American billboard
May. 28th, 2006 01:58 pmAlthough I'm back in Berlin now, I wanted to run one more state-of-America entry. No doubt the people who objected to Pompeii at the kiosk -- my mercurial reading of the nation's spiritual health via a selection of its magazine cover straplines -- won't like it, but I wanted to look at a couple of billboard ads spotted in New York City over the last couple of weeks, and just try to parse what they might be saying about American society.
Let's start with the Leo Burnett Stodgy Banker campaign for Washington Mutual. Here we see rich bankers of the old school making provocative statements like "Free Checking? Exactly how does that help the rich get richer?"

What's really remarkable about these ads is the way they play on class stereotypes in order to work up a sense of resentment against the rich. They're remarkably... well, remarkably communist! There's a kind of Weimar Republic satirical aggression to their tone, something that makes me think of Brecht and Weill, John Heartfield and George Grosz. This kind of hostility to the rich is something we don't associate with this country. Could it be that six years of Bush giving tax breaks to the rich has actually, finally stuck in America's craw? Have we reached the tipping point where people finally start to see the evil in the Gini? To wish for a smaller disparity between the rich and the poor? Are these posters (and they're also TV ads) being displayed in red states as well as blue ones like New York? (The ad agency that made them is based in Chicago.)
It's not before time. As the Wall Street Journal reported recently, Americans have tolerated inequality in their society because they believe that the US offers high social mobility to those who are talented, have motivation and ability. Anyone can make it if they work hard enough, according to the old mantra. But this is no longer the case. The US now offers less chance of social mobility than Europe, Scandinavia or Canada: "Despite the widespread belief that the U.S. remains a more mobile society than Europe, economists and sociologists say that in recent decades the typical child starting out in poverty in continental Europe (or in Canada) has had a better chance at prosperity." Studies show that France and Germany are now somewhat more socially mobile than either the US or the UK, and Canada and the Nordic countries are much more so. So come to Europe, land of opportunity!
Speaking of Europe, it's fascinating to see the way America portrays German cars.

"Bigger engine. Increased envy," reads the Mercedes ad I spotted in midtown. "German engineering in da haus," rapped the VW ad on 3rd Avenue. The Mercedes ad clearly alludes to Freud's concept of penis envy: "Penis envy in popular culture is understood to mean women's psychological response to their lack of a penis. It is also sometimes ascribed to males in regard to others with a larger penis." A number of not-so-subliminal meanings can be (cock-)teased out of this ad. First of all, men with small-engined cars (and again, as in the social mobility issue, we see a reversal of traditional images of the US and Europe: it used to be European cars that were seen as small-engined) are "unmanned", made into women. Secondly, men with American cars are less manly than men with German cars. They have smaller penises.
This idea carries over into the VW ad: here the "in da haus" copyline fuel-injects the semi-conscious idea that having a German car will give you a penis as big as a black man's. I mean, that's the only reason I can think of for advertising "German engineering" with black phraseology.
We Europeans, apparently, done got it uber alles: da Freud, da phallic cars, da social mobility. Reprazent, liebling!
Let's start with the Leo Burnett Stodgy Banker campaign for Washington Mutual. Here we see rich bankers of the old school making provocative statements like "Free Checking? Exactly how does that help the rich get richer?"

What's really remarkable about these ads is the way they play on class stereotypes in order to work up a sense of resentment against the rich. They're remarkably... well, remarkably communist! There's a kind of Weimar Republic satirical aggression to their tone, something that makes me think of Brecht and Weill, John Heartfield and George Grosz. This kind of hostility to the rich is something we don't associate with this country. Could it be that six years of Bush giving tax breaks to the rich has actually, finally stuck in America's craw? Have we reached the tipping point where people finally start to see the evil in the Gini? To wish for a smaller disparity between the rich and the poor? Are these posters (and they're also TV ads) being displayed in red states as well as blue ones like New York? (The ad agency that made them is based in Chicago.)
It's not before time. As the Wall Street Journal reported recently, Americans have tolerated inequality in their society because they believe that the US offers high social mobility to those who are talented, have motivation and ability. Anyone can make it if they work hard enough, according to the old mantra. But this is no longer the case. The US now offers less chance of social mobility than Europe, Scandinavia or Canada: "Despite the widespread belief that the U.S. remains a more mobile society than Europe, economists and sociologists say that in recent decades the typical child starting out in poverty in continental Europe (or in Canada) has had a better chance at prosperity." Studies show that France and Germany are now somewhat more socially mobile than either the US or the UK, and Canada and the Nordic countries are much more so. So come to Europe, land of opportunity!
Speaking of Europe, it's fascinating to see the way America portrays German cars.

"Bigger engine. Increased envy," reads the Mercedes ad I spotted in midtown. "German engineering in da haus," rapped the VW ad on 3rd Avenue. The Mercedes ad clearly alludes to Freud's concept of penis envy: "Penis envy in popular culture is understood to mean women's psychological response to their lack of a penis. It is also sometimes ascribed to males in regard to others with a larger penis." A number of not-so-subliminal meanings can be (cock-)teased out of this ad. First of all, men with small-engined cars (and again, as in the social mobility issue, we see a reversal of traditional images of the US and Europe: it used to be European cars that were seen as small-engined) are "unmanned", made into women. Secondly, men with American cars are less manly than men with German cars. They have smaller penises.
This idea carries over into the VW ad: here the "in da haus" copyline fuel-injects the semi-conscious idea that having a German car will give you a penis as big as a black man's. I mean, that's the only reason I can think of for advertising "German engineering" with black phraseology.
We Europeans, apparently, done got it uber alles: da Freud, da phallic cars, da social mobility. Reprazent, liebling!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 12:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 12:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 01:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 09:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 01:11 pm (UTC)http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1158901779668604713&q=Volkswagen+commercial (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1158901779668604713&q=Volkswagen+commercial)
You may be right in that the entire concept of "pimping my ride" deals with penis envy. There's long been an argument that automobiles serve as a form of phallic overcompensation. I don't think the Volkswagen ads play into that idea of penis envy as much as parody the phenomenon. Then again, perhaps the two are not so dissimilar.
In regard to the billboards above featuring the corporate fat cats decrying breaks for the little people, I'd argue that mentality has been prevalent in American society for very long time. In fact, this is hardly the first time we've seen class tension exploited as a means of advertising. I think you're right in that resentment of the upper classes may be stronger now than it has been in decades, nevertheless I don't really find these ads shocking or indicative of a cultural metamorphosis.
I will say, however, that those ads provoke the opposite response in me. Who are those ads helping if not the rich bankers? Once upon a time, it was the privilege for banks to hold (and have access to) our money, a privilege for which we were reimbursed with interest. Now, it has become a privilege for us to use the banks, a privilege for which we now pay transaction fees for nearly every service rendered. My initial thought upon seeing the billboards, was, "how dare they expect us to be grateful for not charging us to have access to our money?" Unfortunately, I fear I am in the minority on that count.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 01:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 02:17 pm (UTC)nick! 2 viagras and then back to cynthia.
http://www.cynthiapcaster.org/casts/_dicks/casts_momus_page/momus_page.htm
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 02:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 03:00 pm (UTC)And did you know that Americans like instant gratification (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060528/ap_on_re_us/impatient_nation)?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 03:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:Time to unpimp zee auto!
Date: 2006-05-28 03:13 pm (UTC)So basically VW is trying for a chunk of the 'young and fast' market by mocking their competition (easy to do) and hooking you in with multi-contextual humour.
Re: Time to unpimp zee auto!
Date: 2006-05-28 03:17 pm (UTC)Re: Time to unpimp zee auto!
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 03:21 pm (UTC)Would that it were so easy! The lady and I have been scouring the internets for ways to relocate to Western Europe (particularly France) in the wake of the US's political, economic and social climates, but it is fairly closed for those coming from outside the EU. Tips?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 03:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:I haven't really checked it out ...
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-28 04:41 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: I haven't really checked it out ...
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 03:40 pm (UTC)Rather, he represents the "old"—something which advertising ruthlessly attacks and satirises as a matter of course. In the examples you provide, there's something which directly relates to this "old money" thing: the cigar, the butler, the being "born rich".. All of these are outmoded signifiers of wealth. Were the adverts to cite more current signifiers of wealth, SUVs for instance, it'd be doubtful that the client would approve them at all.
Or something.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 03:57 pm (UTC)well said
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-28 04:45 pm (UTC) - Expandstodgy bankers
Date: 2006-05-28 04:17 pm (UTC)What I see going on here is rather simple and transparent - interest rates have risen, checking accounts do not pay interest. WaMu gets in first with a good ad campaign pretending that they are not like the other guys and cleans up, attracting a large amount of money on which they will pay no interest. WaMu will have certainly done a study and projected very carefully (in a very diligent and bankerlike manner) their cost in foregone fees and increased transaction volume compared to the gains on deposits. They would not be doing this if they did not feel sure that it will add to their bottom line (they have shareholders too).
See anything here that doesn't sound like stodgy bankers?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 04:41 pm (UTC)I went to a lecture this past semester on the 'globalization of godzilla' and looking at the different movie posters was fascinating!
in Singapore, many credit card ads are directed -without subtlety- at women...ie "big sales, bring your plastic."
are we in a blunter world? or just one with a sense of humor?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 04:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 05:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 06:11 pm (UTC)I think you make some interesting and valid points above, with which I mostly agree, but I disagree rather over this part. I don't think 'in da Haus' is a 'black' term so much as a 'yoof' term. Therefore to my ears at least it doesn't conjure up an effort to play on that particular strand of racial presumption.
I think it's more an advertising copywriter's attempt to appeal to young, hip folk, without having a clue what young, hip folk are like. It's a cartoon cut-out of street culture, betraying more about the writer's utter lack of street-wisdom than anything about black men's penises, or their relative desirability (both senses.) See also almost every 'yoof' TV experiment, most of which founder due to being controlled by middle-aged people who don't set foot in the real world if they can possibly help it.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 06:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 08:46 pm (UTC)"AIDS DOESN'T KILL STYLISH PEOPLE
...
if they use a condom.
-Kenneth Cole"
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 09:24 pm (UTC)They're a little bizarre (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKK2IkAeciE&search=VW%20Volkswagen%20GTI%20Project%20Fast). "Time to un-pimp ze auto."
Anyway, Washington Mutual has recently (the past 1-2 years) transformed itself into this national banking juggernaut, and they're actually really quite horrible now. I am glad that the ad company managed to sell those ads to them, but it doesn't reflect anything about the philosophy of the company, unfortunately.
I think most messages like these can be attributed to the fact that playing to class disparity is cheap and easy, not that there's any major shift in thinking.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-29 12:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 09:27 pm (UTC)Well, anyway. Yeah. VW in da haus.
i want a lambretta
Date: 2006-05-28 09:33 pm (UTC)Re: i want a lambretta
Date: 2006-05-28 09:51 pm (UTC)Re: i want a lambretta
From:Re: i want a lambretta
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 10:07 pm (UTC)if you throw in the concept of market segmentation (specific american group ads are aimed at) and the ad that put together the campaign (hired by the company, maybe there's more complexity there.
all the billboard and experiences you've had since being in the states has centered around nyc. that is definitely an american experience, but not necessarily the only one.
someone visiting from a midwestern city like chicago and minneapolis might have the same opinion as you since culturally nyc is different from their own american experience. Ads they might see in their city for the same companies might be vastly different to fit their "american" tastes.
your argument from a neo-freudian/socio-economic/racial/geo-political point might have validity and it's also very grounded to a particular place and you, a cultural tourist.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 10:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-28 10:20 pm (UTC)Haha, the rich. The real rich in this country are, of course, not fat old bald men in suits, but middle-class-looking yuppies in SUVs who wear pre-acid-washed jeans those casual-looking button up shirts (unless you're a Bush advisor).
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-29 01:37 am (UTC)The "old money" that is supposedly portrayed in those ads wouldn't be caught dead in those ill-fitting suits.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-29 04:25 am (UTC)But that's why they're memorable. The Ad agency that made these is probably aware of the absurdity of their critique and also the campness of the picture. They do seem almost "un-american" in their send up of the rich of perhaps more likely they seem like great depression America in which the rolls of the u.s. communist party swelled as people gave up on capitalism. The man with the cigar reminds me of old union era posters. But I'm not sure that ads say that much about the culture you're in as much as they say something about the latest trends of it's ad companies.
sticking it to The Man
Date: 2006-05-30 03:22 am (UTC)Would that it were so, but: nah. As others have already said above, this is a fairly common trope in American advertising. Thomas Frank gives dozens of similar examples, dating from the New Economy, in his book One Market Under God; it's part of what he terms "market populism."