imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Well, I performed a Momus set last night outdoors, standing right in the conceptual garden (the sixth in a series) by Atelier Le Balto. In fact, the avant gardeners even have their office in the Kunst-Werke courtyard.

At a time when territorial invasion has become a malign trend, it's nice to see that a more benign use of territory is also fashionable: the transformation of dead sites into gardens. At Palais de Tokyo in Paris, for instance, as well as two Wild Gardens designed by Atelier Le Balto, you can currently see a show called Tropico-Vegetal. This show takes off from the work of Sergio Vega, whose installation Paradise in the New World at the Venice Biennale was, for me, the highlight of the 2005 show.

At Palais de Tokyo, as curator Marc Sanchez explains in a series of video clips about the show, there are five individual exhibitions, taking off from Vega's conception of tropical South America as both a real and a mythical place. The rest of the shows concentrate on "the zone of vegetation". In an installation called "Through the woods to find the forest", Henrik Hakansson has made sculpture of fallen forest trees and fifty species of orchids suspended from steel cables. His main material is "the universe of the forest, its plants and luxuriant trees, its insects, frogs and serpents".

Based on a 17th century book he found which described (with maps) exactly where to find an earthly paradise in the rain forests of Brasil (a place called Matto Grosso, paradise hunters), Sergio Vega has made an installation called "Un Petit Coin de Paradis", recounting his own rather haphazard experiences tracking down and finding this spot.

The Palais de Tokyo gardens will be dismantled in August, perhaps to be reassembled somewhere else. The idea would please Leipzig-based Atelier Atlas, who make mobile and brief-duration gardens: "A small experimental garden may have a life of but a few moments", they say.

Let's hope that Ian Hamilton-Finlay's conceptual garden at Little Sparta, outside Edinburgh, lasts a wee bit longer.

i just can't stop talking

Date: 2006-07-23 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zzberlin.livejournal.com
beautiful sparkling chrystalline pink white image

looks a bit like the set for caligular in pastel

Re: i just can't stop talking

Date: 2006-07-23 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zzberlin.livejournal.com
stupid stupid keyboard impatience

> looks a bit like the set for caligular in pastel

that would be caligula

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
ImageImage

Just spent the better part of the month on my back with encephalitis and lyme disease contracted while photographing wild bog orchids.

ImageImage

My carnivorous plant garden has been kinder.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Golly, sounds painful! Hope you're all better now, your Lordship!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 04:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
On a six-week antibiotic jag at the moment, thanks. The offender is a bacterial spirochete, similar to the little bugger that causes syphillis. Very stylish.

Now I just have to deal with my high cholesterol. Guess I'll have to eat more plants. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 08:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rob.rabiee.myopenid.com (from livejournal.com)
Those, Lord Whimsy, are some beautiful pictures. A pleasant visual tincture for a lazy Sunday morning - gratzi!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
My pleasure. The garden is having a wonderful year, spilling out of the beds. I've seen more butterflies and hummingbirds this summer than any other.

Sadly, I'm now hearing less tree frogs at night, and more locusts are trilling in the afternoon, which means summer is beginning to fade. Here's (http://www.lordwhimsy.com/trifles/webbsmill.mov) a short Pine Barrens Tree Frog clip I shot this June. They're very rare. No bears that night, thankfully.

—The Lord in the Leaves

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rob.rabiee.myopenid.com (from livejournal.com)
Your Lordship,

Fantastic! Your garden, I'd guess, is the most fantastic place in New Jersey. Was that "Village Green" video on your site actually shot there? I want to ramble around it that place forever!

Again, thanks for the beautiful greenness. If you can believe it, Glendale isn't exactly the Hanging Gardens of Babylon.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-25 01:41 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Image

High Cholesterol

Date: 2006-11-29 09:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heetboven.livejournal.com
Plants are a good start visit here to learn more:
http://www.lower-cholesterol-secrets.com/

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 08:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kementari2.livejournal.com
Lyme, dear Whimsy! I know several people with it - please get rid of it for good and don't let it go chronic. Hope you feel better soon.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 09:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
Oh, I'll be fine thx--I'm in no hurry to have neurological problems or arthritis, so I'm being a good boy and taking all my pills!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 09:33 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Why is it that those people on the left who are most fanatically concerned with the environment live in urban areas where their surroundings are 95% glass and concrete? If one had a genuine interest in nature, wouldn't he try to live in nature?

Why is it that city dwellers are politically inclined to the left? Part of it is that there is more sharing: sidewalks, busses, and subways. But I also think when you look around you, and all you see are man-made buildings, you lose an appreciation for the size and majesty of nature, immutable and constant, and you believe that man can create utopia as quickly as he throws up an office building.

-henryperri

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 11:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
ImageIt's more ecologically sound to live in a high-density urban environment than in your own free-standing house in the countryside. For instance, I don't know anyone who can live in the countryside without a car, yet here in the city all I need is a bicycle.

Also, I think city-dwellers are more left-wing because they're surrounded by "the other", people of other ethnicities, for instance. This keeps them tolerant.

As for nature being "immutable and constant", I'm reminded of something from the biography of Bertolt Brecht. On one of his many displacements, as he escaped the Nazis, he was living in a house next to a stunning view of mountains. But he moved his writing desk away from the window. He had no interest in a landscape that could not be changed by humans.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-23 11:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cheapsurrealist.livejournal.com
urban areas where their surroundings are 95% glass and concrete?

That 95% figure. You just pulled that out of your ass right?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-24 12:41 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
For somebody twice my age, I would've figured you'd have something more meaningful to contribute.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-24 01:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cheapsurrealist.livejournal.com
For somebody twice my age, I would've figured you'd have something more meaningful to contribute.

When you get a little older your mommy and daddy might take you to the Big City. They have lot's of candy and ice cream there. And if you're lucky they'll take you to an urban area like San Francisco where natural wonders abound.

Bumpkins anonymous

Date: 2006-07-24 12:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
I'm what you might call a middle-aged environmentalist and I've never lived in a city. I live in a former prefab army barracks. It's a freestandng apartment with a yard, which is full of plants that act as a refuge and food source for all sorts of animals. I use my bicycle to get around town, and I work from my house, so I don't commute. Ironically, the only time I seem to use my car is when I'm going into a city. I'm pretty certain that I consume less resources than the average urbanite.

Image

It's been my experience that most people in cities tend to mean well and talk a good game, but because they are so physically isolated from nature, they can do little in the way of action other than tourism--at which time many, even good friends, come off as spoiled children (you can tell right away who the NYers are when kayaking or hiking: they're the ones making demands). It's an amusement ride to them, another artificial constuct made solely for their benefit. They can't seem to shut up and muster the slightest bit of reverence for the place they're in, which took millions of years to come about--as opposed to the paltry century it took to raise most American cities. They may have green sympathies, but they inhabit another world, and have little or no understanding of the one in which I live. No wonder most naturalists are misanthropes.

I belong to numerous organizations who try to keep real estate developers from encroaching on the unprotected parts of this region, (http://www.nps.gov/pine/) which is the last of its kind on the Mid-Atlantic seaboard. I patrol sensitive areas to prevent poachers from stealing animals and rare plants, many of which live nowhere else. You wouldn't want to see what this area would be like if people like myself moved to a city. It would be a massive airport for New York and Philadelphia, like they had originally planned. I dearly hope I can help to keep it as 'immutable' as possible during my lifetime.

Re: Bumpkins anonymous

Date: 2006-07-24 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zzberlin.livejournal.com
<< It's been my experience that most people in cities tend to mean well and talk a good game, but because they are so physically isolated from nature, they can do little in the way of action other than tourism--at which time >>

I'm not a huge nature fan myself. Like momus was saying, the nature vista is unchanging unless there's a thunderstorm. I'd rather eat my cereal and keep an eye on the street below, the cars.

I like to enjoy a sunny day from behind a glass window

I'll take the city, an enclosed orb, underneath the water maybe, now there's something to watch! but not the mountains. BORING

Re: Bumpkins anonymous

Date: 2006-07-24 02:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
Excerpt from this article: (http://www.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=Some+Dark+Thoughts+on+Happiness+--+New+York+Magazine&expire=&urlID=18800333&fb=Y&url=http://www.newyorkmag.com/news/features/17573/&partnerID=73272)

"...which is where the subtle thesis of Barry Schwartz’s The Paradox of Choice comes in. He argues, with terrible persuasiveness, that a superabundance of options is not a blessing but a certain recipe for madness. Nowhere do people have more choices than in New York. 'New Yorkers should probably be the most unhappy people on the planet,' says Schwartz, a psychology professor at Swarthmore. 'On every block, there’s a lifetime’s worth of opportunities. And if I’m right, either they won’t be able to choose or they will choose, and they’ll be convinced they chose badly.'"

"Economists have a term for those who seek out the best options in life. They call them maximizers. And maximizers, in practically every study one can find, are far more miserable than people who are willing to make do (economists call these people satisficers). 'My suspicion,' says Schwartz, 'is that all this choice creates maximizers.' If that’s the case, New York doesn’t just attract ambitious neurotics; it creates them. It also creates desires for things we don’t need—which, not coincidentally, is the business of Madison Avenue—and, as a corollary, pointless regrets, turning us all into a city of counterfactual historians, men and women who obsessively imagine different and better outcomes for ourselves."

Re: Bumpkins anonymous

Date: 2006-07-24 06:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Well, imagining different and better outcomes for ourselves is one of the hallmarks of liberalism, isn't it? The belief in progress? The perfectability of man? The Golden Age being in the future, not the past?

Re: Bumpkins anonymous

Date: 2006-07-25 02:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
Certainly, but I do wonder if an overabundance of avenues often undermines this progress by bewildering or distracting would-be 'advancers' from the start. Many of my favorite advances are a result of making the best of limited choices, or the result of creating many choices from few. Such situations seem to better facilitate focus, and I find the process itself exciting—but then, I'm more keen on interesting failures.

--Sumomi

Leftist City Dweller

Date: 2006-07-24 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandyrose.livejournal.com
Why is it that "those people" on the right are constantly building ugly subdivisions of identical giant houses in what was unspoiled nature? I'd rather live in a city and use what we've already built, and leave nature to itself thank you. I think that's a much better way of "appreciating" it. Who's creating utopia quickly again?

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags