Outlandish!
The true eccentric never believes herself to be so; all she sees is that other people seem increasingly bland, and have a tendency to brand her in increasingly exaggerated, lurid ways. The same day I was berating the world for wearing jeans, the London Evening Standard's free commuter paper London Lite ran a review of my Thursday night show at the Spitz which, while essentially positive, painted a rather frightening picture of a person way out on the margins of society, flirting with madness.

For reviewer Joe Muggs, my performance was "tiring, even uncomfortably close to insane". "Scotsman-turned-world-citizen Nick Currie - aka Momus - took the stage in pyjamalike suit, ludicrous Beatle-wig and his trademark eyepatch, with only a laptop for accompaniment," Muggs wrote, mentioning my "mind-boggling" blog and "unashamed wonkiness". The headline to the piece ran "Mad Momus is an inspiration".
"You do look pretty close to madness!" commented my mother, who famously refuses to walk down the street with me these days, afraid that people may throw a straitjacket around her. "Glad they are saying some good things though."
At the Tate Gallery last night the "uncomfortably close to insane" line was running through my head as I lay face down on a table in the august and imposing Room 9 of Tate Britain, filled with heroic Victorian military and naval scenes, early Turners, and a screen showing scenes from "Funky Forest". My hands, bound at the wrists by invisible ropes, twitched violently as I simulated being anally raped by an invisible medieval knight. In my mind it was perfectly clear that I was playing The Lady of Shalott, and that exactly such scenes could well appear in any one of the paintings hanging on the walls nearby. Early Momus songs were inspired by exactly the kind of perversity I'd see in paintings at the Tate and the National Gallery.
Apparently when No Bra played this same room, the sudden appearance of Suzanne's breasts almost made the organizers halt the performance -- again despite the fact that many of the paintings and sculptures nearby featured scenes of bare-breasted women. The Tate also requested the artists performing to "please decline from using any pornographic or violent video footage within their performence". I immediately cancelled plans to show images of The Rape of the Sabine Women and Judith with the Head of Holofernes, or make any reference to The Bible or, indeed, the new Stephen Fry comedy series, the trailer for which features a parrot shouting "Fuck me! Fuck me! Come on my tits!"
A great range of normal human behaviour veers "uncomfortably close to insanity"; even the most eccentric or extreme art doesn't show the half of it. Still, I'm grateful to the Tate (in the shape of funky culturepreneurs Adrian Shaw and Dexter Bentley) for letting me perform under the paintings. You can also hear me today live in session on Hello Goodbye, Dexter's show on Resonance FM, between noon and 1.30pm UK time. The webstream is here. I promise not to sing any rude words or be at all mind-bogglingly mad in the interview.
For reviewer Joe Muggs, my performance was "tiring, even uncomfortably close to insane". "Scotsman-turned-world-citizen Nick Currie - aka Momus - took the stage in pyjamalike suit, ludicrous Beatle-wig and his trademark eyepatch, with only a laptop for accompaniment," Muggs wrote, mentioning my "mind-boggling" blog and "unashamed wonkiness". The headline to the piece ran "Mad Momus is an inspiration".
"You do look pretty close to madness!" commented my mother, who famously refuses to walk down the street with me these days, afraid that people may throw a straitjacket around her. "Glad they are saying some good things though."
At the Tate Gallery last night the "uncomfortably close to insane" line was running through my head as I lay face down on a table in the august and imposing Room 9 of Tate Britain, filled with heroic Victorian military and naval scenes, early Turners, and a screen showing scenes from "Funky Forest". My hands, bound at the wrists by invisible ropes, twitched violently as I simulated being anally raped by an invisible medieval knight. In my mind it was perfectly clear that I was playing The Lady of Shalott, and that exactly such scenes could well appear in any one of the paintings hanging on the walls nearby. Early Momus songs were inspired by exactly the kind of perversity I'd see in paintings at the Tate and the National Gallery.
Apparently when No Bra played this same room, the sudden appearance of Suzanne's breasts almost made the organizers halt the performance -- again despite the fact that many of the paintings and sculptures nearby featured scenes of bare-breasted women. The Tate also requested the artists performing to "please decline from using any pornographic or violent video footage within their performence". I immediately cancelled plans to show images of The Rape of the Sabine Women and Judith with the Head of Holofernes, or make any reference to The Bible or, indeed, the new Stephen Fry comedy series, the trailer for which features a parrot shouting "Fuck me! Fuck me! Come on my tits!" A great range of normal human behaviour veers "uncomfortably close to insanity"; even the most eccentric or extreme art doesn't show the half of it. Still, I'm grateful to the Tate (in the shape of funky culturepreneurs Adrian Shaw and Dexter Bentley) for letting me perform under the paintings. You can also hear me today live in session on Hello Goodbye, Dexter's show on Resonance FM, between noon and 1.30pm UK time. The webstream is here. I promise not to sing any rude words or be at all mind-bogglingly mad in the interview.
evening standard are renowned for their insight into things cultural
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 10:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Best of luck, keep being insane.
The Wonkiness Of Momus
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 12:04 pm (UTC)(link)Thomas S.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)Overhead:
"This appears to be getting out of hand. We could have our 2008 funding compromised. And the repercussions if the press get hold of this...shall I pull the show, sir?"
"Hmmm....no...no...let her continue..."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)Thomas S.
no subject
I did take some photos at the Tate gig, too, but they were, without exception, very blurry. I might upload them, anyway.
Nice version of The Rape of Lucretia I just heard there on the radio.
no subject
~*~*~*~
Whilst I do realize that the true eccentric doesn't do things mearly to be strange, but rather out of a true sense of calling, I do understand why other people can call people like us clickOpera-ers (for lack of a better noun) "eccentric" or "nuts" etc. But like the true "eccentric" I am, I dismiss such accusations.
w00t w00t.
And for the record, I think simulated anal rape and things like parrots saying "fuck me! come on my tits!" are perfectly in keeping with and sane in light of today's social scene.
Kudos, Mo-Man.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)mixu62
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 02:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Here's the album:
http://my.opera.com/quentinscrisp/albums/show.dml?id=184621
Sorry it's so blurry. I blame the camera.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)get over yourself
no subject
There are so many things wrong with what you just attempted (and failed) to imply that I'm quite sure further comment will be wasted on your knee-jerk, self-righteous catcalls of "craziness".
In discussions such as these, you = fail. Clearly. Get over YOURSELF and the "cleverness" of the brevity of a comment like this.
no subject
Did you hear the 'band' that opened the show? You could expend some of the bile you inflict on harmless denims on far more deserving targets, y'know. Charlatanry..
Ah well. Are you planning to post the remix of Summerholiday1999? Cause that was bitchin' poignant.
Eyepatch & Lyrics
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Eyepatch & Lyrics
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)I always enjoy your dancing and miming. I especially liked the mime for 7th Wife at the ICA, when you pretended to play a keyboard: but now I see you with a huge silver cloak. Which shows that the mime was effective.
DONT BITE MY POSTS, LITTLE ANONOMOUSE
Re: Eyepatch & Lyrics
no subject
no subject
That said, it's very amusing to see where people now draw the lines in these homogenized times. In the words of Mr. Thompson, "It never got weird enough for me".
Makes one wonder how a young Bowie would be received today. Would he be seen as mad? Eccentric? Threatening? A calculating poseur? Inauthentic?
That wig is possibly the most "punk" gesture I've ever seen Nick adopt. Keep the freak flag flying, Nick, you wonderful poseur--people need a little shaking up.
bowie wouldnt raise an eyebrow
Re: bowie wouldnt raise an eyebrow
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
RESONANCE FM = JOHNY BROWN!!!!!!!!!
I WONDER WHAT YOU THOUGHT OF THE BAND OF THE HOLY JOY WHEN YOU WERE A YOUNG THUG COMING UP IN THE HOOD
23.00 Mining For Gold Johny Brown
there is a soundscape involved and guests with words and instruments and stuff and....
ideas actions memories dreams and what have you
sometimes it occurs in other manifestations like live gig or play or drama but mostly it is radio...
Re: RESONANCE FM = JOHNY BROWN!!!!!!!!!
YOU ARE BLOWING MY MIND MOMUS
ID LIKE TO KNOW WHO'S WHO IN BAND OF HOLY JOY
no subject
"please decline from using any pornographic or violent video footage within their performence"
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)Why do you put your own smug delusions of "originality" before the feelings of your own mother?
Why do all these naive college kids worship your affected "insanity"?
Why do you pretend your wig is art when you're clearly just a baldy bastard?
mixu62
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-01-06 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)p.s. I quite enjoyed your post on relational aesthetics. More like that please. I haven't read the Bourriaud volume yet, but my working suspicion, informed by your post, is that as it cascaded through the ranks, it was reinterpreted through a lens of vulgar communalism, and lost its strong flavor of something that takes relationships between subject-objects seriously, which is what I hope it is or was. In other words, less semiotic, more humanist, less observational/experimental, more normative. But these are all guesses, art/criticism is not at all my forté.
Note the similarities in the covers between Relational Aesthetics (http://www.amazon.com/Relational-Aesthetics-Nicolas-Bourriaud/dp/2840660601) and Reassembling the social (http://www.amazon.com/Reassembling-Social-Introduction-Actor-Network-Theory-Management/dp/0199256047/sr=1-1/qid=1168123967/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-6400728-4125759?ie=UTF8&s=books). Having read the latter really realy carefully that's also informing my intuition. Also I think tofu is fucking gross. Wow, am I off topic.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-01-06 22:59 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
melvyn bragg likes this one.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-01-07 10:13 (UTC) - ExpandHello, it is me, Joe Muggs
POP
Momus, Spitz E1
3/5
Upon walking in to the Spitz, it was hard to believe that this wasn’t a filming of some Chris Morris satire of the art world. Onstage were two young men in thick-rimmed specs, sitting on opposite sides of a café table loaded with cups, glasses and a steaming pot of tea. A loud soundtrack of street noise and snatches of music was playing. One of the duo – BoyleAndShaw, according to the posters – was hammering percussively at an amplified typewriter on his lap, and occasionally passing paper to his thickly-bearded colleague, who was murmuring, ranting and occasionally chanting, monk-like into another microphone. After some twenty minutes of this, they stood up and the crowd applauded wildly.
Unsurprisingly, this crowd were a bohemian bunch. In the break, as cool ambient/classical drones played, it was possible to overhear earnest conversations about Chinese Confucianism, Barcelona techno venues and Jay Joplin’s White Cube gallery all at once. Everyone made a point of looking cool, unruffled and unembarrassed as next support act Suzanne Oberbeck, aka No Bra appeared, living up to her stage name – clad in nothing but neon pink micro-miniskirt, stockings and blonde toothbrush moustache. Unruffled they may have been, but that didn’t stop them eagerly (if coolly) taking pictures and post-ironically commenting on her breasts. Amazingly, though, No Bra’s ultra-deadpan delivery of grimy urban tales and parodies of trendies and scenesters, over brooding electro beats – think a depressive Peaches – quickly transcended gimmickry or titillation.
Scotsman-turned-world-citizen Nick Currie – Momus – is a veteran of such boho scenes. From the early 80s on, he has plied clever, quirky and hyper-literate electronic pop to a cult audience without ever making waves in the wider music scenes, except in Japan where he now lives. His poppiest songs often resemble the Pet Shop Boys, but in almost every way he represents the opposite of their populist, disco-driven ambition and Englishness.
Taking the stage in pyjama-like suit, ludicrous Beatle-wig and his trademark eyepatch, with only a laptop for accompaniment, Currie began with a couple of PSBs-like wistful pop songs, but rapidly diverted into stranger electronic sounds and more abstracted lines. He zipped through medieval folk, kitsch exotica samples, trip-hop beats, electronica songs about Beowulf, nonsensical lyrics translated by Google from Japanese, and a shockingly sexy Curtis Mayfield falsetto on ‘Born To Be Adored By Women’. Currie, as anyone who has read his mind-boggling blog – imomus.livejournal.com – has a restless intelligence. At times, this made his performance tiring, even uncomfortably close to insane, but each time he appeared to be too far off on a tangent, he would always return to the melodic hooks he writes so well. It’s easy to mock the eccentric and arty-farty, but such unashamed wonkiness can provide invention to be treasured.
I would add that
This is not a paper with a particularly 'Evening Standard' agenda - after all, it is thrust into people's hands for free so is read by an entire cross section, not a self-selecting audience. It is essentially populist, hence, I think, the fact that they didn't use my descriptions of the support acts (the usual phrase commissioning editors use is "I don't think thats on our readers' radar"), and hence also the fact that I didn't go into any kind of analysis of what eccentricity might mean beyond my final sentence.
Had I had more space, I would have made it clear which particular bits of the performance were more uncomfortable / compelling etc. As it is I had to give a quick overall impression to a readership the majority of whom would never have heard of Momus, let alone seen a performance. I hope the description I did give will be enough to intrigue the more curious amongst them.
Re: I would add that
I must say, the original uncut review reads a lot better. It's much more measured and detailed. Bah, subs!