imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
"In China we have a special way of preserving the eggs," says artist Gou Shaolan. "It's called salty eggs and we preserve them with a lot of salt in a container for one month and afterwards that egg can be eaten or can be preserved for another two or three or ten years."

The BBC, on the other hand, doesn't salt its eggs -- audio-on-demand radio programmes like the very interesting Sunday Feature on Beijing's Factory 798 stay online for only one week before they're obliterated. A couple of years ago the BBC announced that they were contemplating using p2p to distribute their vast and valuable archives, but nothing seems to have come of this. As a result, the public part of the BBC archive is a bit like the way Gou Shaolan describes Beijing:



"I'm amazed at the speed with which China changes, the city, the landscape and in terms of the shops around you -- the whole street can be torn down in two weeks time... I started to think that for a city or a nation like this, memory is no longer valid. Because you don't need, really, to remember anything, because things can change so fast."

One area that's changed is in Dashanzi in north east Beijing, just beyond the 4th ringroad, on the way out to the airport. Here, a 1950s factory complex on a wooded site (financed by the Soviets, designed by East Germans) has morphed into China's most creative artistic centre. A series of industrial units have been transformed into galleries, studios, bookshops, installations, workshops and cafes. After making several incognito visits wearing hats and sunglasses just to see just what was going on, senior party officials decided to let Factory 798 remain and even expand. It's undergoing a sympathetic architectural renovation (unfortunately the last traces of actual industry are also being forced out of the area).

I found BBC Radio 3's documentary about the area so interesting that I thought I'd make it available here in the form of a sort of audio salted egg:

The Sunday Feature: Factory 798 (40.3 MB stereo mp3 file, 45 mins. First broadcast Sunday 19th November 2006 on BBC Radio 3.)



You can enhance your listening experience by watching Roy Wang's Flickr slideshow of the complex. Here's a China Daily article about Factory 798, published to co-incide with the 4th Beijing Dashanzi International Art Festival on April 29th 2006. And here are some interesting tidbits which emerge in the course of the programme:

* The way you identify artists in China is that all the guys have long hair and all the women have short hair and crew cuts.

* One artist brought a gun to the gallery and shot her own installation, a telephone booth, then got arrested.

* Another dipped dolls in a bucket of red paint to protest the government's one-child policy.

* Another played a traditional Chinese instrument wearing a punky mohawk hairstyle, and another tore up the flag of the Communist Party.

* Not everybody interviewed in the documentary thinks these shock tactics are the way forward.

* Selling paintings and doubling, tripling or quadrupling your money is just a small part of what running a gallery is about. It's also about building relationships and trust with your artists and your collector base. Galleries who don't realize that can't deal with Western museums. "They can't talk the talk."

* One Japanese gallerist who thought he'd established a bond of trust with a Chinese artist was appalled to see her showing her work with two other galleries at a major art fair. The Chinese are very business savvy, but they fail to grasp that sometimes getting the best possible price for your work just overheats the market and isn't good for anyone in the long run.

* "What does China make money for? Money can't make people happy if they don't have any freedom for themselves."

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-26 07:46 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The disposability in question is a product of our affluence.
Should we feel a self-flagellating, impotent guilt because we live in what is nominally a wealthy society whilst others living under other political regimes live in poverty.
Our indulgent self- loathing does nothing to help societies that do not have the benefits we enjoy, nor is there anything ennobling about the shackles which third world poverty puts upon people.
I am curious to interrogate what exactly is this Western economic model and for you to develop further your definition of it.
Whilst we in Western society enjoy a good carp at the flaws within the democratic systems we live in and whilst democracy and the free market are not by any means an ideal can you succinctly elucidate more fully on what alternative you would propose?
Regards
Thomas Scott.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-26 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
I think we should get more ecological, not so economical.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-26 08:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
And by that I think that there is way too much talk about how we need to grow economically these days though the way we "grow" economically these days is devastating for mother earth and our relatives in nature as we are destroying everything that we didn't build. Just like the taste of the jalapeƱo is to the non-mexican this way of living is ridiculous to those who want to keep the earth green.

According to that man who I heard that "Western economics doesn't work in China" thing said that at 2050 all of the forest on earth might be depleted if everybody in China would be middle-class wealthy.

That to say if they consumed as much as they do in the west, especially the US, who consume such a large amount of basically everything. What the fuck, leave something to the others at the table, I say. Sooner or later you won't be able to drink the wine as wine anymore since it is already been diluted with too much dirty water and urine.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-26 09:54 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I presume then that you have no more idea how exactly to construct this utopian alternative society than the rest of us.
Ecology meanwhile is a luxury we in Western society can afford to indulge in, we have roads, railways,educational institutes,hospitals, sanitation, infrastructure, mechanization, industrialization, all these wonderful things that we take for granted.
From our position of empowerment we preach to the third world the message of ecology and environmentalism expecting poorer societies to continue to live with disease, lack of sanitation,lack of infrastructure, to 'learn from our mistakes' and value the environment over humanity
This flawed view of the supposed responsibilities of developing societies is both anti-humanist and racist.
Environmentalism has become both the unquestioned orthodoxy of our time and a pernicious quasi-religion which deserves -but seldom gets- skepticism and scrutiny.
Thomas S.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-27 08:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
Hey, you got to start somewhere, a society doesn't need to be wealthy in the economic area to be able to be ecological. This goal can be reached if we put aside alot of things that we, as you say, take for granted and put down our mass-consumion behavior and start to help these poor nations.

It is not impossible, just something that will take some time to achieve, but if we would start now...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-27 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hello again Cap Scaleman,
The best chance Third World countries could have would be if the World Bank, the I.M.F. and charity based N.G.O.s were to jettison their despicable policy of sustainable development and instead channel their funding to the bigger projects which developing countries need.
Third World countries do not want wells, mud hut schools and fabricated hospitals presided over by beneficent- faced missionaries they want hydro-electric power, highways, industry and infrastructure.
These developments will inevitably impact the environment- as all human activity I am afraid does.
But we cannot conscionably dictate agenda that favours the environment over humanism.
Had we in Western Europe chosen to follow the Luddite path at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution we would still be leading the 'short, brutish lives' that were most peoples lot hitherto.

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags