Making cities work
Jul. 11th, 2006 08:48 pmUrbanism and sustainability are subjects I just can't seem to get enough of. This year, for the first time in the history of humanity, more people will be living in cities than outside them. But the future of the city isn't particularly rosy: in many places, shanty towns of the ultrapoor have sprung up, containing up to 35% of the population of cities like Mexico City. These are places without basic amenities or law and order; meanwhile, the rich retreat to gated communities.
Making Cities Work, a three-part series by Deyan Sudjic for BBC World Service, explores these and other issues. After the grim scenarios sketched out in Mexico City and Moscow, I particularly liked the third programme, on sustainabile design experiments in China. All the shows can be downloaded as mp3s, I link them below. (The image shows Cai Guo-Qiang's "Clear Sky, Black Cloud".)

1. Mexico City
A page about the show.
2. Moscow
A page about the show.
3. Huangbaiyu
A page about the show.
I leave you with two thoughts from the third programme.
"One way of measuring sustainability is something called ecological footprint, which is actually the area of land that's needed to support a person's life, to generate food, to generate power and electricity and energy, and to absorb waste and to provide water. In the UK and Europe we typically have an ecological footprint of 6 hectares per person, which is about 3 planets' worth, if you take the total number of people in the world. And in the US it's about 10 to 12 hectares, which is about 5 or 6 planets' worth. In China, at the moment, if you average right across China -- if you take all the people and all the land area -- the average is only about 1.5 hectares per person." Peter Head, director of ARUP Dong Tang sustainable city project.
"In order to imagine sustaining cities, we have to speak of the future in the present tense. And we have to imagine what the perfectly exquisite would look like in order to achieve the practically impossible. So we look at the future of cities and imagine that we could take all the earth and raise it up onto the roofs and farm the roofs, so that from a bird's perspective nothing has happened. Then we still maintain our farmland. If China's urban development will mean that we lose 25% of Chinese farmland by 2020, then wouldn't it be marvellous if the cities could lift the soil up and we could farm the roofs." William McDonnagh, chairman of group building sustainable houses.
Making Cities Work, a three-part series by Deyan Sudjic for BBC World Service, explores these and other issues. After the grim scenarios sketched out in Mexico City and Moscow, I particularly liked the third programme, on sustainabile design experiments in China. All the shows can be downloaded as mp3s, I link them below. (The image shows Cai Guo-Qiang's "Clear Sky, Black Cloud".)

1. Mexico City
A page about the show.
2. Moscow
A page about the show.
3. Huangbaiyu
A page about the show.
I leave you with two thoughts from the third programme.
"One way of measuring sustainability is something called ecological footprint, which is actually the area of land that's needed to support a person's life, to generate food, to generate power and electricity and energy, and to absorb waste and to provide water. In the UK and Europe we typically have an ecological footprint of 6 hectares per person, which is about 3 planets' worth, if you take the total number of people in the world. And in the US it's about 10 to 12 hectares, which is about 5 or 6 planets' worth. In China, at the moment, if you average right across China -- if you take all the people and all the land area -- the average is only about 1.5 hectares per person." Peter Head, director of ARUP Dong Tang sustainable city project.
"In order to imagine sustaining cities, we have to speak of the future in the present tense. And we have to imagine what the perfectly exquisite would look like in order to achieve the practically impossible. So we look at the future of cities and imagine that we could take all the earth and raise it up onto the roofs and farm the roofs, so that from a bird's perspective nothing has happened. Then we still maintain our farmland. If China's urban development will mean that we lose 25% of Chinese farmland by 2020, then wouldn't it be marvellous if the cities could lift the soil up and we could farm the roofs." William McDonnagh, chairman of group building sustainable houses.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 07:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 07:22 pm (UTC)Japan: 4.3 (just over two planets)
Germany: 4.4 (2.2 planets)
UK: 5.6 (2.8 planets)
US: 9.7 (almost five planets)
China: 1.6 (less than one planet)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 07:26 pm (UTC)I will listen to it shortly but do "they talk" about the possibility of suburbs being "assimilated" by the larger cities?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 07:29 pm (UTC)Workshops, summits, conferences, etc.
Date: 2006-07-11 07:30 pm (UTC)Also, are you familiar with John Thackara's Door of Perception?
Re: Workshops, summits, conferences, etc.
Date: 2006-07-11 07:36 pm (UTC)Don't know about Thackara.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 07:37 pm (UTC)And those who live in that shanty town are peasants from the countryside who tried to get jobs in Nairobi too. But they only had enough money for a one way ticket unfortunately.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 07:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 07:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 08:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 08:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 08:30 pm (UTC)"In China, at the moment, if you average right across China -- if you take all the people and all the land area -- the average is only about 1.5 hectares per person."
Well, if you take a country the size of China, I would have said so. That 1.5 hectares per people is likely due to the poverty of a large proportion of Chinese people - not romanticized, simple-life poverty, but absolute destitution. And the apparent plan to pump water up-hill from south north to Beijing... I dunno. Doesn't sound that rosy to me, in the short term if nothing else.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 08:36 pm (UTC)the blog worldchanging.com (http://www.worldchanging.com)
is a fairly constant source of information
on sustianability mostly becuase it's written by a bunch
of sustianability and energy effecient designers around the world.
secondly, Mike Davis wrote a book on shanty towns (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1844670228/sr=8-1/qid=1152649689/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-0636667-3626244?ie=UTF8) and Robert Neuwirth went and lived in them. (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415933196/sr=8-10/qid=1152649689/ref=pd_bbs_10/103-0636667-3626244?ie=UTF8) Neurwith's book is perhaps a bit different than the anaylsis given by the BBC program. He takes a more positive approach to shanty towns from a review: "His ghetto epiphanies include impeccable civility, self-organizing local governments, bustling economies, modest crime rates, and squatter millionaires". Robert also has a blog (http://squattercity.blogspot.com/)
Re: Workshops, summits, conferences, etc.
Date: 2006-07-11 08:39 pm (UTC)Honestly, the AIGA is late in coming to these 'urbanism and sustainability' in design ideas, but sincere in their intention. John Thackara is moving faster. Thackara is many things, but I'm interested only in one of his projects called, Doors of Perception. I think you might be too.
http://www.doorsofperception.com/
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 08:56 pm (UTC)The Chinese now have one of the world's largest EPAs. And yeah I know it's a big country, but their EPA is propotionally now bigger than the U.S.'s EPA and is like one employee for every 3000 people vs 1 for ever 15000 in the U.S. I forget the figure, I calculated it once. Comparatively though, China is hardly India which has massive subsidides for alternative energy hence wind power is quickly becoming a massive industry in India becuase it can be constructed in relatively little time, is local, and by passes the ineffecient national grid. I just finished reading Jim Hansen's review of An Inconvient Truth in the new york review of books though in which Jim calculates that if CO2 emissions aren't reduced by 2010 then the existing damage + future damage to the atmosphere will kill off 20% of animals on earth so really almost all environmentalism doesn't look like enough to me at the moment.
"Well, if you take a country the size of China, I would have said so. That 1.5 hectares per people is likely due to the poverty of a large proportion of Chinese people - not romanticized, simple-life poverty, but absolute destitution. And the apparent plan to pump water up-hill from south north to Beijing... I dunno. Doesn't sound that rosy to me, in the short term if nothing else."
While it's true that China is scary I mean I once walked past the corpse of an 80 year old woman who seemed to have been left on top of a footbridge for at least a week, the concept of extreme destution hardly seems applicable, North Korea's faminines or a Mugabe led farm policy are seriously povery stricken, but life ain't to bad outside of the metropolitian Chinese grid, in fact it's good enough now that the inner-cities have labor shortages and people are staying at home.
On a final note though, a lot of the more imaginative Chinese sustianability projects such as the "eco-cities" strike me as green washing. Anyone who's been to or lived in China knows that Government projects aren't popular or well used all those space age buildings are showcases for China's future while the average Chinese still lives in state built apartments or Hong Kong high rises (that russian needle building in Shanghai was vacant in 2005 for instance). Shanghai is building a skate park for instance despite a relatively low skater pop (although it's definitely bigger than some places in Asia). Chinese development projects have a tendency to focus on building things so they can pump money into the economy easily. Construction pays well and can employ uneducated cats easily and train them vocationally, it's best not to assume that Shanghai's eco-city will be populated by hip-environmentally conscious urbanites, as much that the Chinese see this as killing two birds with one stone, the poor get decent jobs building construction, and the Chinese get a better image abroad while possibly solving some of their power problems. The future of China has been encased in steel, but the concerns of the Chinese have yet to reach the intricarcy or care of their cities designs.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 08:59 pm (UTC)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5169344.stm
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 09:06 pm (UTC)I'm always amazed how so many medium-to-large cities in the U.S. are deserted or blown out yet some still allege we're the shiny-bright happy-land beacon to the world. Manhattan alone can't make up for the rest of the country. Look at Detroit on Google Earth to see former neighborhoods returning to pasture (my favorite local blogger documents this often (http://www.detroitblog.org/?p=287)), and see that repeated in Flint, Saginaw, Toledo, Cleveland, Gary, and even tracts of Chicago, the Midwest's brightest point of optimism.
Is it this country? Or is it the nature of the city to fail in stages? Maybe I'll listen to the rest of this series...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 09:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 09:18 pm (UTC)C2C
Date: 2006-07-11 09:27 pm (UTC)http://www.mcdonough.com/writings.htm
Also, Brad Pitt is hosting a series of pbs programs in the states called e2...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 09:29 pm (UTC)The so-called "decline" of the industrial Midwest has a lot to do with port cities and the drug trade. Right now we are not so much in a period of "decline" and death (though it may look that way to outsiders) as a period of recovery.
My father, among others, used to work for repair and maintenance firms in the steel industry. Currently his work has taken him to reconstruction and repair efforts around the southeast side and port of Chicago, where a lot of federal money is going into both reparation of the infrastructure and into ecological projects. Only a matter of time before other industrial cities see a similar effort.
In short, a lot of this "damage" has to do with the careless economies of the eighties and nineties, which left these communities vulnerable to a drug market which is considerably smaller these days.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 09:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 09:51 pm (UTC)I agree that the 80s and 90s seem to have been the worst of the decline and in some cases the end of it, but this positive seedling of new life and reinvestment is still delicate and vulnerable. I've heard it has sprouted a bit more outside of Michigan.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 10:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 10:04 pm (UTC)Oh, of course, and I didn't mean to mis-read you. It's just that I am from the area and our biggest "enemy" right now is one of perception.
I get frustrated because people think that twenty years of damage = permanence. I don't think so, because these are urban areas - even the suburbs around Gary are more urban and have better infrastructure than areas of sprawl, and I think these would be good places for urban "spillover". In short, they are underused, even though some of them are half an hour or forty-five minutes from downtown Chicago.
Cities like Flint, Michigan, however, may face an entirely different set of problems. In our case, it's a matter of a ecologically valuable area (sand dunes, rivers, wetlands) being misused and wasted.
Thank you for your links, though - I saw your friend's blog and will keep an eye on it. Being from a similar area, I have a strong interest in Michigan.
I haven't been to Detroit since I was a kid, but we always felt a kinship with them.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 10:19 pm (UTC)organic rooftop farms, not factory farms
Date: 2006-07-11 10:45 pm (UTC)It's been done in Cuba extensively, especially after the Special Period following the fall of the Soviet Union. Combination chicken/rabbit coops - rabbits eat grass, chickens eat rabbit pellets, the rest composts to refertilise the grass etc. City parking lots and former parkland were converted to farms or raised-bed gardens...all operated with considerable freedom by various groups, with either collective or profit-motivated structures.
green roofs
Date: 2006-07-11 10:45 pm (UTC)water
Date: 2006-07-11 10:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 11:20 pm (UTC)Rio (and other cities in Brazil, for that matter) is getting to the point where a separate social and urban order is being consolidated, and by now things have snowballed to a point where the success of any programs designed to affect, change or reverse shanty-town growth is highly questionable. Not to mention the bitterness that develops in shanty-towns towards the gleaming, ultra-high-class condominiums all around them.
Apparently in the next few decades shanty town population should be around 2 billion. Like I said, it's a problem we don't even know how to approach.
Organic Architects
Date: 2006-07-12 01:01 am (UTC)Licht und blindheit
Date: 2006-07-12 02:36 am (UTC)Ever seen Phantom of the Paradise? Talk about faulted beauty. Faust, Dorian Gray and Jessica Harper(before Suspiria). It makes you think if truely failed art is just art out of time.
Anyways the movie hit me like a bolt of light, lets have music like Bernard Herrmann and Angelo Badalamenti swirled up into a pixelated first person view of man's journey to hell*.
Germanic root meaning concealed.**
Heart and Soul
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 03:49 am (UTC)Re: Licht und blindheit
Date: 2006-07-12 03:53 am (UTC)Nick, maybe you should change "Ocky Milk" to "Cock Milk." Sex sells, does it not?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 04:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 10:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 02:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-12 11:21 pm (UTC):)
Date: 2006-12-11 02:08 pm (UTC)Dave (http://www.hammsgarage.com)
Help find you
Date: 2007-02-01 05:57 pm (UTC)gave me plenty of poschelkal and all the different prices and the extra dollars to pay not
want some Pro write this kidala and I spent about an hour and does not want one site is
not found Posovetuiti send to passion as, in fact
Virtual SEX
Date: 2007-02-03 10:04 am (UTC)This site specializes in free virtual sex games.
These sex games are xxx, x-rated for adults only. For real, I'm 100% serious.
I know most of the web has become nothing but a giant bait-and-switch game,
but I give you my word this site really contains a game where you can have
interactive virtual sex as advertised! These fully interactive sex games work like
todays most popular CD-ROM games These are NOT just sliding puzzles or
Tetris games that reveal a static picture as you play Hear the girls moan and
scream when YOU bring them to climax! Pulsing techno soundtrack while you play our sex
games Features easy one-handed virtual sex There are no applications to download or
plug-ins required. You may begin playing the virtual sex games instantly Can where you
find
Teams for cities
Date: 2007-02-26 02:04 am (UTC)