The golden age of masturbation
Dec. 4th, 2005 06:25 pmIn the ID magazine Japan Special, Tom Vanderbilt, reviewing Lionel Lambourne's book Japonisme, says: "Japan has evolved from consumer-goods economic powerhouse to a more "soft power" form of cultural influence. The modern metropolis, in any country, now pulses to a beat of chopsticks clicking over sushi... We devour manga and anime and horror films like Ringu, chronicle the strange goings-on among school girls (Lolita one day, Betty Boop the next)..."
In a slightly oblique way, Tom seems to be suggesting that part of Japan's "soft power" (which is also, of course, software power) includes porn. Now, I'm not sure what the consumption figures for Japanese porn outside Japan are; I know the Japanese porn industry is meant to represent more than 1% of total Japanese GNP, but figures on its overseas consumption are hard to, well, come by. I do know that J-porn has brightened up my life ever since I bought my first multi-system VHS player in 1992, though, and particularly since the internet ushered us into "the golden age of masturbation". I now don't care to look at non-Japanese porn at all; most of it looks vulgar and crude to me, its gurning rockstar actresses seeming marginal and decadent beside the wholesome and generous milkmaids of J-porn. So I keep an eye on sites like Babypink and CPZ, if only for purposes of—ahem!—cultural criticism. After all, as Vanderbilt says, "we would be vastly disappointed if suddenly we learned there were no more incredibly minute schoolgirl obsessions, no more odd game shows, no more bizarre animated characters."
Aside from the obvious attaction of porn (the procurement of fabulous orgasms), there are incidental joys and values to be had. Porn is a kind of social work sometimes, a way for disadvantaged men to live out vicariously the experiences of the advantaged, and for attractive girls to share their beauty with the largest possible number of admirers. Beauty is not egalitarian, but porn shares it out. It also portrays a world of utopian embodiment, a world radically free from guilt, a world in which the incompatibilities between instinct and civilisation noted by the late Freud are blown away completely.
Sometimes, too, it's just very funny. Take this movie, Senior, Your Dick is Just Only Mine. The wildly optimistic wish fulfillment is a scream, but the Jinglish alone could make you cream. As far as I can see by, well, screwing up my eyes, the strapline reads "Hinata is a brand new art club member. In this club has many strange kind of people who let me wear various costume every day and touch my body... But in fact I am very fun to be in this touchy relationships and to have intercourse..." In even smaller type, we read: "My panty began to get wet again because of thinking about such a erotic things... ah, how long is the club activity time?"
Coming soon, I should think, Hinata-Chan! Thank you for your tiredness!
In a slightly oblique way, Tom seems to be suggesting that part of Japan's "soft power" (which is also, of course, software power) includes porn. Now, I'm not sure what the consumption figures for Japanese porn outside Japan are; I know the Japanese porn industry is meant to represent more than 1% of total Japanese GNP, but figures on its overseas consumption are hard to, well, come by. I do know that J-porn has brightened up my life ever since I bought my first multi-system VHS player in 1992, though, and particularly since the internet ushered us into "the golden age of masturbation". I now don't care to look at non-Japanese porn at all; most of it looks vulgar and crude to me, its gurning rockstar actresses seeming marginal and decadent beside the wholesome and generous milkmaids of J-porn. So I keep an eye on sites like Babypink and CPZ, if only for purposes of—ahem!—cultural criticism. After all, as Vanderbilt says, "we would be vastly disappointed if suddenly we learned there were no more incredibly minute schoolgirl obsessions, no more odd game shows, no more bizarre animated characters."
Aside from the obvious attaction of porn (the procurement of fabulous orgasms), there are incidental joys and values to be had. Porn is a kind of social work sometimes, a way for disadvantaged men to live out vicariously the experiences of the advantaged, and for attractive girls to share their beauty with the largest possible number of admirers. Beauty is not egalitarian, but porn shares it out. It also portrays a world of utopian embodiment, a world radically free from guilt, a world in which the incompatibilities between instinct and civilisation noted by the late Freud are blown away completely.Sometimes, too, it's just very funny. Take this movie, Senior, Your Dick is Just Only Mine. The wildly optimistic wish fulfillment is a scream, but the Jinglish alone could make you cream. As far as I can see by, well, screwing up my eyes, the strapline reads "Hinata is a brand new art club member. In this club has many strange kind of people who let me wear various costume every day and touch my body... But in fact I am very fun to be in this touchy relationships and to have intercourse..." In even smaller type, we read: "My panty began to get wet again because of thinking about such a erotic things... ah, how long is the club activity time?"
Coming soon, I should think, Hinata-Chan! Thank you for your tiredness!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-04 07:41 pm (UTC)I found one movie of a nurse who sneaks in like some guilty shameless slut having no self-control to the bedside of a man who apparently was recovering from major cranio-facial trauma. As he lay there in the bed, she pulls down his shorts and gives him head. At the end of the act the nurse, as if in some revusion at what she has done, does not spit out his come, but slack-jawed lets it dribble out, her eyes half shut in a strange face at once gratified and sickened at her own action. Only once did the bandaged "victim" look up at all.
I loved it, it was so damned refreshing, if, to some, gross.
SUN
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-04 07:42 pm (UTC)There may be some work in this for you and your fabled hucklebone. Why, think of the wardrobe!
Happy grunting,
W
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-04 07:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-04 08:13 pm (UTC)Mind you, I've never even seen j-porn; that's what museum installations of eighteeth-century court dresses (and those tiny embroidered gloves, shoes and stomachers) are for.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-04 08:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 12:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 07:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-04 08:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-04 08:28 pm (UTC)The only way male porn could in any way be culturally relevant is in masquerading as satire, which is what most of your music is. If it weren’t satirical, you’d be very puritanical. Guys who like porn the most are usually puritans.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 01:43 am (UTC)and it's always amazing to me how fashionable it is to disregard the cruelty within the porn industry
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 03:33 am (UTC)Really? Think of Classical-era pornography...
Other than that, though, I couldn't agree more.
To say that porn is radically guilt-free is untrue in the sense that it's the guilt which creates the pleasure - as you note when mentioning that puritans enjoy porn the most.
Nor would I say that the pleasures of porn are only for men who are 'disadvantaged', that all porn is is a vicarious way of living out fantasies which one can't achieve in real life. Another and probably more deep-seated satisfaction of porn is to buy into a system of objectification in which one as a watcher and in terms of the porn 'character' with whom one identifies in fantasy is always in the position of objectifier, not objectifiee. So it's a sop to feelings of powerlessness, whether related to sexuality or otherwise. The view that the provision of such a sop is a valuable 'social service' seems to address the symptom, not the cause.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 03:36 pm (UTC)I agree with you. If we've kept one thing from the Marquis de Sade, it's that pornography and power are inextricable.
MALE PORN???
Date: 2005-12-05 11:11 am (UTC)porn for everyone i say.
the whole problem with any kind of sexual-political-social-whatever argument is that it fails to recognise the fact that there are just as many forms of sexuality as there are people engaging in acts of sex.
can we just sack with the whole male/female thing.
it would be a step forward.
(btw, i'm a girl if that makes any difference)
Re: MALE PORN???
Date: 2005-12-05 03:44 pm (UTC)If you're saying something about lesbians, that's interesting. But there's something deeply ironic about a lesbian watching mainstream porn. Porn makers and sex workers don't take lesbians into account. That's just not where they make their money. But that's not to say they shouldn't.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-04 09:13 pm (UTC)so ok, "ahem!—cultural criticism" - i get the sense you dont even fully believe what you're saying here, that you're winking at us. it strikes me as a skirting of the issue. sure theres a bit of glee in it (porn is a giggly topic) but isnt it also that dangerous trap where the educated ironist gets to claim to enjoy, one degree removed, the essentializing/stereotyping/subjugating pap that he would disapprove of others gobbling up?
you're so careful not to associate yourself with the consumption of j-porn - you're a purveyor of culture, not a consumer of it, and thus no geisha girl fetish for you, you're just checking in to see if other people are still fetishizing that ignorant old idea.
your interests in porn have to do with utopianism, egailty, ironic humor at how bad the translations are? i agree that all these things are angles from which we can look at porn, but in a way isn't there a strange degree of intellectualist prudishness in needing to find an angle from which to view porn in the first place? i'm remarking on a general phenomenon amongst the ironic culture elitists, the wallpaper mag mock-porn fashion shoots, nerve.com, isnt deep throat hilarious approach, which then trails into actual porn consumption. isnt this suggesting we have to distance ourselves from just wanking to it like some lowly consumer might? isnt it a bit like the classic 16 year old's excuse of 'oh i watch it cuz its funny'? if you've got a fetish for japanese girls, can't you just have a fetish for japanese girls? cuz i've got one hell of a fetish for gurning rockstar actresses, and i just sort of wonder about our modes of apologizing for it?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-04 11:33 pm (UTC)It sounds like you've done your bit for the export drive over the years!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 12:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 12:28 am (UTC)I suppose some porn consumers don't like the idea of porn where the woman has any kind of agency in the situation and/or enjoys the sex.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 01:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 03:16 am (UTC)My experiences with Japanese pornography have been exactly how you described. Apparently they don't just export the crap stuff, because this pornographer had the exact same complaint you did. I tried navigating the sites that Momus linked to above, and my views on Japanese pornography (it's terrible) still haven't been proven wrong.
Whatever happened to Momus' entirely sensible view on porn (http://www.livejournal.com/users/imomus/148296.html) of a couple months ago?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 05:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 06:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 06:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 06:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 07:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 10:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 10:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 03:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 02:46 pm (UTC)Unarousing is the word.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 02:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 11:55 am (UTC)Don't I wish
Date: 2005-12-06 07:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 05:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 07:47 am (UTC)"These may be very perverted," says Yuki, "but much deeper than Sailor Moon and all the other yaoi stories that are currently available on the market. Just to clear up, I don't read comics on a daily basis (although I totally can) and I definitely am not into these modern yaoi cultures which girls turn into otaku and forget to how to talk with real live men...Although it's an interesting subculture to look into."
Agreed.
Date: 2005-12-05 08:44 am (UTC)Marxy
Re: Agreed.
Date: 2005-12-05 09:00 am (UTC)Re: Agreed.
Date: 2005-12-05 09:52 am (UTC)Marxy
Re: Agreed.
Date: 2005-12-05 09:56 am (UTC)Time we got out of pop and into porn, perhaps!
Re: Agreed.
Date: 2005-12-05 11:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 09:20 am (UTC)hehe...
Date: 2005-12-09 05:31 am (UTC)I like porn very much occasionally...
The J-porn is in a category by itself. I now find myself I have to be in the mood for it.
No longer satisfied with the free little samples they have online...
I was wondering if any free spirited males could offer good quality porn sites, either korean/japanese that are in english... that I could buy the dvds?
Thanks...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 11:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 02:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 04:53 pm (UTC)http://www.japansm.com/home.htm
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-05 05:08 pm (UTC)