imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Throughout my life, the best-selling British magazine has consistently been the Radio Times, the BBC's listings guide to radio and television in the UK. (It was only recently overtaken by The Reader's Digest and What's On TV.) Copies of the RT used to lie around our family house, and when, as a first year Sociology student at Aberdeen University, I had to do a dissertation, I chose to write a semiological analysis of the advertising and editorial messages in one edition of Radio Times; "Barthes meets the British class system", you could say. I remember one sentence from my essay (which got the highest possible marks and resulted in my tutor begging me to stay on and do a Sociology major instead of English): "Myth thrives by incest, but there's always room for the reader in the happy family". (I returned to that a couple of years later, when I called my first band The Happy Family.)

Well, last night I found a website called TV and Radio Bits which, with admirable thoroughness, displays covers of the Radio Times throughout its history. I started in 1960 and followed the magazine's front page designs and featured shows down to 2006. It was a bit like seeing my whole life pass before me -- or, rather, parts of my life, because I spent big chunks of time outside the UK.



I don't remember much before about 1966. That's when I come onstream as someone who's aware of TV shows, cultural trends and design. Dr Who, The Man From U.N.C.L.E. and chat show host Simon Dee (I think I actually pinned this dandyesque picture up on the side of a crate in our wine cellar at 6 Ainslie Place, Edinburgh) marked my life in the year or two before my family headed off to live under the colonels in then-fascist Greece. (Another influence on my Happy Family album, which concerns the assassination of a fascist dictator.)

In late 1969, as Robin Carmody (a Click Opera reader, as it happens) explains in his thorough guide to the history of the Radio Times, a new editor, 29 year-old Geoffrey Cannon, gave the Radio Times what I think of as its definitive look: a distinctive logo in the form of a black, fancy type flourish for the title, complemented by clear and crisp layouts featuring Franklin Gothic condensed, and reminiscent of the quality advertising and album sleeves of the era. This look continued for fifteen years, and represents, I think, the magazine's best period.



Britain's rightward swing and increasing class differentiation are all too aparent in the 80s, as costume dramas and aristocratic poise dominate the Radio Times cover. Around the time of Band Aid the magazine begins to use other typefaces, seemingly influenced by the more cluttered, post-modern style of Smash Hits. Then begins a terrible decline into visual hell. 1989's Angela Rippon Come Dancing cover looks like Woman's Own. In the early 90s the magazine becomes a supermarket celebrity title. As Carmody explains, this is because Thatcher's broadcasting de-regulation had allowed it to list ITV, cable and satellite shows as well as the traditional, more up-market BBC ones. The result of reaching out to more readers, though, was a certain loss of the magazine's soul. Not only did it lose its identity, it began losing readers (this was the era when any magazine could print TV listings -- they were everywhere).



In the 90s, as computers and the internet took over, I stopped watching TV. (Actually, to be more honest, I specialized my way out: early 90s, porn on Westminster cable and Twin Peaks, mid-90s MTV's The Real World, late 90s Arte via satellite, 00s TV replaced by internet, with occasional glimpses of UK TV in the form of Nathan Barley torrents or The Office DVDs.) I also left the UK to live in Paris. The Radio Times, meanwhile, re-designed its title in an apparent nod to Rolling Stone magazine, featuring endless grotesquely grinning celebrities. Charity-friendly comedian Lenny Henry became as unavoidable on the cover of the Radio Times as Oasis were on the front of the NME. The magazine's type got cluttered and garish, mixing styles and weights, adding drop shadow, random italicization and lots of "exclusive", "free" and "special" flashes. Like a whole new generation of British magazines (Q, Mojo and Heat, for instance), The Radio Times looked more American than British. The predominant theme of the 90s in the UK is all too clear from these covers: product formats are endlessly rejigged according to the requirements of a ruthless form of Thatcherite-Darwinian ultra-marketing. This continues under Blair.

The visual nadir for the Radio Times comes in 2001, when the magazine switches to Gill Sans and starts to look like an in-flight magazine or in-house corporate title. From that point on, I no longer care. There's no longer the slightest connection to the Britain I grew up in. I'm elsewhere, anyway. My own country's core narrative has become an irrelevance, a book I haven't read, a show I haven't watched. I wouldn't even bother to write scathing sociology about it; waste of bile, mate.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] niddrie-edge.livejournal.com
Even its radio coverage has gone down hill, though it is still at this point the most extensive.

The Sun newspaper still lists all main channels except BBC Radio 3(Classical and Arts) and BBC4 TV (Arts and Classical)in some consistent anti intellectualist stance.. one day i will be a Sun letter writer and ask why.

I want a good media coverage journal to return in the Uk. I wrote about it here (http://niddrie-edge.livejournal.com/tag/listener).

Currently the Radio Times is giving away Dr Who collectable cards and has a crossword where one can win a Sony DVD Recorder.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 12:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Very much agree with you about The Listener magazine. We used to subscribe to it, even when we lived in Canada. I read it religiously. I think of Click Opera as a sort of Listener of the web, in fact! Intellectual, yet accessible...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 01:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nicepimmelkarl.livejournal.com
spike milligan, he looks just like o'gara.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dermfitz.livejournal.com
The Radio Times seems more than ever to be representing a kind of modernist revisionism about broadcasting in general, and the BBC's output in particular, especially through the horrific Alison Graham, who seems to see The Office as the absolute apex of TV comedy.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Would saying "I love you" enkindle the "Angry Box" userpic?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 02:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Your wish is my command!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Gosh, your userpic got up on the wrong side of the genie bottle!

Jools.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 02:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cheapsurrealist.livejournal.com
I grew up in the u.s. so I'm not familiar wth RT. What jumped out at me was the Man From U.N.C.L.E. (with girl from uncle inset). I loved these types of shows - Danger Man was called Secret Agent here apparently so that Johnny Rivers could have a hit with the title song and 70's punk bands could cover it later. Just my theory. The Wild Wild West was an interesting blend of the western and the secret agent genres. It was great because it used the word "Wild" twice in the title. You could do that type of thing in the sixties. And of course James Bond.

These heroes fought terrorists. Evil geniuses who wanted to destroy the world just because that would be kind of a cool thing to do. They weren't States, they were organizations with names like T.H.R.U.S.H and 'Get Smart's' K.A.O.S.

And now we have A.L.Q.U.I.D.A. Didn't Blair and Bush learn anything from T.V. (in Blair's case The Tele). We need Napoleon Solo and Stephanie Powers ,and if he promises not to sing, Noel Harrison with little ball point pen communicators, tuxedos, dinner parties where you can poison people and stick a stiletto in their back.

Maxwell Smart would make a better president. He had a shoe phone.
Although I'm pretty sure Bush and Cheney have a "Cone of Silence"

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Are you seriously having a pop at the Radio Times?? Who gies a sh1t?

BTW what are your plans for the world cup? Will you be following England??

Darren J

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I'm not so much having a pop at it as sadly noting where me and (mainstream) Britain are obliged to take leave of each other.

My only contact with the World Cup is likely to be at the Sonambiente (http://www.sonambiente.net) music festival, which has a World Cup Lounge (http://sonambiente.net/de/01_spektrum/worlcuplounge.html) where various experimental sound artists will provide an alternative soundtrack to the matches as they unfold on TV. Even that's a bit too much football for my liking...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 06:23 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
An alternative soundtrack to John Motson would be very welcome (how long before first mention of 1966), but you must be secretly wishing that Scotland does well against the Huns (the English rather than the German ones)?

Nathan Barley &tc...

Date: 2006-06-03 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cityramica.livejournal.com
Brian Szente solidified my love of BBC [on DVD] during my last visit to NYC.
i should try torrents, i suppose, because the best of what i saw is not available in the US.
you mention Nathan Barley [i only watched the first few episodes but found it somewhat painful], but have you by chance seen Big Train, Jam, Black Books, or The League of Gentlemen? i know you don't watch TV...neither do I [internet and dvds on projector]...but these were sort of the glinty kernals stuck between an otherwise foul set of teeth. but then British television is still novel to my poor culture, nutrient, and patina deprived american brain.

[[[oh and just randomly curious...how is Berlin for wireless internet?]]]

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 08:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kineticfactory.livejournal.com
Do you have any particular aesthetic, philosophical or cultural objection to Gill Sans? I'm just wondering.

Re: Nathan Barley &tc...

Date: 2006-06-03 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] intergalactim.livejournal.com
i love Black Books. There was also a good show called the Book Group a few years ago, set in Scotland... TV shows about books.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 10:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] intergalactim.livejournal.com
well, i reckon it looks good black on a white page (a la Gill), but they have certainly messed it up on that cover. too bold,drop shadow is everywhere, and look at what they have done to the kerning to fit the T over the i, yuck.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 10:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
I honestly couldn't care. I'd feel patriotic if Alasdair Gray won the Nobel Prize, though.

Image

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-03 10:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
No, even the fact that Eric Gill buggered his own daughters doesn't put me off his font (I used it on my first album sleeve, Circus Maximus). It just looks horrible on the Radio Times, in lilac with a drop shadow, is all.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-04 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Here's a different one, then!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-04 01:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] niddrie-edge.livejournal.com
I was reviewing a film I have about West Linton composer Ronald Stevenson only last night. It was made for BBC Gaelic TV by a chap who said that he met Stevenson in a bar knowing him from his Listener pieces.
I empathise with the lost Britain angle, the land without...I am wallowing in various renaissances of the early 20th C in order to innoculate myself..
I wish I had capped the recent repeat of Mark Cousin's(Moviedrome?) Ian Hamilton Finlay tribute (http://www.sundayherald.com/55548) on Scottish BBC. Perhaps you could employ your redoubtable search skills after that one.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-04 07:28 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
My own country's core narrative has become an irrelevance

Well you certainly seem to bang on about it enough considering you haven't lived here for years. Stop wasting your bile, mate. Move on.