imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
1/The Dewey Decimal System is a system for classifying books.

2/Today, however, I would like to classify the English singer Simon Bookish, who has a new album out next week, his third, "Everything/Everything" (Tomlab), "a big band song cycle about science and information".

3/The Devo-ish sleeve (which is very good) is by Anthony Stephinson.

4/Before Bookish released Everything/Everything he released Unfair/Funfair (2006) and Trainwreck/Raincheck (2007). Generic titles containing consistently quirky punctuation are good.

5/Simon Bookish is the stage name of Leo Chadburn. Leo/Simon (as I expect he would enjoy being called) is very tall and always looks more interesting than anyone else in the room.

6/Pitchfork called him "the long-lost son of Jarvis Cocker".

7/Other people (I still love you, powpowpow!) have said "he thinks he's Momus" and "but Simon Bookish is quite a bit better than anything he's done in years". Grrr!

8/Tracks on the Simon Bookish Myspace page make it seem as if this new album -- played by a fifteen piece band rather than Bookish's usual digital synths -- is a great leap forward, a coming-of-age.

9/It is therefore time to say some things about Simon Bookish.

10/But first, let's watch him performing a song called Interview, from his previous album.

[Error: unknown template video]

11/ I like the way the backing track is almost Brian Eno's Golden Hours, which is probably my favourite Brian Eno song ever.

12/ The repeated refrain "Queen Victoria", and Bookish's outlandish garb, make me think of him as a futuristic "New Victorian Dandy" type.

13/A typical Bookish lyric: "the royal meteorologist's expression is pained". This is refreshing as a break from "let's hump and grind one more time", but not refreshing if you set your watch by Divine Comedy lyrics.

14/Reviewing Ocky Milk, Simon Bookish SLASH Leo Chadburn kindly called me "one of the most ingenious, pranksterishly self-aware musicians around". He criticized my Jamaican accent (correctly), though, and thought some of my friendly songs were mawkish.

15/If I might be allowed to criticize back, I would say that I find something emotionally attenuated (not mawkish enough) in Simon Bookish songs. Where, gentlemen, is the soul?

16/If Interview has the sound of Golden Hours, it certainly doesn't have the soulfulness of the Eno song.

17/People Simon Bookish has been compared to in reviews: Pulp, The Divine Comedy, Momus, Steve Reich, Marc Almond, David Bowie, Laurie Anderson.

18/People I would compare him to: David Cunningham, Wire, Penguin Cafe Orchestra, The Books, Dickon Edwards, Idle Tigers.

19/Artists I would not compare him to, but might compare to each other (because they're all out of control, dark, subconscious, soulful and fascinating to me): PiL, Tricky, No Bra.

20/No Bra's Susanne Oberbeck might be the only person in the room more extraordinary-looking than Simon Bookish, if a room were to exist where they both were.

21/I don't know why, but No Bra songs like She Was A Butcher and Doherfuckher touch me in a way Simon Bookish songs don't. Perhaps because, as Susanne says, "for me music is about relating emotion". There's something vulnerable and dangerous there. No Bra songs are "bad", but in a good way.

22/Boomkat classifies the new Simon Bookish album as "laptop folk / americana", which is completely weird, especially since the American empire has this week officially fallen. Laptop folk / Americana is the category my Folktronic belongs in, but not his Everything/Everything.

23/Simon Bookish asked John Talaga -- Fashion Flesh -- to do a remix for him for a single called Leo Being Simon Bookish.

24/Simon attended the Guildhall School of Drama and Music in the Barbican.

25/In 2004 Simon presented Fear of Music, a deconstruction of the work of Talking Heads at Limehouse Town Hall.

26/David Byrne played a track from Everything/Everything on his podcast recently.

27/Not Wanting To Say Anything About John Cage is an art piece Simon Bookish has presented.

28/He has also made a new score for Bertolt Brecht's The Caucasian Chalk CIrcle at the National Theatre, and appeared in the production as The Singer.

29/I would like to inform you that I approve of Simon Bookish's new Tomlab release wholemindedly.

30/But perhaps not, alas, wholeheartedly.

Re: ha!

Date: 2008-10-02 01:49 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Well, French New Wave was the new thing that happened in the early sixties, and it's interesting that it's so rooted in commercial Hollywood moviemaking, rather than surrealism or primitivism or something. That its heroes are Ford and Hitchcock, not Bunuel or Eisenstein. That's what's new about it!

Re: ha!

Date: 2008-10-02 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
But you absolutely can't say the French New Wave is some kind of genre play -- it may draw some energy from Hollywood, just as Fassbinder drew something from Douglas Sirk. But it adds a hell of a lot of totally new content. And for me, personally, Breathless is a lot less interesting than La Chinoise. Breathless is Godard's Noel Gallagher film (and it's the one Oasis fans are still likely to prefer, if they watch any Godard at all). After that he breaks away from pastiche and does something to establish a new genre rather than feed off an old one. He made sure that future Hollywood whizz kids like Tarantino would be in his shadow, rather than he in theirs.

Re: ha!

Date: 2008-10-02 02:55 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Well Breathless remains Godard's best known film. Yes, Godard then went off on a tangent but I'm not sure you can't say the others weren't "genre". Truffaut in particular is a 40s Hollywood director manqué. But anyway, I think it's interesting that even today France's cinéphile intelligentsia is probably more interested in obscure films noirs from the 40s than art cinema from Asia or whatever.

At one point you used to bang on about how there is no space outside society, it's an illusion. Well, I think something similar applies to genre. There's no real space outside genre, or convention, because it is the conventions that create the meaning. Playing off or against a convention is just playing the same game, albeit negatively.

Re: ha!

Date: 2008-10-02 03:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I don't mind you saying genre is inevitable and universal, but that's not a reason to leave existing genres untouched and unchanged. Their survival, in fact, depends on their being stretched and spliced and messed around. You're not "breaking" genre because you're messing around with it. And you're not obliged to do pastiche of old work just because genre exists. But sure, the limitations of genre can be productive.

By the way, who are you? You have a somewhat professorial tone! (I'm impressed by the correctness of the french accents!)

Re: ha!

Date: 2008-10-02 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You may call me Noël Galles-à-Guerre...

The messing around with the genre is just part of the dialectic that makes up the ur-genre, though. The other part of the dialectic is the "getting back to the essence of the genre" - the two need each other to exist.


Re: ha!

Date: 2008-10-02 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Noël Galles-à-Guerre

Ooh you big liar!

Have we met in real life?

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags