The grandeur of ancient ruins
Jun. 10th, 2004 02:58 pm
Above, you see Silk Scarves With Tartan Plaids and Led Zeppelin Lyrics by Jerome Jerome. It's one of the works in an online exhibition called Heraldic Pomp held by Repellent, a magazine and 'gallery on paper' based in Brooklyn, with strong Japanese connections. The pieces in the show are somewhere between graphic design and fine art (a colourful, modestly pretentious grey area I like a lot) and contain exactly the kind of era and genre-splicing I tend to get up to in my music -- in this case, making wry observations on the contrasts and parallels between European royal crests and street-turf tagging, or between Classicism and classic rock (interesting in the light of yesterday's entry). (Link courtesy of Shift Blog.)
Speaking of the links between a certain kind of graphic design and a certain kind of pop music, I've just prepared a shortened and slightly re-written version of my essay Metaphysical Masochism of the Capitalist Creative for the excellent design / visual culture magazine Dot Dot Dot. It'll appear in Issue 8. (Thanks to James Goggin of Practise for the introduction to Dot Dot Dot.)
I wish I could post the latest track for the 2005 Momus album, The Artist Overwhelmed, but I really can't. Suffice to say that it's chilling, grand, ruined, spooky and beautiful, and that there's an incredible moment when the ultra-prolonged word 'death' leads into a Purcell-like instrumental passage overlaid with a text from an early Edison phonograph demonstration record. The phonograph itself is speaking, boasting its qualities -- how it connects you with loved ones, records and plays back your voice, etc -- but in the context of the song it becomes the voice of death, and the extraordinary insight that opens up (and I didn't intend this, but I love it) is that for artists, death is the ultimate recording medium. Death remembers and plays back only the important stuff, the durable stuff. Don't choose Memorex, choose death!
Speaking of preservation, and Memorex, I've just been made aware of The Momus Museum, an interweb institution entirely dedicated to shards, stones, ruins and fragments from my own recording history. Like all good museums it has shopping (or at least the track of that name I recorded with Bran Van 3000) and memories (aha, here's Mnemorex, the track I made with Kreidler in 2000!). I have nothing to do with this site, and I can't vouch for the legality of its displays. But that's true of The British Museum too; after all, who really owns the Elgin Marbles?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-10 06:16 am (UTC)What you have to say about classicism and romanticism is thought-provoking - although I do think you're in denial about a certain quixotic romanticism that runs through your artistic projects, if not your writings.
Hugo
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-10 06:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-10 07:11 am (UTC)Hugo
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-10 07:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-10 07:36 am (UTC)Hugo
Save the music for the big release
Date: 2004-06-10 10:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-10 12:35 pm (UTC)Re: Human Diversity
Date: 2004-06-11 11:23 pm (UTC)Regarding busts: the full-sized bronze bust of my person is almost complete. Now I just need that trireme...
Enjoyed your AIGA article. I'm a bit weary of my older illustrator colleagues' insisting that they're artists with a capital "A". I beg them to stop caring, but the poor things are inconsolable; I do so fear for their health.
W
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-12 02:59 am (UTC)A splendid entry and a wonderful blog.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-12 01:04 pm (UTC)At this point, having heard the songs you've been putting up, it's made me quite curious to hear the finished version of this album, and so I will probably buy it very soon after it comes out. (I almost never buy things right when they're released, except for certain serial publications (comics).) I want to hear the song about ancient ruins, as I like ruins. It would be trite to say that they have a tragic beauty, but they are paradoxical, because they make me sad that the original beauty was destroyed, but that destruction is also the creation of a new beauty, because ruins and fragments are wonderful and mysterious in their own ways. Of course, creation and destruction are always the same thing.
I, too, generally find myself bouncing between supposedly opposed theories and ideas in philosophy and aesthetics.
Re: Human Diversity
Date: 2004-06-13 01:45 am (UTC)Re: Human Diversity
Date: 2004-06-13 07:54 am (UTC)(Perhaps Andres Serrano might aid me in the oxidation? No--"Piss Whimsy" might be a bit much.)
W
Re: Human Diversity
Date: 2004-06-13 10:25 am (UTC)...or redundant.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-14 12:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-24 02:27 pm (UTC)