imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Although I seem to be writing more and more journalism these days, I've never had a cover feature. Until today. I've just found out that the article I wrote about Norwegian design team Yokoland has run as the cover feature in the new ID magazine.

This chuffs me to the very bollocks, for various reasons. First of all, I'm delighted for Yokoland themselves. Espen and Aslak are just 25; they only graduated from college two years ago. It's great for them. Secondly, because it's an "emerging talent" theme issue, and spotting "barely legal" emerging talent is something I love to do. I'm never happier than when running round art school degree shows. Thirdly, because this feature is one I suggested myself. ID editor Julie Lasky simply commissioned me to write about some young designers. I came up with Yokoland, and she liked the idea and went with it.

And, finally, because these designers come from a part of the world the Anglo press doesn't often cover, and incarnate values I'd like to see disseminated a bit more widely through the Anglo design world. In Yokoland's case, those values are all tied up with playfulness and a slightly retro-1970s aesthetic. I don't want to go into my "politics of texture" thing all over again here, but I think Yokoland's work is politically-texturally... well, right on, actually. If "Yokoland" is an imaginary republic of sorts, a place of trees and games, well, it just got slightly more real. This cover may attract a few settlers. And, as art directors commission them, other places may start to look slightly more Yokolandish. Best of all, the boys may now be able to pay the rent on their office in the world's most expensive city.

You can read the feature online here.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 04:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cityramica.livejournal.com
congrats, nick. i got the issue in the mail today, and i am very happy for you! thanks for the intro to Yokoland...i haven't been excited about art for a bit and i really enjoy the feel of their work.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 05:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Thanks for telling me about the cover, Mischa!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 06:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cityramica.livejournal.com
no problem! :D

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 05:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trini-naenae.livejournal.com
So Oslo is the most expensive? Good thing I like warm weather then.

Congrats. And Yokoland does look fun and playful.

Oh, and I think I'm going to have to go around finding excuses to say "This chuffs me to the very bollocks".

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 05:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
It's even better when non-British non-men say it!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 05:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trini-naenae.livejournal.com
Y'know, I laughed so hard when I read your response that my mom asked me what I was laughing at.

Come to think... while I figured from the context that "This chuffs me to the very bollocks" meant "This makes me very happy", and I know what bollocks mean, I still don't know what chuffs means.

So what does chuffs mean anyways? Aside from sounding really silly?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 05:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
"Chuffed" just means "pleased". If you don't want to say "bollocks" in front of your mum, you can say "I'm chuffed to the proverbials", in which "proverbials" becomes a somewhat absurdist fig leaf for your "bollocks".

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 05:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trini-naenae.livejournal.com
My mother is oblivious to British slang, thank heavens. Proverbials is even sillier though. Hmmmmmm... I'll have to alternate them then. :D

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 05:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
That's a mighty spicy meatball. Congrats, Nick!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 07:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
Did the paper version of the article include more pictures?

And congratulations for it being a cover feature!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 08:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sparkligbeatnic.livejournal.com

Well done!

The fellow on the left looks 15, not 25.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 11:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pixelmist.livejournal.com
Expertly written article, sir! Congratulations!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 11:17 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Ah, the northern woods!! Thanks for the article. I had no idea that Oslo was the most expensive city.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] akabe.livejournal.com
and i'm actually surprised tokyo is the 2nd expensive, i mean one can live a pretty low-key, low budget life here, would have thought (since it's not the late 80s, paris, londen NY were above. how do these things get worked out anyway?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 12:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
Note that this is for living a Western corporate executive lifestyle. Many Japanese get by fine on a budget in Tokyo, underpinning the high national savings rate. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo#Economy)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deadbatteries.livejournal.com
the most expensive cities are up to debate, just like college rankings and 'most polluted cities!' lists and things like that. economistsssssss- i dunno what you do!

http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/23/pf/expensive_cities/index.htm

this one ranks the most expensive cities as 1-moscow, 2-seoul, 3-tokyo.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-02 12:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dzima.livejournal.com
I've recently read about another index (not the Big Mac index, I can't remember its name) which was based on the average salary in any given city and the amount of time it took for a person to buy the basic items of food, clothing and transport. On those terms, Lagos, Nairobi, Sao Paulo, Mexico City are the most unaffordable; soon after them come London, Moscow, Zurich; then on a third tier are cities like Tokyo, Sydney, Berlin.

It is basically an 'affordability' index focusing on the locals "buying power" and not on the lifestyle of jet-setting New York businessmen.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] olamina.livejournal.com
I read here (http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/23/pf/expensive_cities/index.htm) that Moscow is the most expensive city.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] norsteinbeckler.livejournal.com
So, is 25 the new 16? Yawn.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 11:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaipfeiffer.livejournal.com
so, at 16, you had your studies finished since three years and the first monography on your works was being offered to you? wow, that is amazing! that is incredible!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-02 06:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] norsteinbeckler.livejournal.com
No, no, i was speaking to the "barely legal" title. What, are you their rep or something?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-02 12:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaipfeiffer.livejournal.com
oh, i see. of course, you're right. you can't pass as "barely legal" at 25, in the golden age of kiddy porn! but you can act like 19 until you're 38 now, no problem.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jmathewes.livejournal.com
Congratulations on having such an engaging feature published.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Well I don't mean to undermine your article, but you are aware that ID magazine last had its finger on the pulse sometime around '87?

It's been around too long, it's exhausted itself trying to build up and then distance itself from every trend, and it has as much relevance to modern life now as the crepe suzette.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
A bold view indeed from someone using AOL!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-02 12:01 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
This person is clearly mixing up their I.D. with their i-D.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-02 11:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desant012.livejournal.com
Probably. I accidentily bought i-D when looking for I.D. to see some of my friend's work featured. I didn't see any of his designs, but the bad photography of coked-up London scenesters more than made up for it.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
Food has to be "relevant"? Will irrelevant food give us gas?

Modern life is whatever we say it is. That's what makes it modern.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-01 10:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pixelmist.livejournal.com
I'm with you, Whimsy. And I like the crepe suzette: love it, in fact! Maybe I'll go get one right now. And I'll wear a cap, as well.

Yeah

Date: 2006-09-02 02:03 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
A 19th Century Cameroon, yes? Your taste is in your ass!

'Rick' Masters

12 year old Halo 2 Freak

Yeah

Date: 2006-09-02 02:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darthkronos.livejournal.com
To Live in Die in LA

Sweeet

Art is tangentially related to the watcher.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-02 04:24 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I went to Oslo to rendevous with the band ArtSkool some years back. For a city everyone has heard of everything is on the small side, not tightly packed like Japan, just small. Lots of early 20th Century modern architecture that doesn't make the architecture books. I guess it's not International style enough.

Expensive? Maybe the rents are high and the place is rather small as cities go? I didn't see goods as that expensive. Expensive, sure, but I wasn't shocked or anything. What I did see was considering the small size of the population perhaps the highest ratio of designers to the rest of the population. Of course my friend whom I stayed with not only lived in a 1920s modern house but had his own design studio. He's since had to close the studio because of high overhead and presumably all those other designers milling about, he now works for someone else's design studio.

-ndkent

Oslo

Date: 2006-09-03 01:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] campbellstein.livejournal.com
Does anyone know that little artsy area
with a giant chandlier made of old glass hanging over the alleyway?

And yes, Oslo is expensive, I had a small not very good lasagna for $17 in some cafe.

Re: Oslo

Date: 2006-09-03 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Its my fav spot: an old welding firm, one of Europes finest Jazz clubs, occupied houses, underdog artschool, stinky river, excellent graffiti, etc all whithin 50 metres...Used to work there

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-06 06:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] audiodregs.livejournal.com
Nice to see you help get these guys a cover feature, I love their work.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-10-25 02:36 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
very inspiring interview. thanks!