Fear of the Matterhorn
Oct. 5th, 2006 12:00 amI don't know what's the matter with me, but I'm afraid of the Matterhorn.
Image google the famous Swiss mountain and you'll find page after page of pictures of it -- vast, stark, dead, angular, permanent. I find it terrifying the way I used to find planetaria terrifying as a child; they confirmed beyond all shadow of a doubt that I was tiny and insignificant, and that within a nonsensically short time-frame I'd be dead. Space carried on forever, but I didn't. Only my death was as endless.

But although the Matterhorn, like space, seems vast and impervious to time, the way it's pictured isn't. I'm much more able to accept the warm, yellow, friendly, integrated Matterhorn in the 1950s postcard I have of it, pinned to my cork noticeboard, than any of the blue, cold, digital Google images that come up now. Each age depicts the Matterhorn differently. The internet Matterhorn is different from the postcard Matterhorn. We shouldn't think that just because there are 32 pages of images of the Matterhorn on the web, the "real Matterhorn" is there. Perhaps, like Alin Huma, we should draw attention to the artifice of our portrayals of the mountain.
In the images you find of it on the internet the Matterhorn is mostly aggressive, angular, sharky. It's vast and hard, and yet not too vast or hard for today's "we are so vast and hard" humans. The mountain, as depicted today, looks like something Zaha Hadid would design, something cold, technological and capitalist. Something filled with the fascist imagery of sport, and achievement, and challenge that we so often see around us. Is that cocaine on its slopes? Is it made of steel? Has James Bond skiied down the South face yet?
The mountain, in today's representation, isn't the warm, integrated natural shape seen in my old postcard. It seems to say "fuck you, losers, I'm the proud winner of the mountain race". It's often depicted with a plane flying by, or with adventurers with pick-axes and bad sunglasses "conquering" it, or as a theme park model under construction by humans, or as a Hollywood logo, or with a nightmarishly huge suspension bridge attached to it, or simply like a great bloody fang in the sunset.
The Matterhorn we get we deserve, I suppose. At least it will outlive us and our pathetic angular social Darwinism. Now, did I tell you that I'm also terrified of Mount Fuji? Fuck me, what a spooky mountain! I feel like I'm on Mars every time I see it.

Image google the famous Swiss mountain and you'll find page after page of pictures of it -- vast, stark, dead, angular, permanent. I find it terrifying the way I used to find planetaria terrifying as a child; they confirmed beyond all shadow of a doubt that I was tiny and insignificant, and that within a nonsensically short time-frame I'd be dead. Space carried on forever, but I didn't. Only my death was as endless.

But although the Matterhorn, like space, seems vast and impervious to time, the way it's pictured isn't. I'm much more able to accept the warm, yellow, friendly, integrated Matterhorn in the 1950s postcard I have of it, pinned to my cork noticeboard, than any of the blue, cold, digital Google images that come up now. Each age depicts the Matterhorn differently. The internet Matterhorn is different from the postcard Matterhorn. We shouldn't think that just because there are 32 pages of images of the Matterhorn on the web, the "real Matterhorn" is there. Perhaps, like Alin Huma, we should draw attention to the artifice of our portrayals of the mountain.
In the images you find of it on the internet the Matterhorn is mostly aggressive, angular, sharky. It's vast and hard, and yet not too vast or hard for today's "we are so vast and hard" humans. The mountain, as depicted today, looks like something Zaha Hadid would design, something cold, technological and capitalist. Something filled with the fascist imagery of sport, and achievement, and challenge that we so often see around us. Is that cocaine on its slopes? Is it made of steel? Has James Bond skiied down the South face yet?The mountain, in today's representation, isn't the warm, integrated natural shape seen in my old postcard. It seems to say "fuck you, losers, I'm the proud winner of the mountain race". It's often depicted with a plane flying by, or with adventurers with pick-axes and bad sunglasses "conquering" it, or as a theme park model under construction by humans, or as a Hollywood logo, or with a nightmarishly huge suspension bridge attached to it, or simply like a great bloody fang in the sunset.
The Matterhorn we get we deserve, I suppose. At least it will outlive us and our pathetic angular social Darwinism. Now, did I tell you that I'm also terrified of Mount Fuji? Fuck me, what a spooky mountain! I feel like I'm on Mars every time I see it.

(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-04 10:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-04 10:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-04 10:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 12:48 am (UTC)The other day I was walking at the old port in Montreal where several huge cargo ships that look a hundred years old are parked. A friend of mine told me they were probably actually younger than we are, but they were all rusty and looked like obsolete, giant monsters from a different time. I found them terribly unsettling to behold.
fuji-san
Date: 2006-10-05 12:54 am (UTC)"A wise man climbs fuji once, a Fool climbs it twice"
Re: fuji-san
Date: 2006-10-05 06:44 pm (UTC)http://www.artskool.biz/newpics/japan04/travelogue.html
-nicholas d. kent
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 01:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-06 05:03 pm (UTC)jesus christ
Date: 2006-10-05 01:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 01:38 am (UTC)When I looked at the Google Image Search results for 'matterhorn' I saw shot after shot of a breathtakingly beautiful natural formation. I didn't find any of it scary, morbid, oppressive, or any of the labels you've foisted upon it in your post.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 01:39 am (UTC)Of course, in 50 years it will be an barren gray stump, which should look a good deal more sinister.
I know what you mean about the childhood effects of photographs of vast natural objects. To this day, I get vertigo looking at high altitude photos of the ocean, such as those in the National Geographic Magazines I grew up with.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 03:04 am (UTC)...beyond all shadow of a doubt that the pictures belonged to m-m-mat-matmatmat-matterhorn.
Date: 2006-10-05 03:18 am (UTC)Is that cocaine on its slopes? Shut up don't answer back!
Just tell it I'm dying to meet it.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 03:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 08:40 am (UTC)You should really consider the self-negating inferences of the following title, 'tis yours now, to share this essay's sentiments in song: "Anti-Matterhorn [of Plenty ;)]". Working from that concept didn't really pan out for me in my turntable dabblings with old "Bavarian" records of alpenhorns, drinking songs, and yodeling put through ~Echo & delay pedals. Although the experience was fulfilling enough with viewing the vertiginous spin of the record reflecting the voluminously vaulting effected music.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 08:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 09:54 am (UTC)But beyond that factual error, good thought-piece.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 01:06 pm (UTC)Little big matterhorn...
Date: 2006-10-05 01:46 pm (UTC)Re: Little big matterhorn...
Date: 2006-10-05 02:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 02:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 04:08 pm (UTC)Max Hardcore's cock may be said to be sublime.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 04:17 pm (UTC)Upon finding this (http://www.hel-looks.com/faq.html), I wondered if you had seen it. It's street fashion from Helsinki.
Also, remember that the Matterhorn is more afraid of you than you are of it. I'm afraid I only know the Southern California (http://www.yesterland.com/oldmatterhorn.html) Canadian Matterhorn.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 04:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 04:24 pm (UTC)No turn unstoned! (http://imomus.livejournal.com/156191.html)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-05 08:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-06 05:16 pm (UTC)da shamrock 4sum !!! that's what i'm talking about. she luvs ya.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-06 08:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-06 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-06 09:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-15 04:44 pm (UTC)Mt. Taranaki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Mt_Taranaki_Drainage_System.jpg)
I didn't think perfect circles existed in nature.