Notes on Syd
Jul. 12th, 2006 10:47 amSyd Barrett has died aged 60.
I remember 1967. I was in the Doune Gardens, behind the family house in Edinburgh, and I had a little Crown transistor radio. That's where I first heard "See Emily Play". It stood out -- much weirder and more beautiful than anything else on the radio. A bulletin from another world.
When David Bowie made his "Pinups" album I didn't much like it. The only track I could actually remember from the 60s was "See Emily Play". That's the only song on the record which contained enough strangeness, the kind of strangeness you could hear in Bowie songs like "The Bewlay Brothers".
Syd went "beyond", and his iconic power is based on incommunicability -- he's on the dark side of the moon. But later Floyd become messengers, channelling him the same way Bowie channels his psychotic brother Terry in some of his best work. They tap into that "beyond".
Young Syd is, visually, a rock archetype. He looks like Bob Dylan, Marc Bolan, Robert Smith, Richard Ashcroft. Older Syd looks like Lawrence of Felt, a similarly legendary casualty of... something or other.
You hear echoes of Syd in Wire and Blur and David Bowie's "Low" album.
Syd is both the best and worst advertisement for LSD ever.
When I lived in Chelsea (I lived at 37 Draycott Place between 1985 and 1990), the flat where Syd had lived (the one in the photos on "The Madcap Laughs" sleeve) was just around the corner on Draycott Avenue. I used to think of him when I walked up to shop at Europa. My flatmate Mick Popper was the biggest Floyd fan ever, and sold bootlegs. That flat was like a rock museum. In the bathroom was a huge goat's head, a relic of the Rolling Stones' "Goat's Head Soup" tour.
My favourite Syd Barrett song is "No Good Trying". The chord changes are so weird, the bass so psychedelic, the lyrics communicate derangement in a weirdly focused way. "You're spinning around and around in a car with electric lights flashing very fast..." The song reminds me of Bowie's "Always Crashing in the Same Car".
There's a definite charm in being wasted. I've never tried it, though. I'd hate to be wasted.
I don't really like post-Syd Pink Floyd.
Epigone pop almost spoils Syd for me, because now I hear the lisping Damon Albarn when I hear Syd, and when I watch this video I can't help thinking of the worst period of Creation's epigone rock, the late 80s, when everyone was wearing those paisley shirts and dithering about in a field. There was even someone called Jeff Barrett, the worst press officer I ever had, because when he should have been doing my press he was off in a field somewhere, wearing a paisley-pattern shirt, taking drugs.
What a curse it was to be born too late, condemned to revere the 60s! Not that the 60s didn't deserve it, mind. It's just that the 80s began so well, with new idioms being minted, but then lost its nerve and fell to kneeling at the shrine of the (admittedly great) 1960s. I'm sure it's something to do with demographics, the baby boomers being all-powerful. And post-modernism saying it was okay to recycle the past endlessly. "Then" was "now", etc. Well, it wasn't.
If you can strip all the epigonery out of your mind, there's something impressive about Syd's First Trip. The idea of people running through the woods, high as kites, staring at tree-stumps and seeing... what?
Tonight let's all make love in London is also great for setting the scene the young Syd burst into, Swinging London. It's a promotional film for a UFO club event at Crystal Palace by Peter Whitehead, and it's dedicated to Syd. And The Look of the Week is a brilliant BBC clip with an incredible musicological analysis and interview cross-examination of the Floyd (not an appreciation) by Hans Keller.
The VH1 clip is alas also part of the retro-epigone thing, part of The Great Museum of Rock syndrome which kicked in during the 80s. Mojo, Q, Uncut, VH1, the Great Museum of Rock. All endlessly memorializing (and killing) a few moments of aliveness in the 1960s.
There's a picture of Syd from April 2001, taken near his mother's house in Cambridge. He's a middle-aged man wearing shorts, a man with a shaved head, a vegetable, a dosser, a loser. He's carrying some papers. You can't help wondering if he's got a copy of Mojo magazine in there somewhere. If he's going home to read about his own moment of aliveness.
Britain is still there, rock music is still there. People still know how to be sane in rock music, clever enough to reproduce the interesting bits, or to write exhaustive historical articles about the interesting bits. But do they still know how to be mad and eccentric? Is there anybody in the charts as crazy as Syd Barrett was when "See Emily Play" charted? Is there anybody who'd try to stop its release, as Syd did, because it was "too commercial"? Is there anybody who'd write the unreleaseable "Vegetable Man" as a follow-up?
It doesn't feel like Syd's dead now, because it's felt like he's been dead since the 60s. Syd went missing just before the genius of rock did.
But of course saying this leads us straight to the logic of Mojo magazine. It's the conclusion Mojo starts from. How to escape this loop, this self-fulfilling prophecy?
Notes on Mojo magazine
I'm not saying Mojo is a bad magazine. In fact, it's one of the better rock magazines, and it's been consistently supportive of me in reviews ("a laptop Tom Lehrer"). But you could paraphrase its mission statement as "The Continuing Adventures of Dead People Much More Alive Than You'll Ever Be". And the problem with that is that it fosters a reverential, interpretative culture. It turns rock music into classical music, a music of the museum and the academy. Although they write their own material, bands now are more like classical musicians; they mostly just interpret the masterpieces left behind by dead (or ageing) composers.
The reason I object to this state of affairs is that there's a clear binary in my head. I started making records when I was a literature student at a conservative university. "The Continuing Adventures of Dead People Much More Alive Than You'll Ever Be" could also be a paraphrase of what my Eng. Lit. course was all about. And I turned to popular music because it was alive. How disappointing, then, to see it, too, enter the museum.
I remember 1967. I was in the Doune Gardens, behind the family house in Edinburgh, and I had a little Crown transistor radio. That's where I first heard "See Emily Play". It stood out -- much weirder and more beautiful than anything else on the radio. A bulletin from another world.When David Bowie made his "Pinups" album I didn't much like it. The only track I could actually remember from the 60s was "See Emily Play". That's the only song on the record which contained enough strangeness, the kind of strangeness you could hear in Bowie songs like "The Bewlay Brothers".
Syd went "beyond", and his iconic power is based on incommunicability -- he's on the dark side of the moon. But later Floyd become messengers, channelling him the same way Bowie channels his psychotic brother Terry in some of his best work. They tap into that "beyond".
Young Syd is, visually, a rock archetype. He looks like Bob Dylan, Marc Bolan, Robert Smith, Richard Ashcroft. Older Syd looks like Lawrence of Felt, a similarly legendary casualty of... something or other.
You hear echoes of Syd in Wire and Blur and David Bowie's "Low" album.
Syd is both the best and worst advertisement for LSD ever.
When I lived in Chelsea (I lived at 37 Draycott Place between 1985 and 1990), the flat where Syd had lived (the one in the photos on "The Madcap Laughs" sleeve) was just around the corner on Draycott Avenue. I used to think of him when I walked up to shop at Europa. My flatmate Mick Popper was the biggest Floyd fan ever, and sold bootlegs. That flat was like a rock museum. In the bathroom was a huge goat's head, a relic of the Rolling Stones' "Goat's Head Soup" tour.
My favourite Syd Barrett song is "No Good Trying". The chord changes are so weird, the bass so psychedelic, the lyrics communicate derangement in a weirdly focused way. "You're spinning around and around in a car with electric lights flashing very fast..." The song reminds me of Bowie's "Always Crashing in the Same Car".
There's a definite charm in being wasted. I've never tried it, though. I'd hate to be wasted.
I don't really like post-Syd Pink Floyd.
Epigone pop almost spoils Syd for me, because now I hear the lisping Damon Albarn when I hear Syd, and when I watch this video I can't help thinking of the worst period of Creation's epigone rock, the late 80s, when everyone was wearing those paisley shirts and dithering about in a field. There was even someone called Jeff Barrett, the worst press officer I ever had, because when he should have been doing my press he was off in a field somewhere, wearing a paisley-pattern shirt, taking drugs.
What a curse it was to be born too late, condemned to revere the 60s! Not that the 60s didn't deserve it, mind. It's just that the 80s began so well, with new idioms being minted, but then lost its nerve and fell to kneeling at the shrine of the (admittedly great) 1960s. I'm sure it's something to do with demographics, the baby boomers being all-powerful. And post-modernism saying it was okay to recycle the past endlessly. "Then" was "now", etc. Well, it wasn't.
If you can strip all the epigonery out of your mind, there's something impressive about Syd's First Trip. The idea of people running through the woods, high as kites, staring at tree-stumps and seeing... what?Tonight let's all make love in London is also great for setting the scene the young Syd burst into, Swinging London. It's a promotional film for a UFO club event at Crystal Palace by Peter Whitehead, and it's dedicated to Syd. And The Look of the Week is a brilliant BBC clip with an incredible musicological analysis and interview cross-examination of the Floyd (not an appreciation) by Hans Keller.
The VH1 clip is alas also part of the retro-epigone thing, part of The Great Museum of Rock syndrome which kicked in during the 80s. Mojo, Q, Uncut, VH1, the Great Museum of Rock. All endlessly memorializing (and killing) a few moments of aliveness in the 1960s.
There's a picture of Syd from April 2001, taken near his mother's house in Cambridge. He's a middle-aged man wearing shorts, a man with a shaved head, a vegetable, a dosser, a loser. He's carrying some papers. You can't help wondering if he's got a copy of Mojo magazine in there somewhere. If he's going home to read about his own moment of aliveness.
Britain is still there, rock music is still there. People still know how to be sane in rock music, clever enough to reproduce the interesting bits, or to write exhaustive historical articles about the interesting bits. But do they still know how to be mad and eccentric? Is there anybody in the charts as crazy as Syd Barrett was when "See Emily Play" charted? Is there anybody who'd try to stop its release, as Syd did, because it was "too commercial"? Is there anybody who'd write the unreleaseable "Vegetable Man" as a follow-up?
It doesn't feel like Syd's dead now, because it's felt like he's been dead since the 60s. Syd went missing just before the genius of rock did.
But of course saying this leads us straight to the logic of Mojo magazine. It's the conclusion Mojo starts from. How to escape this loop, this self-fulfilling prophecy?
Notes on Mojo magazine
I'm not saying Mojo is a bad magazine. In fact, it's one of the better rock magazines, and it's been consistently supportive of me in reviews ("a laptop Tom Lehrer"). But you could paraphrase its mission statement as "The Continuing Adventures of Dead People Much More Alive Than You'll Ever Be". And the problem with that is that it fosters a reverential, interpretative culture. It turns rock music into classical music, a music of the museum and the academy. Although they write their own material, bands now are more like classical musicians; they mostly just interpret the masterpieces left behind by dead (or ageing) composers.
The reason I object to this state of affairs is that there's a clear binary in my head. I started making records when I was a literature student at a conservative university. "The Continuing Adventures of Dead People Much More Alive Than You'll Ever Be" could also be a paraphrase of what my Eng. Lit. course was all about. And I turned to popular music because it was alive. How disappointing, then, to see it, too, enter the museum.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 09:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 09:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 09:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 10:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 03:27 pm (UTC)http://www.ecu.edu.au/pr/Publications/Aug02.pdf
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 10:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 10:21 am (UTC)I wonder if maverick artists like Syd were actually helped by the snooty, high-culture, "all pop music is rubbish" attitude of the broadsheet critics of the time.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 11:03 pm (UTC)Which is why I'm as happy to offer the information that I love Ace of Base as I do Yoko Ono.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 10:55 am (UTC)Makes u think, ehhhhhh?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 03:30 pm (UTC)"laptop Lehrer"
Date: 2006-07-12 11:00 am (UTC)Speaking of which, will Cherry Red have promos of Ocky Milk yet?
Re: "laptop Lehrer"
Date: 2006-07-12 11:12 am (UTC)Cherry Red have finished masters of Ocky, but I'm not sure what we're doing about press, there's a possibility that Andy Fraser will do it, but he doesn't have a copy yet. Hold yer horses!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 11:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 02:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:Mojo
Date: 2006-07-12 12:08 pm (UTC)p.s Didn't Mojo have a Momus album in their greatest 1000 albums ever magazine?
Re: Mojo
Date: 2006-07-12 12:18 pm (UTC)Yes, as I recall it was "Momus' next album, which he hasn't written yet". They like to celebrate the future!
Re: Mojo
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-07-12 12:30 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 12:25 pm (UTC)There was a mad rush that started in 1966 to fuse every genre, break down every barrier and taboo that existed.
The bent blues note was a wonderful thing initially but I could die a happy man if I never heard one again.
The offical end of music came in 2005 with the Ying Yang Twins "wait till you see my dick/beat the pussy up" song, which became tremendously popular.
Where to go from here? Find a new hobby. Music is for kids. By the time you get to 25, you've heard it all anyway. People either "go back" to blues music or start buying the world music they hear on NPR. Sounds like a sad fate to me.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 01:30 pm (UTC)I'm assuming you haven't heard Scott Walker, because he defies all my conceptions of music each time I hear him, and it's far deeper than any innitial shock value, because some of his songs are so intense that they shock me brutally everytime, causing me to require great space in between listenings. But it is a beautiful thing; hardly "unlistenable"...It's the listenability of what should be "unlistenable" that makes it for me...And much of the other things that crop up from nowhere...And then there are those things that simply please us.
Also, NPR has reccomended some great things like the very earthy, Finnish Värttinä.
Rock/music will never be dead so long as people continue to be surprised by life and have revelatory experiences. Newness for newness's sake is overrated too--we must take pleasure, in equal measure, in the perfecting demands of an artist's vision to make clearer the stuff of life, no matter if it's from a Tubax, a Mongolian violin, or a kazzoo.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-07-12 02:53 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-07-12 03:50 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-07-12 04:05 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-07-12 04:12 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-07-12 06:32 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:<i>The best head comes from a thug...</i>
From:albums?
Date: 2006-07-12 12:37 pm (UTC)cheers
Re: albums?
Date: 2006-07-12 01:21 pm (UTC)Re: albums?
From:Re: albums?
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 12:48 pm (UTC)It was later he lived at Chelsea Cloisters.
The Syd/Floyd story is actually less about LSD and more about how English schoolboys love to torture each other, with a dash of Mozart V. Salieri thrown in.)
The Syd Barrett legend, the drugs, the brylcreem, etc was essentially a lie invented by Nick Kent to which Syd pled the right to silence.
And it is a lie that is forever held up by the Salieris of this world as a warning to young men and the dangers of tapping in too deeply to the wellsprings of their own creativity.
R.I.P. Wunderkind.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 01:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-07-13 12:24 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 01:25 pm (UTC)Damon Albarn doesn't remind me remotely of Syd either...Hmmmm
But Syd was a true one-off; I think "If It's In You" is one of the most derrangedly fun songs of all time. Yezzir.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 02:04 pm (UTC)It needn't enter the museum unless the few, the intelligent and creative, such as yourself, let it do so.
Just think of "The Drift" and know the magnitude, the kicking spirit that stands for.
Other things have their place and moment for us, even if they are less than spectacularly original. Because originality for originality's sake is less than a force of integrity.
---
Memorialisation is hardly a new phenomena, and has been used to derive strength in the religious repetition and exacting science of tradition in cultures such as your beloved Japanese one, and others that cling tightly to the reverence of their ancestors.
There will always be new ancestors to revere, and always new manifestations of the human spirit, so long as people don't believe there's nowhere else to go.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 02:04 pm (UTC)and..a mention of Peter Whitehead !!!..you spoil us ambassador
kind of missed Barrett as a teenybopper in the early 70s. By then he was written out of the mainstream. He would turn up in some doc about the "60s culture" like some health warning.
The big thing for me was that Marc Bolan's girlfriend at the time June Child was once a paramour of Barretts. How I miss Jackie magazine (http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1853755869/202-1712433-1503063?v=glance&n=266239).
Even when post-Syd Floyd became aural wallpaper I didnt click. Waters had rewritten the history.
Later some Husker Du fans would play me their Blue Aeroplanes 80s take on psychedelia and Lucifer Sam would descend obsessively in the background and I would ask what is that. At that point I felt deprived.
I didnt lust after him like I have with other casualties. Skip Spence's Oar comes to mind. After reading the "history" and sampling his albums I could only think, what a great career move, retire into obscurity with royalties coming in endlessly to paint and garden. I dont mean that to sound cynical, I believe he had real problems. But, as the legend goes, who really knows?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 01:12 am (UTC)His friends, his doctors...
I met Skip Spence briefly in 79. He still looked like the young Skippy from Jefferson Airplane and Moby Grape days but he was totally gone. Not just stoned but not there anymore. I've seen it in unfamous people - friends with schizophrenia, Alzhiemers in relatives. People like to play up the drug use and the excesses of the 60's.
It's just really sad what happened to Alexander and Roger.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 02:26 pm (UTC)Lots of funny bits too and interesting insights into the 60's. One point it cleared up for me was why Syd's replacement, Dave Gilmour, produced and played bass on Syd's solo albums. Turns out they were long time friends and Syd was always trying to get him to join Pink Floyd. And so it fell on Gilmour to help fulfill Syd's contractual agreement to make two more records.
I'll stop here because I'm sure there will be plenty to read in the next issue of Mojo. And take care not to be hit by all the Syd Barrett reissues that will be flying around.
P.S. I say poorly titled because it is taken from Pink Floyd's awful arena rock period.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 02:44 pm (UTC)There's a quite interesting interview with Syd's nephew from 2000:
http://www.pink-floyd.org/barrett/ianintw.htm
By the sounds of things, he probably didn't read Mojo.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 03:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 03:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 07:15 pm (UTC)Aaah: you're falling into a dangerous, sentimentalist trap here, Momus! It's been my main problem with Barrett obituaries thus far - "fractured genius of rock," "the crazy diamond shines no more," "he's got a bike he can ride it to Valhala if he likes," "Legendary loony dead at 60." I've heard more than enough about Syd's "sad" life in Cambridge in his mother's basement. You know what he was doing, according to most reports? Painting, writing a book on world history, and tending to his garden. Awful "Slow Life," isn't it? I hate the idea that just because he retired from pop music he was some sort of "loser." That's unfair, judgemental, and ill-informed. How the fuck do we know what he was?
There's nothing romantic about burned-out rock stars, and there's very little tragic about it, either. Syd Barrett gave us three brilliant records worth of material, a handful of fantastic singles/bootlegs, and that's that. I'm honestly glad he retired; as we could tell from most of the psych groups, post-1960s they fell into the prog trap, and that's something I would never wish on Syd Barrett.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-07-12 07:34 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-07-13 02:10 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 09:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 09:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 10:17 pm (UTC)The new "transcendent rock for the masses" has got to be......ahhh.....I don't know. Shakira, Radiohead, maybe even Ayumi Hamasaki. They have sincerity and they have healing, and lots and lots of people listen to them.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 11:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 01:27 am (UTC)http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:8p821vs4zz9a~T1
http://www.myspace.com/arielpink
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 05:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-13 02:21 am (UTC)