imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
The part of Kreuzberg where the Falckensteinstrasse meets Schlesischesstrasse (I honestly defy anyone, German or not, to pronounce that word, it has me slathering like an alkie every time I try) has recently become trendy. Three trendy new shops have opened up on the Falckensteinstrasse -- a bookshop called -- trendily! -- Gap, an Asian goods store called 7th Sense selling baskets, lampshades, tea, and other trendy Asian stuff, and a clothes shop too trendy to have a name or even open when its owners don't feel like it.



Thanks to the wonders of photography, the ultra-trendiness of this neighbourhood (or kiez, as we trendy Berliners say) can now flap around the world like a snobby woodpigeon, putting less trendy places to shame. And, like an arrogant badger, I can tell you that in Gap's used vinyl section I today bought three records so untrendy they're trendy: a selection of communist cabaret songs with titles like "A Letter From Friedrich Engels", some baroque dance music played on a church organ, and a record of renaissance lute music which, trendily, I am playing at 16RPM instead of the recommended 33, just to exaggerate the odd crackly sound of the trendy, trendy vinyl.

Which is appropriate enough, since my new Wired piece is about the fall and rise of vinyl. The article, entitled Snap, Crackle and Pop, puts forward the idea that, exempted from the irksome duty of representing the world, a medium is free to celebrate -- even fetishize -- its own errors and limitations. But that this is a mere consolation prize; power never comes from representing only yourself, it comes from representing others. This has serious consequences for anyone basing claims to power on being a culture, because being a culture is all about being situated -- in other words, celebrating limitations and errors (even if you don't call them that).

This is what my lecture in Birmingham on November 17th is going to be about, so hurry, hurry, book your ticket now! Or if you want to hear an even better lecture, totally free, listen to this recent one by Brian Eno, part of BBC Radio 3's Freethinking Festival.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-06 11:27 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-06 11:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] butterflyrobert.livejournal.com
The resolution of most analog formats (vinyl records, for example) is a lot higher than their digital counterparts (cd, for exmple). I won't bother looking it up, but if memory serves, the resolution ratio for vinyl record:cd is something crazy like 3,000,000:44,500. So, despite the crackles and such, vinyl just sounds better. It's no mystery.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-07 12:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mini-snape.livejournal.com
Communist cabaret songs are the best. Especially when they do a dialogue in the middle of it.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-08 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inuitmonster.livejournal.com
I find East German psychedelia to be the best music from that part of the world.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-09 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mini-snape.livejournal.com
Sounds delicious. Any recommendations?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-12 11:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inuitmonster.livejournal.com
DDR psych maybe exists more in theory than in practice, but the second volume of the Amiga-a-go-go series has an amazing cover of The Zombies' 'She's Not There', with the lyrics in German and probably about the need to fulfill the latest five year plan. There is also an album by Oktoberklub out there, in which these state-sanctioned hippies sing folk-rock protest songs in favour of the East German regime.

The best introduction to weirdo music from the DDR is probably the "Kult" volume of the "Das Beste Aus Der DDR" series (don't buy the "Pop" or "Rock" volumes as they are teh suck).

All of these records are probably available on the interweb, or in the branch of Saturn on Alexanderplatz.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-07 12:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nicepimmelkarl.livejournal.com
i like old eno....i'd produce him anytime. eno! get off the porno and give us a shout, mate. such a gentle face. nice voice 2. he's a brother. now momus that slagging off of robert wyatt the other day. i didn't like that. and calling julian cope 'acid fried' i didn't like either. momus is apple fried. that's what i'm talking about. off 2 the wannsee. fick it out.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-07 04:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deliriumbarf.livejournal.com
you crack me up. thank you momus, for always making my day, whether it be something quasi-trivial or intense philosophical discourse, thank you! -pilar

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-07 05:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] considertransit.livejournal.com
Thank you so much for linking that brian eno lecture

SCOTSCHE GRAMMOPHONY

Date: 2006-11-07 06:54 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You're just secretly jealous of STING who just released IN EARNEST an album of ELISABETHAN LUTE SONGS OF JOHN DOWLAND on DEUTSCHE GRAMMOPHON (http://www.deutschegrammophon.com/special/?ID=sting-dowland).

I am a performance artist

Date: 2006-11-07 06:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zzberlin.livejournal.com
I will go to my best grave thinking about how best to make people listen to me. I went once before before a court, they said don't make that mistake twice. Don't peel off that bad tampon pad more than once. Hey momus called me eccentric never had a bettter compliment ever!!!~!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-07 11:08 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Deliberate introduction of analog crackle wasn't just something that was introduced following the demise of vinyl as the dominant medium for reproducing music. I'm sure that there were lots of tracks in the 60s and 70s that used it. The only one I can think of off the top of my head is the Beatles' Honey Pie, but I'm sure there are others. I think that sort of self-referentiality was really a founding cornerstone of the pop era as it developed from the early sixties onwards, whether one is talking about the Beatles, Warhol, or Batman & Robin or whatever.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-07 12:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I think you're right that introducing "error artefacts" is something at least as old as postmodernism itself, ie it's been going on since about 1956.

But it wasn't until the 90s that you could find a machine, like the Korg D12, that had "analog crackle" as a handy readymade patch that you could apply at the flick of a switch. I didn't go into synths in the article, but it was also the 90s that saw the emergence of digital synths which mimicked analog synths.

You could say (simplifying vastly, of course) that when Rick Wakeman was playing them in the 70s, synths aspired to "represent the world" -- to be orchestral, the universal instrument, capable of anything. But later it was the specificities of the analog synth which were celebrated, just as it was the errors and limitations of vinyl that we revived. What survives of a displaced medium is not its capacity to represent the world, because the next medium always wants that. What survives is a series of limitations. For this reason, the displaced medium is always cute.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-07 12:35 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think there was a battle going on with synths - on the one hand they were mimicking the traditional music world (synth strings and horns etc); on the other hand they were the transcendental other (representing a future, or mind-state, that was either utopian or dystopian, at least nothing like the present). On something like Diamond Dogs you hear both paradigms on the same album. I guess the more recent mimicking of analog sounds is the next step on in the cannibalization - what was considered the universal instrument turns out in fact to have a particular sound, just like any other instrument. Scott Walker recently said that he didn't use synths because, like CGI, they couldn't surprise any more. They've lost their mystical power. Just like how we've become so attuned to CGI that no matter how good they render dinosaurs or galactic battle scenes, what we see now is primarily the artifice of the effect.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-07 05:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freesurfboards.livejournal.com
It seems lazy to say that we celebrate errors while not calling them so (unless you are just cynical). We all know that humankind never reaches the ideals it strives for (that may not exist), so celebrating "error" is really celebrating life and reality. It's also undermining the idea that there really is truth or order.
Of course when it's going on ("being a culture") then these are not recognized as non-truth, but as truth in itself, so on with ozymandias.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-07 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Argh, do I have to choose between "lazy" and "cynical"? Can't there be a nice choice in there too, like "handsome"?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-08 07:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freesurfboards.livejournal.com
yeah, my post was pretty negative - I've been reading too much Nietzsche and just feel like an intellectually superior troll (although I wasn't actually directing it at you specifically, I was just saying that 'error' assumes a 'correct' which I don't feel is right) . . .

so to rephrase (though I think it still sounds negative):
It seems handsome to say that we celebrate errors while not calling them so (unless you are just coy). We all know that humankind always reaches the heights of greatness, so celebrating "error" is misnomer since obviously we intended to do it that way to begin with.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-09 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geekrocklove.livejournal.com
Thanks for the Eno tip. The bit about the ribbon hovering six inches above the Earth totally did me in; it's nice to a way to recontextualize our sense of place/ size. Anyways, I ran with it. (http://www.urbanhonking.com/universe/archives/2006/11/rainy_day_sunsh.html)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-09 04:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Hey, happy one year anniversary, Claire and Jona!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-09 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geekrocklove.livejournal.com
Wow, you really are a web super-sleuth, not to mention the only person who has congratulated us yet. Thanks!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-12 01:33 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hi Momus, looking forward to the lecture (the first that i've attended for a long time). But you state here it's on the 19th whereas the linked site states the 17th. Also, i've emailed for a reservation but not yet received a confirmation. Is this ok?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-25 01:15 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hi momus don't mean to stalk you. Bad that way. Dreamy once about a big canal. I do not need to get a restsuninh order against me just because I. Trademarked your ccute self