imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
The Tanz im August season hadn't been going well. I'd been very tempted to walk out of the Michèle Anne De Mey company's performance at the Schaubuhne on Friday night. Not only because I realized I'd seen the exact same piece ten years ago at London's Place Theatre, but because the dancers -- a cross between the white-teethed, uncool "cool" characters you see on German cigarette billboards or the cast of sitcom Friends -- were just so fucking irritating. The idea was that they were just messing around, jamming, interacting informally with each other the whole time, telling each other hilarious jokes, massaging their legs and flashing "winning" smiles, then occasionally breaking into complex, tricky and quirky group routines as if by accident. Finally came the piece de resistance, where the floor got wet and the dancers took turns to skid across its surface or fly over the stage on a pulley. But what infuriated me was the sense of relaxed non-performance. Despite all the tricks they had up their sleeves, the dancers seemed to be dancing (to bombastic Beethoven) just to amuse each other. There was an extremely irritating sense of "repressive desublimation" about their refusal to admit they were performing for us. And they all just had irritating faces and clothes. Dasai.

Louise Lecavalier's show was also a tremendous bore, though the actual choreography was more admirable. This ex-La La La Human Steps dancer, with her horsey Billie Whitelawish face, looks good for her age, just like David Bowie, with whom I last saw her dance. But, like Bowie, she seems to have hardened her habits, lost her ability to startle. She's resting on her laurels. Her piece, broken into two equally tedious halves, just seemed to go on forever. Nothing happened. The first half had classical music and some music stands on the stage. The second had a very annoying piece of skittering electronica that kept seeming to fade only to come back, sentencing an increasingly weary audience to another ten minutes of... well, of Louise shuffling around on the side of her shoes, wearing a tracksuit, apparently mimicking a schizo bum she'd once seen on the Toronto subway. In slow motion. It just went on and on.

I was beginning to wonder whether it was me. Had I lost interest in dance? Did you have to be super-attuned to technical prowess to get this stuff? Or was it the fault of the festival curators for foisting old, safe, yuppie-ish or academic stuff on us?

Then along came Ann Liv Young's show, Solo. KAPOW! Brilliant. Faith restored. Roadmap to brilliance in own artform sketched out: just tap into primal bitch energy.

It was in a studio up on the 3rd floor at Podewil. Mirrors and a brightly-lit kitschy set faced an audience seated on low black foam scaffold benches. When the performance started, instead of going down the lights went up, blazing white fluorescent light off the pinky plastic highlights and chintz curtains and chairs. A funny fatty Japanese-Mexican guy in an afro wig controlled an iBook and mixer on a trestle table while two overweight women slutted around wearing riding hats, black bathing suits, white stilettos. They blew up black balloons and sang along to energetic pop music. Suddenly they stripped naked and the trailertrash swearing upped a notch. What obnoxious bitches, worse than Britney!

On paper, it should have pushed all my "hate this!" buttons. Here was American South (Young is from Roanoke, Virginia) trailer trash style, girls behaving badly, an iTunes playlist approach to narrative (it was basically a karaoke show, with the girls singing along to hits), way too loud, with slovenly overweight bodies and a fuck-you attitude. But five things pushed the obnoxiousness over into marvellousness. First, that it was so OTT. The girls not only got naked, but actually pissed as they danced. Secondly, there was such fantastic energy, unbridled delight. The songs were very well-chosen (I enjoyed hearing Young sing along to "Feelgood Inc" by the Gorillaz). Thirdly, comedy. This was actually a very funny piece. Watching two dissolute naked women spraying chocolate sauce over each other then hosing it down with mineral water was hilarious. Fourthly, it was (only moderately) sexy. Snatch was being thrust in our faces in such an unashamedly lascivious, stripperish way. And yet there was no sense of spurious, affirmative redemption, no sense that this was "raunch feminism". Fifth, there was a brilliant control, a formal organization undercutting the appalling stroppiness of the performers. The colours and shapes and lighting were great (Ann also makes and sells craft work, which is rather beautiful).



The "bitches without britches" approach shouldn't have worked for me, but it did. I came away from this brilliant performance with my belief solidly reaffirmed. Not just in dance, but in art's capacity to zap bolts of positive energy through an audience. Young taps into the amazing, brash energy of adolescent girls on a bus trip, singing along to crappy chart hits. (She only graduated three years ago, so she's pretty close to that energy herself still.) When the three cast members lined up, shaking their fatty bodies at us, it felt like some pagan campfire orgy or artlessly arty community centre evangelical meeting -- but without any religion whatsoever, just obnoxious, infectious enthusiasm.

I got a sense -- and I love getting this feeling of "art envy" -- that there was a message for me in this work, something I could learn from and use in my own work. I suppose, in a nutshell, I'd sum it up with the hellish proverb of William Blake: "Energy is eternal delight". Ann Liv Young is, in the words of one critic, "Pina Bausch on steroids". Last night, she was the aestheticized essence of Saturday night poured into a pink bottle and shaken.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xishimarux.livejournal.com
Last performance art deal I went to was during the winter this year in Santa Monica. I saw a man making a painting in a pool of black ink with this oversized paintbrush in his ass. I also saw a man "Birth" out of a tent with like 10,000 open things of silly putty or whatever that pink stuff was. The most interesting piece was when I took my shoes, went into a little door and suddenly I was on a homebuilt stage with like 20 people on the other side applauding for me. I took a slight bow and walked out. :) I love art.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 09:38 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
wow. Sounds fantastic. What were the reactions from others like?
[I'm wondering if anyone was as infuriated by this as you were by the de Mey / le Cavalier pieces. After all, who are those shows for? Can we imagine anyone coming out of them as electrified as you from Young's? What sort of person would you have to be? I'm always obsessed by these questions when i go to see bad shows... ]
Also - is Podewil open again? I thought it closed 2 years ago... their website is still frozen in time.
ant

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
You could actually watch audience reactions very closely, because we were all reflected back from behind the stage in a mirror, like a big bright group photo. When one of the dancers started peeing I got a clear "Oh, yuck!" reaction from the women next to me. But mostly people were wearing incredulous smiles on their faces. Nobody walked out.

During the Lecavalier piece the man sitting next to me hated it even more than I did. He was a fat German man, and I have no idea why he was there. His wife tried to mollify him by massaging his back, but he kept sighing and shifting position. There was a thin willowy guy next to me at the Mey piece who didn't like it until they got to a quirky scene where a man tries to pot a tennis ball in a woman's shoe. He laughed slightly at that.

I think that to like the De Mey piece you would have to have been rather elderly and out-of-touch, and to like the Lecavalier piece you'd have to be an ageing "dance lovey" who's very invested in tiny technical details, and knows all Louise's previous work. Young's piece attracted a much younger, trendier crowd and, although it was in a tiny studio, there was a sense that a much wider audience would have liked it (though quite a few would have been shocked).


Podewil is now called the Podewilisches Palais, an annoyingly snooty name. It's no longer run by the same people, but has pretty much the same layout, and hosts visiting events.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I'd also say that a certain kind of tasteful minimalism, a less-is-more aesthetic, has prevailed in dance for too long. It's convenient, because it's cheap to have an empty stage and not have to think about scenery. But it's very, very boring in most cases. Ann Liv Young's set was cluttered, lots going on, lots to look at, and the audience, under full house lights and reflected back in the mirror, was also part of the spectacle. This is a much better presentation style. Cheap and cheerful (but aesthetically very well-controlled), and you trash the set as you go along by pissing on the carpet etc! Never a dull moment!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trufflesniffer.livejournal.com
So bad it's good?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wingedwhale.livejournal.com
(slightly unrelated)

I've lately had a craving for a new Momus post about Japanese pornography. Is there any chance of it?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wingedwhale.livejournal.com
I just hope you can prepare yourself for the barrage of replies, "well I saw this-and-that and it is depraved..."

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I certainly won't be hiding behind any "by the time the dog came in all thought of masturbation had left my mind. This was all so wrong" nonsense.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 11:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
It'll be more this kind of approach:

Image

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
Did they dance as a sort of "unit", or did they make it "look like some sort of teenage party" in a burlesque way?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
They sat on each other's laps, squirted each other with chocolate sauce, made a formation line at the front of the stage, etc. You could see it was well-rehearsed, but there was room for improvisation too. Young impulsively started the last track again as an impromptu encore at the end, and the other dancer looked genuinely surprised, then joined in. Exactly the sort of spontaneity the De Mey dancers tried to simulate, but ended up faking in a really poor way. I was tempted to do a Jarvis Cocker and jump up on the stage and throw a few moves, just to jolt them out of their uptight hang loose schtick.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
Why didn't you get up on stage dancing then? Is this Young someone who dislikes audience participating in the dancing?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 12:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Oh, I meant I'd have done the Jarvis-Jackson thing in the De Mey piece, not the Young one. But in a sense the audience were participating by being in the mirror behind the stage.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 12:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
Was that mirror meant to be some kind of vouyeristic influence? In the sense that the audience should se their own reactions and then react on their own reactions (and so on)?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I think it's a permanent feature of that room, which is normally used as a dance studio. But it had the effect you mentioned... except that the full lighting on the audience made us feel less like voyeurs, more like participants alongside the britchless bitches. Participants in pants.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
It would've been somewhat different, and probably more fun, if the audience had to sit wearing only their underwear. Make it near, with your underwear.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 12:09 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Does your mother read your blog? Or your neice?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 12:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Luckily my mother is into sex. It's one of the reasons I'm here.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 12:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
(And welcome back, Oxford Science Park! Haven't seen you since... yesterday!)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 10:20 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
What you described isn't sex.

My name is Eamonn and I don't know why you think I am from Oxford Science Park...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-21 05:39 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You are an idiot.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tilney.livejournal.com
I am interested whether you are using the word 'fatty' in a postmaterialist context.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I'm meaning it as the opposite of skinny, or as in the Morrissey song title "You're the one for me, fatty!"

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uberdionysus.livejournal.com
Hope it comes to NYC.

Up Against The Wall Redneck Mama

Date: 2006-08-20 04:37 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)

My 9 year-old sis and I were doing our own Ann Liv Young act in our backyard in 1987! :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBySvb5zBNg

(Yes, that's me on pot and pan percussion and my sis on vocals... she also wrote the lyrics)

Re: Up Against The Wall Redneck Mama

Date: 2006-08-20 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peripherus-max.livejournal.com
Sorry, 'twas me. Anonymous is so three years ago. ;)

Re: Up Against The Wall Redneck Mama

Date: 2006-08-20 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Ha ha, a classic of the genre. But what genre?

Re: Up Against The Wall Redneck Mama

Date: 2006-08-20 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peripherus-max.livejournal.com
I'm not quite sure. Neither were our parents. ;)

Re: Up Against The Wall Redneck Mama

Date: 2006-08-20 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
William Christenberry's house band.

I love Ann Live Young!

Date: 2006-08-20 06:58 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I first saw her work three years ago here in NYC:

http://bloggy.com/mt/archives/000929.html

barry (bloggy.com)

Re: I love Ann Liv Young!

Date: 2006-08-20 06:59 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Oops, make that Ann Liv Young.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-20 08:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] londonsound.livejournal.com
they're fat?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-21 05:44 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That was my reaction, too. The one on the left could be, but the others? No way.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-21 08:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
The photo used here represents different actors than the ones who performed in Berlin.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-21 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Ah, that makes sense.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-28 10:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] southwarkpest.livejournal.com
Is this a one off thing, or is it a yearly performance?

Southwark Pest Control (http://southwark.able-pest.co.uk)