imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
As anyone who even glances at newspapers will have seen this past week or so, we're in the middle of a "correction" -- big money is being wiped off share values. It's said to have started with rumours that the Chinese government were planning to make a tougher business environment in order to slow down the country's overheated, bubble-style growth. Anyway, today shares continue to slide, amidst conflicting noises: Correction: this could become a crash after all, thinks The Guardian's chief economics journalist. But Treasury chief feeling good about economy, contradicts Reuters. Gung ho hum!



Now, a lot of the selling we've seen this week represents typically irrational capitalist behaviour -- hunches, worries, fears, projection and paranoia trigger more hunches, worries, fears, projection and paranoia . This storm in a rich man's bone china teacup needn't really concern the rest of us. The huge sums of money being lost are largely imaginary, purely notional, and concentrated, anyway, in very few hands.

But what might a big crash mean to the rest of us? Might it even be rather good news? I think the answer to that depends on the answer to the question "How big?" The kind of crash people call a "correction" would mean very little to me, personally. I own no property, no house, no car. I have no dependents. Neither do I have any debt. I could live on a quarter of the sum I'm currently earning, and it wouldn't honestly make much material difference to my life. A crash would only start to impact my life if it made air travel more expensive, or made the internet somehow stop working.

Berlin isn't just a city well-protected from rising sea levels, earthquakes, and so on. It's also well-protected from financial instability. This is a city with incredibly cheap prices, a city populated by people who manage to live well on little money, a city of renters rather than owners, a city pretty familiar with post-materialist lifestyles.

But a warning on just how wrong things can go here, in other circumstances, comes from Kafka's experience of the city in the early 1920s. High inflation and unemployment led to such poverty, misery and civic unrest that Kafka, already seriously ill with tuberculosis, didn't dare buy newspapers or venture into the centre of town. He stayed in a rather dull suburb with his girlfriend, Dora Diamant. Then again, the same conditions of instability attracted the younger, tougher Bertolt Brecht, who came to the city to agitate for communism. He later described Kafka as "a man too much trapped under the wheels" of the capitalist system rather than someone looking for alternatives. But even Brecht had to flee when the Nazis used instability to grab power. They eventually murdered Kafka's sisters in concentration camps.

The big fear, should a big crash come, isn't so much the immediate economic effects, but the political ones. What would a desperate America do if and when it realized that, as The Guardian thinks, what we're seeing now is its supremacy crumbling away? Might the empire lash out with more ill-advised military adventures, try to take the world down with it?

It's easy to get apocalyptic, though. I prefer to think that what's been happening this last week or so -- and seems set to continue this week -- might actually be a bit of a boost, a filip, an incentive to people to start looking at their basic priorities in life.

My own brand of post-materialism matches Berlin values with Japanese ones. Here, for instance, is Kyoichi Tsuzuki, in the afterword to "Tokyo Style", his documentation of the way ordinary Tokyoites live in small spaces:

"Today, amidst Japan's unprecedented devotion to money, even after property and fame and desires have all been attained, somewhere in the backs of our minds lingers an altogether Asian vision of the quiet life in a thatched hut deep in the mountains.... There's a Buddhist adage that says: Half a mat to sit, one mat to lie down. No matter how huge a mansion you may build, there's no need for more than one-meter by two-meters when you sleep; no matter how many dishes are set out before you, there's no eating what will feed ten. Sure, given the choice, who wouldn't like more space instead of less? Still, if it comes down to working extra hard just to pay high rents and mortgages, then there are people who would rather spend that time surrounded by their favorite things."

Atelier Bow Wow have followed their interest in "pet architecture" -- basically the design ingenuity of poor people responding to vastly over-valued real estate -- with a book about the Post-Bubble City, in which small, sustainable private houses become a metaphor for the body, and for local personal survival. Post-bubble is a way of life.

It isn't just Japanese in Japan who feel this way. David Duval Smith of design group Namaiki really impressed me with a lovely interview he gave Theme magazine. Namaiki do just enough work for corporate clients to follow their own interests, which have veered recently into guerilla gardening -- the greening of spaces in the city and outside it.

"The model for my farms," says Smith, a New Zealander, "is Masanobu Fukuoka’s seed ball project and Bill Mollison’s Permaculture system of sustainable agriculture. (Fukuoka is the pioneer of natural farming and sustainable agriculture in Japan who now gives lectures abroad. Mollison is an Australian researcher.) Basically, the idea is to spread the seed and let nature go. It’s about living in an edible jungle. You don’t need to pay 100 yen to buy a few pieces of lettuce or herbs. You just plant some seeds, the rain falls and they grow, and you get hundreds of leaves and thousands of seeds the next year.

"People have been calling them “guerilla farms” or “green graffiti,” I guess because it is done without permission. But I believe it is a victimless crime, if a crime at all. No one profits [financially], there is no damage, no loss of anything. A gross and a net gain.

"I came to a realization that nothing was more miraculous than soil and seed. They are positive in every sense, right up to the massive real profit in seeds at the end of the plant’s life, clearly sustainable, and essential to human existence.

"The project also was started as a reaction to the car, which I believe is a true villain in communities. Cemented roads are unproductive, as is parking. Yes, personal mobility is important, but I think that can be addressed more intelligently. And also, yes, goods and delivery systems are important, but only in commerce and the consumer market, which is quite unsustainable. At present, it takes 100 calories to make 10 calories of food, not to mention petroleum-based fertilizers, machine harvesting, plastic, and the worldwide delivery involved. This is unsustainable, unhealthy, and unintelligent. Vegetables are best fresh, and so I thought that they should be grown locally.

"People sometimes use the expression “going to seed” to refer to something in the process of declining or decreasing, but I think going to seed is a necessary part of life."

finances and flowers

Date: 2007-03-05 11:49 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Back in 2001 I visited my pal in the bluegrass state Kentucky. One day on the front porch of his house he showed me two pages of the Louisville gazette. On it, in small characters were listed the names of those louisvillians who had one million dollar or more.

I realized then, that, Louisville being a small american town with hardly one million inhabitants, this list could fill weeks and weeks of newspapers, if all the millionaires in the world were listed on it. I wondered what would happen if all of them decided to go to the bank to ask for their money in cash? I think, there is not so much money. And from this I concluded that a financial crash is a world wide illusion.

About gardening: when I lived in Amsterdam in the eighties and nineties, pavements were full of dog shit and streets were full of cars. An utopian idea enlightened my days. It was to break open the streets and turn them into park lanes. Mix seeds with dog food, so their heaps would become fertilizer and seed bomb at once. What wonderful result it would have if tropical seeds were used. Think of the exotic plants and birds that would arrive.

Meanwhile in Berlin, the palast der republic is almost dismantled. It will leave an open space in town for some years...

greetings from the east of town,

rinus

Re: finances and flowers

Date: 2007-03-05 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Hello Rinus! Glad to see you've survived the crash too!

Re: finances and flowers

Date: 2007-03-05 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] risk1911.livejournal.com
but what's money? seems the federal reserve can't even define it.

Alan Greenspan: "We have a problem trying to define exactly what money is. the current definition of money is not sufficient to give us a good means for controlling the money supply."

Congressman Paul asked "Well, if you can't define money, how can you
control the monetary system?"

Greenspan replied "That's the problem."

Re: finances and flowers

Date: 2007-03-05 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Bring back arguing how many sheep are worth a cow? Capitalism is the glorious mechanism to overcome the tiresome burden of haggle and interaction - for ayone wishing to live on more than seeds! Enjoy the rollercoaster, brothers and sisters, the market gets paranoid so you don't have to be. Wheeeeeee.

Re: finances and flowers

Date: 2007-03-05 12:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] risk1911.livejournal.com
this "correction" certainly won't last for very much longer. money supply growth in the last 12 months...

UK M4 is up 13%
Eurozone M3 is up 10.6%
China M2 is up 15.9%
South Korea M3 is up 10.6%
Australia's M3 is up 13%
Russia's M2 is up 48%.

lots of liquidity in the market to squelch it.

Re: finances and flowers

Date: 2007-03-05 05:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zzberlin.livejournal.com
No, there's nothing wrong with capitalism, in theory, there's nothing wrong with it, only hippies dislike the free market.

I'm a big believer in the merits of capitalism. What's better? Please don't say european socialism, I'll turn my nose up at that, thanks, the U.S.. system is better.

What's wrong with the U.S. now is not its economic system, it's fat apathy and poor leadership. But Obama will fix that. I don't give two shits about politics and I'm holding a fund raiser for him this summer. If he can get me, a tried and true political nihilist, interested in U.S. politics, he can do magic.

Re: finances and flowers

Date: 2007-03-05 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zzberlin.livejournal.com
<< I realized then, that, Louisville being a small american town with hardly one million inhabitants, this list could fill weeks and weeks of newspapers, if all the millionaires in the world were listed on it. I wondered what would happen if all of them decided to go to the bank to ask for their money in cash? I think, there is not so much money. And from this I concluded that a financial crash is a world wide illusion. >>

Why Louisville? I grew up there. It has an industrial beauty but the air has some problems.

Re: finances and flowers

Date: 2007-03-05 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
because i happened to be there, and it was the local newspaper.

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags