imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Anecdotal observation: I've been working as an unreliable tour guide at the Whitney for a week now and I've only seen two Japanese people.

Hypothesis: New York, once a playground for the Japanese, especially art and culture tourists, has seen a heavy disinvestment by Japanese visitors in recent years.



Speculation: If they're not coming any more, why not? Is it fear of terrorism? Is it because the city just isn't what it once was? Has the (now ending) recession in Japan kept Japanese tourists closer to home? Are Asian destinations now trendier than American ones? Are fewer travel articles about New York appearing in Japanese magazines?

Statistics: The New York Times reports in 2004 "a 30 percent drop in overseas visitors to the United States since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001... Fear of terrorism contributed to a 12.6 percent decline in Japanese tourism to the United States." The ITA Office of Travel, reporting in 2003, noted declines in Japanese tourists to the US of 7% per month, although found that rate slowing.

Observations: I've been walking around Manhattan checking out Japanese haunts. Had dinner at Saka Gura on 43rd Street with Karl Haley on Sunday night. Takashi Murakami came up and congratulated me on being in the Whitney. Well, he's still here, anyway! Stuyvesant Street still has its little cluster of Japanese businesses: Panya, Hoshi Coupe and Sunrise Mart. And Sunrise Mart now has a new branch on Broome Street. It's doing very well... but whereas most of the visitors to their St Marks branch seem to be Japanese, most of the customers here are well-heeled Caucasian SoHo shoppers popping in for a snack.

Advice for travellers: Apparently Japanese tourists in the US are easily ripped off because of their "trusting nature". Innocents abroad details why. "Con games ("shinyosagi" in Japanese), in general, appeal to the weaknesses of people to separate them from their money," this page tells us. "Con artists lean on Japanese trust, innocence, desire to help, or greed." It's strange to hear trust, innocence and desire to help being described as "weaknesses", ne?

Home truths from abroad: In a Japan Today vox pop about how Japan can be a more friendly place for visitors from overseas, an old man called Endo says: "Nobody is going to visit a country that is cold and selfish. When I traveled to the U.S. and South Korea, the people were really kind and helpful. It almost brought me to tears when I had to leave and say farewell to the people whom I met during my short stay. People will come, regardless of government policy, if a nation possesses an 'affectionate heart.'"

Conclusion: Further research needed -- must check out the art schools, and the Armory Show, which opens tomorrow. Look, there's Popeye turning Japanese on the poster!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-08 04:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
You're probably right. If there'd been web pages like that for the American Indians, maybe they never would have sold Manhattan for a pile of beads.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-08 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
Didn't happen.

Actually, the laugh is on the Dutch in this case, because they paid the wrong tribe. They gave a king's ransom of guns, axes, and other valuable goods to the Canarsies, who lived in what is now Brooklyn; it was the Weckquaesgeeks who lived on Manhattan Island. The Dutch then waited until intertribal conflicts (many of which they instigated) and successive waves of epidemics weakened the Weckquaesgeeks to such a state when, in the 1640s, with the aid of the Canarsies and other tribes on Long Island, the Dutch exterminated most of the Weckquaesgeeks.

In case anyone cares...

Date: 2006-03-08 08:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
These purchases, which went on all over the continent, were simply a bid for respectability; they were a rationalization, a means by which the Europeans could take the land without actually appearing to do so. Europeans were constantly paying tribes off, many, many times over (you don't see those totals tallyed up in history books). The Europeans were still paying off the remaining Weckquaesgeeks who lived in northern Manhattan a hundred years after the Dutch had killed most of them.

Of course, what went on with the Louisiana purchase—which sparked off about fifty Indian wars over a century—makes what happened on Manhattan look quaint in comparison.

Re: In case anyone cares...

Date: 2006-03-09 09:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tassellrealm.livejournal.com
Hmm yeah, the Dutch have a bit of a bad heritage in the genocide department.

I watched that Nick Broomfield film about Eugene Terrablanche the other night and couldn't help thinking that it was possibly only the South African greed in keeping black slaves that had stopped them achieving the eternal white-only paradise they dreamed of.

In America of course, they did the job properly. They wiped out all the rightful inhabitants AND kept black slaves.

Apparently The Dutch have the purest Hittite Aryan dominator genes on the planet.

Re: In case anyone cares...

Date: 2006-03-09 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
It may go back farther than anyopne suspects. Turns out that the American natives might have wiped out the previous inhabitants...

Apparently The Dutch have the purest Hittite Aryan dominator genes on the planet.

A fact expressed in the height of their public urinals. I was in South Africa two years ago, and the blessed things came up to my chest!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-08 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cerulicante.livejournal.com
I can see it now:


"Dear Japanese, DON'T TAKE THE BLANKETS! Sincerely, Native Americans."



Cor blimey, that were terrible....

Profile

imomus: (Default)
imomus

February 2010

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags