Andrea Crews m'excite!
Mar. 31st, 2007 12:54 am
My fashion contacts tell me that this week Hedi Slimane got kicked out of Dior Homme. I wish him all good fortune for his future projects, I really do. But for me, the big Paris fashion story of the last five years isn't that rather boring 60s-retro skinny black suit and tie look. It's Andrea Crews, a fashion collective grouped behind a fictitious persona and operated from a threatened Belleville atelier-squat called La Generale.
Andrea Crews -- the brainchild of Maroussia Rebecq, an art school grad from Bordeaux -- is a recycling clothes label. Working closely with charity shops like Emmaus, the Crews crew cuts up and repurposes huge heaps of secondhand clothes, re-investing dead and ugly heaps of cloth with playful panache. They stage big fun events where dozens of amateur models are transformed into garish and sometimes grotesque creatures, and all the clothes are given away to the audience at the end of the show. Most importantly, and against all the odds, many of their creations actually look excitingly good. It's a philosopher's stone sort of deal -- Andrea Crews recycles base materials into pure fashion gold.

I went to one of their Berlin shows back in early 2003, an event called Berlin M'Excite held in a warehouse in Kreuzberg, and did a bit of DJing as the clothes were chopped up and playfully repurposed (by, amongst others, Jean-Marc of label Pelagique). It was actually one of the most fun things I've seen in Berlin -- some guerilla fashionistas called Additional came up and restitched my eyepatch with pink thread as I played. Above all, there was a sense of people having fun with clothes, and emboldening each other to pull off ever more ridiculous, splashy, weird and flamboyant looks. It's the kind of thing I do in thrift stores like Humana anyway, but it was nice to meet people who took it further. (And I don't tend to chop stuff up -- my splicing all happens at the original seams.)

"Andrea Crews values creative energy more than form," declares the Crews website, but I think that's perhaps unduly modest. And while there's lots of talk of social concern, ethical fashion, sustainable development, alternatives to consumer society, and even relational aesthetics (the Crews people were invited to take over the temple of RA, the Palais de Tokyo, as you can see in a video on their MySpace page), I think that's merely the ethical icing on the aesthetic cake. Many of these spliced secondhand clothes are simply fun, inspiring and desirable -- covetable enough to warrant the rather high prices they're pegged at on the Crews website.

While more elitist fashion houses hold their defilés in central Paris in the presence of invited guests and the world's press, Andrea Crews holds theirs out on the street in Belleville -- and gives the clothes away at the end, as you can see in the videos on this page. Just like in "real" fashion shows, there's a bride in a white dress to end the show. Crews also has a widow's veil -- but she's a bloody merry widow, naked and primed for fun.

President-presumptive Nicolas Sarkozy doesn't like Andrea or her kind -- he's been cracking down on Paris squats and "doesn't give a shit about artists," according to this Guardian piece about La Generale and its troubles. But gay Paris mayor Bernard Delanoe does, and the threatened takeover of the collective's headquarters has been averted -- for now.

La Generale gets no subsidy of any kind, though, and survives thanks to donations from the people who work in its lofty spaces, and bar takings from the odd event -- so maybe that's why the prices for Andrea Crews bomber jackets are as high as they are. (They're still a lot cheaper than Bape.)
In the longterm, though, the authorities plan to turn La Generale into a mental hospital. If, like sarky Sarkozy, you hate these people with their parties, their ethical aesthetics, and their garish colours, if you think their ateliers de creation need to be cleaned out with Karsher, well, there's a set-up for your punchline right there.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-30 11:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-30 11:50 pm (UTC)Grand Lodge 2
Date: 2007-03-31 12:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 12:26 am (UTC)fashion gold
Date: 2007-03-31 01:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 01:52 am (UTC)Sometimes being stared at and judged due to your 'peculiar dress' is annoying though, and one can never discount the challenge of wearing banal mass-market clothing in a different manner- what makes my a4 sheet of white paper better than yours? It's sort of like guerrilla dressing. I do it often with clothing from my workplace. At most, if the workmates see their familiar signage, they ask if it is a design from one of our overseas siblings ('no! it is from the Australian range!') and I watch them totter off muttering in confusion and blank disbelief.
At that price point, the clothes Andreas Crews sell are definitely nothing special though. :(. Who do you know, like and respect, can afford to purchase something from Andreas Crews, and not be on a diet of water and sloppy gruel for the next few weeks ? As much as I like it, fashion is stupid and fickle, like our minds. $AUD8 is my limit for clothing, and for that, i damn better be getting some old school embroidery, silk or metallic fabrication. $AUD12 if I know that certain fabric is no longer manufactured anywhere in the world.
Those special buys' are once a year.
Ofcourse, I am also the addle-brain who thinks nothing of spending $350 on a couple of metres of fabric. Just because it's nice. Infact, I tend to weigh things against the wholesale price of silk organza - "Hmmm I could purchase these boots for he low price of $40, or i could buy 3.5m of silk organza..."
That piece of information sort of voids all my opinions doesn't it? hahaha.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 02:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 03:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 03:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 03:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 06:26 am (UTC)Eh--screw fashion, either way. Style's far more interesting.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 06:39 am (UTC)the green piece is really nice.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 07:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 07:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 07:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 10:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 11:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 11:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 11:02 am (UTC)I must say I don't agree with that bit -- to me the colour references are rather controlled and rather specific. The dominant axis is acid dark green, acid "Barney" purple, and acid pink. That makes a very specific 80s reference, as do the forms of the clothes themselves, the sunglasses, etc. Circa 1984, but without the badly-dyed big shaggy hairdos of the period, and with a lot more chopping up, so it's defamiliarized.
The disgustingness, vulgarity and riskiness of this style reference (as opposed, say, to the tasteful quote Hedi Slimane makes to La Dolce Vita is an index of the originality of Crews. And one of its functions is to exclude those who are not ready to see 80s styles as "tasteful". But the thing is, within five years (and some would say, already) these references will no longer be "ironic" and the style will no longer be seen as inherently hideous. It will be a much more mainstream reference, and the 80s will be quoted for "classic values" -- whether in clothes like these, or Memphis-style furniture, or Japanese architecture, or... And at that point, people like Crews will have moved on to grunge, or Shibuya-kei. Sure, it's a predictable circle, but my interest in alienation makes me follow the resistance to the revival as much as the revival itself. With some excitement.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 11:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 11:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 11:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 11:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 11:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-31 01:19 pm (UTC)