imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Well, IQ has been largely discredited. Eysenck and the others who championed the system of measuring intelligence are out of fashion. These days we tend to say "IQ tests merely measure one's ability to take IQ tests". Well, those of us on the left, anyway. Of course, it's true that Wikipedia's entry on Intelligence Quotient does say that IQ "is taken by psychologists to be an excellent proxy for intelligence, and possibly the best measurable definition of intellectual ability", but they add that it's "generally not taken to represent intelligence perfectly".

Caveats like that are important when we come to the fraught, hot-button-scattered area of the correlations between race and intelligence. Wikipedia says:

"While the distributions of IQ scores among different racial-ethnic groups overlap considerably, groups differ in where their members cluster along the IQ scale. Some groups (e.g. East Asians and Jews) cluster higher than whites, while other groups (e.g. Blacks and Hispanics) cluster lower than whites."

This is borne out by stuff we're seeing in the news. "Europe's skills fall behind Asia", the BBC reported recently, citing a report published in Brussels by the Lisbon Council which says that Europe's 11.6 trillion euro economy is threatened by the fact that France and Germany "are no longer among the world's leaders in developing knowledge and skills" and are being overtaken by countries like South Korea.

Wikipedia's article on Race and Intelligence admits the controversy of such correlations, but doesn't deny they exist, and also makes clear another correlation: there are strong links between average intelligence and national wealth. "For example, a randomly selected group of Americans with an average IQ of 103 had a poverty rate 25% lower than a group with an average IQ of 100."

And, while it would be a mistake to equate education with IQ, it seems clear that where they're in sync, as in South Korea, they have a dramatic effect on the wealth of a nation. The graph on the right shows the "earnings dividend" produced by different levels of education in different countries. As you can see, getting a higher education more or less doubles your earnings in almost every country.

Again, it's South Korea which is the education star: 97% of South Korea's 25 to 34-year-olds today have high school education. That's the highest rate among the main industrialised countries.

This brings us to a book published in 2002 by Dr. Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, and Dr. Tatu Vanhanen, Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. Incidentally, Finland is Europe's one success story in terms of educational investment and achievement, and it's showing in the nation's booming economy. And that's pretty much the message of the book these men wrote, IQ and the Wealth of Nations: that the average IQ of a nation correlates with its GDP.

The Wikipedia's article on the book gives us a handy Top 100 run-down of nations by their (estimated) average IQs. Here's the hot Top 25:

Hong Kong (PRC) 107
South Korea 106
Japan 105
Taiwan 104
Singapore 103
Austria 102
Germany 102
Italy 102
Netherlands 102
Sweden 101
Switzerland 101
Belgium 100
China 100
New Zealand 100
United Kingdom 100
Hungary 99
Poland 99
Australia 98
Denmark 98
France 98
Norway 98
United States 98
Canada 97
Czech Republic 97
Finland 97

At the bottom of the list we find a sad cluster of African countries: Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, Congo-Kinshasa, Zimbabwe, Guinea, Nigeria, Ghana... But wait, I say "sad" assuming that being rich and good at IQ tests makes you happy. But it isn't so. Not only have we been adamant in the past on Click Opera that richer isn't happier, we've also read the research that says that the world's happiest people live in Africa. In a survey of happiness published in New Scientist magazine in 2003 the country with the highest percentage of happy people was... Nigeria.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-17 05:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tassellrealm.livejournal.com
The idea that you can measure intelligence in this way, is itself not very intelligent.

The hippocampus is a muscle, and like a muscle, the more you use it, the bigger it gets.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-17 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] henryperri.livejournal.com
The hippie-campus? Is that in San Fran?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-17 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tassellrealm.livejournal.com
No.

No, it's not in San Fran.

I was always amused by that line spoken by the hippy guy in Repo Man:

"The more you drive - the less intelligent you become."

Obviously not true.

The hippocampus is connected with navigation.

This is why taxi-drivers always win quiz shows on TV.

And this is why, when chatting to the taxi driver on the way to a film shoot, I'm always surprised to find that he knows more about films than the director does.

I always say: "The more you smoke, the more intelligent you become."

There's a certain amount of evidence that bears this out. Nicotine switches on all your acetylcholine receptors.

I've recently augmented my cigarette habit with snuff:

http://www.sharrowmills.com/

Mozart, Beethoven, and Wagner were all heavy snuff users - which is good company as far as I'm concerned.

Microwave radiation coming from cell-phones and cell-phone transmitters knocks out your acetylcholine receptors - which is probably why everybody is so thick these days.

Snuff

Date: 2006-04-17 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I've got a tin of snuff that must be 25 years old, from when I worked in a mine. I can't get the bloody thing open now. Shows how intelligent I am. Some of those Sharrow Mills things look wonderful.

Re: Snuff

Date: 2006-04-17 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tassellrealm.livejournal.com
Yeah, they are.

This snuff thing is a real discovery as far as I'm concerned - it's like smart champagne for the brain.

Of the Wilsons range, I would recommend:

"Tom Buck" - That's a great one. Quite a euphoric - a real blast.

"Irish High Toast No. 22" - Slightly less potent, but a bit more high frequency.

Both these come at the hilariously cheap price of £2.50 a tin.

Don't know what you've got in that tin, but it's probably a bit dried out by now.

Here are some links, if anyone's interested...

http://www.snuffbox.org.uk/

http://www.mcchrystals.com/en/index.html

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/snuffboxthenasalsnuffclub/

being agreeable

Date: 2006-04-18 12:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cityramica.livejournal.com
you know, i've also been pretty consistenly impressed by the amount that taxi drivers know about film....and in the bay area about politics as well. many that i meet here are either obsessed with classic movies or avid patrons of public radio...

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags