imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
San Francisco art noise duo Matmos sound a bit like Momus. Their name, for a start, begins with an M, has another M in the middle, has two vowels, one of which is an O, and ends with an S.

Some of their ideas sound a bit like mine too. Their 2003 album The Civil War, for instance, used medieval instruments like crumhorns and sackbuts, just like the records of my "Analog Baroque" period. ("The sheer audacity of taking computers to Camelot!" marvelled Blender.) And talking of Analog Baroque, Matmos also have a penchant for the Momusesque hobby of genre-splicing. I have "folktronica", "cabaret concrete" and "absurdist torch", they have "conceptual musique concrete", "Arabic ragtime psychedelia", "porn funk" and "Wagnerian slapstick". My 1999 release "Stars Forever" was an album of portraits. And the new album from Matmos (The Rose Has Teeth In The Mouth Of A Beast, due May 9th) is... an album of portraits.

The new Matmos is "a series of sound portraits of a pantheon of people that they admire," the Matador press release tells us. "Matmos read their biographies and re-enacted events from their lives, making songs out of the sounds of the re-enactments. They gathered objects that were important to these people, made noises with them, and built melodies out of the noises."

You can hear an mp3 of Track 1 off the album, Roses and Teeth for Ludwig Wittgenstein, on the Matador Records site.

If Matmos' conceptual framework smacks of Momus' ideas done four or five years late, their noises sound like the Momus records of the future. Because it's in the realm of sound design that Matmos outstrip me. Here are some descriptions, from various sources, of a few of their sounds:

* "We went to a working farm in Sebastopol, California and recorded the sound of cows eating, and of cow manure being shovelled onto roses. Back at the studio, we recorded the sound of fresh roses swinging through the air, and built rhythms out of the sound of dried roses being scraped, shaken, and crushed. In order to create the crispier percussive noises, Erika Clowes loaned us her wisdom teeth (extracted and dried) and we clicked and grinded them against each other. We also sampled noises made by the teeth of cows, goats, sharks, and beavers." (Matmos, in their Press Release.)

* The sound of semen, burning flesh, and the embalmed reproductive tract of a cow are all featured. (Matador Press Release)

* They also took items important to the songs' subjects and built melodies out of the noises these items made. Such objects include snails, semen, burning flesh, and "bovine reproductive track" (we're not making this up, we swear!). (Pitchfork.)

* The Darby Crash song is dark electronics made out of the sound of Drew Daniel crying out in pain getting burned by the Germs’ Don Bolles, combined with the noise of M.C. Schmidt shaving his head. (Matador Press Release)

* The Patricia Highsmith song was made as a collaboration with her favorite animal, the snail (they aimed a laser at a light sensitive theremin, and then got snails to crawl across the path of the laser, triggering changes in the theremin's pitch). (Matador Press Release)

* "We have made music out of the preserved uterus of a cow." (Martin Schmidt, interviewed in The Guardian, explaining why Drew Daniel was throwing up.)

* Also featured: the sounds of liposuction, a five-gallon bucket of oatmeal and the pages of a Bible turning. (Pascal Wyse in The Guardian.)

* Martin begins by creating a Tibetan temple sound with his teaset, ticking it with percussion brushes or rubbing edges together. Later there are bubbling fluids, cattle, dancefloor grooves, aircraft and some spoken-word recordings. (The Guardian)

* It seems just as appropriate to shout down the trombone or impersonate a helicopter as it does to play a pure note. (The Guardian)

* "All your records sound like insects eating stuff". (Martin's brother, who lives deep in the woods.)

A couple more examples of Matmos catching up with Momus: I've been contributing to music board I Love Music since 2001, and for the last year or two Drew Daniel has been there too. I'm performing at the Whitney Museum in New York, and on May 5th, 2006 at 7pm Matmos perform at the museum too.

They're no stranger to art museums, of course. In 2003 they did a 17-day live performance at the Yerba Buena Museum of Contemporary Art in San Francisco. "In the mornings Drew will be interviewing museum goers and making songs about them, and in the afternoon Martin will host guest performers and improvisers," their blog reported.

Curator Betty Nguyen takes up the story: "They moved their entire living room studio there, equipped with bear skin rug, human skeleton, grand piano, laptop and some synths. They made audio portraits for a few weeks for the first person that walked thru the gallery doors... I remember watching Martin rubbing a brown paper bag with a microphone while making an "audio portrait" for this old man... One night they performed with video and I remember it was footage of a grand piano being dragged and mic-ed from the back of a pick up truck. And there was this cool imagery like the Adams Family, Thing, of Martin's hand plucking the inside of the piano's strings while he was playing it live at the same time, and not really knowing if this was live video feed or not... They did this at the Compound, Martin slapping Drew's bare ass and a video of the same action in some library set up. Drinking from a pop can and then crunching it and sampling it live into a looped beat at the Exploratorium. Good stuff."

Oh, and one last example of Matmos' egregious copycatism: the duo even had the nerve to tour with Bjork after I did.
Page 1 of 4 << [1] [2] [3] [4] >>

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 09:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loverboy82.livejournal.com
ho ho ho. that's sooo gayy

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tassellrealm.livejournal.com
Matmos?

What a rubbish-y name.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 10:26 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
well, martin and drew are a couple, and you're not a couple :) this said, this new album really is a marvellous experience. i met them for the second time, and they moreover happen to be the among the nicest and and smartest human beings i had the chance to encounter. have you ever had the chance to meet them? (odot)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kubia.livejournal.com
And what is most revealing: they are even caught on camera (http://brainwashed.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4481&Itemid=1) quoting their role model.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nato-dakke.livejournal.com
tom waits lives in sebastopol. my friend's family ran a montessori preschool there where he sent his daughter. there are also any number of good places to get a burrito in sebastopol. the end.

Trainspotter here...

Date: 2006-04-25 12:02 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think you've mistaken a few points in the Guardian article. Matmos have made music with Oatmeal (not on this record, though, on 'Drug Opera [The Live album]' with Liposuction (not here, but of course on 'A chance to cut...'/'California Rhinoplasty') and Drew was throwing up due to food poisoning, I believe, not the presence of cow Uterus...

Then again, maybe he'd eaten the cow uterus. Who knows in London restaurants these days?

Björkmus? ...Momjörk? hmmmm...

Date: 2006-04-25 12:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biseinen.livejournal.com
What are the chances of a Momus/Björk collaboration? Something I've been daydreaming about for the longest time. Although, to me, it seems an inevitable symbiosis, it just doesn't seem to ever happen. Even if it is a sort of EP like the one penned for Kahimi Karie "Journey to the center of me" (a personal Momus top 5). After all "she's basically the Bjork of Japan" (http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/news/00-02/02.shtml) in the eyes of some internet commentariat.
Image

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 12:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nightspore.livejournal.com
The reference you probably know is to Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations:

"A new born child has no teeth." "A goose has no teeth." "A rose has no teeth." This last at any rate--one would like to say--is obviously true! It is even surer that a goose has none. --And yet it is none so clear. For where should a rose's teeth have been? The goose has none in its jaw. And neither, of course, has it any in its wings; but no one means that when he says it has no teeth. --Why, suppose one were to say: the cow chews its food and then dungs the rose with it, so the rose has teeth in the mouth of a beast. This would not be absurd, because one has no notion in advance where to look for teeth in a rose.

This is one of many places where LW is showing that things that seem just obviously true require context to understand; that nothing is true without context. The first sentences all sound parallel to each other, but they're not, and the idea that a rose has no teeth is not a model sentence (as it might seem) for the idea that newborns or geese don't. There are no model sentences. As is usual in LW, the place where the interlocutor (what Blake calls the idiot questioner) ceases talking and Wittgenstein answers, in fuller voice, is after the dash: "--And yet..."

It's not quite that the rose actually does have teeth in the mouth of the beast; it's that only of things with mouths does the question of teeth properly come up. (That's why we don't say of a goose that it doesn't have teeth in its wings.) And if it's made to come up elsewhere, then all bets are off.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spoombung.livejournal.com
Well the acts that distinguish themselves as ‘artists’ (usually self-proclaimed anyway) like Matmos, always feel the need to explain where their source material is from. They like to imbue the source of the original material (the building blocks) with some sort of social significance (an event, a narrative, etc) to add weight to their enterprise and they labour these points over and over again. Even better if you can add a taboo element or a ‘squirm’ factor - like Marc Quinn talking about making art from his daughter’s umbilical cord. If the material comes with a story - so much the better for the artist.

Being a modern artist these days seems to involve writing a thesis to authorize and authenticate every action, every gesture and every mark. You've got to read before you look or listen, it seems.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tassellrealm.livejournal.com
Hmm yeah.

The track neither thrills nor enlightens.

If it were able to perform either of those prerequesets, it wouldn't need the augmentary 15 tons of bumpf and pamphletry.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Ah, thanks for that, a great documentary (http://brainwashed.com/common/video/mov/matmos-eye_060127.mov). They're so refreshingly articulate, funny, and interesting! More ideas in 40 minutes than most music artists pack into a whole career...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I chat to Drew online, and I'll meet them at the Whitney next week fo' sho.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Actually, the track thrills me. It's sort of like The Books (who I also like) in its use of spoken word, but with more found sound than music. I like the floppy, awkward sound of the percussion, and the spliced-in goose noises, and the denatured voice. And I think excitement is often a matter of concepts; you can't reach certain sorts of freshness of sound without coming to them by a conceptual route. The concepts don't have to be spelled out, but you can hear, listening to music like this, their presence, and you can hear it in the fact that something is fascinatingly askew.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
the books are matmos followers, for sure, and certainly not the other way round! in fact, did you know that matmos have been hiding snippets of wittgenstein's tractatus in all of their records? it's one of drew's obsessions, or so it seems. (odot again)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kubia.livejournal.com
I'm glad you like it. I've always considered you and the Matmos guys sharing a similar concern with ideas behind your musical output rather than embracing the latest technological gadgetry just to make it sound "phat". Personally, I regard it as form of "Boyband-Fandom", albeit with swapping the looks for the brains. ;-)

Will you be at the Whitney show of the two?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bearzbub.livejournal.com
They are supersweet fellows. I was lucky enough to be the last musical portrait for their Work Work Work installment. Based on Drew's interview they came up with a set of sounds, which I was able to particpate in. Before lunch I left with a cd with the track.

I'd be curious to hear what the three of you could come up with.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Yes! I will sacrifice DJ Spooky's tour of the Rubin Museum, happening that same evening! No man hath greater faith than this!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mini-snape.livejournal.com
Well, at least neither of them is a pirate. Right?

Wired

Date: 2006-04-25 02:46 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hihi, even one more thing in common: You both contribute to Wired. They feature on the CD in the November 2004 issue. Spoooky.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tassellrealm.livejournal.com
What I really can't stand is the nasty plazzy narcissist voice of the woman.

Sonically it's still on the dusty old start blocks of Holger Hiller, The Art of Noise &c, but no frisson, no melody, no delight in sound and being, no 'new moment'.

There's a thread that runs through the track that says "We want something in advance," consequently - it sucks.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 03:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kubia.livejournal.com
Willst thou report on it? It'd be great to know what to expect when they come over in September.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 03:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tassellrealm.livejournal.com
Also..

It took people 40 years to find out there was a backward-flushing toilet in the guitar solo on Joe Meek's "Telstar."

It wasn't a bit of pre-publicity. It wasn't 'the tail wagging the dog.'

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Maybe they'll work backwards, copy Momus copying Beck, then copy Momus copying Pet Shop Boys..

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-25 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I hear the new Pet Shop Boys album is called Appropriationism (http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?refid=561534479&vv=400) and consists entirely of Momus cover versions.
Page 1 of 4 << [1] [2] [3] [4] >>