Sharks, skulls and coke
Sep. 23rd, 2005 12:31 pm
The sneering skull snorts a huge line of coke into her broken nose then turns to you. "I'm going to kill you," she growls.
That's a reductio ad absurdum of the iconography I pick up from a single edition of sharky UK style magazine Dazed and Confused, a magazine which recycles fashion-punk attitude endlessly. Publisher: Jefferson Hack, ex-partner of Kate Moss, the model currently forced into a big public mea culpa over her coke habit. (Personally, I'm with Tracey Emin on the issue. Coke sucks.)
I call this "sharky style", and the West is full of it. It's how we picture ourselves. We have sharky cars, sharky watches, sharky bands, sharky sports stars, sharky buildings, sharky white teeth (even when sharky tobacco companies are selling us cigarettes that first yellow our teeth then leave us dead in the water, static in a cloud of blood). They're all fit, these sharks, in the Darwinian sense. They kill their competitors. They're likely to kill you too... unless you can make yourself look and act like them!
The reasons the sharky style attitude (sneers, skulls, coke, killing) is so prevalent in the West (and just how much further can it go? Style mags filled entirely with bloody-toothed sharks? What if sharks become extinct and look like losers?) are various:
1. It's cool to kill: Yeeh-hah! It's very hard, confronted by someone who's threatening to kill you, to assert that they're trivial or uncool or a loser, just as it's hard not to admire an actor waving a pistol in a Hollywood poster. A sneer, a threat or a pistol transforms a model or an actor instantly from a passive, plaintive object, vulnerable and desperate for our approval, to a powerful subject, indifferent to our cries for mercy, not only genetically superior to us (and therefore more fit to reproduce) but on the verge, here and now, of snuffing out our DNA with a single shot to the head.
2. Empowerment: A woman can never be a sexual object when she's about to kill you, even if she's naked. A working class or black youth never looks like a sad victim, ready for a visit from a social worker, if he's pointing a gun at your head. Violent imagery is empowerment, innit? Like those killer-girls in "Baise Moi!", women too can be rapist-murderers, and all's right with the world! Instant justice from the barrel of a gun! A level swimming pool for all sharks, regardless of race, colour, gender or creed!
Actors, models and musicians are, of course, all a bit gay and girly to be "just about to snuff out our DNA". But it's the nerd's revenge, isn't it? No wonder it takes its inspiration from punk; who could be more nerdy than Johnny Rotten and Sid Vicious? I mean, they were more like minnows than sharks, weren't they? Yet one of them, sharked up by drugs, turned out to be a real killer.
3. Drugs as a metaphor for consumerism: That great long line of coke the skull is snorting... it's a metaphor for the addictiveness of the consumer end of capitalism, just as the skull is a metaphor for the murderousness of the producer end of capitalism. You're not supposed to enjoy consumer societies. That would lead to widespread epicureanism, to wholesomeness, to health. No, plethora is supposed to lead to addiction, to guilty pleasures, to sin, to death. At the production end, well, if you get in the way of the producers you'll be disposed of, your body dumped in a quarry in Columbia. One human life doesn't matter much, my friend. If you're at the consumption end, your duty is to get addicted to the product, to buy it reliably, and to die promptly, without placing too much strain on the social health network of your state (if it has one).And meanwhile, your style sharkiness is just for show because it's a metaphor for the real sharks, the ones on the floor of the brokerage, the ones in business suits, the ones with the power for which "empowerment" is a mere metaphor, a bit of fancy dress. Yes, the middle-aged, balding men in suits are the real sharks. They don't look like sharks themselves, though. They look more like elderly pigs or walruses.
"Dazed and Confused has found innovative ways to present brands to a uniquely influential readership that demands to be addressed on its own terms," waffles the Dazed and Confused press-pack. "Dazed has translated the following blue chip brands for the style audience: Coca Cola, Nike, Evian, Converse, Motorola, Canon, Hilfiger, Tiger Beer, Topshop... to name only a few."
"Demands, translated". The "style subculture" who read Dazed speak a different language from the language of capitalism (or at least some heavily-accented dialect) and therefore "demand translation". Once translation occurs (largely a process in which dominant values become visual metaphors in the subculture, because the subculture doesn't tend to read much), the basic concepts of the mainstream culture can appear, quite unchallenged, in the subculture.
The thing that interests me is this: not all social systems model themselves on Darwinism, and not all style mags require everybody to look and act like a shark. In fact, it sometimes seems like only the Anglo-American model does these things. There is nothing inherent in systems of production that demands shark-like imagery, or "empowerment" through skulls, sharks, and snorting.
Yes, you guessed it, I'm about to tell you that Japanese magazines have peaceful nature imagery, and unashamedly feminine women (the women of the future!) and reassuring pictures of cakes and cafes instead of skulls, sneers, and coke. That Japanese capitalism seems to be a production system with less viciousness and vulgarity than any other. Well, not quite. I'm going to show you.

(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 10:49 am (UTC)How real a killer, tho'? Apparently Sid was so smacked out that night that he was in no fit state to have stabbed anybody, let alone Nancy. It's most likely that the person who stole money from their room at the Chelsea was the culprit.
Bernard Manning
Date: 2005-09-23 10:51 am (UTC)Did anyone watch "Extreme televison" on channel 4 last night?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 11:02 am (UTC)Btw, IMHO, cocaine killed the indie subculture, by sharking it up. The indie kids started doing coke, listening to thugged-out hip-hop, wearing aspirational designer sneakers and trucker hats and fuckloads of skulls on everything and affecting a sort of sneering macho irony.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 12:03 pm (UTC)Coke and E, possibly - both brought to the party by the dance music community. They gave 'indie' got a whole new lease of life at the turn of the 90s before going on to kill it a few years later.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 12:41 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 11:25 am (UTC)Not that they should necessarily be substituted by gun toting drug fiends.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 11:27 am (UTC)Can we take it from this piece means that you have severed all ties with Vice magazine?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 12:54 pm (UTC)"I’m not saying that Darwin was utterly wrong. I’m just saying that Darwin was only part of the story—like 50 percent of the picture.... With a hammerhead or a spoonbill or any kind of animal that seems to be an extreme example of what you can do with anatomy or morphology, the question isn’t, “What is the function of these structures?” It’s more like, “What were the mechanisms through which these structures came about, and how did these structures become an advantage?” ...let’s not ignore the sheer randomness that makes animals look so fucking weird. Sometimes they come in handy and sometimes they’re just a genetic fuck-up."
(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-25 04:15 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 12:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 12:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 12:50 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 12:33 pm (UTC)I clearly remember having an argument with a bozo in a bar who took this article as irrefutable proof for his idea that it is possible to snort a bit of cocaine now and then and not get addicted. He was completely wasted at the time, making a show of ordering stupidly expenive shots of tequila. Ugh!
Why aren't we hearing more about the huge and growing crystal meth problem? Could it be a class thing?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 12:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 12:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 12:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 12:49 pm (UTC)But I'd suggest another lens in examing this difference (and excuse me for being Jungian) but what of the Woman/girl difference? I'm not using this in the qualitative sense I usually do (in terms of Mother/nonmother) but rather the sexual maturity of the subject.
In American chic the girls are Women. They are as vicious and mired as the Great Mother, but terrifying because they have usurped paternal power (guns, etc) while rendering themselves girlishly barren (as thin as Schiele's models!). This effects a sort of...the Great Mother is aborting you, you little shit. She could take your sperm, if they were fucking worthy of her.
On the other side you have these very passive "feminine" as you denoted girls in Japanese couture. These are Women who are girls. They are submissive to the paternal, and if you forced them they'd probably take your sperm. They are frivolous but not necessarily infertile.
The big cut here I'd say is the Gothic/Gothic Lolita thing. You've mentioned fashion Goth & your hatred for it -- and that Gothic Lolita is different. But you've left the difference unexamined. Isn't it relevant to talk about this "Lolita" which gives these two cultures (aesthetically often the same -- black, frills, formal) such an elemental difference in validity?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 01:04 pm (UTC)In my (necessarily selective) picture strips a Western is demonstrating power by holding a scythe, a Japanese woman is demonstrating power by holding a ladle. Death power versus life power.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:turkishb and imomus
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 02:18 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 02:19 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 02:32 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 02:59 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 03:21 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 03:50 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 05:18 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 05:57 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 06:51 pm (UTC) - Expandpsyche inter alia...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 01:44 pm (UTC)Japanese women are only scary after marriage.
This is secondhand knowledge.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 01:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 02:51 pm (UTC)To me it seems as though Western culture is dying through efficiency. This killer attitude and ruthlessness when considering other human beings is tied directly to standing in line, driving your car and other times/places/arenas in which time is an issue and often a frustration (but this must be deeper, eh?). One less human, one less human to cut us off in traffic, to stand in the speed lane at the grocers with a few too many items. American culture is getting ruder and angrier by the minute. Everyone is in a hurry.
I think American magazines speak this language and love it. It is a ruthless consumerism that will keep people purchasing if not solely because they are in too much of a hurry to realize anything otherwise.
right on
Date: 2005-09-23 03:05 pm (UTC)http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC10316.htm
Re: right on
From:Re: right on
From:Re: right on
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-23 03:22 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: right on
From:Re: right on
From:Re: right on
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 03:02 pm (UTC)der.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 03:06 pm (UTC)I will eat you with my flower teeth
Date: 2005-09-23 03:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 03:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 04:23 pm (UTC)www.thesuperficial.com is quite fun in how it bites back at sharky celeb culture with its insulting blather. hey... if the shark's gonna bite off your nuts, might as well poke fun at it. how christopher walken.
cheer,
Sanjay.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 04:48 pm (UTC)that says it all i think, so who cares about Sharks, skulls and coke, anymore?? I don't
I didn't see much "nature" in Kill Bill.
Date: 2005-09-23 05:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 05:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 06:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 07:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:"It's not funny, but it makes us laugh"
From:Re: "It's not funny, but it makes us laugh"
From:Re: "It's not funny, but it makes us laugh"
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 06:52 pm (UTC)japanese magazines always seem to me to be about light summer fun away from cram school and best friends with matching outfits.
perhaps this isn't realistic of everyday life
but neither are western magazines..they just tend to focus on negative aspects of life and glamorize them.
but life isn't all skulls and blowjobs from crackhead hookers with motorhead t-shirts
Also
Date: 2005-09-23 07:23 pm (UTC)As for Vice; there is nothing sharky about Vice. It is sNarky, in that "dumbass sub-urbanite, high off his ass, first time downtown, beating up on a street person" snark style. "it's gotta be the shoes"TM, indeed. I hope they pay you well at least.
;)
B.
Re: Also
Date: 2005-09-23 07:27 pm (UTC)Actually I just gave them three photos for the next issue totally free. It's for a good cause!
Re: Also
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2005-09-24 08:35 pm (UTC) - Expandsharks
Date: 2005-09-23 09:22 pm (UTC)it's a lifestyle where noone is your friend and all is war.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 10:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-23 11:06 pm (UTC)And something that I have learned from living* in two cultures that are polar opposites (Pakistan and USA) is that both cultures have their advantages and disadvantages. Regardless of what culture you are in, they all have something they do very well, and their problems. And sometimes the thing they do very well ironically, can be a problem. Comparing cultures can be difficult and inaccurate, because there are so many angles, subtleties and different contexst that sometimes comparing without full knowledge and appreciation of both for both the good AND bad becomes fairly biased.
One of the things I was taught to deal with all the change and difficulties, is that there are many chaotic stages of transition until one finally recreates their way of thinking and creates a new norm. (Sometimes they never do, and live seperately from the culture.) And then when they return to the original culture, they find that they have changed so much that what once was home and 'right' has become alien. In my personal experience, that is even more painful. Having to readjust to what was once considered home, but no longer is, can be suprising and unexpected.
From the various times that I have read your commentary on the world around you, it appears that you prefer Japanese culture to Western culture. In fact, it feels like you lived in Japan and became immersed in the culture, and it became home to you, and when you returned to Western culture, it has become alien, and almost even, distasteful. Perhaps you never liked Western culture to begin with. I am not you, so I do not know, and can only speculate.
*Granted, my experience of Pakistan is extremely limited. I only lived there for a little less than a year in a half, in a community of Global Nomads, in a tourist town for most of the time, and when not in the tourist town, in the capital city, which was newly built (all things considered) and was affected more than most of the country by Western media. Regardless, because it was discussed so much, and because the differences were so glaringly apparent, it was easy to see how some of their values and ways of thinking could not work in Western society, and how some of the Western values and ways of thinking could not work in Pakistani society.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-24 06:14 am (UTC)The images came from Dazed and Confused magazine (London) and Fudge magazine (Tokyo). They were both from the last couple of months. I deliberately chose images which exaggerated the contrasts, which made clear where basic conceptions of femininity differed. It's not just gender attitudes which differ here, but attitudes to pleasure, to one's surroundings, to consumption, to other people. Expressions of individualistic aggression (what I'm calling "sharkiness") are encouraged in the West, discouraged in Japan. And there's a distortion of feminism promulgated in the populist Western media which maps "empowerment" to an arrogation of the privileges of patriarchy, rather than a deconstruction of patriarchy.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-24 06:20 pm (UTC)the reason why i come back day after day.
even when you've spent a week staring up your own arse.
i can always be sure that soon you'll return.
and here you are.
excellent.
"that would lead to wholesomeness, to health"
Date: 2005-09-25 01:47 am (UTC)