imomus: (Default)
[personal profile] imomus
Back in January, taking my cue from ArtForum critic Midori Matsui, I blogged about three young Japanese artists, inventing the rather silly umbrella term Supereveryday for their "strategically unshowy" work. The artists, mostly video-makers, are Izumi Taro, Koki Tanaka and Yuki Okumura.



Yuki (right) is nearing the end of a Location One residency in SoHo, and yesterday he introduced me to his close friend Koki Tanaka (left), another former Location One artist who's currently in residence at the Palais de Tokyo in Paris. You can see three of Koki's films online at Rhizome.

I visited Yuki and Koki at Location One, then joined them later for an opening at the Japan Society, where Asian Contemporary Art Week is being celebrated with a show called Fast Futures: Asian Video Art. In the Japan Society lobby I grabbed a short interview with Koki, who's one of the three artists in this show. I've transcribed it pretty much as it happened, leaving Koki's English uncorrected (it's wabi sabi English!). My favourite piece by him in Fast Futures is a video (made in 2003) of a young chef in a stainless steel kitchen, multi-tasking as he prepares food.

Momus: So I just saw your work and I really liked it very much. We were talking this afternoon about whether you felt Japanese or not, and you didn't think that was so important, but I know that cooking is an obsession in Japan...

Koki Tanaka: In Japan? You think so?

Especially in Japan, because every time I switch on TV everything is cooking programmes, people saying "oishi"!

Ah, yeah yeah yeah...

I wondered about the cooking piece, Each and Every, it seems like you could have been interested in that to show that the chef is an artist? Is that one of your interests?

I think that the chef is kind of like a performer, good performer, but nobody knows. And he knows... He doesn't know about his moving. He's always thinking about something like tomorrow's special dishes and he prepares something... At first I thinking about, like cooking is linear, like "prepare, cooking and washing dishes". But at the moment I shoot at the restaurant he's doing like many stuff at the same time, and it's really complex. I found like every moment is really special. I just cut some parts, and put it together.

Simple editing?

Yeah.

But also there's an aesthetic of the kitchen, the lighting in the kitchen and the stainless steel equipment, there's a certain kind of aesthetic quality. Personally I love this light, and the shape and the colours of the food, it's very beautiful. So is that important?

Yeah, yeah, it's really important.

But no connection with these Japanese TV food shows? Because it's very different on TV food shows, they show the finished result, but they don't show the process. So maybe, in Western terms, I think of Bertolt Brecht, he was always trying to show the process of something. He was very influenced by Asian theatre, like in Japanese theatre you see the stage hands...

Ah, yes!

...they come on stage dressed in black, it's very important to see that theatre is just a human construction and that it can be changed by humans.

Yes.

Anyway... Yuki was telling me about the bouncing basketball piece, and I saw that one. It seems that that's closer to Yuki's work. Do you think you've started off doing quite similar work and then you've gone in different directions?

Ah, I think this work is a little bit older. It's 2001. And after this work I come to New York and I changed my mind. Because for these works I always thinking about manipulate something. To shoot video object, but I changed the speed and make it loop. And even kitchen piece, original version is 30 minutes, and then make it loop. So we cannot see the ending and beginning. So that's the concept for these works. But now I change my mind. You know my piece, Caviar to Pigeons? [Made in 2004.] This is not like this kind of work.

Yeah, it's much more natural, simple. So is it a higher aesthetic for you to be more natural, is it better for you to be more natural?

Yeah, more natural but also special.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-24 03:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uchuufuku.livejournal.com
I'm kind of relieved to hear that an artist like Yuki Okumura came out of Griffith College of Art-- I'm starting to feel like it's an originality no-go zone, but there you have it.

自問自得

Date: 2006-05-24 05:10 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Are you sure you aren't interviewing yourself here? You seem to be doing all the talking and he mostly says "yeah"...
It would have been more interesting if you just started off your interview with a relentless string of rejoinders and didn't let up until he started blabbing!
FYI, the Japanese aren't interested in cooking tasty things, they are interested in watching something tasty being prepared (but you've read that Barthes essay before of course) and then enjoying consuming it. They joy of cooking as an act that you do yourself has very little to do with it.

Re: 自問自得

Date: 2006-05-24 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
If it makes you happier, you have my permission to think of our talk as a "conversation" rather than an "interview". But if it's someone's personal style to give short but empathic answers, that's what you're going to get in an interview or a conversation.

As for your proclamation about cooking, I don't see how it contradicts what I'm saying about TV cooking shows, except that obviously on TV you don't get to enjoy consuming the food, all you can do is watch other people doing so and shouting "oishiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii"!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-24 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] auto-nalle.livejournal.com
"At first I thinking about, like cooking is linear, like "prepare, cooking and washing dishes". But at the moment I shoot at the restaurant he's doing like many stuff at the same time, and it's really complex. I found like every moment is really special."

wow,
your conversation makes my chef's heart wag with joy like a lamb's tail. plus caviar to pigeons.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-24 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] niemandsrose.livejournal.com
Huh, I would have said that while Brecht felt "it's very important to see that theatre is just a human construction and that it can be changed by humans", the Asian theatre he ganked it from uses the same device (visible stagehands) to show something very different, i.e. that theatre can't happen without everybody's cooperation, and everyone knowing their place!

BTW, me, I like the crux of that, I like that theatre really is both of those things.

The Momus Code?

Date: 2006-05-24 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
I spy terrycloth labia in the first photo. And the triangle formed around it by Nick's legs suggests the male member...It's all so cryptic, this hermaphroditic Momus Magdalene/fertility goddess image...clearly there's something afoot...

Re: The Momus Code?

Date: 2006-05-24 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
...I suspect masonic involvement, since the one eye rests at the apex of the triangle:

Image

Re: The Momus Code?

Date: 2006-05-24 04:12 pm (UTC)

Re: The Momus Code?

Date: 2006-05-24 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Tut tut, Whimsy, a gentleman doesn't look up a lady-boy's labia!

Hide your candy, darling...

Date: 2006-05-25 04:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lord-whimsy.livejournal.com
Oh--now we're a lady, are we? Tut tut, indeed!

Momimillian Whitney Mouse

Date: 2006-05-25 07:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaecyy.livejournal.com
Alack and alas, Mister Currie, my friends and I came from west of Philadelphia today and we did not see you at the Whitney (4pm-6pm). It was like going to Disneyworld at age four and getting to see neither Maximillian the killer robot nor Mickey Mouse.

But at least here we did see Mickey Mouse. And nevertheless I had a blast.

Re: Momimillian Whitney Mouse

Date: 2006-05-25 08:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imomus.livejournal.com
Sorry, I've been doing 11am to 2pm. That's what I'll do today, my last day there. Glad you enjoyed the show anyway!

Re: Momimillian Whitney Mouse

Date: 2006-05-25 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaecyy.livejournal.com
Thank you for your kind words. Next time I will ask you, if that's acceptable.