Villain of the piece
Aug. 29th, 2005 06:33 pm
It was hard to be a man at the Barbara Kruger installation at the Glasgow Museum of Modern Art yesterday. A whole room was covered with text about what monsters of sex and violence men are, and in the information area it was all related to life in Glasgow with a series of chilling facts and figures about wife-beating in the city. It made Glasgow's Argyll Street feel like Elm Street and all men look like potential Freddy Krugers, about to batter their pinch-featured, ruddy-nosed wives or slay the Umbro- and Vodaphone-blazoned wee'uns they dragged behind them through the drizzle. It made Aidan Moffat's bruised, obscene, honest, romantic, depressing, dour lyrics at the Arab Strap acoustic show we saw immediately afterwards all the more apt.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 09:44 pm (UTC)NEVER apologize for being male. There is NO shame in it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 10:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 06:14 pm (UTC)newsprint as small and ghostly or newsprint as gigantic and barbaric
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 06:14 pm (UTC)I have to use my BK icon for this.
Date: 2005-08-29 06:50 pm (UTC)On the subject of Arab Strap, what do you think of Malcolm Middleton's solo album? "My Loneliness Shines" is one of the happiest sad songs I've heard for years. Wonderful stuff, which reminds me why I love Scottish accents so much. :)
Everyone needs to hear this.
Date: 2005-08-29 09:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 06:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 07:26 pm (UTC)A.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 07:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 07:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 07:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 08:44 pm (UTC)I've loved Barbara Krugers work for years. I love the graphic power of it. But basically i just have a weakness for a certain way of using text and image together in art. For some reason she's hardly known in the Netherlands.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-30 04:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-30 05:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 08:56 pm (UTC)Moronically cynical art?
Date: 2005-08-30 05:29 pm (UTC)I've seen many of her installations over the years, and while I think they make powerful graphics, they always strike me as linear and one-dimensional, containing very little in the way of ambiguity: we're being spoken to, not with. Maybe I'm just a fuddy-duddy aesthete, but to me, her work epitomizes that crunchy, moronically cynical, whiny, glib, paranoid late 80's-era political agitprop that made the '93 Whitney Biennial such a self-righteous bore. In the long run, I think her work will probably be of more historical interest than artistic; but in the meantime, such work will continue to place crap-colored glasses upon the noses of all who encounter it.
Re: Moronically cynical art?
Date: 2005-08-31 06:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 09:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 10:15 pm (UTC)Curious
Date: 2005-08-30 12:16 am (UTC)Re: Curious
Date: 2005-08-30 01:07 am (UTC)Nevermind that 1 in 4 college women would mean hundreds of thousands of rapes...
Re: Curious
Date: 2005-08-30 03:43 am (UTC)Even so, for sake of argument, let's use the 1 in 4 number. Heading back to college math (slipping standards, I know), 1 in 4, when represented as a percentage, is 25%.
That leaves us with 75% to make up, unless you forget to reference/link some other studies? Did you?
(75% + 25% would make 100%, the number used in the original post)
Thanks for your help in getting to the bottom of this.
Re: Curious
Date: 2005-08-30 08:28 pm (UTC)(From a book called Defending Pornography, by Nadine Strossen, by the way.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 10:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-29 11:45 pm (UTC)I'm going to be in Glasgow for a few days next week helping my girlfriend settle into Glasgow School of Art. Maybe we'll go see this.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-30 10:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-30 11:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-30 11:54 am (UTC)czn
Commercial Tie-ups
Date: 2005-08-31 01:15 am (UTC)Marxy
the paradox of the taboo
Date: 2005-08-31 09:24 pm (UTC)i sometimes think that in any discussion about sexual politics this is the starting point. not wages. not childcare. not housework. but murder.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-01 08:46 am (UTC)She gave a lecture at the School of the Art Intitute of Chicago back in 1995 or 96... can't remember the year but I do recall how she seemed to even HATE people in admiration of her.
(I wondered how she could have a top job at one of the most comercial magazines in fasion at the time and still manage to do the work to attempt to undermine the system so wonderfully, yet I recall some of her anti-comercializtic works backfired with shopping bags saying "I shop therefore I live"... whilst it was an ironic commentary, somehow people generally didn't seem to get the irony..maybe this harder direction is something she CAN do.. without people mistaking the intention.)
Being that I was from New York, sort of, most people in Chicago thought of her as automatically agressive, I didn't see her as agressive but, "normal" of the type of work and buisness she worked in..it's hard and agressive.. its an interesting direction for her to be MORE direct about her underlying hostilities.
Dorian
P.S. sorry about such a late response... long week.
I won't personally get into the "feminst arguments" the statistics sadly speak for themselves and don't need anyone to comment on them.. men who are "good" sadly have to live in the shadow of the "bad deeds" of others.. just as EVERY American has to live in the shadow of the deeds of the various wars and crimes against humanity commited under those various wars.. one can justify the actions and causes, one can deny it ever existed, one can support fully, or many of the various combinations.
There is something to be said about the power of men though...it sometimes excludes the men themselves and then it becomes a "class issue".