Alcohol-oriented districts
Apr. 3rd, 2008 12:51 pmWhite people -- if you'll forgive the generalisation -- drink, and the further north you go the more immoderately and self-destructively they tend to drink. Or, to put that a little differently, the whiter your district gets, the more bars are going to pop up, and the more your Friday and Saturday nights will fill up with piss, shouting, boom-boom -boom, swagger and bravado.
When I first moved to London I lived in Streatham Hill, a residential district to the south of Brixton with a significant black population. There were certainly pubs there, but alcohol didn't entirely dominate Friday and Saturday nights in Streatham. For that you had to go uptown. A few years later I moved (via Chelsea and Fitzrovia) to Brydges Place, a tiny alley just off St Martin's Lane in Covent Garden.
I thought that being in the midst of a district dominated by theatre and retail I'd be living in a refined environment. Instead, I found I was living in a sewer. Brydges Place, of an evening, became an open toilet, used as a slash-wall of last resort by many of the thousands of people who descended on central London every evening to drink... heavily. My friend Thomi, who had a studio above John Calder's publishing house on Green's Court in Soho, had it even worse: people would stand on his step and pee right through the letterbox. Later I moved to the Chinese end of the Lower East Side just in time to see it teeter between a quietly industrious Asian district by day and a burgeoning, boisterous white people's drinking district by night.
Experiences like these taught me that sometimes what's passed off as a fashionable district, an artist's district, can actually turn out to be nothing more than an alcohol-oriented district. Where pubs and clubs dominate a district, the only artists are likely to be piss artists (and the odd DJ).
Yesterday Hisae and I revisited Friedrichshain, the Berlin district where we lived for over a year. Our only active tie to the area now is Smart Deli, the Japanese cafe where we eat salmon teriyaki and pick up our month's supply of Japanese rental DVDs. But every time we return to Friedrichshain there are a couple more glitzy new bars, a few dozen more people carrying beer bottles, some more drunks in the park, and lots more piss and broken glass underfoot. It's become an alcohol-oriented area. And -- no coincidence, I suspect -- it's predominantly white.
It's not that bars in themselves are a problem, or beer. I like a quaff of the old dunkel weissbier of an evening myself. It's when bars are the only expanding business in your neighbourhood that alarm bells should start ringing. Your neighbourhood, to stay liveable, needs to be more than a mere alkie magnet. And for that, I'd argue, it needs to stay mixed -- not just in the mixed use sense, but the mixed race one too.
Neukolln, where we live now, has a 35% immigrant population, most of whom are muslims. Our streets are dotted with Turkish, Iraqi and Lebanese social clubs where muslims play dominoes, smoke pipes, watch satellite TV and chat under bright fluorescent lights (white people's bars never have such bright white light -- drunk people know how gormless they look in that kind of blaze). What they don't do, of course, is drink alcohol. Islamic culture frowns on it.

It's been interesting following not just the embourgeoisment of our corner of "Kreuzkolln", but also its coverage in the Berlin media. My own coverage of Neukolln's transformation has followed a "creative class" template borrowed from Richard Florida: I've been focused on workshops, art galleries, shops. But when the Berlin media declares that "Neukolln rocks", what they mostly seem to mean is "Here are some new bars for you to drink in". It isn't even about house prices (Berlin is still mostly a rental city, and rents don't radically alter the way house prices do -- they tend to be controlled). It's about the Kneipenszene: drinking.
Two trendy new bars have just opened round the corner from us on the Hobrechtstrasse: Mama and Raumfahrer. Raumfahrer is an interesting case: the curvy-windowed 70s storefront it's housed in strugged for a year as a designer workshop where earnest girls converted Chinese laundry bags into inventive, quirky clothes and bags. They were offering cheap creative studio space in there, but didn't seem to get any takers, and suddenly they were gone, and their space re-opened as a bar.
The bar is doing amazingly well -- at weekends it mills with people, and the windows go opaque with condensation from all the chat. The contrast makes me a little bit sad. It seems to suggest that what I thought was shaping up to be an art-oriented district might just be turning into an alcohol-oriented district, another Friedrichshain. But we have one secret weapon -- our much higher muslim population. As long as they stay, the demon drink can never take more than 65% of Neukolln's soul.
When I first moved to London I lived in Streatham Hill, a residential district to the south of Brixton with a significant black population. There were certainly pubs there, but alcohol didn't entirely dominate Friday and Saturday nights in Streatham. For that you had to go uptown. A few years later I moved (via Chelsea and Fitzrovia) to Brydges Place, a tiny alley just off St Martin's Lane in Covent Garden.I thought that being in the midst of a district dominated by theatre and retail I'd be living in a refined environment. Instead, I found I was living in a sewer. Brydges Place, of an evening, became an open toilet, used as a slash-wall of last resort by many of the thousands of people who descended on central London every evening to drink... heavily. My friend Thomi, who had a studio above John Calder's publishing house on Green's Court in Soho, had it even worse: people would stand on his step and pee right through the letterbox. Later I moved to the Chinese end of the Lower East Side just in time to see it teeter between a quietly industrious Asian district by day and a burgeoning, boisterous white people's drinking district by night.
Experiences like these taught me that sometimes what's passed off as a fashionable district, an artist's district, can actually turn out to be nothing more than an alcohol-oriented district. Where pubs and clubs dominate a district, the only artists are likely to be piss artists (and the odd DJ).
Yesterday Hisae and I revisited Friedrichshain, the Berlin district where we lived for over a year. Our only active tie to the area now is Smart Deli, the Japanese cafe where we eat salmon teriyaki and pick up our month's supply of Japanese rental DVDs. But every time we return to Friedrichshain there are a couple more glitzy new bars, a few dozen more people carrying beer bottles, some more drunks in the park, and lots more piss and broken glass underfoot. It's become an alcohol-oriented area. And -- no coincidence, I suspect -- it's predominantly white.
It's not that bars in themselves are a problem, or beer. I like a quaff of the old dunkel weissbier of an evening myself. It's when bars are the only expanding business in your neighbourhood that alarm bells should start ringing. Your neighbourhood, to stay liveable, needs to be more than a mere alkie magnet. And for that, I'd argue, it needs to stay mixed -- not just in the mixed use sense, but the mixed race one too. Neukolln, where we live now, has a 35% immigrant population, most of whom are muslims. Our streets are dotted with Turkish, Iraqi and Lebanese social clubs where muslims play dominoes, smoke pipes, watch satellite TV and chat under bright fluorescent lights (white people's bars never have such bright white light -- drunk people know how gormless they look in that kind of blaze). What they don't do, of course, is drink alcohol. Islamic culture frowns on it.

It's been interesting following not just the embourgeoisment of our corner of "Kreuzkolln", but also its coverage in the Berlin media. My own coverage of Neukolln's transformation has followed a "creative class" template borrowed from Richard Florida: I've been focused on workshops, art galleries, shops. But when the Berlin media declares that "Neukolln rocks", what they mostly seem to mean is "Here are some new bars for you to drink in". It isn't even about house prices (Berlin is still mostly a rental city, and rents don't radically alter the way house prices do -- they tend to be controlled). It's about the Kneipenszene: drinking.
Two trendy new bars have just opened round the corner from us on the Hobrechtstrasse: Mama and Raumfahrer. Raumfahrer is an interesting case: the curvy-windowed 70s storefront it's housed in strugged for a year as a designer workshop where earnest girls converted Chinese laundry bags into inventive, quirky clothes and bags. They were offering cheap creative studio space in there, but didn't seem to get any takers, and suddenly they were gone, and their space re-opened as a bar.
The bar is doing amazingly well -- at weekends it mills with people, and the windows go opaque with condensation from all the chat. The contrast makes me a little bit sad. It seems to suggest that what I thought was shaping up to be an art-oriented district might just be turning into an alcohol-oriented district, another Friedrichshain. But we have one secret weapon -- our much higher muslim population. As long as they stay, the demon drink can never take more than 65% of Neukolln's soul.
i think there's a very simple explanation for this
Date: 2008-04-03 11:09 am (UTC)soho is absolutely disgusting at weekends (i'd also experienced waiting for the last trains back to south london in the past, and they would inevitably be full of scantily clothed girls in high heels, barely managing not to fall over, and/or redfaced chips/burger/kebab eaters...)
give me a vegan cafe with cakes (very important) any day!
Re: i think there's a very simple explanation for this
Date: 2008-04-03 11:21 am (UTC)And obviously there's a colossal grey area between having a cake in a vegan cafe, and vomiting into the lap of someone you fancy in an All Bar One. A quiet pint in a handsome old boozer is one of life's great pleasures. For me, anyway.
Re: i think there's a very simple explanation for this
From:Re: i think there's a very simple explanation for this
From:Re: i think there's a very simple explanation for this
From:Re: i think there's a very simple explanation for this
From:Re: i think there's a very simple explanation for this
From:Re: i think there's a very simple explanation for this
From:Re: i think there's a very simple explanation for this
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 11:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 11:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 11:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 11:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 11:34 am (UTC)3 cheers
Date: 2008-04-03 11:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 12:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 12:22 pm (UTC)Though it is about your current district of living, not alcohol in general. Just wanted to point that out though.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 12:40 pm (UTC)Your analysis seems to miss out on the fact that huge swathes of the white European population are Latin, and Latin countries don't tend to go for binge drinking.
Choose Christianity, kids
Date: 2008-04-03 12:47 pm (UTC)But - is the 'problem' of revelry in the streets (don't go to Jamaica, Nick) really worth the brain-closure of religion? A few broken bottles - it's the patina of living. I say 'sweep them up and stay free'.
Re: Choose Christianity, kids
Date: 2008-04-03 01:02 pm (UTC)No, Islam quite specifically forbids alcohol, Christianity doesn't.
You're right that not everyone muslim is non-white, and not everyone white is non-muslim. But the vast majority of muslims aren't white, so I'm being a bit lazy and leaving out the caveats.
I'd say, by the same token, that all brain-closed people aren't religious, and all religious people aren't brain-closed.
Re: Choose Christianity, kids
From:Corinthians 6:10; Galatians 5:21; Ephesians 5:18
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-03 10:22 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 12:49 pm (UTC)I can’t find any studies that go into motives for drinking: why do white colleges for example have bigger kegger parties than black colleges? Reason would tend to suggest it’s because they can, but I’m no anthropologist and will leave that to the research of “the experts.”
I do know a bit about Berlin though. Just from observation I would guess that the boozing in Friedrichshain also has a lot to do with the age demographics. Not only are more young people living there, more young people who don’t live there are flocking there on Friday and Saturday nights.
In Neukolln, where you have just moved, there are not just more Muslims, there are also more families and elder (past middle-age) people. But that can only provide so much defense against the make-over of gentrification. In the end “who lives there” is only part of the change, and the smaller part.
In my 20s in San Francisco I lived in the predominately Mexican, Mission neighborhood. It was great place for years, but during the dot.com boom (remember that?) it got gentrified into party central. And you’re right, it was mostly those damn white kids, not only frequenting the bars, but opening and running the bars. On the weekends those of us who lived in the neighborhoods were out-numbered by the swarms of slumming hipsters.
So your percentages might not have much to do with the final picture. IF Neukolln becomes the next Friedrichshain in terms of being a party destination, the piss artists will desend like locusts.
I also moved recently, and had considered Neukolln briefly because it was a neighborhood I always liked. But then there was so much hype over the area in the past year that I ended up deciding on another neighborhood (also known for its Muslim population): Wedding. It’s wonderfully quiet, and more central than most people think. The part I live in is a hop away from Mitte and Prenzlauer Berg, and as we talked about before, on bike there’s no where in this city that is far. I’m also near the cross-town trains (S1, S2), the circle line, and the Neukolln-express, the U8—not to mention a beautiful park that most white people—including Germans who have lived here for years—have never even been to.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 01:07 pm (UTC)But yes, you're right, there can be a nomadic population of drinkers who descend like locusts onto an area if it gets bar-hip. When that happens, it doesn't matter who lives there. People will come expressly to piss on you night after night.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 12:59 pm (UTC)In any case, the thought seems applicable here.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 01:12 pm (UTC)For instance, I would rejoice to see a video store in Neukolln as good as Friedrichshain's Filmkunst (world cinema, nice cafe, trendy clientele). For it to appear here would be a sign that our area was going in a good direction. And it would really stand out here, because there's nothing like that.
But in Friedrichshain, Filmkunst just caters to the majority of the local population. It somehow feels smug and non-controversial there, part of a young white bourgeois hivemind. It certainly doesn't stand out. Context, it seems, changes everything.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 02:12 pm (UTC)Perfect example of the false friend (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_friends) phenomenon.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 02:45 pm (UTC)I'm rather interested in whether the model is Turkish, or meant to suggest Turkishness. I think, just by virtue of being not-blonde, we are supposed to get at least a taste of that from her. But she's clearly not wearing a headscarf or looking too threateningly "otherly".
It would have been funny if they'd put a radical Islamist standing in front of a mosque behind the "Neukolln Rockt!" slogan instead. And it's interesting how the women of any ethnic minority community are considered more internationally acceptable than the men. They can sort of pass and cross better. They can play both sides, strategically.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 02:43 pm (UTC)Music and drugs (alcohol included) are the backbone of nearly all youth cultures. I tend to find that even neutrally proposing the possibility that people might need drink and drugs just to enjoy themselves is met with accusations of self-righteousness, or everyone quickly goes on the defensive about their habits.
Dont get me wrong, each to their own, and I'm sure there are people who could genuinely enjoy the social aspect of bars and clubs without necessarily drinking. That said, I'm inclined to believe a lot of people only really enjoy bars and clubs because they're intoxicated. I'm one of those people -- I generally don't enjoy bars and clubs unless I'm drunk. That's fine if they're happy with that, I just wasn't.
As easy as it would have been for me to just carry on drinking to ensure I enjoyed a night out, it depressed me somewhat that I needed to drink just to slot into the status quo. It was also eating into my wallet. Anything is fun when you're drunk... you're inebriating yourself just to enjoy something that you wouldn't otherwise. "Why am I doing this?" I thought. I tried to find other ways to occupy myself and lift my mood, and luckily I found that in many forms of art and activities like cooking and meditation.
I'm not saying this is true of everyone, but for me, not drinking has made me a happier person and a better artist, or rather an artist more in touch with being creative as a way of enriching my existence. I would like to believe that if people left drink behind as a method of escapism, creativity would fill that void and play a larger role in their lives.
Sorry for rambling on. That's just my 2 cents on drinking culture from my perspective.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 02:54 pm (UTC)That means that an industrial structure in which music was a commodity in its own right has been replaced by one in which music fits into a drinking / chatting / socialising framework -- it's an accessory to a pint. We've seen this in the way you now get big events like the Carling NME Awards. NME probably now has a more significant relationship with a drinks company than any record company.
And, in line with my theory about the relationship between drinking and whiteness, it may be no co-incidence that the NME celebrates black music less than it ever did. It's very much promoting a white music culture, a culture of drink and drugs, rather than a nerd music-loving culture of collectors and crate-diggers and curious cultural tourists.
(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-03 03:43 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-03 06:40 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 02:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 03:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 04:23 pm (UTC)black fans
Date: 2008-04-03 04:48 pm (UTC):-)
Re: black fans
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-03 04:57 pm (UTC) - Expandblack fans
From:drinkin'
Date: 2008-04-03 05:14 pm (UTC)Re: drinkin'
Date: 2008-04-03 07:55 pm (UTC)Emmm, for most people that's the major selling point of drugs.
Dank, smelly bars, tedious social gatherings, etc. I'd rather just avoid circumstances where alcohol is required to have a good time, even at the risk of being viewed a party-pooper.
Yeah, but all those drinking people probably don't have that many circumstances where alcohol is not required to have a good time to fall back to.
The Acid House Class Bond
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-03 10:19 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 05:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 05:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 06:10 pm (UTC)What's interesting, I think, is the gender/cultural factor. The Muslim gentlemen's clubs seem completely devoid of women, whereas the whole point of white boozeries is for "random play" with the opposite sex. The shit-facedness just makes these uncomfortable interactions easier. It seems unthinkable, in fact, that a white would go out for a night on the town without having the opposite sex in mind, whereas the men's clubs seem open to the idea of hanging out with one's friends for a friendly chat. The romantic relationship factor seems to be taken care of, in this case, by the idea that one's lover is most likely at home with the kids.
For middle-class whites, staving off family and the future for as long as possible, this is no longer tenable. Instead, we drink and fuck, fuck and drink. Is this what happens when religious traditions and the culture of marriage and family gives way to atheistic materialism? Is temperance impossible when one is only living for oneself?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 11:14 pm (UTC)Hehe. I think you'll find that vast numbers of white people quite often go out with their friends for a cosy chat in the pub, and a good many of them, including every one of the 13 people I was in the pub with tonight (most of whom were couples), aren't 'having the opposite sex in mind'. Although some of them might have been having the same sex in mind :) I don't think I've ever been out in a single-sex group, or even in a single sexual orientation group, and I really don't think I'd want to. Of course, as a female in your little Muslim fantasy world, I wouldn't get to go out at all and would have to stay home breeding. I suppose you'll call that 'temperance'?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-03 09:50 pm (UTC)a more direct, more personally risky, more socially acceptable, less authoritarian fix might be mixing drugs. think of it as a nice salad! a little tomato, a little scallion, some mesclun... heart-pounding, heart-stopping delicousness! .....er, any form of intoxication is a complicated venture. feeling like i want to balance out my coffee brain chemistry with some fatty fish right nowsers.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-04 12:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:r
Date: 2008-04-04 01:46 am (UTC)keyboard malfunction
Date: 2008-04-04 01:48 am (UTC)CS
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-04 02:02 am (UTC)also, practically everywhere in the world is north from NZ, there must be a less northern-hemisphere-centric way to put it...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-04 05:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-04 05:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-04 06:01 am (UTC)