imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Eighty Years of Book Cover Design by Faber & Faber -- as previewed in a multimedia feature in The Guardian -- jogged a few memories for me. Faber is probably the publisher I've owned the most books by, after Penguin and Picador. Seeing the covers laid out in this way made me think of Emily Jacir's artwork Material for a Film, which displays the books owned by a Palestinian poet assassinated by the Israeli secret services.

The two Lawrence Durrell covers visible in the glimpse below of Jacir's piece were designed by Berthold Wolpe, a long-time Faber designer. We had them on our family bookshelves in the 1960s, so when my mother and I met and drank a pastis with Lawrence Durrell in Avignon in 1985 it felt like meeting an old family friend. (My mother embarrassed me by saying "My son Nicholas writes too!" Which totally wasn't true.)



Of the Faber covers, I found the ones designed by the books' own authors the most interesting. T.S. Eliot's design for Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats looks like a zine -- surprisingly light and scrappy, twee and pungent.

David Jones' Anathemata almost reminds me of a Peter Saville Factory Records design. Letting this poet-painter design his own jackets was totally the right thing to do -- as with the great Alasdair Gray, the effect is to create the impression that the artist has a personal stylistic universe which can be extended into any medium. That can be a welcoming and charismatic thing; the feeling that an artist's vision is immersive and comprehensive, different from everything you know.

Looking at the cover for Crow by Ted Hughes reminded me of how this book of visceral reports "from the life and songs of the crow" influenced my debut record The Man on Your Street ("songs from the career of the Dictator Hall", whose thoughts are described in The Courier as "hovering on like rooks as he wings his way below").

The generic postmodern Pentagram design that wrapped all Faber poetry titles from the early 80s onwards made me start thinking of Thomi Wroblewski, the designer I befriended and worked with from 1987 on. Thomi -- employed by Mike Alway to do the least el set of el single sleeves ever -- was known for his Talking Heads and Siouxie and the Banshees sleeves, as well as William Burroughs jackets for Picador:



When we started collaborating, Thomi had a big studio above the office of maverick Scottish publisher John Calder, in Green's Court, just off Brewer Street in Soho. I ended up spending a lot of time there, meeting Calder and some of his unlikely hangers-on (the Jewish doctor from Eastenders!). Thomi shared my taste for refined erotica (he designed an edition of Apollinaire's 1907 smut classic Les Onze Mille Verges, which publisher Peter Owen had to paraphrase, so subversive was it still considered to be in 1980s Britain), and liked to photograph you naked, writhing like a dancer. So it was up in that Soho studio that I posed, naked and masked, with various pretty girls for the Murderers, The Hope of Women sleeve. Thomi even dressed me up as dandy barfly Julian Maclaren-Ross, and put me on the cover of Memoirs of the Forties, his book about Fitzrovia. I'm seen from behind, toasting Soho.

What I notice about Thomi Wroblewski's 1980s book jacket work now is that while it often transgresses against the standards of good taste, it has an interesting maverick diversity -- exactly the sort of quirky zing that Wolpe-period Faber books had, but Pentagram-period Faber had lost by the time they standardised their poetry line with the tight-assed, Laura-Ashley-like "pomo ampersand classic" design.

This period of 1980s late pomo design is now coming back with a rush; the stretched typefaces on Thomi's 1988 Quick End anthology, for instance (The Quick End was a collection of short stories by Michael Bracewell, Don Watson and Mark Edwards, a writing group formed under the tutelage of Kathy Acker -- I faithfully attended all their readings) look rather like what Mike Meiré is doing now at 032c magazine. There's an awkward, ugly energy here which suddenly looks interesting again.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 10:47 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
What do you see as postmodern about those Pentagram designs?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 11:37 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Slightly off-topic, I know - - I finished reading your 'Book of Scotlands' last night. Received on Thursday and found it pretty hard to put down. Very much enjoyed it, rotting news anchors and all. The final alternative Scotland is probably the one that sticks in my mind the most, though (trying to not give too much away to any other potential readers), and I rather enjoyed reading about the king and his Lady Sirloin.
Congrats on a very original book. Am intreagued by the other releases in the 'Solutions' series now!

James

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 11:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
There's a certain classicism, a "return to order" in them. They're retro and referential. There's a sort of Ian Hamilton Finlay look to the type, as if it's chiseled, slightly ironically, in stone. The double line around the "label" suggests VIctorian herbal medicines, again slightly ironic. There's absolutely none of the progressivist Modernist streamlining you see in a cover like Wolpe's Eric Mendelson (http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2009/7/10/1247222490516/Eighty-Years-of-Book-Cove-009.jpg) jacket. Instead everything is symmetry, irony, dryness, neo-classicism, restraint, repetition, systems, minimalism. For me the early 80s Pentagram covers are very much of a piece with the systems music of Glass and Reich, or the stately retro you see in Philip Johnson's AT&T (Sony) Building.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Ah, good to hear! The book isn't officially out yet, so I'm interested to get these early readers' reports! The other titles are definitely worth investigating -- in a way, they all combine to form one big speculative text about various nations.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 12:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
To be more specific, the design seems to refer to the decorative inner endpapers of Victorian books, and the labels stuck inside them ("This book belongs to..."). And that retro reference fulfills the same function as the cornice on the AT&T building. Postmodernism was as playfully backwards-looking as Modernism was earnestly forwards-looking. It's simply impossible to imagine that double-line device which frames the label being used during the Modernist period. It's a schoolmarmish gesture which fits all too well with Thatcherism, and with high streets filled with retro-themed shops with ampersands in their names.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 12:05 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 12:45 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I see what you're driving at here, but when does "old-fashioned" become "postmodern"? Was it even possible to be non-postmodern in the eighties? For example, in the eighties you can have a record cover like this:

Image

which is referencing early modernism and therefore retro and postmodern, although utterly different in intent to the Faber covers. But if everything is postmodern, then the term no longer means anything, does it? What would be an example of non-postmodernism in the eighties?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
There's absolutely none of the progressivist Modernist streamlining you see in a cover like Wolpe's Eric Mendelson jacket.

Worth adding: the Mendelson jacket (http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2009/7/10/1247222490516/Eighty-Years-of-Book-Cove-009.jpg) does link much more clearly to Zak Kyes' (ahem) altermodern jacket for my Book of Scotlands (http://www.sternberg-press.com/files/book/137/solution_scotlands_cover_364.jpg). They both use (something like) the efficient "transport font" Johnston and they both look "Orwellian", uptopian-dystopian, propagandistic.

Just as a reference to Victorian motifs would have been unthinkable for modernists -- because its identity would have been threatened by attempts to integrate the still-potent styles of the Victorian era -- so a reference to Modernist motifs would have been difficult for postmodern design. The recent past had to be swept under the carpet, banished to the anxious interval (http://imomus.livejournal.com/435556.html).

The altermodern period we're now entering (and we may call it something else in the end) was heralded by a "return of the repressed" -- the sudden re-emergence of Modernist themes suppressed during the era of Postmodernism. One of the key slogans of this "return": "Modernity is our antiquity".
Edited Date: 2009-07-13 12:59 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Ah, you're usefully contradicting the point I make below about Modernist references being impossible in Postmodernism, but possible now!

It's true that pomo was the dog that could eat anything, and I think everything produced in the 80s was necessarily postmodernist for this reason. I think we'd have to then start quibbling about how the dog ate things, and in what context, to distinguish a 1980 Modernist reference from a 2010 Modernist reference.

wrapping books

Date: 2009-07-13 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I love what you say about David Jones--"immersive and comprehensive", the invitation to a world view, as it were. Which is especially true of Ian Hamilton Finlay, who often used a similar hand-lettered face, during his 'War' with Strathclyde region... my favourite Faber covers, though, are Adrian Stokes' books, like Ben Nicholson's cover for Stones of Rimini, and the ballet books: http://www.pstokes.demon.co.uk/

Thomas

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 01:49 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Well then, what is the difference between a Modernist reference in 1980 and one in 2010?

Actually, don't we have to get away from the idea that anything that references the past is necessarily postmodern? After all, plenty of modernists referenced the past. Lots of modernists were obsessively working images from the Old Masters; the Die Brucke people were into medieval woodcuts etc etc. What makes something postmodern must be to do with the way it references the past, not just the fact that it does it.

Re: wrapping books

Date: 2009-07-13 01:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Oh, I never heard of Adrian Stokes! Interesting!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
What makes something postmodern must be to do with the way it references the past, not just the fact that it does it.

Exactly what I was trying to say with "I think we'd have to then start quibbling about how the dog ate things, and in what context". Thanks!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 02:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krskrft.livejournal.com
It's not what things objectively are, but rather how we see them, that would determine whether they were pomo (or modernist, or whatever else).

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 02:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krskrft.livejournal.com
By which I mean to say that we can't just bank on there being clear, objective referentiality. The extent to which we feel one thing references another often depends entirely on a subjective "feeling" that can't be more than hinted at.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Artists as designers (http://www.jameslangdonwork.net/index.php?/copy-stand-weblog/), interesting blog by James Langdon.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kumakouji.livejournal.com
While you were browsing the Guardian's website did you happen to see this:

Image

I appreciate the Japanese insistence on uniform, I appreciate the Japanese insistence on strict etiquette... but this is crossing the line into creepy and strange, even by Japanese standards.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 04:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Aki Sasamoto told me that she was sacked from a Japanese department store job because, no matter how much she smiled, she couldn't manage to do it "from the heart".

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] milky-eyes.livejournal.com
Its good to know that you very intelligent word-meisters are questioning what exactly is post-modern,,, Everytime I use the word, I self consciously peer over my non existent spectacles to see if the dim witted rascal that has fallen from grace enough to have to endure a word or two from the sorts of me, noticed that I may not have a clue what postmodern even means... I guess I more or less am on the same page as the awesome-nesses of these blogmasters.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] count-vronsky.livejournal.com
The clean shaven (crazy baldhead?) look is growing on me momus. Yesterday a cute litle cashier at the grocery store reached over (without asking!) and stroked my scalp and gave me a smile and a purr.

Today I am wearing a white turtleneck and I look lexactly ike, well... your penis.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 05:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
```arf arf```

'Jokes'

Date: 2009-07-13 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Have there been any book jackets revealed for foreign editions of 'Jokes'? I'm wondering how many try to market it as comedy (riotous cartoon, the Tom Sharpe look) or are they under instructions to 'art' it up?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 06:39 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
There's a strong argument that Modernism actually spent more time harkening backwards---drawing on Classical antiquity, and so on...

of course this may pertain more to Modernist lit than other arts and disciplines.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
very postmodern/poststructuralist

Re: 'Jokes'

Date: 2009-07-13 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
The French publisher is working now on getting the rights for a photo by Izis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izis_Bidermanas), which will give the french edition a somewhat humanist, bildungsroman look. The German editors, last time I heard, were working with the image in my icon here -- an image of me with toilet paper around my head!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 08:10 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
emotion fascists

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 08:14 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"And suddenly the memory returns. The taste was that of the little crumb of madeleine which on Sunday mornings at Combray (because on those mornings I did not go out before church-time), when I went to say good day to her in her bedroom, my aunt Léonie used to give me, dipping it first in her own cup of real or of lime-flower tea."

Yeah, whatever Marcel.

Re: wrapping books

Date: 2009-07-13 09:16 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
For me, the greatest ever art writer. The first to merge psychoanalysis (Kleinian) with art theory--that is, with the act of looking as well as the act of making. There was a Penguin Selected Writings (ed. Richard Wollheim) in 1972, just after he died... he was friendly with Ezra Pound in Italy, and that's how Faber came to publish him. But his writing style is amazing--lithe and limid simultaneously. I guess he could be called the last of the amateurs. His son Telfer is a wonderful artist's book maker--and until recently lived just a few miles from Little Sparta...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-13 11:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krskrft.livejournal.com
Umm, not really. It's just the truth.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-14 04:19 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
yes, really. this "feel something...hint at other things..." it's all very Derridian; ghosts, specters, traces, contingencies, differance, etc....

but, that it's "the" truth is not very postmodern. if you had said it's "a" truth, then we'd be in business...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-14 04:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krskrft.livejournal.com
The underlying idea comes out of poststructuralism, but I don't think that the utterance itself is intensely poststructural in nature.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-14 07:00 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
yes, but there are traces there...ghosts, phantoms, specters...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-14 07:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krskrft.livejournal.com
No there aren't.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-07-14 07:27 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
even your refusal of them is an acknowledgement, in some sublime way....