Ubiquity is the abyss
Mar. 26th, 2006 12:42 pmMusic is a good thing. Of course it is. I'm a musician, I've dedicated my life to it, and I know few better things. Music can be sacred, mysterious, otherworldly, intimate, moving, extraordinary. But, increasingly, music is the opposite of those things. It's profane, banal, public, shared, irritating, ordinary and ubiquitous. It's in every restaurant and every cafe and every car and every office and on every computer and on every website. It's in each ear, snaking in on a thin white wire. You listen to music all day, every day. Time without music is downtime. It's the triumph of music! Or is it? Maybe ubiquity signals quite the opposite; music's defeat. For music, ubiquity is the abyss.
Thank you, Steve Jobs, and thank you, Rupert Murdoch! Your marketing ingenuity has spread 42 million iPods across the world, each capable of holding weeks and weeks of music. There are almost as many MySpace pages, 37 million, each one loading up a piece of music as soon as you hit it. Of course, Steve and Rupert aren't leveraging music into our lives because they love music, or even because they love us. They're doing it because it's a key to massive profits, because we love music. Music, after all, is a key to so many other things. It's an index of taste, a measure of social class, a way to bond with others in a social network.
But for whatever reason, Steve and Rupert and the others have squeezed music into every blank bit of space in our lives. We are rapidly reaching the limits of our own ears (tinnitus, my headphoned friend?) and the saturation point at which music becomes utterly unremarkable, and thus, effectively, inaudible.
As usual, Brian Eno was the first person I'm aware of to sound a warning note. In an interview he gave around the time he moved to St Petersburg, he said (I quote from memory) "I'm beginning to be dissatisfied with the idea of CDs, the way they make all music so available to us, the way that all musical experiences are supposedly able to be shrunk down to fit this little plastic disc. I'm beginning to think it should be as difficult to hear music as it was in the Middle Ages. Imagine just hearing a concert once a month, how amazing it must have sounded!"
One good thing about iPods, though, is that they privatize the bad taste of others. When not plugged into speakers or streaming wirelessly to sound systems, iPods shrink other people's music choices (and for me 95% of other people's music taste is unbearable, sorry, other people!) down to little white buds of semi-silence. It's a start in the great work of music removal we must now begin to undertake, we who love music and want to save it by making it scarce again.

On Friday evening I attended a party celebrating Lord Whimsy's birthday at a flock wallpapered bar called The Dove on Thompson Street. A Californian dandy called Doran Wittelsbach was there, and I found his Robert de Montesquiou-esque image admirably extreme. He told me he'd been catcalled on the street by ruffians who pronouced him a "douche". "It sounds very clean, a douche," I remarked, refreshed and impressed by his capacity to antagonize the bridge and tunnel crowd merely by walking down the street in a top hat. Clothes, these days, are clearly more subversive than even the most aggressive music.
Unfortunately, the inevitable moment came. "I also make music," Wittelsbach confided. "I'd like to give you a CD later." I made hasty excuses and left, sneaking off with Karin Komoto to Japanese cafe Hiroko's Place further down the same street. I'd love to tell you we dined accompanied by the ambient, arhythmic sounds of running water, voices cooing conversational Japanese, and clattering pots. But no, Hiroko was piping in Ayumi Hamasaki. Another hour, another 15 songs.
Thank you, Steve Jobs, and thank you, Rupert Murdoch! Your marketing ingenuity has spread 42 million iPods across the world, each capable of holding weeks and weeks of music. There are almost as many MySpace pages, 37 million, each one loading up a piece of music as soon as you hit it. Of course, Steve and Rupert aren't leveraging music into our lives because they love music, or even because they love us. They're doing it because it's a key to massive profits, because we love music. Music, after all, is a key to so many other things. It's an index of taste, a measure of social class, a way to bond with others in a social network.
But for whatever reason, Steve and Rupert and the others have squeezed music into every blank bit of space in our lives. We are rapidly reaching the limits of our own ears (tinnitus, my headphoned friend?) and the saturation point at which music becomes utterly unremarkable, and thus, effectively, inaudible.As usual, Brian Eno was the first person I'm aware of to sound a warning note. In an interview he gave around the time he moved to St Petersburg, he said (I quote from memory) "I'm beginning to be dissatisfied with the idea of CDs, the way they make all music so available to us, the way that all musical experiences are supposedly able to be shrunk down to fit this little plastic disc. I'm beginning to think it should be as difficult to hear music as it was in the Middle Ages. Imagine just hearing a concert once a month, how amazing it must have sounded!"
One good thing about iPods, though, is that they privatize the bad taste of others. When not plugged into speakers or streaming wirelessly to sound systems, iPods shrink other people's music choices (and for me 95% of other people's music taste is unbearable, sorry, other people!) down to little white buds of semi-silence. It's a start in the great work of music removal we must now begin to undertake, we who love music and want to save it by making it scarce again.

On Friday evening I attended a party celebrating Lord Whimsy's birthday at a flock wallpapered bar called The Dove on Thompson Street. A Californian dandy called Doran Wittelsbach was there, and I found his Robert de Montesquiou-esque image admirably extreme. He told me he'd been catcalled on the street by ruffians who pronouced him a "douche". "It sounds very clean, a douche," I remarked, refreshed and impressed by his capacity to antagonize the bridge and tunnel crowd merely by walking down the street in a top hat. Clothes, these days, are clearly more subversive than even the most aggressive music.
Unfortunately, the inevitable moment came. "I also make music," Wittelsbach confided. "I'd like to give you a CD later." I made hasty excuses and left, sneaking off with Karin Komoto to Japanese cafe Hiroko's Place further down the same street. I'd love to tell you we dined accompanied by the ambient, arhythmic sounds of running water, voices cooing conversational Japanese, and clattering pots. But no, Hiroko was piping in Ayumi Hamasaki. Another hour, another 15 songs.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 05:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 05:58 pm (UTC)from this American Life (http://207.70.82.73/pages/descriptions/98/88.html):
"Alex Melamid and Vitaly Komar hired a polling firm to investigate what people want to see in paintings. Then, using the data, they painted what people want. It turned out to be a landscape, with a mountain and a lake, and deer, and a family, and George Washington. Then they applied these techniques to music, with composer David Soldier. They surveyed audiences about what kind of instruments and topics for they liked most in their songs. Then they produced one song based on what people most want to hear--and one song based on what they hate the most. The one people hate includes bagpipes, children singing, lyrics about holidays and religion, wild volume and tempo changes...."
the most wanted one sounds like a dispicably radio-worthy r&b song.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:02 pm (UTC)i didn't mind the mid-tempo operatic rap about cowboys so much.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:27 pm (UTC)Sitting at home with the window open, listening to the tree branches brush against each other outside and the occasional horn-honks of Flatbush Ave, bark of dog and squeal of child... this uncomposed ambience is my creativity engine lately. I'm not even turning to Eno's quiet music to cocoon me when I write in the mornings anymore, I am listening to his quiet philosophy instead.
Cheers.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:29 pm (UTC)food
Date: 2006-03-26 06:32 pm (UTC)Joey
www.joeyroth.com
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:39 pm (UTC)There's a worrying trend in the UK at the moment of "young people" loading their phones with music and playing it through the speaker, notably on busses. Not only do you have to suffer their bad taste but it sounds like it's coming from a broken transistor radio.
I wonder if this idiotic behaviour is because they've grown up in a world where music is, like you say, ubiquitous so adding a little more isn't going to make any difference. On they other hand, they might just be morons.
I've just realised that despite having 17,000 mp3s on my computer I often work with no music playing at all. Hmm...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 06:53 pm (UTC)If only filmakers would resist the urge to "score" thier films we might begin to see the beauty of a soundtrackless life. Most of us alive today have grown up with films and television where the image must be accompanied by music. It's for this reason, I believe, that we try to pipe music into nature.
Tecnology is to blame for the availability of music but why do we feel the need to always have music in the background.
"The public wants what the public gets."
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 07:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 07:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 07:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 07:35 pm (UTC)Brian Eno should start a national chain of his quiet clubs. They would be as ubiquitous as Starbucks but without the sound of espresso machines and Jack Johnson.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 07:43 pm (UTC)Would this be indicative of saturation, or worse, a tipping point? A Darned Fine Question.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 07:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 08:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 08:24 pm (UTC)Classism is never cool, and never okay.
The music you like, experimental and independent musicians, still exists in the form you're talking about, playing concerts that are genuinely rare and special to hear.
Everybody should get to listen to music whenever they want, even if you don't like their specific taste. I think if people appreciate music less on the whole because they hear it more, that's fine, because they choose to listen to music more, because they like to.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 08:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 08:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 08:30 pm (UTC)Probably the right time to follow Ivor Cutler's lead and buy yourself a good pair of bright yellow earplugs and join the noise abatement society.
I wish I'd done that before being subjected to Thin Lizzy's entire back-catalogue in a Waterloo pub on St Patrick's night last week.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-26 08:33 pm (UTC)Indeed, have you ever even seen a wealthy person? They don't dress like Doran Wittelsbach; most of them dress like middle-class, middle-brow consumers with expensive designer loyalty. And by all means: let's be careful to avoid any appearance of "ingenuity and hip whimsicality". T-shirts and jeans, everyone, and you with the combed hair: muss that up right this minute!