Two incidences of beauty
Nov. 3rd, 2006 01:00 amIn a world of sometimes unbearable ugliness, beauty becomes terribly important.

This is a picture of half-Russian, half-Japanese model Rina Ohta in the new edition of Fudge magazine.
And this is a beautiful song by Juana Molina (from her Domino album Son) called Malherido.

This is a picture of half-Russian, half-Japanese model Rina Ohta in the new edition of Fudge magazine.
And this is a beautiful song by Juana Molina (from her Domino album Son) called Malherido.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 12:20 am (UTC)Time to go back to watching Sparks videos on YouTube, I think.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 12:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 12:54 am (UTC)That's kind of an ugly sentence.
The song is beautiful.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 01:05 am (UTC)i think the whole world needs to just curtail consumption of *everything* in general :(
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 01:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 01:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 02:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 02:20 am (UTC)She is one of my fav models!..like a gentle beauty that speaks no evil
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 03:02 am (UTC)give up the fish
Date: 2006-11-03 04:43 am (UTC)Why is it ugly when species go extinct? It's evolution. I am reminded of a story I read in 2004 in the Wall Street Journal. About a donkey species that was dying out, but the species was so fucking adorable, that all these volunteer middle aged US women were trying to keep it from going extinct. They tried to entice the male donkeys, who had no sex drive but were given donkey viagra, to mate with the females. Neither male nor female wanted to copulate.
But the American women kept insisting the species not die out!
I say if the breed stops wanting to have sex, it's time to let them go.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 04:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 05:04 am (UTC)Re: give up the fish
Date: 2006-11-03 09:08 am (UTC)Then we wouldn't have to fish from the seas... and I suppose everyone would be up in arms over the fishermen going out of business!
Re: give up the fish
Date: 2006-11-03 09:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 10:05 am (UTC)PS: you forgot to add sex.
Re: give up the fish
Date: 2006-11-03 10:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 10:49 am (UTC)Re: give up the fish
Date: 2006-11-03 11:11 am (UTC)I agree completely. The most pernicious political concept ever is that of continual expansion. Thngs have really come to a head for the human race. People have talked about utopias in one form or another, and failed to acheive them, for centuries, but now, if we don't fundamentally change our values, it looks like we're done for, unless science manages to manufacture the kind of brave new world that will allow us to sustain our selfish habits even longer. But personally, I think that Mary Shelley was prophetic, and one way or another, our rape/enslavement/manipulation of nature has created and will continue to create monsters that will come back to us.
Re: give up the fish
Date: 2006-11-03 12:23 pm (UTC)R-White.
Re: give up the fish
Date: 2006-11-03 01:39 pm (UTC)The way things are going, I doubt that humans have got that long.
Call me an old cynic, but it seems to me the green taxes proposed by the New Labour Junta is merely a fund-raising exercise for the upcoming invasion of Iran.
Re: give up the fish
Date: 2006-11-03 02:13 pm (UTC)This is what I generally think about it all, here (http://my.opera.com/quentinscrisp/blog/humans-off-earth-now).
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 02:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 03:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 03:48 pm (UTC)Re: give up the fish
Date: 2006-11-03 04:01 pm (UTC)Oh, thanks for making this clear. Sorry I was being glib with my comparison.