Sturm und Drang

[imomus]

As the whole of Germany braced last night for the huge winter storm known here as Orkan Kyrill, I became fascinated with the live television coverage of the gusting winds (over 200 km/h on the north coasts) and heavy rain. First of all, I noticed how it took a local event of this magnitude to feel I was actually in Germany at all (I'm usually mentally in Japan, the UK or the US, selected parts of the city of Berlin, the internet). Secondly, I noticed the silly way all the reporters -- mostly icily sexy blonde madchen -- were shouting into big fuzzy mic shields like enormous ruffling caterpillars, their hair flying out behind them. As the wind buffeted them, each in turn struggled, live on camera, to stay alive. There was something of Munch's "The Scream" about it all. But, in contrast to their usual icy reports on meetings at the Finanzministerium, this storm seemed to be flushing the madchen with an unwonted elan vital. Next I noticed that the flat and banal quality of television video was being transformed, by wind and rain and water on the lens, into something else, something more exciting and artistic, a kind of radical subjectivity that harked back, perhaps, to something in Germany's 18th century past: the movement known as Sturm und Drang -- storm and stress.

Yes, this natural cataclysm seemed to be bringing something out in these "emergency girls": they seemed to be reaching back to the Geniezeit, the "era of genius" -- that part of the German soul best encapsulated in the writings of young Goethe and Schiller. One of the reporters was even called Anke Genius! The Literary Encyclopaedia describes the Storm and Stress sensibility thus:

"In a nutshell, the central concepts of Sturm und Drang are ecstasy of emotion and passion; boundless affirmation of nature; the idolisation of the unique, creative and all-powerful individual (the "genius", the "Faustian" personality); the veneration of art as gospel, i.e. as creation of the genius... There was a strong psychological orientation in the movement: a keen interest in human nature and the passions that cause its triumphs and its downfall. The Weltanschauung [world-view] of Sturm und Drang was essentially tragic: as the Promethean genius it liked to portray is invariably undone by a world of mediocrity, tragic failure appears to be a matter of course for greatness."

A radical subjectivity, a derangement of the senses, a sense of impending crisis, an awe in nature, a fascination with death -- it was all there. Feeling my own genius rising up in me like a storm, I opened up iMovie and set shots of the "Sturm und Drang girls" to one of my own compositions, "I Refuse To Die". Here are the results.

[Error: unknown template video]

Comments

[qscrisp.livejournal.com]

"What an obtuse, misantrophic question"

Really? Are you sure?

By the way, do you mean 'misanthropic'? I can't find 'misantrophic' in my dictionary.

Anyway, surely you can do better than merely try to impugn the intelligence of anyone who asks a question. I even had the notion that you wanted to encourage people to ask questions. Was I wrong?

[charleshatcher.livejournal.com]

By the way, do you mean 'misanthropic'? I can't find 'misantrophic' in my dictionary.

This is rather pedantic and, I would have thought, beneath you.

Your question was rather obtuse and misanthropic. Not to mention trite, jejune and absurd -- yes, there has been human progress; quite a lot of it, in fact.

[qscrisp.livejournal.com]

Well, I should clarify that I thought that 'misantrophic' might actually be something I'm not aware of.

Well, okay, if we're going to get into this, my question was at least slightly humorous. I realise that doesn't always come across on the Internet, and, besides which, I suppose it wasn't entirely a joke. I think I just wanted to call attention to the idea of progress. I mean, what is it, really? Certainly there has been change, and this or that change can be argued over as good or bad. Does a cautious assumption that there is a link between human activity and climate change mean that you hate all human progress? Personally, I think that it would be real progress if we could actually work out some way to live that isn't destructive to our environment.

[charleshatcher.livejournal.com]

Well, we are working on it, utilising all those fake progresses we've made through the centuries.

[qscrisp.livejournal.com]

Nice photo, by the way.

(He says, changing the subject.)

[charleshatcher.livejournal.com]

Vielen Dank.

[(Anonymous)]

Spell checking aside QS, I was not seeking to impugn your intelligence.
I do however tend to take issue with rejection of human progress.
Regards
Thomas.

[qscrisp.livejournal.com]

That's all right.

The Internet's a strange place. When I get this disembodied, I don't feel myself anymore.

I wouldn't reject the idea of human progress out of hand, though I do question it sometimes.