Ginsberg's ghost
Mar. 12th, 2006 11:19 amI've found myself this week in the middle of a certain kind of New York conversation, the kind I used to hunger for, lively conversation about art and projects and ideas and ambition and politics, falling silent. It's not that I don't want to be in the conversation. It's not that the terms of the conversation make no sense to me. It's not even that I'm still a bit jet-lagged and tend to get tired early in the evening. It's just something to do with feeling bored with the way these New York conversations, these American conversations, are framed. I feel like, no matter how much I agree, I won't agree. No American definition of the good life will match mine. I want to opt out of the terms and framings of these conversations even before I get into them. These days I seem to prefer processing things visually; I find that more interesting. I'm sitting in a bar, and there's conversation, but I notice that there's an abacus lattice in front of me,
and I want to concentrate on that. Or there's music playing, but the peripheral sounds (rain, ventilation, machinery) are more interesting. The landscape out the window of the plane is more interesting than the film. Silence is more interesting than speech. I just want to look at what people are wearing, watch a crane elevator moving up and down its metal spine, silhouetted against the western horizon.
At moments like this I think of Allen Ginsberg. I think of that gimmick he had -- and it also wasn't a gimmick -- of launching into a mantra at any given moment. Here's one, his Vajra Mantra. It's a lovely recording, a serious and sensuous pronunciation of holy syllables. And I think of Ginsberg's self-awarded license to pronounce these syllables as a strategy, in part, to avoid other syllables. His embrace of Buddhism might have been, amongst other things, a way for Ginsberg to be post-American, a way out of all sorts of conversations with people at universities, rallies, in cars and cafes, wherever; a way out of small talk which would ultimately just confirm certain American fixed ideas, and also confirm him as an American Jew. By becoming some sort of satyr-devotee, by mixing cultures and invoking gods who were non-gods, Ginsberg could escape all that rubbish, all that restricting clutter. I wish I had a gimmick like that! I wish I could break out a small electronic shruti box and just start chanting! Where do I need to apply for the license to do that? Do I need to be a 1960s person? An eccentric? A famous poet? A visiting lecturer?
Ginsberg is a man I admire a lot. He's dead, of course, and now we have Devendra Banhart, a sort of "fashion Hindu", in something approximating the same cultural space. Now, all sorts of objections could be raised to Devendra -- and what's he doing in the men's fashion section of the New York Times, anyway? What kind of transcendence is that? -- but I'm not really interested in any of them. Anything that lifts America away from its dull denims, its dreadful protestant practicality, is fine by me. A use of fashion that lifts America away from itself -- away from its endless small talk about the weather and projects and success -- towards a recognition of the wisdom of India is, well, a correct use of fashion. The ghost of Ginsberg is there, doing good work.
and I want to concentrate on that. Or there's music playing, but the peripheral sounds (rain, ventilation, machinery) are more interesting. The landscape out the window of the plane is more interesting than the film. Silence is more interesting than speech. I just want to look at what people are wearing, watch a crane elevator moving up and down its metal spine, silhouetted against the western horizon.At moments like this I think of Allen Ginsberg. I think of that gimmick he had -- and it also wasn't a gimmick -- of launching into a mantra at any given moment. Here's one, his Vajra Mantra. It's a lovely recording, a serious and sensuous pronunciation of holy syllables. And I think of Ginsberg's self-awarded license to pronounce these syllables as a strategy, in part, to avoid other syllables. His embrace of Buddhism might have been, amongst other things, a way for Ginsberg to be post-American, a way out of all sorts of conversations with people at universities, rallies, in cars and cafes, wherever; a way out of small talk which would ultimately just confirm certain American fixed ideas, and also confirm him as an American Jew. By becoming some sort of satyr-devotee, by mixing cultures and invoking gods who were non-gods, Ginsberg could escape all that rubbish, all that restricting clutter. I wish I had a gimmick like that! I wish I could break out a small electronic shruti box and just start chanting! Where do I need to apply for the license to do that? Do I need to be a 1960s person? An eccentric? A famous poet? A visiting lecturer?
Ginsberg is a man I admire a lot. He's dead, of course, and now we have Devendra Banhart, a sort of "fashion Hindu", in something approximating the same cultural space. Now, all sorts of objections could be raised to Devendra -- and what's he doing in the men's fashion section of the New York Times, anyway? What kind of transcendence is that? -- but I'm not really interested in any of them. Anything that lifts America away from its dull denims, its dreadful protestant practicality, is fine by me. A use of fashion that lifts America away from itself -- away from its endless small talk about the weather and projects and success -- towards a recognition of the wisdom of India is, well, a correct use of fashion. The ghost of Ginsberg is there, doing good work.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 04:43 pm (UTC)reading this feels scary, a real bummer to be american. what should america talk about, what can we talk about? i can relate man, i talk about the weather, projects, success to some level with every one i know and dont know, i have other cares too, but these topics always come up over and over. why is there nothing to say. i'm finding my self speaking less and less, looking listening, the things i have to talk about dont excite me again, yet. and the things other people talk about are the same
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 05:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 05:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 05:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 06:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 11:34 pm (UTC)I used to think he was a flake and a conman, especially with all those "working for the CIA" rumours but recently I have been reappraising his importance on culture and on my own life. Yoko Ono will have to wait.
He seems to be a custodian for a lineage in a sense, being an important connector of people and events. His quips about having fucked Whitman by proxy due to a teacher/lover he had carnal knowledge of being three fucks removed from Whitman's lovers. His interpretation of Bob Dylan as a trickster/changeling. His love of Blake and the Romantics. His active encouragement of Kerouac and Burroughs.
I read recently that he and Gary Snyder felt some karmic guilt for actively encouraging a generation to take sometimes dangerous psychedelics. They had to take responsibility for some damaged minds and lives.
Watching a documentary, "What happened to Kerouac" recently, I was deeply moved by Ginsberg's take on Kerouac's search for the core of experience and its infinite sadness. Something he expresses at times in his own recorded "songs".
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Aliens Don't Like To Eat People That Smoke
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 06:25 pm (UTC)That's part of the business of being a transient passenger in an ambient world.
I don't necessarily think it need have anything to do with autism.
Decades ago when I was into Northern Soul I used to live in a timeless zoneless dayless nightless motorway cafe blur.
Later on when I became an international model it was pretty similar but a lot more comfortable. I love the interzone way of things. Airports, Motorways, Trains and Boats and Planes.
I hate being rooted. I hate the mentality that goes with rootedness. I spend most of my time in London convinced that I'm just a tourist.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 06:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 06:40 pm (UTC)*adds it to the sonic arsenal*
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 06:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 08:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 06:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 07:59 pm (UTC)America from its start was a global nation - not to get all preachy and Super America Is Awesome, but it's the truth. When you grow up and go to school, you automatically learn about the entire world because you're in classes with kids whose families come from nearly every continent on earth. Also, you grow up hearing stories about your ancestral homeland, where some family still is, etc. You're automatically tied to the world as a whole.
Post-Americanism sounds like regular Americanism, at least in the congested NY Metro area. It surprises me all these art critics insist this globalism and internationalism is something new ... as far as I remember, it's always been around here.
With the advent of the internet, the same thing has only gotten more intense. This just sounds like another case of nothing.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 08:30 pm (UTC)Yes, it does. We've had these "post-Americans" from our very inception; America is unimaginable without them.
Americans are by definition uprooted, so we don't deplore "rootedness" (whatever that really means) as Europeans might, who grow up amid the tradtions and artifacts of the past. Perhaps Europeans take them for granted; a bit spoiled by being surrounded by such riches, viewing their legacy as a burden rather than a boon?
I think we Americans (or at least the Americans described above), while relishing the dynamism of this ceaseless cultural cross-pollination, sometimes crave this admittedly oft-idealized state of rootedness because we live in a rootless, fluid society, devoid of any universal traditions. The rootless future many Europeans seem to desire is where we've grown up—and I can speak from experience when I say that relentless novelty becomes tiresome after a point, unsatisfying.
But hey—good luck just the same, Europe. Maybe you have what we lack: a rich cultural foundation that might prevent you from making a complete hash of things. Fluidity and dynamism may be another matter, though.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 08:05 pm (UTC)Although I think that beatnik culture has mostly become Americanized in the same sense that you describe here, I agree. I find that in many of my conversations whatever I say is put through a matrix of accepted "American" or "Canadian" ideas. My ideas are matched with similar sounding, though completely different ideas, and either accepted or rejected according to those terms. It seems that many people here don't really listen, or perhaps they can't hear because they have never stepped out of this accepted way of thinking. I tend to find myself repeating things, often without any achievement at true communication. And like you I often fall silent, becoming bored with talking to myself.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-14 09:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 08:58 pm (UTC)You teach me something new(literally)every post. But not only that, but that you have a walking type brilliance that is willing to share.
So,yeah. Go Momus.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 09:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 10:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-12 10:03 pm (UTC)also, it makes sense that you'd love the so-called post american, who is in his/her rejection of cultural values, precisely the most american ideal... after all, you've always loved the post-japanese japanese (the only ones who bother to learn english). Rejection of the japanese cultural values is precisely the most american ideal.
Look at Murakami Ryuu's "Almost Transparent Blue" for a hint as to where the thoughtful, directionless youth culture of japan grew up.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 01:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 02:14 am (UTC)I was probably snoozing on the train, because I was tired after work. Or, if it was the B train, I was planning a blog piece about the Chinatown Chinese, because, despite having lived amongst them for two years, I feel like they're very mysterious people. Or perhaps I was wondering if I'll have to visit the Armory Show tomorrow alone... I'm getting sick of doing stuff on my own.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 01:45 am (UTC)There is no link, you should read the LRB anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 02:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 02:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 02:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 03:04 am (UTC)Must be damn hard to be a European in the US these days... Read an article in this month's In These Times, in which a former NSA chief called the invasion and occupation of Iraq the greatest foreign blunder of the US because it has effectively killed off NATO... Europe withdrawing from the madness/no good outcomes of this war...
See you're withdrawing, too, Nick... and as the atlantic gets ever wider, those things that were common (or in common) now seem strange and tinny...
-that, and performance fatigue, too...
hope the good weather on Saturday was a balm, and you can get out of Breuer's box for a bit...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 02:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 06:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 10:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-13 12:32 pm (UTC)The only real way to be Post-American is to Exit This Roman Shell.