![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
imomus
My Pecha kucha is dead piece a couple of weeks ago was a facetiously premature obituary for a meme which is still very much alive, as I explain rather more straightforwardly in the Wired News column that went up this morning, Pecha Kucha: Design Virus. One of the more surprising responses to the Click Opera piece was a mail from architect Mark Dytham, who, with his partner Astrid Klein, started the pecha kucha virus back in 2003. "Pecha Kucha is dead?" he spluttered. "Phew - glad I read down the blog thread [to the comment where I admit I'm just kidding] I was just about to flame you... But all is cool now!! PS - any ideas how we can cool the fire?"
The difference between the Click Opera piece and the Wired News one isn't just a question of tone. In the interim I actually attended a pecha kucha night here in Berlin and found it highly entertaining. Berlin "franchise operator" Luka Hinse explained to me how he'd got the pecha kucha "religion" during a stay in Tokyo interning for Panasonic. He'd visited SuperDeluxe, Dytham's club in Roppongi, seen a pecha kucha event, and decided to set one up when he got home to Berlin.
That got me thinking about my Mukokuseki Diasporans theme again -- thinking of Tokyo as a mecca for a certain kind of international creative, as a place where a sort of "third culture", a blend of East and West, gets fused in "style labs" and exported all over the world in the form of digital products, ideas, music, memes. It's certainly happened with pecha kucha, and SuperDeluxe is certainly one of the places where this "third culture" congregates in the city. If Tokyo-as-highly-viral-third-culture-style-lab had a logo, it would be Klein Dytham's SuperDeluxe logo.There are a few things to say about this viral third culture emanating from Tokyo. First of all, the creative people working within it are highly privileged, a kind of brahmin class amongst global creatives. Tokyo is still the world's most expensive city. If it takes ambition to move to New York to try and make a living from art or design or music, it takes even more gall and guts to move to Tokyo to do the same. Secondly, they're very much visually-oriented people. We saw in The trip inside how Richard Lloyd Parry puzzled, in the London Review of Books, over why foreigners would stay in a place "with no intellectual climate at all". The conclusion was that people like Donald Richie are lifelong sex tourists -- they stay there for Asian bodies. But Parry's perspective is a fusty one; as a literary intellectual he's attuned to a literary and political culture which is all but dead in the West as well as in Japan. The foreigners in Tokyo are not so much a literati as a designerati; they're primarily visual people. And Tokyo's visual culture -- an intellectual climate of a textural rather than textual kind -- is a very rich one. It's the culture on display daily in blogs like Jean Snow, Pingmag, or Shift, and represented in international events like Tokyo Design Week. Anyone who thinks that Tokyo is off the boil is deliberately snubbing this visual culture.
One question we might ask ourselves is how Japanese this emerging visual "third culture" is? And one way to answer that is to look at what the creatives involved are saying. The picture of the digital bathhouse above is an installation Klein and Dytham made for London's Architectural Association in 2005. Mark Dytham tells me he and Klein "have just finished a large bathouse in Japan's Southern Alps", a real-world extension of the fun digital bathhouse they put together for the AA. Meanwhile, over at Wieden and Kennedy's Tokyo Lab Eric Cruz (in a promotional film made for Apple) puts it this way:
"One of the biggest influences, to us, is the city of Tokyo itself. The Tokyo youth culture always demands innovation. We pay attention to the visual landscape. And then we approach it from a sense of 'How do we introduce something that they've never seen before?'" Since W+K's lab is dedicated to the fusing of music and visuals, that means finding new fusions on the level of sound too. You can hear some of that going on in the podcasts labber Shane Lester does. But you could as easily hear it in the work of Digiki, Lullatone, Marxy, or any of hundreds of non-Japanese stationed in Japan. It's also, of course, implicit in the Mukokuseki Diasporan idea that there's a network of non-Japanese Japanese-influenced people in other countries too. And one thing I've noticed is that my lifestyle -- living outside Japan, participating in "franchise" events which originated there, making regular trips to Tokyo to recharge my creative batteries -- is becoming much more normal. For instance, Helsinki teens on the Hel-Looks website are now as likely to say they go shopping in Tokyo as that they merely buy clothes mail order from Japan. Let's listen to them:
"I visited Tokyo last January and fell in love with Japanese street fashion, language and culture. My style comes from Japan." Nina (17).
"London and Tokyo are the best cities for shopping." Aino (17).
"The whole set is from Tokyo. There's nothing else to do but shop there. Laforet sales – I had never seen anything like that before. What a hassle!" Teemu (29).
The inside of Laforet is of course also a Klein Dytham design, which brings us full circle back to pecha kucha, and the peculiar viral global reach of the Tokyo designerati.
From Richard Lloyd Parry: The Fusty One Responds
Date: 2006-12-20 09:16 am (UTC)It's difficult to know how to respond. I don't regard myself as any of those things. I don't think there's any evidence for attaching those labelsto me. Momus' chracterisations of my opinions are based on assumptions about a person he does not know and has made no obvious effort to learn much about.
My piece about Donald Richie did make the point that, in contrast with other comparably important cities, foreigners in Japan have produced no lasting works of literature (the words "no intellectual climate at all" are Richie's, by the way, not mine). But to conclude that I must therefore be visually impaired, insensitive to design, texture, the look and taste and feel of Tokyo, exclusively "attuned" to a "dead" culture, blind to anything but the literary/political, is to make a large and unwarranted leap. Perhaps I am - but you don't know that. You know almost nothing about me at all. There may be people out there who believe that "culture ... has to be literary / political or it's just not there", but I am not one of them. Where did you get the notion that I am?
I'm sorry that you don't like my blog - but it doesn't matter, does it? Like everything I write for The Times, print or online, its basic design is predetermined by people in London. That's the thing about newspapers - because they are produced in haste, they have to be formulaic, to a certain extent. I fail to see what the "aridity" of my blog's design tells you about my views on Tokyo and its visual culture.
As for its content, you don't seem to have done more than browsed a few of the more recent entries and scanned the comments. As for being at the level of a shock jock: I hope I'm a bit subtler and more humorous than that, but people will make up their own minds. Some of the comments are a bit loony, but that's another feature of newspapers - they attract all sorts, and the people who go to the bother of writing in are not always conventionally original or articulate. My policy is to put up everything unless it's libellous or grossly offensive. Not many citations of Koji Karatani on my blog, it's true, but I don't regard them as a particular mark of distinction. The jibe about Murdoch is pure laziness, by the way -if you have criticisms of The Times (and there are plenty to be made), then spell them out. You're not making any kind of point by merely invoking its proprietor's name.
Richard Lloyd Parry
Re: From Richard Lloyd Parry: The Fusty One Responds
Date: 2006-12-20 10:42 am (UTC)First of all, I think you're right that I've made a bit of a snap judgement on you, without gathering tons of empirical detail first. I make no apologies for this, though. It's all part of the very thing we're talking about. As a bit of a Malcolm Gladwell fan, I agree with what he says in his book "Blink"; we all make snap judgements, but snap judgements are often highly informed, cannily intuitive ones. For instance, your blog photo (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/TGD/picture/0,,247612,00.jpg) already carries vast amounts of textural information about you, as mine no doubt does about me.
Of course, Gladwell's thesis is very much at odds with the standard Anglo-Saxon emphasis on inductive argument and empiricism. This takes us right to the nub and crux of the issue, because it takes us to this question of the textural and the textual, and my feeling that people who "understand" Japan best are those who respond to the textural, emotional, intuitive and even sexual aspects of it. This is why I think your dismissal of Richie in the LRB was unfair. Or, shall we say, came from the other side of a particular culture war I feel implicated in, a side in which sexual motives, for instance, are suspect and textual ones respectable. You implied that Richie should have been in Japan for its intellectual culture rather than his apparently sexual motives (amongst other textural ones). What then do you make of a figure like Jean Genet?
Did you cover Tokyo Design Week, a very important international event this autumn? Have you covered the pecha kucha phenomenon? Are these visual culture events less important than noting the resemblance between Shinzo Abe and Tom Conti? What I'm saying is that your blog, your photo and your employer -- and yes, my prejudices about them -- suggest to me that you have some important blind spots regarding Tokyo. I do too -- vast ones. I don't even speak Japanese competently, and I'm as uninterested in party politics as... well, as most Japanese people I know are.
More from the Fusty One (RLP)
Date: 2006-12-20 01:33 pm (UTC)You know nothing about how I "respond to the textural, emotional, intuitive and even sexual aspects" of Japan, because you don't know me or my work. Pondering my little photograph doesn't make up for this.
I didn't "dismiss" Donald Richie. I wrote a 5,000 word essay on his life and work. What is all this about "textual" motives and "sexual" ones? What gives you the impression that I suspect one and glorify the other? I sound tetchy, because your sloppiness smakes me impatient - but I would genuinely like to know the answer.
I didn't cover Tokyo Design Week - because it's not my job. I'm a foreign correpsondent for the international pages of a general, daily newspaper. My partner, also a journalist (she works for Wallpaper) wrote at length about Design Week - although she neglected the election of prime minister Abe, the coup in Thailand, and the North Korean nuclear test. Is any of this really surprising?
No, none of these "culture events" are more or less important than one another. Really, this is is too obvious to be worth pointing out. But please take it from me - there are plenty of Japanese people passionate about politics, whether you know them or not. Let's agree that (being human) we both have blind spots. (Isn't this just a way of saying that we are interested in dfferent things?) I'm happy to let yours go, as long as you refrain from showering me with epithets when I express my own.
Re: More from the Fusty One (RLP)
Date: 2006-12-20 02:20 pm (UTC)My worldview is basically an aesthete's, and to that extent I'm probably closer, culturally, to your partner, who did write about Design Week. I'm glad one of you is covering this stuff, anyway, because, in a society at peace rather than one in the throes of a civil war, it's important and, I think, central.
Re: More from the Fusty One (RLP)
Date: 2006-12-20 04:34 pm (UTC)"In 150 years, foreigners in Japan have produced important works of history, political science, anthropology and journalism, but no lasting work of literature. Perhaps Donald Richie shows us why."