imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus


The sneering skull snorts a huge line of coke into her broken nose then turns to you. "I'm going to kill you," she growls.

That's a reductio ad absurdum of the iconography I pick up from a single edition of sharky UK style magazine Dazed and Confused, a magazine which recycles fashion-punk attitude endlessly. Publisher: Jefferson Hack, ex-partner of Kate Moss, the model currently forced into a big public mea culpa over her coke habit. (Personally, I'm with Tracey Emin on the issue. Coke sucks.)

I call this "sharky style", and the West is full of it. It's how we picture ourselves. We have sharky cars, sharky watches, sharky bands, sharky sports stars, sharky buildings, sharky white teeth (even when sharky tobacco companies are selling us cigarettes that first yellow our teeth then leave us dead in the water, static in a cloud of blood). They're all fit, these sharks, in the Darwinian sense. They kill their competitors. They're likely to kill you too... unless you can make yourself look and act like them!

The reasons the sharky style attitude (sneers, skulls, coke, killing) is so prevalent in the West (and just how much further can it go? Style mags filled entirely with bloody-toothed sharks? What if sharks become extinct and look like losers?) are various:

1. It's cool to kill: Yeeh-hah! It's very hard, confronted by someone who's threatening to kill you, to assert that they're trivial or uncool or a loser, just as it's hard not to admire an actor waving a pistol in a Hollywood poster. A sneer, a threat or a pistol transforms a model or an actor instantly from a passive, plaintive object, vulnerable and desperate for our approval, to a powerful subject, indifferent to our cries for mercy, not only genetically superior to us (and therefore more fit to reproduce) but on the verge, here and now, of snuffing out our DNA with a single shot to the head.

2. Empowerment: A woman can never be a sexual object when she's about to kill you, even if she's naked. A working class or black youth never looks like a sad victim, ready for a visit from a social worker, if he's pointing a gun at your head. Violent imagery is empowerment, innit? Like those killer-girls in "Baise Moi!", women too can be rapist-murderers, and all's right with the world! Instant justice from the barrel of a gun! A level swimming pool for all sharks, regardless of race, colour, gender or creed!

Actors, models and musicians are, of course, all a bit gay and girly to be "just about to snuff out our DNA". But it's the nerd's revenge, isn't it? No wonder it takes its inspiration from punk; who could be more nerdy than Johnny Rotten and Sid Vicious? I mean, they were more like minnows than sharks, weren't they? Yet one of them, sharked up by drugs, turned out to be a real killer.

3. Drugs as a metaphor for consumerism: That great long line of coke the skull is snorting... it's a metaphor for the addictiveness of the consumer end of capitalism, just as the skull is a metaphor for the murderousness of the producer end of capitalism. You're not supposed to enjoy consumer societies. That would lead to widespread epicureanism, to wholesomeness, to health. No, plethora is supposed to lead to addiction, to guilty pleasures, to sin, to death. At the production end, well, if you get in the way of the producers you'll be disposed of, your body dumped in a quarry in Columbia. One human life doesn't matter much, my friend. If you're at the consumption end, your duty is to get addicted to the product, to buy it reliably, and to die promptly, without placing too much strain on the social health network of your state (if it has one).

And meanwhile, your style sharkiness is just for show because it's a metaphor for the real sharks, the ones on the floor of the brokerage, the ones in business suits, the ones with the power for which "empowerment" is a mere metaphor, a bit of fancy dress. Yes, the middle-aged, balding men in suits are the real sharks. They don't look like sharks themselves, though. They look more like elderly pigs or walruses.

"Dazed and Confused has found innovative ways to present brands to a uniquely influential readership that demands to be addressed on its own terms," waffles the Dazed and Confused press-pack. "Dazed has translated the following blue chip brands for the style audience: Coca Cola, Nike, Evian, Converse, Motorola, Canon, Hilfiger, Tiger Beer, Topshop... to name only a few."

"Demands, translated". The "style subculture" who read Dazed speak a different language from the language of capitalism (or at least some heavily-accented dialect) and therefore "demand translation". Once translation occurs (largely a process in which dominant values become visual metaphors in the subculture, because the subculture doesn't tend to read much), the basic concepts of the mainstream culture can appear, quite unchallenged, in the subculture.

The thing that interests me is this: not all social systems model themselves on Darwinism, and not all style mags require everybody to look and act like a shark. In fact, it sometimes seems like only the Anglo-American model does these things. There is nothing inherent in systems of production that demands shark-like imagery, or "empowerment" through skulls, sharks, and snorting.

Yes, you guessed it, I'm about to tell you that Japanese magazines have peaceful nature imagery, and unashamedly feminine women (the women of the future!) and reassuring pictures of cakes and cafes instead of skulls, sneers, and coke. That Japanese capitalism seems to be a production system with less viciousness and vulgarity than any other. Well, not quite. I'm going to show you.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 10:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] besskeloid.livejournal.com
who could be more nerdy than Johnny Rotten and Sid Vicious? I mean, they were more like minnows than sharks, weren't they? Yet one of them, sharked up by drugs, turned out to be a real killer.

How real a killer, tho'? Apparently Sid was so smacked out that night that he was in no fit state to have stabbed anybody, let alone Nancy. It's most likely that the person who stole money from their room at the Chelsea was the culprit.

Bernard Manning

Date: 2005-09-23 10:51 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)

Did anyone watch "Extreme televison" on channel 4 last night?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kineticfactory.livejournal.com
Is "sharky style" the same as "fashion goth"?

Btw, IMHO, cocaine killed the indie subculture, by sharking it up. The indie kids started doing coke, listening to thugged-out hip-hop, wearing aspirational designer sneakers and trucker hats and fuckloads of skulls on everything and affecting a sort of sneering macho irony.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 12:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mcgazz.livejournal.com
> cocaine killed the indie subculture
Coke and E, possibly - both brought to the party by the dance music community. They gave 'indie' got a whole new lease of life at the turn of the 90s before going on to kill it a few years later.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] besskeloid.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 12:10 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mcgazz.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 12:32 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] besskeloid.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 12:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 01:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nicepimmelkarl.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 01:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sparkligbeatnic.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 01:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 03:05 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sparkligbeatnic.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 03:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] artysmokes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 05:47 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 12:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 11:25 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You sure don't seem to read a lot of Japanese magazines, and not a lot of English ones either. The great majority of magazines are not Heroine chic fashion rags. And there are plenty of those in Japan, perhaps more than anywhere else. At lease in the nordic country the vast majority of magazines are full of those "unashamedly feminine women" to the point of choking. We definitely don't need more of them making people dress their daughters up as princesses and their sons as knights.

Not that they should necessarily be substituted by gun toting drug fiends.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 11:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarmoung.livejournal.com
You could be with my mum rather than Tracey Emin. We were talking over the Kate Moss issue at lunch the other day and I can assure you that nobody has ever taken coke at any of my mum's parties and she wouldn't stand for it either. They might be a little more sedate than your standard EC2 event but you'd be home by midnight to feed the rabbit.

Can we take it from this piece means that you have severed all ties with Vice magazine?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 12:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Vice is a much more intelligent magazine than Dazed and Confused. They tackle this sort of thing head on with satire that picks at ideological knots. Take Hammerheads My Ass: Fuck Darwin! (http://viceland.com/issues/v12n7/htdocs/hammerheads.php) from the current edition, the Animals edition. It's tackling the shark/Darwinism rubbish head-on. The article goes:

"I’m not saying that Darwin was utterly wrong. I’m just saying that Darwin was only part of the story—like 50 percent of the picture.... With a hammerhead or a spoonbill or any kind of animal that seems to be an extreme example of what you can do with anatomy or morphology, the question isn’t, “What is the function of these structures?” It’s more like, “What were the mechanisms through which these structures came about, and how did these structures become an advantage?” ...let’s not ignore the sheer randomness that makes animals look so fucking weird. Sometimes they come in handy and sometimes they’re just a genetic fuck-up."

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-25 04:15 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mcgazz.livejournal.com
From the pictures it looks like you're comparing "Dazed & Confused" with the Japanese equivalent of "Woman's Weekly".

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] henryperri.livejournal.com
Agreed. This wasn't one of his strongest arguments.

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 12:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dermfitz.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 12:31 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] artysmokes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 05:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 12:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sparkligbeatnic.livejournal.com
This article (http://economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=953529), a review by the Economist magazine of a study on social status in monkeys and tendency towards cocaine addiction, seems to provide strong evidence against their usual libertarian policy on the de-regulation of "recreational" drugs. Either that or a useful datum for social darwinists.

I clearly remember having an argument with a bozo in a bar who took this article as irrefutable proof for his idea that it is possible to snort a bit of cocaine now and then and not get addicted. He was completely wasted at the time, making a show of ordering stupidly expenive shots of tequila. Ugh!

Why aren't we hearing more about the huge and growing crystal meth problem? Could it be a class thing?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 12:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com
An interesting article, but I have a question about the experiment itself. It notes that the D2 is a product of dominance (and then the product feeds into addiction habits) but it doen't make any claim of where the dominance came from in the first place. If the D2 is a product, what is its input? Is that input perhaps what we'd term the "biologically deterministic" part of this equation?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] henryperri.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 01:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mcgazz.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] henryperri.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 03:32 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-silence-song.livejournal.com
momus, you rule. may I add you?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 12:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com
I have to agree with the others in noting that your pool of examples is, perhaps, a bit misleading. I do agree --to a certain extent-- that the aesthetic of couture magazines are different from Japan to America. Japan often does having "nature" present, calm neutral tones, and cheerful models.

But I'd suggest another lens in examing this difference (and excuse me for being Jungian) but what of the Woman/girl difference? I'm not using this in the qualitative sense I usually do (in terms of Mother/nonmother) but rather the sexual maturity of the subject.

In American chic the girls are Women. They are as vicious and mired as the Great Mother, but terrifying because they have usurped paternal power (guns, etc) while rendering themselves girlishly barren (as thin as Schiele's models!). This effects a sort of...the Great Mother is aborting you, you little shit. She could take your sperm, if they were fucking worthy of her.

On the other side you have these very passive "feminine" as you denoted girls in Japanese couture. These are Women who are girls. They are submissive to the paternal, and if you forced them they'd probably take your sperm. They are frivolous but not necessarily infertile.

The big cut here I'd say is the Gothic/Gothic Lolita thing. You've mentioned fashion Goth & your hatred for it -- and that Gothic Lolita is different. But you've left the difference unexamined. Isn't it relevant to talk about this "Lolita" which gives these two cultures (aesthetically often the same -- black, frills, formal) such an elemental difference in validity?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 01:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
But I think the Japanese feminine stereotype is not just the child image, there's also a strong strand of mother-worship in Japanese culture. Amateru the sun goddess is the mother of all mothers, and Japanese men are said to be spoiled by their mothers and then have a mother-complex attitude towards their wives (who traditionally control the domestic purse). It's called Mazacon (a Japanization of "mother complex"), and it co-exists with Lolicon, the Lolita complex.

In my (necessarily selective) picture strips a Western is demonstrating power by holding a scythe, a Japanese woman is demonstrating power by holding a ladle. Death power versus life power.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 01:24 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 01:38 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 01:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 01:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:09 pm (UTC) - Expand

turkishb and imomus

From: [identity profile] svenskasfinx.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-25 09:09 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nicepimmelkarl.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:10 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nicepimmelkarl.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 01:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 02:18 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 02:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:22 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 02:32 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:38 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:55 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 03:00 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 02:59 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 03:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 03:21 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 03:46 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 03:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 04:42 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 05:18 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 05:31 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 05:57 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 09:54 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 06:51 pm (UTC) - Expand

psyche inter alia...

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 09:57 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mcgazz.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 02:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)

Japanese women are only scary after marriage.
This is secondhand knowledge.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nicepimmelkarl.livejournal.com
as one would expect, stimulants are an explosive topic. malcolm mclaren did write for dazed & confused though? obviously not caught up in either/ors. remember: yet also.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 02:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] intermitencias.livejournal.com
fascinating thoughts.

To me it seems as though Western culture is dying through efficiency. This killer attitude and ruthlessness when considering other human beings is tied directly to standing in line, driving your car and other times/places/arenas in which time is an issue and often a frustration (but this must be deeper, eh?). One less human, one less human to cut us off in traffic, to stand in the speed lane at the grocers with a few too many items. American culture is getting ruder and angrier by the minute. Everyone is in a hurry.

I think American magazines speak this language and love it. It is a ruthless consumerism that will keep people purchasing if not solely because they are in too much of a hurry to realize anything otherwise.

right on

Date: 2005-09-23 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com
Image

http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC10316.htm

Re: right on

From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 03:16 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: right on

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 05:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: right on

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 03:22 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: right on

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 05:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: right on

From: [identity profile] intermitencias.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 07:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: right on

From: [identity profile] turkishb.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 10:05 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] seanthesean.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 06:55 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
What exactly is "western" supposed to denote? (US) America + Europe? Dazed and confused + Lower East Side hipsterdom?

der.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I love it when people ask questions like "What is masculinity?" and "What is the West?" Deconstruction starts here!

I will eat you with my flower teeth

Date: 2005-09-23 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 300letters.livejournal.com
I think you should start a magazine devoted to ironic cuteness.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bostonista.livejournal.com
"Feminine" is just another construct. I'm not sure that the Japanese have a better handle on it than anyone else; they just dig cute.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
dude, i've been reading your blog for a while and you are a fucking genius indeed. its scary.

www.thesuperficial.com is quite fun in how it bites back at sharky celeb culture with its insulting blather. hey... if the shark's gonna bite off your nuts, might as well poke fun at it. how christopher walken.

cheer,
Sanjay.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jina---.livejournal.com
Japanese magazines have peaceful nature imagery, and unashamedly feminine women (the women of the future!)

that says it all i think, so who cares about Sharks, skulls and coke, anymore?? I don't

I didn't see much "nature" in Kill Bill.

Date: 2005-09-23 05:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] artysmokes.livejournal.com
*Goes off to watch violent Anime/Hentai Pron*

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com
So in the future, will we have femenine cultures and masculine cultures?
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cap-scaleman.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 05:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] artysmokes.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 07:53 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seanthesean.livejournal.com
based on your aggression towards this sharky style, i'm not sure HOW you can still go on defending VICE magazine, i could understand if you had a less opinionated but negative stance towards this sharkiness but... Vice totally helped gel the cocaine & skulls & "violence & cocaine are real & ironic at the same time" sort of deal that you're complaining about here.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I found it easy to go through Dazed and find lots of sneering models. I have a copy of the new Vice (German edition) right here, let's see what's in it. Cover: not a sneering girl about to lower her head and charge, but a naked girl in a forest hugging a black cat. Because Vice is a themed magazine, all the editorial photos this month show someone petting an animal. I do find skulls in an advert on page 19, though. Some ironic machismo on page 21, again in an advert, when a cowboy surrounded by ironic blonde bimbos thrusts a fist marked SWYD ("sleep when you're dead"). Animals, Dos and Don'ts, a photo essay of girls with their cute fluffy toys, influenced by Richard Kern. The first snarl is in an ad on page 73, an ad for Sony Connect shot at some grungy concert. A male, not a female. A hedgehog snorting coke, spread over page 82-83. Some girls being sexy but not snarly... then the album reviews, feting (as I do too) Black Dice and CocoRosie. Finally a semi-naked, sexy but empathetic American Apparel girl on the back cover. There's some spoof violence (a dog with an arrow sticking out of its head, a two-headed badger), but I find an almost total absence of the kind of "aggressive normality" I see in Dazed and Confused. And I think that the fact that Vice is always on a theme—thinking about something—makes it a far superior magazine. Also, knowing Jesse the editor I know that he's secretly (or not-so-secretly) a cat-loving, girl-loving, artsy nerd. No sharky imagery here, unless it's an actual image of a shark, and a rumination on Darwin.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] seanthesean.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-23 07:31 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cityramica.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-24 03:37 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] d-g-m.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-25 02:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 06:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autokrater.livejournal.com
western magazines are of course way more raw and violent..because western youth like to see everything from this point of view.where they are totally invicible and they can do hard drugs,party,fuck anyone they want and even when they are about to die just spit in the face of death like a total badass.
japanese magazines always seem to me to be about light summer fun away from cram school and best friends with matching outfits.
perhaps this isn't realistic of everyday life
but neither are western magazines..they just tend to focus on negative aspects of life and glamorize them.
but life isn't all skulls and blowjobs from crackhead hookers with motorhead t-shirts

Also

Date: 2005-09-23 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I also enjoy the tentacle rape manga, bukkake shots .. and macked out garbage trucks.

As for Vice; there is nothing sharky about Vice. It is sNarky, in that "dumbass sub-urbanite, high off his ass, first time downtown, beating up on a street person" snark style. "it's gotta be the shoes"TM, indeed. I hope they pay you well at least.

;)

B.

Re: Also

Date: 2005-09-23 07:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I hope they pay you well at least.

Actually I just gave them three photos for the next issue totally free. It's for a good cause!

Re: Also

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-24 08:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

sharks

Date: 2005-09-23 09:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snosage.livejournal.com
luc besson's film 'atlantis' (1991) did such a spectacular visual comment on sharks and their way of life as representatives of the emotion of hate.

it's a lifestyle where noone is your friend and all is war.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mcfnord.livejournal.com
And that's how it's felt the few times I hung out with cokeheads.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-23 11:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trini-naenae.livejournal.com
Do you mind linking to where you found the pictures? Or are they scans? It would be interesting to see the source material in it's full context, and not just what you pulled out for us to see.

And something that I have learned from living* in two cultures that are polar opposites (Pakistan and USA) is that both cultures have their advantages and disadvantages. Regardless of what culture you are in, they all have something they do very well, and their problems. And sometimes the thing they do very well ironically, can be a problem. Comparing cultures can be difficult and inaccurate, because there are so many angles, subtleties and different contexst that sometimes comparing without full knowledge and appreciation of both for both the good AND bad becomes fairly biased.

One of the things I was taught to deal with all the change and difficulties, is that there are many chaotic stages of transition until one finally recreates their way of thinking and creates a new norm. (Sometimes they never do, and live seperately from the culture.) And then when they return to the original culture, they find that they have changed so much that what once was home and 'right' has become alien. In my personal experience, that is even more painful. Having to readjust to what was once considered home, but no longer is, can be suprising and unexpected.

From the various times that I have read your commentary on the world around you, it appears that you prefer Japanese culture to Western culture. In fact, it feels like you lived in Japan and became immersed in the culture, and it became home to you, and when you returned to Western culture, it has become alien, and almost even, distasteful. Perhaps you never liked Western culture to begin with. I am not you, so I do not know, and can only speculate.

*Granted, my experience of Pakistan is extremely limited. I only lived there for a little less than a year in a half, in a community of Global Nomads, in a tourist town for most of the time, and when not in the tourist town, in the capital city, which was newly built (all things considered) and was affected more than most of the country by Western media. Regardless, because it was discussed so much, and because the differences were so glaringly apparent, it was easy to see how some of their values and ways of thinking could not work in Western society, and how some of the Western values and ways of thinking could not work in Pakistani society.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-24 06:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Interesting to hear about your feelings about Pakistan. Yes, I seem to have become rather alienated from Western culture, after visiting Japan. It's not just that I like the culture there better, but that I've been much more successful, sexually and commercially, in Japan than in the West. Japan has validated, endorsed and re-inforced me, and a certain set of values I'd describe, in a rather vague and woolly way, as aesthetic and moral and spiritual ones.

The images came from Dazed and Confused magazine (London) and Fudge magazine (Tokyo). They were both from the last couple of months. I deliberately chose images which exaggerated the contrasts, which made clear where basic conceptions of femininity differed. It's not just gender attitudes which differ here, but attitudes to pleasure, to one's surroundings, to consumption, to other people. Expressions of individualistic aggression (what I'm calling "sharkiness") are encouraged in the West, discouraged in Japan. And there's a distortion of feminism promulgated in the populist Western media which maps "empowerment" to an arrogation of the privileges of patriarchy, rather than a deconstruction of patriarchy.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nickink.livejournal.com - Date: 2005-09-24 10:58 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2005-09-24 06:20 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
ah-ha!! this is more like it umomus.
the reason why i come back day after day.
even when you've spent a week staring up your own arse.
i can always be sure that soon you'll return.
and here you are.
excellent.

"that would lead to wholesomeness, to health"

Date: 2005-09-25 01:47 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
thank you, momus, just reading that made me feel wholesome and healthy.