made it.
But I can understand, in our modern age, there is so much information and possibility available today for creative people, and our lifespans are so long, that when we have mastered certain genres of creativity, we often want to keep exploring, learning, expanding, even in other genres we may have not appreciated or looked down upon or distrustfully at earlier periods in our lives. You seem to be a very creative and arty person. But having achieved fairly well (I don't mean in the capitalist sense of remuneration) as an artist/writer, and seeming to be a genuinely curious person, maybe it's time to take up more adventurous projects--truly creative humans in our day and age sometimes expand into forms of creativity and expression beyond art and music once they've been successful at those things.
There's an article in the NY Times right now about Wall Street people who were laid off or are wary of the industry now are branching off into their artistically creative sides, pursuing comedy, writing, etc. Now, for Momus, a rather "pure" artist, it's possibly to to think about the creative sides of capitalism. Think of the creativity in industry, transforming on state of land or a community or whatnot into something else useful. Or think of the devious and slightly theoretically humurous, though dastardly and also tragic creativity of a liar like Bernie Madoff . Ponzi schemes? Wow! Or Pet Rocks? Wow! Or real estate development? Maybe think about somewhere with cheap property in Berlin and how you could make it a Starbucks with both luxury lofts above and a few units of low income housing, and how there could be a bookstore next door. Or maybe start making some artsy puppets and clothes to sell on Etsy and make your own craftmaking capitalist empire.
Anyway, I mean to say, you cast yourself and Alan McGee as sorts of Yin and Yangs from one original source, but you are a poor artist and him a rich capitalist now. But as a smart, intelligent, creative person, you probably realize that in today's modern world the boundaries are much more fluid. Your creative self probably sees the delight in exploring things on the other side, the Yang to the Yin or whatnot. That's truly hitting the Maslows hierarchy concept of self-actualization--exploring the possibilities in life further, exploring the worthy and creative parts of ideologies and ways of commerce and life you may have scorned earlier.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-03 05:37 pm (UTC)Then again you probably know this all, and make bitter posts as a meta-joke about your adopted moniker Momus, "the god (daimon) of mockery, blame, ridicule, scorn, complaint and stinging criticism. He was expelled from heaven for ridiculing the gods."
But yeah, in 2009, I think it's time to see Momus cash in more, make something concrete, or get involved in some deals on the physical and capitalist level...but in an enlightened and artistic way. Maybe intern for Alan McGee for awhile on his deals, drop your prejudices, and write about it from an artist/musician's point of view (but without any sort of stereotyping bitterness).
Probably harder done than said, but that's what being creative is about, no?
(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-01-03 05:45 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-03 06:15 pm (UTC)http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/business/04unbox.html
So it seems antithetical to talk about habits in the same context as creativity and innovation. But brain researchers have discovered that when we consciously develop new habits, we create parallel synaptic paths, and even entirely new brain cells, that can jump our trains of thought onto new, innovative tracks.
Rather than dismissing ourselves as unchangeable creatures of habit, we can instead direct our own change by consciously developing new habits. In fact, the more new things we try — the more we step outside our comfort zone — the more inherently creative we become, both in the workplace and in our personal lives.
But don't bother trying to kill off old habits; once those ruts of procedure are worn into the hippocampus, they're there to stay. Instead, the new habits we deliberately ingrain into ourselves create parallel pathways that can bypass those old roads.
“The first thing needed for innovation is a fascination with wonder,” says Dawna Markova, author of “The Open Mind” and an executive change consultant for Professional Thinking Partners. “But we are taught instead to ‘decide,’ just as our president calls himself ‘the Decider.’ ” She adds, however, that “to decide is to kill off all possibilities but one. A good innovational thinker is always exploring the many other possibilities.”
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-04 02:32 am (UTC)i first suspected you of sophistry and tomfoolery after watching "man of letters " .although this is my fav dvd of all time i was left left wondering if you were in your dylan 65/66 mode and it was all a "put on".my mates thought you were being genuine......were you ??,i mean the edd ball scene surely that was staged.(your voice over was pure class though)anyways i still believe your " put on " mode is your default setting....if this is the case then all your pontifications and polemical views are of little consequence to truth seeking rational "normal" genuine readers/contributors.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-04 03:04 am (UTC)Is this "sophistry and tomfoolery"? No, it's structuring a film with a device drawn from fiction. It's not "all a put on", but the fiction and the fact are in a complicated relationship with each other. Actually, all documentary (non-fiction) films are structured according to some kind of plot device -- the honest ones are the ones which foreground this, in my view. Using, and foregrounding, this kind of device is not the opposite of being "truth-seeking" or "rational".